I would definitely call them out on this presentation.

https://www.royalsociety.org.nz/assets/d...

Kia ora Caroline,

NIWA is very aware of geo-engineering:

https://www.royalsociety.org.nz/assets/d...

Does NIWA hold any communication with ships offshore of New Zealand who may have used tropospheric aerosol injection prior to the cyclone?

Caroline,

Is NIWA aware of SCoPEx?

Bill Gates is funding research into solar geo-engineering:

https://www.keutschgroup.com/scopex

Please provide any communications NIWA has had in regard to this technology.

With gratitude

As pointed out today by Rowan, in an annotation to a separate OIA request, by a separate person, to a different NZ institution, HAARP researchers from Stanford University are shown standing on the deck of NIWA's research vessel Tangaroa in Figure 4 of this document https://vlfstanford.ku.edu.tr/research_t...

It would therefore seem that NIWA definitely IS involved in the use of HAARP technology, possibly/probably for weather modification. It'd be interesting to see how they try to avoid admitting that. Section 6 of the Official Information Act, perhaps? Although it is kind of hard to see how admitting such involvement would prejudice NZ's security ....

The answer to FYI's question about status of this request is "none of the above". NIWA did reply to the request. First they said "NIWA does not hold any information on geoengineering" -- which in light of the information in my previous annotation to this request seems perilously close to an outright lie. Then someone else pointed out that a number of NIWA researchers had published material indicating that they were very aware of information on geoengineering -- and NIWA replied that the only one of those individuals still with NIWA is currently in Antarctica, so they can't answer the question till that person comes back. Having been to Scott Base myself, I find this also perilously close to a lie -- it's impossible to believe that NIWA couldn't ask that person on the normal radio sched.

So really, NIWA -- come on. You may or may not currently be involved in cloud seeding. But you are certainly involved in HAARP activity -- either that or you let a bunch of Stanford HAARP scientists use your research vessel to deploy a buoy, without asking them why they wanted to do that ...).

Hi Chris,

Any updates on this in light of the horrific weather bombs we’ve had lately?

Unfortunately not - I will follow up. But it’s exhausting because we know it’s happening, the technology is there and we have a guy out of Liverpool predicting weather bombs and earthquakes just by following all the spraying that’s going on! We have a constant haze in our sky, fast moving clouds and NIWA initially lying (so the are covering it up so they know it’s wrong), climate Minister knows nothing so where does all that leave things?! It is for our “safety” anyway so what can actually be done?

Is it illegal to lie in response to an Official Information Act request?

Ha unlikely - we wouldn’t have any public servants left

I have noted that the sky is covered in a white haze in Auckland often.

Phased array beam forming (5/6G towers) has been used for decades by military to achieve a highly directive antenna beam that is electrically steerable.

HAARP can paint designs in the sky. You can move the beam in any pattern.

What is the purpose of 5G and this technology in NZ if not to manipulate our weather, create food shortages and supply issues (as planned for agenda 2030) and allow the govt to “swoop in” like a hero with their three waters reform plan and buy peoples homes for them because they’re damaged, then put people into a “smart city.”

The truth is being withheld for good reason. This was an act of Terrorism/Genocide there are a number of dead and so many displaced for any Government Organisation to admit to any involvement or knowledege of it would cause a national revolt, oh that's right they took away everyones guns. And if you protest they use LRAD so we are at the masters mercy really.
I personally have witnessed planes at high altitude dispursing aerosols directly over the Manukau harbour into the suburbs of Blockhouse Bay/lynfield etc almost daily since late November of 2022 up until the day before the first of the two cyclones,
And also before Gabrielle at around 3am noticed what appeared as smoke billowing from Eden Park (ground based cloud seeding via a generator) The vast number of drone and satelitte activity every night and the constant cloud brightening, explosive boom noises. I only wish I had video documentation to support these claims, but I didn't know at the time what was about to happen.
The Geo-Engineering is carried out by a contractor (private sector) can't find the link to the company.
Would love to know why, and whats the endgame??

I’ve asked James Shaw for the contractors who are doing it. No response “ we do not hold the information you requested, and we have no grounds for believing that the information is held by another department or Minister of the Crown or organisation, or by a local authority”. I even requested he formally pass onto a number of other agencies Defence, MFE and others which he declined. I have a feeling Royal Society NZ might have something to do with it as I requested comment from them and have not heard back. As I said, they lie, obfuscate and refuse information all the time and even if information comes out what can actually be done?! And we have bought and paid for NZ media “providing the facts” misdirection plays about cloud seeding although not sure anybody still bothers reading their trash?!

Thank you for your attempts. It’s extremely frustrating. Last night I created a complaint and posted on a group hoping a lot of people would send it in.
What is there to do when none of the corporations responsible will even admit knowledge??
Infuriating.

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to express my deep concern and outrage regarding the practice of geo-engineering and its impact on human rights. Geo-engineering, which involves deliberate intervention in the Earth's climate system to counteract the effects of climate change, has resulted in severe environmental and human rights violations, including the loss of life and damage to property and ecosystems.

The practice of geo-engineering has led to numerous adverse effects on the environment, including increased floods, landslides and liquefaction, which have resulted in the loss of lives and livelihoods of many people.

The impact of geo-engineering on communities is particularly alarming. We, as living, breathing men and women, rely heavily on our lands for our livelihoods, and we are disproportionately affected by the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem damage caused by the practice. Furthermore, we have had no say in the decision-making process surrounding geo-engineering and its devastating effects.

Geo-engineering practices breach several fundamental human rights, including the right to life, health, and a healthy environment, as recognized by the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The right to life is being violated due to the loss of lives caused by extreme weather events resulting from geo-engineering. The right to health is being violated by the release of pollutants into the atmosphere, causing respiratory diseases and other health problems. The right to a healthy environment is being violated by the degradation of ecosystems and the loss of biodiversity caused by the practice.

It should be the duty of the government and the international community to hold those responsible for geo-engineering accountable for their actions. Immediate action must be taken to regulate and monitor geo-engineering practices to prevent further damage to the environment and human rights violations.

I urge you to take swift and decisive action to address this urgent issue and hold those responsible for geo-engineering, accountable and especially at this imperative moment, since the current ongoing devastation in New Zealand.

Sincerely,

(Your name)

Well this is a loopy request.

I love how conspiracy theories are so often “The enemy is so powerful they’ve fooled the entire world and can do anything. But I’m the one that can see through it while somehow being untouched by the evil peoples.”

I do feel for the poor researchers that have to put up with such silliness.

No ranty politics? Surely that includes the knee-jerk, evidence-free dismissal as "conspiracy theory" of any information that doesn't fit the poster's preferred narrative. So why wasn't James Sullivan's annotation removed in accordance with FYI's moderation policy?

https://www.royalsociety.org.nz/assets/d...

Well I guess that is it then. Despite NIWA being involved in this research years ago they do not have any evidence of this occurring at all! As I understand it they can feign any interest / respond to these requests because it is run by foreign interests / military so any and all requests are futile. There is however a guy on-line forecasting all of these horrendous weather events based on the aerosol spraying that is going on. He even gave some warning to Hawkes Bay about the hammering they were going to get. Suggest people find him and start following him, at least you would get warning for extreme weather events though this does nothing to save personal belongings and property based on recent results.

Just another conspiracy.....

https://m.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/life/ra...

Suggest people interested in this topic follow
https://fyi.org.nz/request/22137-date-lo...

Sunday 26th March. 11.30am - flight at about 30,000 ft flying in a South Westerly direction SUDDENLY started creating contrails...except they were not dissipating. Approximately 4 minutes later, the aircraft stopped creating trails and the existing trails were now spreading in a very wide manner...no aircraft showing on flight tracker or flight aware. Within 20 mins the sky was cloudy and hazy. We support your line of questions, and have also asked MOD for aircraft ID rules etc. keep digging

Hawke's Bay didn't have a summer this year
That's highly unusual for our region and something I had not experienced in my 35 years of existence. The skies were filled with clouds overcasting the sun. Then the cyclone hit. What was interesting about this is that after it flooded and there were several helicopters rescuing people from their roof tops for days on end the cloudy skies subsided and we actually had a tiny bit of a summer. When this subsided the overcast gloom of the clouds returned. Go figure.

It's against the law to lie in response to an FYI request.

This should go to the Ombudsman immediately.

Have a look at Rocketlabs completed missions , like ,Make it rain and look ma, no hands and rocket like a hurricane ,they are launching from Mahia ,nz for muiltable goverments agencys and under experimental bases

5.30pm Sunday 23rd. 5.35 pm clouds clearing Wellington and a few trails are expanding into clouds. Must have been flights circa 5pm they were doing the spraying. Only visible as the dark clouds move. Relentless at the moment.

"To ensure compliance with legal requirements and to maintain cyber security standards, NIWA's IT systems are subject to ongoing monitoring, activity logging and auditing. This monitoring and auditing service may be provided by third parties. Such third parties can access information transmitted to, processed by and stored on NIWA's IT systems "???

This astonishing statement means that NIWA could EASILY comply with Chris's OIA request for emails about geoengineering. Yet they (NIWA) say they have so many such emails that it would be terribly difficult to comply. In light of their own statement above, this is an outright lie. It would obviously not be at all difficult. Yet they're making half-hearted excuses and now DEMANDING MONEY to comply with the law .... Who do these people think they are??

I reckon it's time to involve the Ombudsman immediately, Chris.

NIWA
Research program:
Earth System Modelling & Prediction
PROJECT LEADERS
Laura Revell
University of Canterbury
Olaf Morgenstern
NIWA
View the full team
BUDGET
$2,225,000
DURATION
July 2015 – June 2024

ACTIVE PROJECT
outcomes:
The introduction of a new functionality into the Global Coupled 5 (GC5) configuration of the Unified Model (the physical base model of NZESM and UKESM) to make dust particles freezing nuclei, meaning they can initiate the freezing of cloud droplets. This improvement has significantly improved the realism of the model simulations and will impact future climate models that are based on the Unified Model.
We have worked with the Deep South observations team to improve marine aerosol fluxes, developed new aerosol chemistry schemes, and enhanced the ability of aerosols to interact with clouds, thus improving performance of the New Zealand Earth System Model in the Southern Ocean region.
Updates to heterogeneous chemistry and inclusion of solar variability as a climate forcer resulted in more realistic simulations of the Antarctic ozone hole.

"Clouds and aerosols are a leading source of errors in climate models, particularly over the Southern Ocean which plays a key role in determining New Zealand’s weather and climate. Throughout the Deep South National Science Challenge we have developed capacity in Earth System modelling, with considerable expertise in modelling clouds and aerosols."

Could you please explain in detail how these "climate models" that you ( NIWA ) have conducted a simulation of new zealands weather and climate over the southern ocean , also explain how this experise in modelling clouds and aerosols was gained ?
Could you please explain in detail how you (NIWA) improved marine aerosol fluxes, developed new aerosol chemistry schemes, and enhanced the ability of aerosols to interact with clouds,
Could you please explain in detail how these Updates to heterogeneous chemistry and inclusion of solar variability as a climate forcer resulted in more realistic simulations of the Antarctic ozone hole.
Finally correct me if im wrong im no "scientist" but introducing aerosols or particles into the atmosphere, is that not "heterogeneous nucleation " aka (cloud seeding) aka (weather modification) ?
You state on your (NIWA) website that (cloud seeding) is not conducted in new zealand ,yet you state as copied above in different context that is ?

NIWA

"As we have previously stated, NIWA is not actively involved in geoengineering in the manner you outline. We have no funding to carry out such research, and are, therefore, not involved in any research on the issue. We are not aware of any such geoengineering being conducted in New Zealand."

Are you (NIWA) currently involved or have been involved in creating simulations (in reality) climate chamge and thus change of weather events and cloud structure in the southern ocean via the introduction of foreign heavy metal ion particles (nuclei) via a contracted aircraft into the atmosphere to create heterogeneous nucleation forming a crystal for water vapor to condense on therefore creating and modifying clouds as part of your New Zealand Earth System Model research.
If this is not the case could you please explain in detail how you simulate changes in climate and weather

From NIWA website

Simulating clouds and aerosols in the NZESM (2019-22)
Budget: $1,000,000

Using observations from the Processes and Observations programme, we addressed aerosol activation to cloud droplets, cloud droplet freezing, and the interactions between clouds and aerosols over the Southern Ocean in the NZESM. We undertook three work streams:

Based on the research in the Clouds and Aerosols Observations project, we implemented and tested new model code to simulate ice-nucleating particles (predominantly dust) in the NZESM, which are important precursors to cloud development and rainfall.
In the NZESM, sea salt aerosol fluxes are highly dependent on wind speed. Previous research developed two new parameterisations of sea salt aerosol flux based on observations made as part of the Clouds and Aerosols Observation project. We tested these parameterisations in the NZESM and found an improvement in the bias in wintertime aerosol optical depth (Revell et al. 2019, 2021).
Finally, we undertook a sensitivity analysis to explore interacting uncertainties on key processes and parameterisations controlling simulated aerosol-cloud interactions over the Southern Ocean in the NZESM.

NIWA
Could you please explain in detail how you implemented and tested new model code to simulate ice-nucleating particles (predominantly dust) in the NZESM, which are important precursors to cloud development and rainfall.
Could you please explain in detail how you undertook a sensitivity analysis to explore interacting uncertainties on key processes and parameterisations controlling simulated aerosol-cloud interactions over the Southern Ocean in the NZESM.

How are any of these simulations being carried out with out the use of either STATIC - DYNAMIC or HYDROSCOPIC cloud seeding .

Time to stop lying you NIWA has and gets multi million dollar funding for the projects .
Are you involved in any of the aspects i have brought to attention

This annotation is posted to help the Ombudsman deal with Chris McCashin's complaint about NIWA's refusal to tell us anything about their involvement in weather modification.

Despite the fact that assorted "fact checkers" regularly pop up at the top of Google searches with paid denials that any such program exists, the following now-very-old video documents the fact that weather modification has long been a reality https://www.bitchute.com/video/NjQiQXRLd...

There are now HAARP installations all over the world. https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer... If you care to look at satellite pics of the locations cited in the above you will actually see these installations -- they're very distinctive. Further intel and links to MSM videos can be found here https://www.wanttoknow.info/war/haarp_we...

It is impossible to believe that NIWA doesn't KNOW about this stuff. They are not incompetent. Yet they continue to maintain that it's nothing to do with them, and to block or even lie in response to requests for information about their involvement. Especially in light of recent weather events, I suggest that it is very much in the public interest to know exactly HOW NIWA are involved in weather modification (as they clearly are). Therefore I would be most grateful if the office of the Ombudsman could suggest to NIWA that they reconsider their position in this matter.

NIWA Group consists of:
• National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd
• NIWA Vessel Management Ltd
• NIWA Environmental Research Institute
• NIWA Natural Solutions Ltd
• NIWA Australia Pty Ltd
• EcoConnect Ltd
• Unidata Pty Ltd
All companies have 100% ownership and voting interests, except Unidata Pty Ltd which has 80% ownership and
voting interest. NIWA Group will adhere to the following procedures, as required to be discussed under section
16 of the Crown Research Institutes Act.

Chris perhaps you could re-word your inquiry towards on of these proprietary companies instead and with some specification maybe get around that collation surcharge demanded for a response. Either try that OR "NIWA Group" - OTG