Roading maintenance and Kent/Cambridge bike lanes
Mike made this Official Information request to Wellington City Council
This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for Mike to read recent responses and update the status.
From: Mike
Dear Wellington City Council,
Some of our main arterial routes in the city are showing signs of wear and lack of maintenance. I would like to know the WCC's schedule for resealing the following roads which are a patchwork of repairs, old painted over road markings and very uneven surfaces:
1. Willis Street from the bypass to Boulcott Street.
2. Taranaki Street - all
3. Vivian Street - all
4. The footpaths along Cuba Street, specifically from Ghuznee Street to Vivian St.
In addition, I would like to know if the council has done any traffic impact analysis on the traffic flows along Kent and Cambridge Terrace since the poorly designed bike lanes have been introduced. Traffic congestion is worse, especially for those turning left onto Majoribanks Street from Kent Terrace. Please send me data from before/after the bike lanes were put in place. Also, are the cheap looking 'parks' now blocking the turn roads between Kent and Cambridge permanent fixtures?
Yours faithfully,
Mike
From: BUS: Assurance
Wellington City Council
Kia ora Mike
Thank you for your email dated 18 December requesting information.
Our team will manage your request under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.
Please note the period 20 December 2023 to 10 January 2024 inclusive is not considered working days. The 20 working days allowed for your response will be on hold over this period and will continue again from 10 January. As a result, we will respond as soon as possible but no later than 8 February 2024 (also taking into account Wellington Anniversary Day).
The reference number for your request is IRC-5817
Please contact us if you have any further questions.
The Assurance Team
Email: [email address]
Wellington City Council | W Wellington.govt.nz | |
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
show quoted sections
From: BUS: Assurance
Wellington City Council
IRC 5817 Correspondence from Wellington City Council.pdf
551K
Download
View as HTML
Kent Cambridge Terrace Traffic Modeling Results RELEASE.pdf
1.3M
Download
View as HTML
Tēnā koe Mike
Please find attached correspondence from Wellington City Council.
Nga mihi
Danika Morris-Brown
Senior Advisor Official Information
Ara Whaimana | Strategy and Governance
Te Kaunihera o Pōneke | Wellington City Council
E [1][email address] | W [2]wellington.govt.nz
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. http://wellington.govt.nz/
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Offensive? Unsuitable?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid requests for Official Information (read more).
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators
Report this request
Chris McCashin left an annotation ()
Good luck Mike!! I can probably answer these for you.
Questions 1 - 4 - No schedule as we don’t budget for any of the services we are supposed to provide. We were also relying on handouts from NZTA following our Gerry mandered reports to get additional funding for cycleways that would have paid for some of this.
Re Traffic Flows on Kent Terrace - our traffic analysis reports completed were done to push this project through without any consultation. Now that this project has been completed causing countless congestion issues our job here is done. No analysis going forward will be completed so us as the ratepayer just need to stop asking questions. And to top this off - the reports (if they do provide them) are likely to not be worth the paper they are written on as they were never going to be done properly when you just need something to support more spending on wasteful projects. I suspect the answers will be along these lines. And the cheap looking parks are likely to remain permanent fixtures for the business owners and employees that are put out of business so they can have lunch and look at where the once worked before they were put out of business.
Link to this