Tēnā koe Tony

 

Thank you for your email dated 14/01/2022 requesting information about
Medium Density Residential Zone (MDRZ).

 

Our team will manage your request under the Local Government Official
Information and Meetings Act 1987 which requires us to provide a decision
as soon as possible, but no later than 14/02/2022, being 20 working days
of receipt.

 

The reference number for your request is IRC-2827.

 

Please contact us if you have any further questions.

 

Kind regards

 

The Assurance Team

Email: [1][email address]

Wellington City Council | W [2]Wellington.govt.nz | [3]Facebook|
[4]Twitter

The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and
intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that
confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the
sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.

 

[5]http://wellington.govt.nz/~/media/Images...

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Randle <[FOI #18190 email]>
Sent: Friday, 14 January 2022 10:26 am
To: BUS: Assurance <[email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - District Plan criteria for Good
Public Transport Accessibility

 

Dear Wellington City Council,

 

The proposed District Plan 2021 includes the following Statement about
Medium Density Residential Zone (MDRZ):

 

“The Medium Density Residential Zone encompasses areas of the city located
near commercial centres and with good public transport accessibility.
These are areas used predominantly for residential activities with
moderate concentration and bulk of buildings, such as detached,
semi-detached and terraced housing, low-rise apartments and other
compatible activities”

WCC District Plan Introduction to MDRZ

 

I am interested in the WCC understanding an assessment criteria it uses to
determine if an area has “good public transport accessibility” and so
could be considered to being a MDRZ.

 

1) Can the WCC please provide copies of the reports, presentations and/or
working papers where the definition of "good public transport
accessibility" was discussed and/or analysed for use in the proposed
District Plan?

 

2) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with Auckland
Transport and/or Auckland Council or any other local government councils
or agencies where there was discussion on the definition of “good public
transport accessibility”?

 

3) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with the
Ministry for the Environment, Waka Kotahi or any other government
ministries, departments or agencies where there was discussion on the
definition of “good public transport accessibility”?

 

4) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with the
Greater Wellington Regional Council or any other local government councils
or agencies where there was discussion on whether the Johnsonville Line
would or would not meet the definition of “good public transport
accessibility”?

 

5) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with the
Ministry for the Environment, Waka Kotahi or any other government
ministries, departments or agencies where there was discussion on whether
the Johnsonville Line would or would not meet the definition of “good
public transport accessibility”?

 

6) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with the
Ministry for the Environment, Waka Kotahi, or any other government
ministries, departments or agencies where there was discussion on the One
Network Framework and its alignment with the definition of “good public
transport accessibility” in the proposed District Plan?

 

I am also interested in the WCC engagement with The Road Efficiency Group
that developed the One Network Framework for Waka Kotahi and was used by
the WCC Spatial Plan to decide that medium density housing should be built
close to railway stations (which is reflected in the proposed District
Plan).  I understand that the WCC is a member of the The Road Efficiency
Group. The One Network Framework Mode Classification for public transport
is listed:
[6]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

7) Can the WCC please provide copies of any reports, presentations and/or
working papers from The Road Efficiency Group that provided supporting
analysis and/or the criteria used in the One Network Framework Mode
Classification PT1:"All metro rail corridors and dedicated corridors for
non-rail public transport: all services.”?

 

8) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with The Road
Efficiency Group where there was discussion on the One Network Framework
and its alignment with the definition of “good public transport
accessibility” in the proposed District Plan?

 

9) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with the The
Road Efficiency Group where there was discussion on whether the
Johnsonville Line would or would not meet the definition of “good public
transport accessibility”?

 

If the requested information is held in electronic form, it is preferred
that it is provided in its complete and original electronic format.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Tony Randle

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

 

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[7][FOI #18190 email]

 

Is [8][Wellington City Council request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests
to Wellington City Council? If so, please contact us using this form:

[9]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:

[10]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
3. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
4. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
6. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
7. mailto:[FOI #18190 email]
8. mailto:[Wellington City Council request email]
9. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
10. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

hide quoted sections

Dear Mr. Randle,

Thank you for your request made under the Local Government Official
Information and Meetings Act 1987 (the Act), and received by the Council
on 14 January 2022. In your email you requested information in respect of
the Medium Density Residential Zone (MDRZ).

Given the scope of your request, information is still being collated.

 

The Act requires that we advise you of our decision on your request no
later than 20 working days after the day we received your request.
Unfortunately, it will not be possible to meet that time limit and we are
therefore writing to notify you of an extension of the time to make our
decision to 28 February 2022.

 

This extension is necessary because consultations necessary to make a
decision on your request are such that a proper response cannot reasonably
be made within the original time limit.

 

Right of review

You have the right to seek an investigation and review by the Ombudsman of
this decision. Further information is available on the Ombudsman website,
[1]www.ombudsman.parliament.nz.

 

Thank you again for your request, if you have any question please feel
free to contact me.

 

Kind regards,

Ian

 

 

Ian Hunter
Senior Advisor | Official Information Team | Wellington City Council
P 04 803 8315 | M 021 227 8315
E [2][email address] | W [3]Wellington.govt.nz 
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and
intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that
confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the
sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
[4][IMG]

 

From: Tony Randle <[5][FOI #18190 email]>

Sent: Friday, 14 January 2022 10:26 am

To: BUS: Assurance <[6][email address]>

Subject: Official Information request - District Plan criteria for Good
Public Transport Accessibility

 

Dear Wellington City Council,

 

The proposed District Plan 2021 includes the following Statement about
Medium Density Residential Zone (MDRZ):

 

“The Medium Density Residential Zone encompasses areas of the city located
near commercial centres and with good public transport accessibility.
These are areas used predominantly for residential activities with
moderate concentration and bulk of buildings, such as detached,
semi-detached and terraced housing, low-rise apartments and other
compatible activities”

WCC District Plan Introduction to MDRZ

 

I am interested in the WCC understanding an assessment criteria it uses to
determine if an area has “good public transport accessibility” and so
could be considered to being a MDRZ.

 

1) Can the WCC please provide copies of the reports, presentations and/or
working papers where the definition of "good public transport
accessibility" was discussed and/or analysed for use in the proposed
District Plan?

 

2) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with Auckland
Transport and/or Auckland Council or any other local government councils
or agencies where there was discussion on the definition of “good public
transport accessibility”?

 

3) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with the
Ministry for the Environment, Waka Kotahi or any other government
ministries, departments or agencies where there was discussion on the
definition of “good public transport accessibility”?

 

4) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with the
Greater Wellington Regional Council or any other local government councils
or agencies where there was discussion on whether the Johnsonville Line
would or would not meet the definition of “good public transport
accessibility”?

 

5) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with the
Ministry for the Environment, Waka Kotahi or any other government
ministries, departments or agencies where there was discussion on whether
the Johnsonville Line would or would not meet the definition of “good
public transport accessibility”?

 

6) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with the
Ministry for the Environment, Waka Kotahi, or any other government
ministries, departments or agencies where there was discussion on the One
Network Framework and its alignment with the definition of “good public
transport accessibility” in the proposed District Plan?

 

I am also interested in the WCC engagement with The Road Efficiency Group
that developed the One Network Framework for Waka Kotahi and was used by
the WCC Spatial Plan to decide that medium density housing should be built
close to railway stations (which is reflected in the proposed District
Plan).  I understand that the WCC is a member of the The Road Efficiency
Group. The One Network Framework Mode Classification for public transport
is listed:
[7]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

7) Can the WCC please provide copies of any reports, presentations and/or
working papers from The Road Efficiency Group that provided supporting
analysis and/or the criteria used in the One Network Framework Mode
Classification PT1:"All metro rail corridors and dedicated corridors for
non-rail public transport: all services.”?

 

8) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with The Road
Efficiency Group where there was discussion on the One Network Framework
and its alignment with the definition of “good public transport
accessibility” in the proposed District Plan?

 

9) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with the The
Road Efficiency Group where there was discussion on whether the
Johnsonville Line would or would not meet the definition of “good public
transport accessibility”?

 

If the requested information is held in electronic form, it is preferred
that it is provided in its complete and original electronic format.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Tony Randle

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

 

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[8][FOI #18190 email]

 

Is [9][Wellington City Council request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests
to Wellington City Council? If so, please contact us using this form:

[10]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:

[11]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.

 

References

Visible links
1. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
2. mailto:[email address]
3. http://wellington.govt.nz/
4. https://wellington.govt.nz/?utm_source=e...
5. mailto:[FOI #18190 email]
6. mailto:[email address]
7. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
8. mailto:[FOI #18190 email]
9. mailto:[Wellington City Council request email]
10. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
11. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

Dear Mr. Randle,

 

Further to my email dated 14 February 2022 I am now able to provide you
with the information you have requested in respect of Medium Density
Residential Zones.

 

Copies of the information held in respect of questions 1 to 9 can be
accessed via the following Dropbox link: 
[1]https://www.dropbox.com/sh/1y75jr85azkmz...

 

Please note: under section 7 (2)(a) of the Local Government Official
Information and Meetings Act 1987, some information has been redacted as
it contains personal information about private individuals.

 

If you disagree with the decision to redact the documents, you can apply
in writing to the Ombudsman to have the decision investigated and reviewed
under section 27 (3) of the Local Government Official Information and
Meetings Act 1987.

 

In addition to the Dropbox documents; the following information also
provides some useful context in respect of your request.

 

The assessment to determine if an area has “good transport accessibility”
for medium density residential zoning is covered in the Wellington Outer
Suburbs Assessment & Evaluation Report (2020) by Beca and Studio Pacific
Architecture and can be accessed via the Councils website:

 

o [2]Introduction
o [3]Northern Suburbs Assessment
o [4]Western Suburbs Assessment
o [5]Southern and Eastern Suburbs Part 1
o [6]Southern and Eastern Suburbs Part 2

 

The Introduction report includes a matrix of medium density enablers. For
public transport, this included a 10 minute walking catchment or 800 m
from a rail station or arterials with high frequency public transit
(weighting ‘3’), and 2-3 minutes walking or 200 m from other bus networks
(weighting ‘1’).

 

The draft district plan used this assessment to map the medium density
residential zones. The mapping was also based on [7]NPS-UD directions and
guidance, and the Ministry for the Environment’s fact sheet on
intensification. We are reviewing the draft district plan consultation
feedback now. The Council does not hold any more recent reports,
presentations or working papers on "good public transport accessibility"
relating to the medium density residential zone.

 

The Council has not corresponded with other local government or central
government agencies on this topic at this time.

 

The One Network Framework (ONF) documents are online here:
[8]https://www.nzta.govt.nz/roads-and-rail/....
Because all that has been done to date in Wellington City is to classify
the ‘current network’, the documentation for current networks, and how to
apply PT1, is here:
[9]https://www.nzta.govt.nz/roads-and-rail/....
The ONF does not specifically relate to medium density zoning, although it
does give a common categorisation to improve integration of transport and
land use planning.

 

The Road Efficiency Group did not work on how the ONF aligns with
assessment of good public transport accessibility in the proposed District
Plan. Implementation of the ONF has included comparing the current ONF
classification against District Plan and Network Operating Framework (if
available), focusing on the areas that will see a planned change of use or
growth. Future district plan changes can consider the ONF. 

 

We do not hold any correspondence with The Road Efficiency Group in
respect of the Johnsonville Line.

 

Kind regards,

Ian

 

Ian Hunter
Senior Advisor | Official Information Team | Wellington City Council
P 04 803 8315 | M 021 227 8315
E [10][email address] | W [11]Wellington.govt.nz 
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and
intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that
confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the
sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
[12][IMG]

 

Dear Wellington City Council,

 

The proposed District Plan 2021 includes the following Statement about
Medium Density Residential Zone (MDRZ):

 

“The Medium Density Residential Zone encompasses areas of the city located
near commercial centres and with good public transport accessibility.
These are areas used predominantly for residential activities with
moderate concentration and bulk of buildings, such as detached,
semi-detached and terraced housing, low-rise apartments and other
compatible activities”

WCC District Plan Introduction to MDRZ

 

I am interested in the WCC understanding an assessment criteria it uses to
determine if an area has “good public transport accessibility” and so
could be considered to being a MDRZ.

 

1) Can the WCC please provide copies of the reports, presentations and/or
working papers where the definition of "good public transport
accessibility" was discussed and/or analysed for use in the proposed
District Plan?

 

2) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with Auckland
Transport and/or Auckland Council or any other local government councils
or agencies where there was discussion on the definition of “good public
transport accessibility”?

 

3) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with the
Ministry for the Environment, Waka Kotahi or any other government
ministries, departments or agencies where there was discussion on the
definition of “good public transport accessibility”?

 

4) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with the
Greater Wellington Regional Council or any other local government councils
or agencies where there was discussion on whether the Johnsonville Line
would or would not meet the definition of “good public transport
accessibility”?

 

5) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with the
Ministry for the Environment, Waka Kotahi or any other government
ministries, departments or agencies where there was discussion on whether
the Johnsonville Line would or would not meet the definition of “good
public transport accessibility”?

 

6) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with the
Ministry for the Environment, Waka Kotahi, or any other government
ministries, departments or agencies where there was discussion on the One
Network Framework and its alignment with the definition of “good public
transport accessibility” in the proposed District Plan?

 

I am also interested in the WCC engagement with The Road Efficiency Group
that developed the One Network Framework for Waka Kotahi and was used by
the WCC Spatial Plan to decide that medium density housing should be built
close to railway stations (which is reflected in the proposed District
Plan).  I understand that the WCC is a member of the The Road Efficiency
Group. The One Network Framework Mode Classification for public transport
is listed:
[13]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

7) Can the WCC please provide copies of any reports, presentations and/or
working papers from The Road Efficiency Group that provided supporting
analysis and/or the criteria used in the One Network Framework Mode
Classification PT1:"All metro rail corridors and dedicated corridors for
non-rail public transport: all services.”?

 

8) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with The Road
Efficiency Group where there was discussion on the One Network Framework
and its alignment with the definition of “good public transport
accessibility” in the proposed District Plan?

 

9) Can the WCC please provide copies of the correspondence with the The
Road Efficiency Group where there was discussion on whether the
Johnsonville Line would or would not meet the definition of “good public
transport accessibility”?

 

 

References

Visible links
1. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/1y75jr85azkmz...
2. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
3. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
4. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
5. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
6. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
7. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
8. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
9. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
10. mailto:[email address]
11. http://wellington.govt.nz/
12. https://wellington.govt.nz/?utm_source=e...
13. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

Dear Mr Randle,

 

Further to your email received on 2 March 2022 I am now able to provide
the clarification and additional documentation requested.

 

My response is highlighted in red below.

 

Kind regards,

Ian

Ian Hunter
Senior Advisor | Official Information Team | Wellington City Council
P 04 803 8315 | M 021 227 8315
E [1][email address] | W [2]Wellington.govt.nz 
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and
intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that
confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the
sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Tony Randle <[3][FOI #18190 email]>

Sent: Wednesday, 2 March 2022 12:04 am

To: Ian Hunter <[4][email address]>

Subject: Re: Medium Density Residential Zones (Ref: IRC-2827)

 

Dear Ian Hunter,

 

Thank you for the information provided.

 

There are a number of matters that require clarification and there appears
to be some missing information.

 

Matters for Clarification:

A number of documents provided cannot be understood witho0ut further
information. Can the WCC please provide the further information on the
following documents:

A. District plan provisions for assisted housing - voluntary vs
mandatory.pdf  B. Fact sheet Group 5 for design 6.10.21.pdf  C.
Inclusionary housing - framework paper.pdf  D. Inclusionary Zoning Draft
Issues and Options Paper.pdf  E. Mandatory_Inclusionary_Zoning-Final.pdf

F. Operative vs Draft District Plan heights.pdf  G. Request for proposal
SIA Assisted Housing.pdf  H. Resource Consents of Multi-Units 2016 to
2021.pdf

 

The information required for A - H above information is:

1. Was this document created by the WCC or a third party ?

2. When was the document completed or, if from a third party, received by
the WCC ?

3. Who is the author of the document ?

4. Was the document provided by way of an email and, if so, can a copy of
this email be provided ?

 

Please find the information requested below.

 

Document Was this When was Who is the Was the
document the author of the document
created document document ? provided
by the completed by way of
WCC or a or, if an email
third from a and, if
party ? third so, can a
party, copy of
received this email
by the be
WCC ? provided ?
A. District plan provisions for By WCC Last Andrew Not by
assisted housing - voluntary vs modified Wharton email
mandatory.pdf 6 May
2021
B. Fact sheet Group 5 for design By WCC Last Andrew Not by
6.10.21.pdf  modified Wharton email
6 October
2021.
Though
revisions
were made
to
different
documents
following
this,
ending up
with the
[5]fact
sheet
available
on the
Planning
for
Growth
website.
C. Inclusionary housing - framework By a 21 Community Attached
paper.pdf  third October Housing (LG/CHA
party 2021 Aotearoa meeting
materials)
D. Inclusionary Zoning Draft Issues and By WCC Last Andrew Not by
Options Paper.pdf  modified Wharton email
17
September
2021
E. By a 1 October The Attached
Mandatory_Inclusionary_Zoning-Final.pdf third 2021 Constellation (FW: MIZ
party Project NATIONAL
Australia FRAMEWORK)
F. Operative vs Draft District Plan By WCC Last Andrew Not by
heights.pdf  modified Wharton email
27
January
2022
G. Request for proposal SIA Assisted By WCC Last Lucie Not by
Housing.pdf  modified Desrosiers, email
3 Andrew
December Wharton
2021
H. Resource Consents of Multi-Units By WCC Last Sarah Dickson Not by
2016 to 2021.pdf modified email
19
September
2021

 

 

I note that the provided information does not include any communications
between the WCC and the Road Efficiency Group who created the One Network
Framework (ONF).  I also note that the WCC specifically answered Item 9 in
stating "We do not hold any correspondence with The Road Efficiency Group
in respect of the Johnsonville Line."

 

However, The WCC response includes the following statement:

"Implementation of the ONF has included comparing the current ONF
classification against District Plan and Network Operating Framework (if
available), focusing on the areas that will see a planned change of use or
growth."

 

It is unclear if this statement refers to any work undertaken between the
Wellington City draft District Plan and the Road Efficiency Group who
created the ONF.

 

I. Can the WCC also specifically confirm that it has not communicated with
the Road Efficiency Group on any 'supporting analysis and/or the criteria
used in the One Network Framework Mode Classification PT1:"All metro rail
corridors and dedicated corridors for non-rail public transport: all
services.”?' which is requested item 7 ?

 

J. Can the WCC also specifically confirm that it has not communicated with
the Road Efficiency Group 'on the One Network Framework and its alignment
with the definition of “good public transport accessibility” in the
proposed District Plan?' which is requested item 8 ?

 

With respect to points I and J, I can advise that to the best of my
knowledge there has been no communication between the Council and the Road
Efficiency Group in respect of the One Network Framework’s Mode
Classification PT1.

 

There also appears to be some missing information which are attachments of
linked information referred to in emails.  Can the following be provided
for the following emails:

K. Email 49.pdf  PowerPoint  Missing document(s) - Presentation to the
Councillor Working Group 24 August 2021 - Heritage and Inclusionary
zoning.pptx

                Attached as Appendix 1

L. Email 40_Redacted.pdf Missing document(s) - Issues and Options Report;
Councillor Presentation; Initial Steering Group Presentation; Early advice
against IZ1; Early Advice against IZ2 Kirdan Lees Economics Review; First
test of draft IS provisions

                Attached as Appendix 1-7. Please note some of these
documents were provided with my initial response.

M. Email 42_Redacted.pdf Missing document(s) - "a snapshot of the key
tables based on the original WCC data provided."

                Attached as Appendix 8.

N. Email 36_Redacted.pdf Missing document(s) - "attached our slides for
you to circulate to the meeting group"

                Attached as Appendix 9.

O. Email 31_Redacted.pdf Missing document(s) - "Here's the last Councillor
presentation" … "And the Councillor presentation before that"

                Attached as Appendix 10. Please note this document was
provided with my initial response.

P. Email 6_Redacted.pdf Missing document(s) - "2. WCC’s Inclusionary
Zoning issues and options paper [Note: we have since changed the name from
“inclusionary zoning” to “assisted housing”] ; 5. Demographic information
on Tawa, Johnsonville and Te Aro [Please use these reports for community
demographic profiles but not for population projections – see below] ; 6.
Population forecast by suburb 2021-2051 [These are the latest projections
(June 2021)]"

                Attached as Appendices 2, 11, and 12.

Q. Email 16_Redacted.pdf Missing document(s) - "Attached as we discussed."

                Attached as Appendix 13.

R. Email 14_Redacted.pdf Missing document(s) - "Item 1: Please find
attached some comments on your summary."

                Attached as Appendix 14.

 

I would highlight at this point that the original request stated "If the
requested information is held in electronic form, it is preferred that it
is provided in its complete and original electronic format."

 

Given the size and scope of your request, the documents were put into a
format which allowed redactions to be carried out and assisted in the
collation and tracking of the numerous documents.  I would also note that
this was a significant request which required many hours of officer time
though no charge was levied for the collation and provision of the
information.

 

In addition there was a spreadsheet that was provided in PDF format. A
copy of the original spreadsheet is requested for the following:

 

S. MHUD housing Place summaries v12 Wellington City.pdf

 

To clarify, this is the format the document referred to is held in. I’m
not aware of it being held in any other format.

 

Is provided to ensure my information request is fully responded by the
WCC. This is not a new request.

 

Finally, Oral submissions on the District Plan are scheduled from the 9th
of March.  It would be appreciate if the response could be provided before
the JCA has to submit to Councillors.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Tony Randle

 

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. http://wellington.govt.nz/
3. mailto:[FOI #18190 email]
4. mailto:[email address]
5. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

hide quoted sections



Hello,

I'm currently away from the office on annual leave until 19 April 2022.

In my absence, could you please contact the Assurance Team via the
following: [email address]

Alternatively, I will respond to any non-urgent messages on my return.

Kind regards,
Ian

Official Information Team.

Dear Mr Randle,

Further to your email below, please find attached a PDF copy of the response sent to you on 25 March 2022.

I am unsure why the response may have appeared scrambled on the FYI site.

The appendices referred to in the response of 25 March 2022 have been provided and appear to be accessible on the FYI site.

Kind regards,
Ian

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Randle <[FYI request #18190 email]>
Sent: Saturday, 26 March 2022 6:25 pm
To: Ian Hunter <[email address]>
Subject: Re: Medium Density Residential Zones (Ref: IRC-2827)

Dear Ian Hunter,

Thanks for the further information and for the efforts by officers to provide it.

Unfortunately, the WCC response within the email did not work for items A - H. This information was scrambled in the response.

Can the WCC please provide this information as a separate pdf or equivalent ?

Yours sincerely,

Tony Randle

-----Original Message-----

Dear Mr Randle,

 

Further to your email received on 2 March 2022 I am now able to provide the clarification and additional documentation requested.

 

My response is highlighted in red below.

 

Kind regards,

Ian

Ian Hunter
Senior Advisor | Official Information Team | Wellington City Council P 04 803 8315 | M 021 227 8315 E [1][email address] | W [2]Wellington.govt.nz The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FYI request #18190 email]

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections