Kia ora,

 

Please find attached an acknowledgement letter in respect of your request
for official information regarding.

 

Ngā mihi

 

 

show quoted sections

 

References

Visible links
1. http://www.ruapehudc.govt.nz/
2. https://www.ruapehudc.govt.nz/our-servic...

Kia ora

 

Please find attached a notice of extension of time letter regarding your
LGOIMA request.

 

Ngā mihi

TeRina

 

show quoted sections

 

References

Visible links
1. http://www.ruapehudc.govt.nz/
2. https://www.ruapehudc.govt.nz/our-servic...

Please see attached response.

 

Regards

 

show quoted sections

 

References

Visible links
1. http://www.ruapehudc.govt.nz/
2. https://www.ruapehudc.govt.nz/our-servic...

Good morning,

Thank you for your email below. Councils response dated 29 May 2024 to your OIA request of 1 March 2024 for costs related to Teitei Drive to states: This decision to withhold information is subject to review on completion of negotiations.
Council intends to review this and similar requests after the annual report is released, expected to be around mid-November. The reason being, negotiations by this stage will be complete.
We appreciate your patience in the interim.

Regards
Maggie Flonk
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT MANAGER

show quoted sections

Original Message-----
From: Ohakune Ratepayers and Residents' Society Inc <[FOI #25948 email]>
Sent: Saturday, 31 August 2024 2:17 PM
To: Info <[Ruapehu District Council request email]>
Subject: Re: FYI-request- 25948

Warning: This email is from an External Sender. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Info,

We consider your response inadequate and request a response to each individual question and the grounds for refusal.

The public deserve a response and deserve to know how much was spent on each project. This is vital for transparency and to show the public that council is fiscally responsible.

With the budget blow outs for 3 waters, housing and with the cost of living crisis and rate increases, council continue to waste rate payer funds including the suggestion on building a new hub in raetihi. With all considered we believe this to be in the public’s best interest and will be taking this complaint to the ombudsman on 30th September if we don’t receive a satisfactory answer

Yours sincerely,

Ohakune Ratepayers and Residents' Society Inc

show quoted sections

Thank you for your email.

We will endeavour to provide a response to the original request dated 1 March 2024 before close of business 6 December 2024.
We thank you for your patience.

Regards

show quoted sections

Original Message-----
From: Ohakune Ratepayers and Residents' Society Inc <[FOI #25948 email]>
Sent: Saturday, 30 November 2024 10:06 AM
To: Info <[Ruapehu District Council request email]>
Subject: RE: FYI-request- 25948

Warning: This email is from an External Sender. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Info,

Morning,

September 18th you wrote us and stated "Councils response dated 29 May 2024 to your OIA request of 1 March 2024 for costs related to Teitei Drive to states: This decision to withhold information is subject to review on completion of negotiations.
Council intends to review this and similar requests after the annual report is released, expected to be around mid-November. The reason being, negotiations by this stage will be complete.
We appreciate your patience in the interim."

Council has since released the Annual Report and we have had confirmation from Kāinga Ora that no negotiations or disputes currently exist with RDC; thus we expect this information to be released in full to ORS

Yours sincerely,

Ohakune Ratepayers and Residents' Society Inc

show quoted sections

Dear Ohakune Ratepayers and Residents' Society Inc,

 

 

I refer to your official information request dated 1 March 2024 for Money
spent on ATMS and projects following.

Council has reviewed its earlier decision to withhold information, please
see attached reviewed response.

 

Regards

 

show quoted sections

 

References

Visible links
1. http://www.ruapehudc.govt.nz/
2. https://eservices.ruapehudc.govt.nz/onli...

Thank you for your email. Your email will be processed during the hours
from 8am to 5pm Monday to Friday, except on Public Holidays when the
office is closed.

Requests for service made outside of normal office hours should be sent
via the Ruapehu District Council website [1]Submit a request for service:
Feedback Form - Ruapehu District Council (ruapehudc.govt.nz) or by calling
after hours on 07 895 8188.
Nga mihi

 

show quoted sections

 

References

Visible links
1. https://eservices.ruapehudc.govt.nz/onli...
2. http://www.ruapehudc.govt.nz/
3. https://www.ruapehudc.govt.nz/our-servic...

Morning Barry,

Your historic LGOIMA request fyi-25948 has been forwarded to the relevant business group for response.
Sincere apologies for your earlier communication not having been followed up.

Regards

show quoted sections

Original Message-----
From: Info <[Ruapehu District Council request email]>
Sent: Tuesday, 8 April 2025 9:20 AM
To: Maggie Flonk <[email address]>; Dale Te Iwimate <[email address]>
Subject: FW: LGOIMA request fyi -25948

show quoted sections

Please find final response attached

 

Regards

 

show quoted sections

 

References

Visible links
1. http://www.ruapehudc.govt.nz/
2. https://www.ruapehudc.govt.nz/our-servic...

Thank you for your email. Your email will be processed during the hours
from 8am to 5pm Monday to Friday, except on Public Holidays when the
office is closed.

Requests for service made outside of normal office hours should be sent
via the Ruapehu District Council website [1]Submit a request for service:
Feedback Form - Ruapehu District Council (ruapehudc.govt.nz) or by calling
after hours on 07 895 8188.
Nga mihi

 

show quoted sections

 

References

Visible links
1. https://eservices.ruapehudc.govt.nz/onli...
2. http://www.ruapehudc.govt.nz/
3. https://www.ruapehudc.govt.nz/our-servic...

Thank you for your Request for Official Information received on 30 April 2025 relating to financial allocations.

We will endeavour to respond to your request as soon as possible with a decision and in any event no later than 28 May 2025, being 20 working days after the day your request was received.

If we are unable to respond to your request by then, we will notify you of an extension of that timeframe.

If you have any queries, please feel free to contact [Ruapehu District Council request email]. If any additional factors come to light which are relevant to your request, please do not hesitate to contact us so that these can be considered.

Please note: if applicable, the request may incur a reasonable charge. We will contact you with an approximate cost, before we proceed.

Regards

Maggie Flonk
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT MANAGER

show quoted sections

Original Message-----
From: Ohakune Ratepayers and Residents' Society Inc <[FOI #25948 email]>
Sent: Wednesday, 30 April 2025 2:42 PM
To: Info <[Ruapehu District Council request email]>
Subject: Re: LGOIMA Request Ref: fyi25948 final response

Warning: This email is from an External Sender. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Info,

I find it hard to believe your recent response stating that "Ruapehu District Council did not separately monitor or record the costs related to the development and implementation of the ATMS between 2020 and 2024", this would lead me to believe that the recent independent review (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url...) needs to be broadened to include the wider cultural and fiscal policies within RDC.

I refer you to your response at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url... and https://www.ruapehudc.govt.nz/repository... which highlighted the budgeted $100k and $125k (totalling $225k) for site investigations. Is council advising that they have no records of this spending allocated correctly?

I also refer you to response https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url... which was "TeiTei Drive Costs to 30 June 2023".

Next I refer you to the following response showing a ~$250k spend with Ree Anderson - https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url...

Questions:
1./ What code and name (in the GL (General Ledger)) does the ATMS sit within.
2./ How GL code and name does Ree Anderson invoices sit within.
3./ What projects was Ree Anderson involved in and what was the budget allocation for each of her projects and the amount paid for each.
4./ From the allocated $100k and $125k for site investigations, what GL code and name did these sit within and how much was spent out of those two approved amounts?
5./ Was any spending on the ATMS or Teitei drive social housing project, allocated to any other GL codes and if so which ones and how much?

Yours sincerely,

Ohakune Ratepayers and Residents' Society Inc

show quoted sections