Dear Mr Randle,
Further to your email received on 2 March 2022 I am now able to provide the clarification and
additional documentation requested.
My response is highlighted in red below.
Kind regards,
Ian
Ian Hunter
Senior Advisor | Official Information Team | Wellington City Council
P 04 803 8315 |
M 021 227 8315
E [email address] |
W Wellington.govt.nz The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its
contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Randle
<[FYI request #18190 email]> Sent: Wednesday, 2 March 2022 12:04 am
To: Ian Hunter
<[email address]> Subject: Re: Medium Density Residential Zones (Ref: IRC-2827)
Dear Ian Hunter,
Thank you for the information provided.
There are a number of matters that require clarification and there appears to be some missing
information.
Matters for Clarification:
A number of documents provided cannot be understood witho0ut further information. Can the WCC
please provide the further information on the following documents:
A. District plan provisions for assisted housing - voluntary vs mandatory.pdf
B. Fact sheet Group 5 for design 6.10.21.pdf
C. Inclusionary housing - framework paper.pdf
D. Inclusionary Zoning Draft Issues and Options Paper.pdf
E. Mandatory_Inclusionary_Zoning-Final.pdf
F. Operative vs Draft District Plan heights.pdf
G. Request for proposal SIA Assisted Housing.pdf
H. Resource Consents of Multi-Units 2016 to 2021.pdf
The information required for A - H above information is:
1. Was this document created by the WCC or a third party ?
2. When was the document completed or, if from a third party, received by the WCC ?
3. Who is the author of the document ?
4. Was the document provided by way of an email and, if so, can a copy of this email be provided ?
Please find the information requested below.
Document
Was this
When was
Who is the
Was the
document
the
author of the
document
created by
document
document ?
provided by
the WCC or completed
way of an
a third
or, if from a
email and, if
party ?
third party,
so, can a copy
received by
of this email be
the WCC ?
provided ?
A. District plan provisions for
By WCC
Last
Andrew
Not by email
assisted housing - voluntary vs
modified 6
Wharton
mandatory.pdf
May 2021
B. Fact sheet Group 5 for design
By WCC
Last
Andrew
Not by email
6.10.21.pdf
modified 6
Wharton
October
2021.
Though
revisions
were made
to different
documents
following
this, ending
up with the
fact sheet
available on
the Planning
for Growth
website.
C. Inclusionary housing -
By a third
21 October
Community
Attached
framework paper.pdf
party
2021
Housing
(LG/CHA
Aotearoa
meeting
materials)
D. Inclusionary Zoning Draft
By WCC
Last
Andrew
Not by email
Issues and Options Paper.pdf
modified 17
Wharton
September
2021
E.
By a third
1 October
The
Attached (FW:
Mandatory_Inclusionary_Zoning-
party
2021
Constellation
MIZ NATIONAL
Final.pdf
Project
FRAMEWORK)
Australia
F. Operative vs Draft District Plan By WCC
Last
Andrew
Not by email
heights.pdf
modified 27
Wharton
January
2022
G. Request for proposal SIA
By WCC
Last
Lucie
Not by email
Assisted Housing.pdf
modified 3
Desrosiers,
December
Andrew
2021
Wharton
H. Resource Consents of Multi-
By WCC
Last
Sarah Dickson
Not by email
Units 2016 to 2021.pdf
modified 19
September
2021
I note that the provided information does not include any communications between the WCC and
the Road Efficiency Group who created the One Network Framework (ONF). I also note that the
WCC specifically answered Item 9 in stating "We do not hold any correspondence with The Road
Efficiency Group in respect of the Johnsonville Line."
However, The WCC response includes the following statement:
"Implementation of the ONF has included comparing the current ONF classification against District
Plan and Network Operating Framework (if available), focusing on the areas that will see a planned
change of use or growth."
It is unclear if this statement refers to any work undertaken between the Wellington City draft
District Plan and the Road Efficiency Group who created the ONF.
I. Can the WCC also specifically confirm that it has not communicated with the Road Efficiency Group
on any 'supporting analysis and/or the criteria used in the One Network Framework Mode
Classification PT1:"All metro rail corridors and dedicated corridors for non-rail public transport: all
services.”?' which is requested item 7 ?
J. Can the WCC also specifically confirm that it has not communicated with the Road Efficiency Group
'on the One Network Framework and its alignment with the definition of “good public transport
accessibility” in the proposed District Plan?' which is requested item 8 ?
With respect to points I and J, I can advise that to the best of my knowledge there has been no
communication between the Council and the Road Efficiency Group in respect of the One Network
Framework’s Mode Classification PT1.
There also appears to be some missing information which are attachments of linked information
referred to in emails. Can the following be provided for the following emails:
K. Email 49.pdf PowerPoint Missing document(s) - Presentation to the Councillor Working Group 24
August 2021 - Heritage and Inclusionary zoning.pptx
Attached as Appendix 1
L. Email 40_Redacted.pdf Missing document(s) - Issues and Options Report; Councillor Presentation;
Initial Steering Group Presentation; Early advice against IZ1; Early Advice against IZ2 Kirdan Lees
Economics Review; First test of draft IS provisions
Attached as Appendix 1-7. Please note some of these documents were provided with my
initial response.
M. Email 42_Redacted.pdf Missing document(s) - "a snapshot of the key tables based on the original
WCC data provided."
Attached as Appendix 8.
N. Email 36_Redacted.pdf Missing document(s) - "attached our slides for you to circulate to the
meeting group"
Attached as Appendix 9.
O. Email 31_Redacted.pdf Missing document(s) - "Here's the last Councillor presentation" … "And
the Councillor presentation before that"
Attached as Appendix 10. Please note this document was provided with my initial response.
P. Email 6_Redacted.pdf Missing document(s) - "2. WCC’s Inclusionary Zoning issues and options
paper [Note: we have since changed the name from “inclusionary zoning” to “assisted housing”] ; 5.
Demographic information on Tawa, Johnsonville and Te Aro [Please use these reports for community
demographic profiles but not for population projections – see below] ; 6. Population forecast by
suburb 2021-2051 [These are the latest projections (June 2021)]"
Attached as Appendices 2, 11, and 12.
Q. Email 16_Redacted.pdf Missing document(s) - "Attached as we discussed."
Attached as Appendix 13.
R. Email 14_Redacted.pdf Missing document(s) - "Item 1: Please find attached some comments on
your summary."
Attached as Appendix 14.
I would highlight at this point that the original request stated "If the requested information is held in
electronic form, it is preferred that it is provided in its complete and original electronic format."
Given the size and scope of your request, the documents were put into a format which allowed
redactions to be carried out and assisted in the collation and tracking of the numerous documents. I
would also note that this was a significant request which required many hours of officer time though
no charge was levied for the collation and provision of the information.
In addition there was a spreadsheet that was provided in PDF format. A copy of the original
spreadsheet is requested for the following:
S. MHUD housing Place summaries v12 Wellington City.pdf
To clarify, this is the format the document referred to is held in. I’m not aware of it being held in any
other format.
Is provided to ensure my information request is fully responded by the WCC. This is not a new
request.
Finally, Oral submissions on the District Plan are scheduled from the 9th of March. It would be
appreciate if the response could be provided before the JCA has to submit to Councillors.
Yours sincerely,
Tony Randle
