Use of HAARP in NZ

Jane made this Official Information request to Ministry of Defence

The request was partially successful.

From: Jane

Dear Ministry of Defence,

Upon reading the Auckland Council Auckland Plan 2050 document, I knew a year or so ago to expect flooding.

The document was written in 2018, which concerns me that 5 years ago flooding was planned.
According to NIWA, cloud whitening and cloud seeding are used to manipulate the weather.

This article I have linked is from an Environmentalist, claiming HAARP technology is being used and can change weather, induce earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.

In the section of the Auckland Plan 2050 document “living with nature” it claims that Auckland will be redrawn, and there will be new islands forming in the Gulf

If flooding was planned for Auckland, in order to contaminate water and swoop in with the three waters reform, bring in the new pandemic which is spread via water contamination and will be similar to polio and target children, the weather had to have been geo-engineered to meet this plan.

The next pandemic was practiced by the WHO and Bill and Melinda Gates on October 23 2022 - named Catastrophic Contagion.

The installation of 5G towers and the rippling of clouds the day prior to the Auckland floods links with the description of what HAARP technology does.

Please provide information on whether HAARP is implemented here in NZ?

Yours faithfully,


Link to this

Jane left an annotation ()

Just a thought to ask the military/nz defence force if they are flying chemtrails, cloud seeding and geoengineering to manipulate our weather

Link to this

Rowan left an annotation ()

I would like to add as well, please release information on any ionospheric heaters that are in use with the intention of affecting New Zealand in any way, shape or form. This includes, but is not limited to direct use in New Zealand, and any other in the world that you are aware of in use that impacts New Zealand.

Link to this

From: Information
Ministry of Defence

Attachment OIA Response.pdf
1009K Download View as HTML

Kia ora AP,

Please find the attached response to your Official Information Act request, noting that the Ministry of Defence does not hold any information relevant to your request.

Ngā mihi,
Ministry of Defence

show quoted sections

Link to this

Ryan left an annotation ()

Does NZ Crown or the defence force collaborate or act in any way with or without any third party in conducting climate and or weather manipulation such as but not limited to cloud seeding, directing frequencies or manipulation of weather in any form in any way?
This is the question we all want answered and the official response here does-not align with mounting evidence to the contrary - are the crown & its agents providing full disclosure & does it hold full informed consent from the natural men & women of the land for any and all operations that affect OUR land air and water quality?

Link to this

Susan left an annotation ()

The response to this request from the Ministry of Defence is as opaque as the scrawled signature of the individual who provides it. The Ministry of Defence does not hold any relevant information, it says, so the request is declined. As Chris McCashin's similar request to James Shaw says: ( ) it is not clear what outfit is (or might be) IMPLEMENTING what certainly appears to be the deliberate weather modification of the past couple of months. However, given that it is rather obviously in James Shaw's political interest NOT to comply fully with McCashin's request that he investigate the identity of the agency that is or might be doing this, perhaps it would be more productive for Jane to address her OIA request to NIWA?

Link to this

Rowan left an annotation ()

Absolutely. NIWA should be the people to address this to. Given that I have found documentation proving that NIWA has been involved in the deployment of a buoy used by Stanford University, via their research vessel Tangaroa, for the High Frequency Active Auoral Program (HAARP), an ongoing research program utilising ionospheric heating technology. Figure 4 in this document shows Stanford researcher on board the Tangaroa. NIWA - how involved are you with this program??

Link to this

Kay left an annotation ()

Maria Zeee - 6 months ago put out a video on Rumble concerning the NOAA and contractors including one called Make Sunsets that has a global contract until 2223 to do geoengineering. She also has info for AUS - apparently energy companies are running some of these, I am actually not just seeing the spray now but the planes too over CHCH.

The video you are looking for is " Worlds First: Chemtrails - The Smoking Gun - Geoengineering contracts exposed.

None of the contractors have carried out environmental reports (as not ticked on the application) have a look also at their library - I have explored a little and have some downloads but there are quite a few docs on here and I cannot find the section on international she found!

Link to this

SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()

There are many patents on weather modification. So why is it so hard for people to believe this or for Government Departments to answer openly and honestly.
United States Patent and Trademark Office
• 0462795 – July 16, 1891 – Method Of Producing Rain-Fall
• 1103490 – August 6, 1913 – Rain-Maker
• 1225521 – September 4, 1915 – Protecting From Poisonous Gas In Warfare
• 1338343 – April 27, 1920 – Process And Apparatus For The Production of Intense Artificial Clouds, Fogs, or Mists
• 1619183 – March 1, 1927 – Process of Producing Smoke Clouds From Moving Aircraft
• 1665267 – April 10, 1928 – Process of Producing Artificial Fogs
• 1892132 – December 27, 1932 – Atomizing Attachment For Airplane Engine Exhausts
• 1928963 – October 3, 1933 – Electrical System And Method
• 1957075 – May 1, 1934 – Airplane Spray Equipment
• 2097581 – November 2, 1937 – Electric Stream Generator – Referenced in 3990987
• 2409201 – October 15, 1946 – Smoke Producing Mixture
• 2476171 – July 18, 1945 – Smoke Screen Generator
• 2480967 – September 6, 1949 – Aerial Discharge Device
• 2550324 – April 24, 1951 – Process For Controlling Weather
• 2582678 – June 15, 1952 – Material Disseminating Apparatus For Airplanes
• 2614083 – October 14, 1952 – Metal Chloride Screening Smoke Mixture
• 2633455 – March 31, 1953 – Smoke Generator
• 2688069 – August 31, 1954 – Steam Generator – Referenced in 3990987
• 2721495 – October 25, 1955 – Method And Apparatus For Detecting Minute Crystal Forming Particles Suspended in a Gaseous Atmosphere
• 2730402 – January 10, 1956 – Controllable Dispersal Device
• 2801322 – July 30, 1957 – Decomposition Chamber for Monopropellant Fuel – Referenced in 3990987
• 2881335 – April 7, 1959 – Generation of Electrical Fields
• 2908442 – October 13, 1959 – Method For Dispersing Natural Atmospheric Fogs And Clouds
• 2986360 – May 30, 1962 – Aerial Insecticide Dusting Device
• 2963975 – December 13, 1960 – Cloud Seeding Carbon Dioxide Bullet
• 3126155 – March 24, 1964 – Silver Iodide Cloud Seeding Generator
• 3127107 – March 31, 1964 – Generation of Ice-Nucleating Crystals
• 3131131 – April 28, 1964 – Electrostatic Mixing in Microbial Conversions
• 3174150 – March 16, 1965 – Self-Focusing Antenna System
• 3234357 – February 8, 1966 – Electrically Heated Smoke Producing Device
• 3274035 – September 20, 1966 – Metallic Composition For Production of Hydroscopic Smoke
• 3300721 – January 24, 1967 – Means For Communication Through a Layer of Ionized Gases
• 3313487 – April 11, 1967 – Cloud Seeding Apparatus
• 3338476 – August 29, 1967 – Heating Device For Use With Aerosol Containers
• 3410489 – November 12, 1968 – Automatically Adjustable Airfoil Spray System With Pump
• 3429507 – February 25, 1969 – Rainmaker
• 3432208 – November 7, 1967 – Fluidized Particle Dispenser
• 3441214 – April 29, 1969 – Method And Apparatus For Seeding Clouds
• 3445844 – May 20, 1969 – Trapped Electromagnetic Radiation Communications System
• 3456880 – July 22, 1969 – Method Of Producing Precipitation From The Atmosphere
• 3518670 June 30, 1970 – Artificial Ion Cloud
• 3534906 – October 20, 1970 – Control of Atmospheric Particles
• 3545677 – December 8, 1970 – Method of Cloud Seeding
• 3564253 – February 16, 1971 – System And Method For Irradiation Of Planet Surface Areas
• 3587966 – June 28, 1971 – Freezing Nucleation
• 3601312 – August 24, 1971 – Methods of Increasing The Likelihood oF Precipitation By The Artificial Introduction Of Sea Water Vapor Into The Atmosphere Winward Of An Air Lift Region
• 3608810 – September 28, 1971 – Methods of Treating Atmospheric Conditions
• 3608820– September 20, 1971 – Treatment of Atmospheric Conditions by Intermittent Dispensing of Materials Therein
• 3613992 – October 19, 1971 – Weather Modification Method
• 3630950 – December 28, 1971 – Combustible Compositions For Generating Aerosols, Particularly Suitable For Cloud Modification And Weather Control And Aerosolization Process
• USRE29142 – May 22, 1973 – Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process
• 3659785 – December 8, 1971 – Weather Modification Utilizing Microencapsulated Material
• 3666176 – March 3, 1972 – Solar Temperature Inversion Device
• 3677840 – July 18, 1972 – Pyrotechnics Comprising Oxide of Silver For Weather Modification Use
• 3722183 – March 27, 1973 – Device For Clearing Impurities From The Atmosphere
• 3769107 – October 30, 1973 – Pyrotechnic Composition For Generating Lead Based Smoke
• 3784099 – January 8, 1974 – Air Pollution Control Method
• 3785557 – January 15, 1974 – Cloud Seeding System
• 3795626 – March 5, 1974 – Weather Modification Process
• 3808595 – April 30, 1974 – Chaff Dispensing System
• 3813875 – June 4, 1974 – Rocket Having Barium Release System to Create Ion Clouds In The Upper Atmosphere
• 3835059 – September 10, 1974 – Methods of Generating Ice Nuclei Smoke Particles For Weather Modification And Apparatus Therefore
• 3835293 – September 10, 1974 – Electrical Heating Apparatus For Generating Super Heated Vapors
• 3877642 – April 15, 1975 – Freezing Nucleant
• 3882393 – May 6, 1975 – Communications System Utilizing Modulation of The Characteristic Polarization of The Ionosphere
• 3896993 – July 29, 1975 – Process For Local Modification of Fog And Clouds For Triggering Their Precipitation And For Hindering The Development of Hail Producing Clouds
• 3899129 – August 12, 1975 – Apparatus for generating ice nuclei smoke particles for weather modification
• 3899144 – August 12, 1975 – Powder contrail generation
• 3940059 – February 24, 1976 – Method For Fog Dispersion
• 3940060 – February 24, 1976 – Vortex Ring Generator
• 3990987 – November 9, 1976 – Smoke generator
• 3992628 – November 16, 1976 – Countermeasure system for laser radiation
• 3994437 – November 30, 1976 – Broadcast dissemination of trace quantities of biologically active chemicals
• 4042196 – August 16, 1977 – Method and apparatus for triggering a substantial change in earth characteristics and measuring earth changes
• RE29,142 – February 22, 1977 – Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process
• 4035726 – July 12, 1977 – Method of controlling and/or improving high-latitude and other communications or radio wave surveillance systems by partial control of radio wave et al
• 4096005 – June 20, 1978 – Pyrotechnic Cloud Seeding Composition
• 4129252 – December 12, 1978 – Method and apparatus for production of seeding materials
• 4141274 – February 27, 1979 – Weather modification automatic cartridge dispenser
• 4167008 – September 4, 1979 – Fluid bed chaff dispenser
• 4347284 – August 31, 1982 – White cover sheet material capable of reflecting ultraviolet rays
• 4362271 – December 7, 1982 – Procedure for the artificial modification of atmospheric precipitation as well as compounds with a dimethyl sulfoxide base for use in carrying out said procedure
• 4402480 – September 6, 1983 – Atmosphere modification satellite
• 4412654 – November 1, 1983 – Laminar microjet atomizer and method of aerial spraying of liquids
• 4415265 – November 15, 1983 – Method and apparatus for aerosol particle absorption spectroscopy
• 4470544 – September 11, 1984 – Method of and Means for weather modification
• 4475927 – October 9, 1984 – Bipolar Fog Abatement System
• 4600147 – July 15, 1986 – Liquid propane generator for cloud seeding apparatus
• 4633714 – January 6, 1987 – Aerosol particle charge and size analyzer
• 4643355 – February 17, 1987 – Method and apparatus for modification of climatic conditions
• 4653690 – March 31, 1987 – Method of producing cumulus clouds
• 4684063 – August 4, 1987 – Particulates generation and removal
• 4686605 – August 11, 1987 – HAARP Patent / EASTLUND PATENT – Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth’s atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere
• 4704942 – November 10, 1987 – Charged Aerosol
• 4712155 – December 8, 1987 – Method and apparatus for creating an artificial electron cyclotron heating region of plasma
• 4744919 – May 17, 1988 – Method of dispersing particulate aerosol tracer
• 4766725 – August 30, 1988 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
• 4829838 – May 16, 1989 – Method and apparatus for the measurement of the size of particles entrained in a gas
• 4836086 – June 6, 1989 – Apparatus and method for the mixing and diffusion of warm and cold air for dissolving fog
• 4873928 – October 17, 1989 – Nuclear-sized explosions without radiation
• 4948257 – August 14, 1990 – Laser optical measuring device and method for stabilizing fringe pattern spacing
• 1338343– August 14, 1990 – Process and Apparatus for the production of intense artificial Fog
• 4999637 – March 12, 1991 – Creation of artificial ionization clouds above the earth
• 5003186 – March 26, 1991 – Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming
• 5005355 – April 9, 1991 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
• 5038664 – August 13, 1991 – Method for producing a shell of relativistic particles at an altitude above the earths surface
• 5041760 – August 20, 1991 – Method and apparatus for generating and utilizing a compound plasma configuration
• 5041834 – August 20, 1991 – Artificial ionospheric mirror composed of a plasma layer which can be tilted
• 5056357 – October 15, 1991- Acoustic method for measuring properties of a mobile medium
• 5059909 – October 22, 1991 – Determination of particle size and electrical charge
• 5104069 – April 14, 1992 – Apparatus and method for ejecting matter from an aircraft
• 5110502 – May 5, 1992 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
• 5156802 – October 20, 1992 – Inspection of fuel particles with acoustics
• 5174498 – December 29, 1992 – Cloud Seeding
• 5148173 – September 15, 1992 – Millimeter wave screening cloud and method
• 5242820 – September 7, 1993 – Army Mycoplasma Patent Patent
• 5245290 – September 14, 1993 – Device for determining the size and charge of colloidal particles by measuring electroacoustic effect
• 5286979 – February 15, 1994 – Process for absorbing ultraviolet radiation using dispersed melanin
• 5296910 – March 22, 1994 – Method and apparatus for particle analysis
• 5327222 – July 5, 1994 – Displacement information detecting apparatus
• 5357865 – October 25, 1994 – Method of cloud seeding
• 5360162 – November 1, 1994 – Method and composition for precipitation of atmospheric water
• 5383024 – January 17, 1995 – Optical wet steam monitor
• 5425413 – June 20, 1995 – Method to hinder the formation and to break-up overhead atmospheric inversions, enhance ground level air circulation and improve urban air quality
• 5434667 – July 18, 1995 – Characterization of particles by modulated dynamic light scattering
• 5441200 – August 15, 1995 – Tropical cyclone disruption
• 5556029 – September 17, 1996 – Method of hydrometeor dissipation (clouds)
• 5628455 – May 13, 1997 – Method and apparatus for modification of supercooled fog
• 5631414 – May 20, 1997 – Method and device for remote diagnostics of ocean-atmosphere system state
• 5639441 – June 17, 1997 – Methods for fine particle formation
• 5762298 – June 9, 1998 – Use of artificial satellites in earth orbits adaptively to modify the effect that solar radiation would otherwise have on earth’s weather
• 5800481 – September 1, 1998 – Thermal excitation of sensory resonances
• 5912396 – June 15, 1999 – System and method for remediation of selected atmospheric conditions
• 5922976 – July 13, 1999 – Method of measuring aerosol particles using automated mobility-classified aerosol detector
• 5949001 – September 7, 1999 – Method for aerodynamic particle size analysis
• 5984239 – November 16, 1999 – Weather modification by artificial satellite
• 6025402 – February 15, 2000 – Chemical composition for effectuating a reduction of visibility obscuration, and a detoxifixation of fumes and chemical fogs in spaces of fire origin
• 6030506 – February 29, 2000 – Preparation of independently generated highly reactive chemical species
• 6034073 – March 7, 2000 – Solvent detergent emulsions having antiviral activity
• 6045089 – April 4, 2000 – Solar-powered airplane
• 6056203 – May 2, 2000 – Method and apparatus for modifying supercooled clouds
• 6315213B1 – June 21, 2000 – Method of modifying weather
• 6110590 – August 29, 2000 – Synthetically spun silk nanofibers and a process for making the same
• 6263744 – July 24, 2001 – Automated mobility-classified-aerosol detector
• 6281972 – August 28, 2001 – Method and apparatus for measuring particle-size distribution
• 20030085296 – November 2, 2001 – Hurricane and tornado control device
• 6315213 – November 13, 2001 – Method of modifying weather
• 6382526 – May 7, 2002 – Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers
• 6408704 – June 25, 2002 – Aerodynamic particle size analysis method and apparatus
• 6412416 – July 2, 2002 – Propellant-based aerosol generation devices and method
• 6520425 – February 18, 2003 – Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers
• 6539812 – April 1, 2003 – System for measuring the flow-rate of a gas by means of ultrasound
• 6553849 – April 29, 2003 – Electrodynamic particle size analyzer
• 6569393 – May 27, 2003 – Method And Device For Cleaning The Atmosphere
• 0056705 A1 – March 17, 2005 – Weather Modification by Royal Rainmaking Technology
• 6890497 – May 10, 2005 – Method For Extracting And Sequestering Carbon Dioxide
• 2446250 – January 4, 2007 – A dust or particle-based solar shield to counteract global warming
• 7965488 – November 9, 2007 – Methods Of Removing Aerosols From The Atmosphere
• 8048309 – August 28, 2008 – Seawater-Based Carbon Dioxide Disposal
• 20100072297 – September 24, 2008 – Method for controlling hurricanes
• 8012453 – October 27, 2008 – Carbon Sequestration And Production Of Hydrogen And Hydride
• 7645326 – January 12, 2010 – RFID environmental manipulation
• 7655193 – February 2, 2010 – Apparatus For Extracting And Sequestering Carbon Dioxide
• 8079545 – December 20, 2011 – Ground based Manipulation and Control of Aerial Vehicle during nonflying operations
• 0117003 – October 5, 2012 – Geoengineering Method Of Business Using Carbon Counterbalance Credits – alternate link
• 8373962 – February 12, 2013 – Charged seed cloud as a method for increasing particle collisions and for scavenging airborne biological agents and other contaminants

HAARP - details and its capabilities from the main HAARP patent (4,686,605):
1) Can lift a portion of the atmosphere: "excitation of electron cyclotron resonance is sufficient to
cause movement of a plasma region along said diverging magnetic field lines to an altitude higher
than the altitude at which said excitation was initiated"
2) Move portions of the atmosphere: "rising plasma region pulls with it a substantial portion of neutral
particles of the atmosphere which exist in or near said plasma region"
3) Causes energy waves in the ionosphere: "second radiation excites plasma waves within
ionosphere "
4) Alters selected regions of the atmosphere: "This invention relates to a method and apparatus for
altering at least one selected region normally existing above the earth's surface and more particularly
relates to a method and apparatus for altering said at least one region by initially transmitting
electromagnetic radiation from the earth's surface essentially parallel to and along naturally-occurring,
divergent magnetic field lines which extend from the earth's surface through the region or regions to
be altered"
5) HAARP uses barium as part of its wave-carrying plasma: "It has also been proposed to release
large clouds of barium in the magnetosphere so that photoionization will increase the cold plasma
density, thereby producing electron precipitation through enhanced whistler-mode interactions"
6) Charges or ionizes regions of particles in the atmosphere: "Sufficient energy is employed to cause
ionization of neutral particles (molecules of oxygen, nitrogen and the like, particulates, etc.) which
then become a part of the region thereby increasing the charged particle density of the region. This
effect can further be enhanced by providing artificial particles, e.g., electrons, ions, etc., directly into
the region to be affected from a rocket, satellite, or the like to supplement the particles in the
naturally-occurring plasma. These artificial particles are also ionized by the transmitted
electromagnetic radiation thereby increasing charged particle density of the resulting plasma in the
7) Causes oscillation (pulses) of energy at specific locations in the atmosphere: "Sufficient power can
be applied so that the altered plasma can be trapped on the field line between mirror points and will
oscillate in space for prolonged periods of time. By this embodiment, a plume of altered plasma can
be established at selected locations for communication modification or other purposes"
8) Propagates selected frequency waves throughout the ionosphere: "The amplitude of the frequency
of the main beam and/or the second beam or beams is modulated in resonance with at least one
known oscillation mode in the selected region or regions to excite the known oscillation mode to
propagate a known frequency wave or waves throughout the ionosphere"
9) Can be used to interfere with, or enhance, communications: "this invention provides the ability to
put unprecedented amounts of power in the earth's atmosphere at strategic locations and to maintain
the power injection level, particularly if random pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise and
better controlled than heretofore accomplished by the prior art, particularly by the detonation of
nuclear devices of various yeilds at various altitudes....Thus, it can be seen that the disrupting effects
achievable by this invention can be employed to benefit by the party who is practicing this invention
since knowledge of the various electromagnetic waves being employed and how they will vary in
frequency and magnitude can be used to an advantage for positive communication and
eavesdropping purposes at the same time"
10) Weather modification: "Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper
atmosphere wind patterns or altering solar absorption patterns by constructing one or more plumes of
atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device"
11) Can change the molecular structure of locations in the atmosphere: "Molecular modifications of
the atmosphere can take place so that positive environmental effects can be achieved. Besides
actually changing the molecular composition of an atmospheric region, a particular molecule or
molecules can be chosen for increased presence. For example, ozone, nitrogen, etc. concentrations
in the atmosphere could be artificially increased. Similarly, environmental enhancement could be
achieved by causing the breakup of various chemical entities such as carbon dioxide, carbon
monoxide, nitrous oxides, and the like"
12) Transportation of material across the atmosphere: "Transportation of entities can also be realized
when advantage is taken of the drag effects caused by regions of the atmosphere moving up along
diverging field lines. Small micron sized particles can be then transported, and, under certain
circumstances and with the availability of sufficient energy, larger particles or objects could be
similarly affected. Particles with desired characteristics such as tackiness, reflectivity, absorptivity,
etc., can be transported for specific purposes or effects"
13) The earth's magnetic field can be disrupted: "The earth's magnetic field could be decreased or
disrupted at appropriate altitudes to modify or eliminate the magnetic field in high Compton electron
generation regions.
14) Electrical fields can be created in the atmosphere: "High intensity, well controlled electrical fields
can be provided in selected locations for various purposes"
HAARP - details of its capabilities from its inventor, Dr. Bernard Eastlund:
1) Telecommunications - mobile phones, Long haul communication
2) Atmospheric Heating - Controlled heating of specific atmospheric regions, Controlling electrical
conductivity of atmosphere
3) Weather Research - Modification of steering winds, Modification of electrical patterns, Generation
of acoustic and gravitational waves
4) Weather Research Applications - Heating of steering winds in mesocyclones and hurricanes,
Modification of electrical patterns in mesocyclones, Generation of acoustic and gravitational waves
(gravity waves can produce severe weather, and transfer energy which results in unstable cloud
layers and weather behavior)
5) Applications discussed in the patents included destroying missiles, communications control and
disruption, to modify weather, and to lift a portion of the upper atmosphere further out into space,
where hopefully it would be able to deflect missile trajectories
Patents related to HAARP technology:
- US Patent 4999637 - Creation of artificial ionization clouds above the earth:
- US Patent 4712155 - Method and apparatus for creating an artificial electron cyclotron heating
region of plasma:
- US Patent 5777476 - Ground global tomography (CGT) using modulation of the ionospheric
- US Patent 5068669 - Power beaming system:
- US Patent 5041834 - Artificial ionospheric mirror composed of a plasma layer which can be tilted:

Link to this

Susan left an annotation ()

Spencer Jones (to whom many thanks are due for going to the trouble of looking up these patents) asks "why is it so hard for people to believe this or for Government Departments to answer openly and honestly "

Possible answers to this two-part question are: 1. It is so hard for people to believe this because the mainstream media and online 'fact-checkers' have fallen in love with the words "misinformation" and "conspiracy theory" and deploy these ad nauseam to hide whatever facts they've been told to hide. Which is why nobody trusts the legacy media any more.
2. Perhaps it is so hard for Government Departments to answer openly and honestly because they actually ARE involved in covert actions they feel the need to hide from the public. For example, they might be trying to avert what they have convinced themselves (and a surprising number of the public, again thanks to the mainstream media) is our current "climate crisis" by generating enough cloud cover to deflect sunlight back into space and thereby cool the planet. Or, for example in the case of the Australian HAARP installations south of Longreach in Queensland and east of Sandstone in WA : ( -- if you look up the coordinates supplied, these installations can be seen quite openly on Google Earth) they might be trying to make it rain in the Australian desert. Or alternatively, of course, they might be trying to do things so utterly stupid that these simply cannot be revealed.

Whatever the case, the observable fact that government departments do refuse to provide open and honest answers to legitimate questions is a transparent explanation of the sad fact that fewer and fewer people trust their national governments. Which, in turn, is (supposed by some to be) a jolly good reason for instituting an even LESS democratically accountable World Government, run by a totally unelected elite. Which is why the simple questions asked by Spencer Jones MAY NOT BE ASKED.

If any of the above speculations or suggested answers is incorrect, the government knows exactly what to do about it. Stop calling people "conspiracy theorists", skip the weasel words and simply tell us the truth.

Link to this

SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()

Continuation of my above annotation showing the patents relating to HAARP. The general public are unaware of HAARP and many other program/projects as they have previously been hidden behind Patent applications Under the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 Patent Security.

Open-source intelligence (OSINT) the practice of collecting information from published or otherwise publicly available sources. Below is more information to support the Patents previously listed showing more peer review and published information on the subject of HAARP.

1. 29 Dec 1997; US Airforce Research Paper - Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025.
Abstract : “In 2025, US aerospace forces can 'own the weather' by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map. A high risk, high reward endeavor, weather modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather modification offers the war fighter a wide range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. Some of the potential capabilities a weather modification system could provide to a war fighting commander in chief (CINC) are listed in table 1. Technology advancements in five major areas are necessary for an integrated weather modification capability: (1) advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, (2) computational capability, (3) information gathering and transmission, (4) a global sensor array, and (5) weather intervention techniques. Some intervention tools exist today and others may be developed and refined in the future.”

2. European Parliament Brief; Background information : 09-Feb-1998. The HAARP Project and non-lethal weapons. Experts alarmed - public debate needed.

3. 14 January 1999 European Parliament report; A4-0005/99 on the environment, security and foreign policy Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defence Policy.

4. 5 May 2008; Weather as a Force Multiplier - Washington, DC The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
May 5, 2008 - That class of weapons includes the 'weather weapons'. ... responses during non-lethal warfare projects.68 HAARP frequencies ... include: U.S. Army Training Manual STP-21-1-SMCT: Soldiers Manual of Common Tasks

5. Book - Angels Don't Play this HAARP, Advances in Tesla Technology. By Nick Begich, Jeane Manning 1995.

6. Book - HAARP The Ultimate Weapon of the Conspiracy. By Jerry E. Smith 1998.

7. Chemtrails, HAARP, and the Full Spectrum Dominance of Planet Earth. By Elana Freeland 2014.

8. Under an Ionized Sky From Chemtrails to Space Fence Lockdown. By Elana Freeland.

9. HAARP: TESLA TECHNOLOGY PLUS. 7th September 2019.
The High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project, also called HAARP is a disturbing program being conducted by the U.S. Military and the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Many of the concepts employed for the functions of HAARP come from the writings of Nikola Tesla. Some of the intended uses of HAARP come directly from hell. Tesla's intention was to advance science and technology to free man to pursue more intellectual endeavours. One of the intended uses may be the control of the minds of the public. Basically, HAARP is a device which beams super-powerful radio waves to the ionosphere, heating those areas, thereby lifting them. The electromagnetic waves bounce back to the earth and penetrate everything, even a person. Some of the planned uses of this technology: 1. A military tool to replace the electromagnetic pulse effect of thermonuclear devices; 2. To replace the extremely low frequency (ELF) communications network system; 3. To replace the over-the-horizon radar system; 4. To provide a wide area of earth penetrating tomography;

10. High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) - Space Weather Effects with the Flip of a Switch.
Two National Research Council Studies Involving HAARP -
2013 Decadal Survey in Solar and Space Physics - Priority - Fully realize the potential of ionospheric modification techniques through collocation of modern heating facilities with a full complement of diagnostic instruments including incoherent scatter radars. This effort requires coordination between NSF and DOD agencies in planning and operation of existing and future ionospheric modification facilities
Mar 2013 - Workshop: Opportunities for High-Power, High-Frequency Transmitters to Advance Ionospheric/Thermospheric Research
- NRC Workshops do not provide recommendations but report contains 72 pages of HAARP science
- Themes: Geospace and space weather; Stimulated emission and radiation belts; radio science, communications, and radar
- Strong recommendation to co-locate incoherent scatter radar.

11. HAARP, Research and Applications - A Joint Program of the Air Force Research Laboratory and the Office of the Naval Research by D Papadopoulos - ‎1990HAARP, Research and Applications - A Joint Program of the Air Force Research Laboratory and the Office of the Naval Research by D Papadopoulos - ‎1990. This report describes and documents the scientific uses and the wide range of applications created by the HF Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP).

The above and list of patents is just the very tip of the iceberg of information out there is you look for it.

Link to this

Susan left an annotation ()

AND now, finally, we come to the nub of the whole issue. Yet more thanks to Spencer Jones for posting undeniable evidence that militaries all over the world seriously believe that they can use HAARP to conduct their covert warfare operations -- and very possibly have already done so. This technology truly is the modern atom bomb. Its uncontrolled use truly is utterly stupid.

Humanity NEEDS to have an open public discussion of this issue. In which regard, it is now long past time for 'the fourth estate' to remember their responsibilities and purpose.

Link to this

anna left an annotation ()

If this information is not "held" by the MInistry of Defence we must ask which branch of the NZ government "holds" this information? My bet would be the "Ministry of Business innovation and employment" as most functions of government (selling out the people for corporate profit) seem to fall under this category.

Link to this

Susan left an annotation ()

Good question, Anna. How about The Office of the Prime Minister?

Link to this

R S Grant left an annotation ()

Or, just maybe, all these agencies say that they don’t have information on the subject because it is an absolutely bonkers conspiracy theory with no factual basis whatsoever. Just a small possibility perhaps.

Link to this

Susan left an annotation ()

RS Grant rolls out the tired old "conspiracy theory" phrase to dismiss this inquiry. But it is a verifiable fact that HAARP installations exist -- originally just in Alaska and now all over the world. They are clearly man-made, not 'natural' phenomena, which makes it entirely valid to ask WHY they exist. They clearly COULD have been involved in the extreme weather events currently being explained as resulting from "climate change". So the fact that all requests for information on how NZ is involved with HAARP are being batted away by officialdom is at least somewhat disturbing.

Link to this

SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()

Re: RS Grant’s annotation "conspiracy theory" phrase. To help you understand how unintelligent, ignorant, simple minded, subservient your statement is, my personal knowledge and understanding comes from the following.

I’m fifth generation Military Service family, I personally have served both in the British Army (28 years) and NZDF Army (7 years), I’m also ex Freemason. I have seen, I have met, i have worked alongside covert operations teams, I have discussed with those who worked on such projects and programs.

I have come come across much information in my service life that made me question everything I was told (Perception Management (PM) Perception management is a term originated by the US military. The US Department of Defense gives this definition: Actions to convey and/or deny selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to influence their emotions, motives, and objective reasoning as well as to intelligence systems and leaders at all levels to influence official estimates, ultimately resulting in foreign behaviours and official actions favourable to the originator's objectives.

I can assure you there is and has been far more going on in this world than you can truly comprehend. Cognitive dissonance is what’s occurring to many people as they are presented with the truth. Cognitive dissonance is the mental discomfort that results from holding two conflicting beliefs, values, or attitudes. People tend to seek consistency in their attitudes and perceptions, so this conflict causes unpleasant feelings of unease or discomfort.

The inconsistency between what people believe and how they behave motivates them to engage in actions that will help minimize feelings of discomfort. People attempt to relieve this tension in different ways, such as by rejecting, explaining away, or avoiding new information.

It’s time to wake up to what’s truly been going on around us all. The use of the term conspiracy theory demonstrates people’s lack of understanding and how much perception management has played apart of their daily lives.

Further proof of perception management carried out around the world is Operation Mockingbird a large-scale program of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that began in the early years of the Cold War and attempted to manipulate domestic American news media organisations for propaganda purposes. This program is still running today through all media channels worldwide.

Link to this

SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()

Further proof for those still not wanting to accept or acknowledge this technology (Cognitive Dissonance) It’s hidden in plain sight, it’s even taught at universities.

2024 Polar Aeronomy & Radio Science (PARS) Summer School Announced.

The 2024 Polar Aeronomy and Radio Science (PARS) summer school will be held in person at the University of Alaska Fairbanks and the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) between August 6-15, 2024. The summer school provides faculty, graduate, and advanced undergraduate students with exposure to the National Science Foundation (NSF) Subauroral Geophysical Observatory (SAGO) for Space Physics and Radio Science and the HAARP research site in Gakona, Alaska.

The summer school’s goal is to provide student and advisor mentor pairs an opportunity to study the upper atmosphere and ionosphere at polar latitudes, with practical experience built into the learning process. The first week will be spent in the Fairbanks area with lectures and tours of space physics research sites, then relocating to HAARP to run active experiments and brief initial results. Students will be trained in the theory and concepts of ionospheric heating, with an introduction to Ionospheric Research Instrument (IRI) experiment design, diagnostics, and analysis. All students will have the opportunity to dialogue one-on-one with experienced scientists from multiple U.S. academic institutions. This year’s school will focus on Illuminating Space using Ground HF and VLF Receivers, Oblique Ionosonde Transmitters, HF Receivers on Satellites, Digital Ionosonde, Satellite Beacons, etc. sponsored and operated by NASA, NSF, CSA, etc.

The application form may be accessed at: Please provide the following information in your application:

Link to this

SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()

Further acknowledgement and proof of its existence. Has been presented in various news articles.

FAA issues a flight advisory about electromagnetic radiation over its location in Gulkana, Alaska.

Link to this

SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()

Australian Chief Scientist - Occasional Paper Series Issue 1: Geoengineering. Thursday, 05 April 2012

The Office of the Chief Scientist has launched the first report in its Occasional Paper Series, examining the risks and benefits of geoengineering to mitigate the effects of climate change. You can download a copy of the PDF by clicking here.

Reference list:

1 Lacis, A. A., et al. (2010), Atmospheric CO2: Principal Control Knob Governing Earth’s Temperature, Science, 330(6002), 356-359, doi: 10.1126/science.1190653.

2 Le Quéré, C., et al. (2009), Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide, Nature Geoscience, 2, 831-836, doi: 10.1038/ngeo689.

3 Peters, G. P., et al. (2012), Rapid growth in CO2 emissions after the 2008-2009 global financial crisis, Nature Climate Change, 2, 2-4, doi: 10.1038/nclimate1332.

4 Huber, M., and R. Knutti (2012), Anthropogenic and natural warming inferred from changes in Earth’s energy balance, Nature Geoscience, 5, 31-36, doi: 10.1038/ngeo1327.

5 Howard, W. R., et al. (2008), CO2 Emissions and Climate Change: Ocean Impacts and Adaptation Issues, 15 pp, Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre,Hobart,Tasmania.

6 Siegenthaler, U., et al. (2005), Stable Carbon Cycle-Climate Relationship During the Late Pleistocene, Science, 310(5752), 1313-1317, doi: 10.1126/science.1120130.

7 e.g. Rockstrom, J., et al. (2009), A safe operating space for humanity, Nature, 461(7263), 472-475, doi: 10.1038/461472a.

8 Task Force on Climate Remediation Research (2011), Geoengineering: A National Strategic Plan for Research on the Potential Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Consequences of Climate Remediation Technologies, 33 pp,Bipartisan Policy Center, Washington, DC.

9 Royal Society (2009), Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty,London: Science Policy Centre of The Royal Society, 98 pp.,

10 Boyd, P. W. (2008), Ranking geo-engineering schemes, Nature Geosci, 1(11), 722-724, doi: 10.1038/ngeo348.

11 Read, D., et al. (2001), The role of land carbon sinks in mitigating global climate change, 27 pp, Royal Society,London.

12 Archer, D., et al. (2009), Atmospheric lifetime of fossil fuel carbon dioxide, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 37(1), 117-134, doi: 10.1146/

13 Chisholm, S. W. (2000), Oceanography: Stirring times in the Southern Ocean, Nature, 407(6805), 685-687, doi: 10.1038/35037696.

14 Boyd, P. W. (2008), Implications of large-scale iron fertilization of the oceans, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 364, 213-218, doi: 10.3354/meps07541.

15 Buesseler, K. O., et al. (2008), Ocean Iron Fertilization–Moving Forward in a Sea of Uncertainty, Science, 319(5860), 162, doi: 10.1126/science.1154305.

16 Wallace, D., et al. (2010), Ocean Fertilization: A Scientific Summary for Policy Makers, IOC/UNESCO,Paris.

17 Boyd, P. W. (2002), Environmental factors controlling phytoplankton processes in the Southern Ocean, Journal of Phycology, 38(5), 844-861, doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2002.t01-1-01203.x.

18 Boyd, P. W., et al. (2007), Mesoscale Iron Enrichment Experiments 1993-2005: Synthesis and Future Directions, Science, 315(5812), 612-617, doi: 10.1126/science.1131669.

19 Gnanadesikan, A., and I. Marinov (2008), Export is not enough: nutrient cycling and carbon sequestration, Marine Ecology Progress Series, 364, 289-294, doi: 10.3354/meps07550.

20 Peng, T.-H., and W. S. Broecker (1991), Dynamical limitations on the Antarctic iron fertilization strategy, Nature 349, 227-229, doi: 10.1038/349227a0

21 Matear, R. J., and B. Elliott (2004), Enhancement of oceanic uptake of anthropogenic CO2 by macronutrient fertilization, Journal of Geophysical Research, 109(C4), C04001, doi: 10.1029/2000jc000321.

22 Lampitt, R. S., et al. (2008), Ocean fertilization: a potential means of geoengineering?, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1882), 3919-3945, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0139.

23 Kirchner, I., et al. (1999), Climate model simulation of winter warming and summer cooling following the 1991 Mount Pinatubo volcanic eruption, J. Geophys. Res., 104(D16), 19039-19055, doi: 10.1029/1999jd900213.

24 Crutzen, P. (2006), Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma?, Climatic Change, 77(3), 211-220, doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9101-y.

25 Morton, O. (2007), Climate change: Is this what it takes to save the world?, Nature, 447(7141), 132-136, doi: 10.1038/447132a.

26 The “SPICE” Project is a UK feasibility study funded by the NERC:

27 Trenberth, K. E., and A. Dai (2007), Effects of Mount Pinatubo volcanic eruption on the hydrological cycle as an analog of geoengineering, Geophysical Research Letters, 34(15), doi: 10.1029/2007gl030524.

28 Andreae, M. O., et al. (2005), Strong present-day aerosol cooling implies a hot future, Nature, 435(7046), 1187-1190, doi: 10.1038/nature03671.

29 Kravitz, B., et al. (2009), Sulfuric acid deposition from stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate aerosols, J. Geophys. Res., 114(D14), D14109, doi: 10.1029/2009jd011918.

30 Robock, A., et al. (2009), Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering, Geophysical Research Letters, 36(19), L19703, doi: 10.1029/2009gl039209.

31Conference of the Parties (2010), Decision X/33: Biodiversity and climate change, 9 pp, United Nations Environment Program Convention on Biological Diversity,Nagoya.

32 Resolution on developing a common EU position ahead of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20), 20/9/2011,

33 Resolution LC-LP.1 (2008) on the Regulation of Ocean Fertilization, International Maritime Organisation,London.
Last updated: Tuesday, 03 May 2022

Link to this

SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()

The Black Vault - Weather / Weather Modification Search
A Summary of the U.S. Navy Program and FY 1967 Progress in Weather Modification and Control, 1967
Research in support of the NWC weather modification program; Progress in engineering weather modification experiments by computer modelling; Project STORMFURY operations-1967; Flight studies of glaciation in clouds at -4 to -6C; Office of Naval Research program in weather modification.
Document Archive
A Summary of the U.S. Navy Program and FY 1967 Progress in Weather Modification and Control, 1967 [19 Pages, 2.6MB]

Link to this

SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()

AIR UNIVERSITY. Operational Defenses through Weather Control in 2030 by Michael C. Boger, Major, United States Air Force. A Research Report Submitted to the Faculty In Partial Fulfillment of the Graduation Requirements. Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama April 2009.

The United States needs to incorporate the defense against directed energy weapons with the same intensity used developing anti-ballistic missile defenses. One of the major drawbacks to optical or directed energy systems is the inability to penetrate clouds or dense fog. Advances in technology are beginning to bring weather phenomena under our control. Greatly increased computing power and micronized delivery systems will allow us to create specific perturbations
in local atmospheric conditions. These perturbations allow for the immediate and lasting ability to create localized fog or stratus cloud formations shielding critical assets against attack from
energy based weapons. The future of nanotechnology will enable creation of stratus cloud formations to defeat DEW and optically targeted attacks on United Sates assets. The solution the
weather control problem involves networked miniature balloons feeding and receiving data from a four-dimensional variation (4d-Var) computer model through a sensor and actor network. A network of diamond-walled balloons enters the area to be changed and then both measures and affects localized temperature and vapor content. This system effectively shortens the control loop of an atmospheric system to the point it can be “managed.” The capabilities in the
diamond-walled balloons are based on the future of nanotechnology.

Link to this

SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()

The 2024 Polar Aeronomy and Radio Science (PARS) summer school will be held in person at the University of Alaska Fairbanks and the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) between August 6-15, 2024. The summer school provides faculty, graduate, and advanced undergraduate students with exposure to the National Science Foundation (NSF) Subauroral Geophysical Observatory (SAGO) for Space Physics and Radio Science and the HAARP research site in Gakona, Alaska

Link to this

SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()

Let's take an important and timely moment to discuss asymmetrical warfare, and things you may not realize.

Earthquakes can be triggered by scalar electromagnetic force, as can various weather events and many other "natural" disasters.

No, this was not the product of HAARP- but rather decades of clandestine research by the DOD and CIA.

In 1997, then U.S. Defense Secretary William Cohen described it thusly: "Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves."
- in this speech he also described the pursuit of "ethnic pathogens" being researched to target specific populations - which we openly see the U.S. doing now but had clandestinely been taking place for decades.

In 2010, then Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez openly accused the United States of manufacturing the massive Haitian earthquake as a pretense for occupying the nation. At the time U.S. media smeared him as "more sci-fi than stable"; but looking back perhaps your opinions will have changed.

Included are archived links to both items, which are no longer accessible to the public.

(Defense Sec. Cohen Briefing)

(Chavez commentary)

To further explain, This is called "Asymetrical Scalar Force Warfare" and despite little in the way of public knowledge, is more common than you may think.

Since 1980 The CIA was sharply researching this weaponry under the guise of cold war fears. They openly discussed the Bohm-Aharonov effect and various theoretical weapons applications here:

They proceeded to research these waves under the direction of Dr. Jack Vorona:

(Scalar wave summary by Dr. Vorona)

The clandestine weapons program was known as "Project Grill Flame" and was run in conjunction with the Stanford Research Institute and knowledge of it was originally dismissed by the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency.

(Project Grill Flame)

The more we learn, we know, the more we need to keep reevaluating what our government’s have been telling us

Link to this

Susan left an annotation ()

Steve Snoopman Edwards summarises evidence on this topic in relation to recent NZ events here:

Link to this