Reason for ongoing refusal to prosecute serious violent offender

Katherine Raue made this Official Information request to New Zealand Police

Response to this request is long overdue. By law New Zealand Police should have responded by now (details and exceptions). The requester can complain to the Ombudsman.

From: Katherine Raue

Dear New Zealand Police,

On May 13th I made the an OIA request for information regarding a decision not to prosecute an offender for two serious assaults despite a witness coming forward and formal complaints laid. The request is at this link.
https://fyi.org.nz/request/1686-reason-f...

"Jamahl Glassey" responded, stating that the reason for the decision not to prosecute was that "the identity of THAT PERSON is not known." Glassey deliberately failed to specify WHICH person he is talking about - the offender or the witness.

He is lying, everyone knows who the offender is, and the identity of the witness is known to the journalist who printed the 'story' in the newspaper as well as the Police because the witness went to the Police as well as the local paper.

Please read the request and the responses at the link above and then respond to the request properly! WHOSE identity is Glassey falsely stating is unknown?

The offenders identity is RONALD CHARLES PEACOCK - a recidivist violent offender - as you know PERFECTLY WELL! The whole community believes that he deliberately torched two houses as well! As this front page news report proves:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/articl...

Yours faithfully,

Katherine Raue

Link to this

New Zealand Police

Dear Katherine,

Thank you for your email.
I ahve forwarded your email to the team that manages OIA requests.

Kind regards,

PUBLIC AFFAIRS TEAM
NZ POLICE
JC

-----Katherine Raue <[OIA #1797 email]> wrote:
-----

To: OIA requests at New Zealand Police <[New Zealand Police request email]>
From: Katherine Raue <[OIA #1797 email]>
Date: 09/07/2014 02:45AM
Subject: Official Information Act request - Reason for ongoing refusal
to prosecute serious violent offender

Dear New Zealand Police,

On May 13th I made the an OIA request for information regarding a
decision not to prosecute an offender for two serious assaults despite a
witness coming forward and formal complaints laid.  The request is at
this link.
[1]https://fyi.org.nz/request/1686-reason-f...

"Jamahl Glassey" responded, stating that the reason for the decision not
to prosecute was that "the identity of THAT PERSON is not known."
 Glassey deliberately failed to specify WHICH person he is talking about
- the offender or the witness.  

He is lying, everyone knows who the offender is, and the identity of the
witness is known to the journalist who printed the 'story' in the
newspaper as well as the Police because the witness went to the Police
as well as the local paper.

Please read the request and the responses at the link above and then
respond to the request properly!  WHOSE identity is Glassey falsely
stating is unknown?

The offenders identity is RONALD CHARLES PEACOCK - a recidivist violent
offender - as you know PERFECTLY WELL!  The whole community believes
that he deliberately torched two houses as well!  As this front page
news report proves:
[2]http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/articl...

Yours faithfully,

Katherine Raue

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an OIA request done via the FYI website.

Please do not send progress updates as PDF files.

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published
on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[3]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

If you find this service useful as an OIA officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

===============================================================

WARNING

The information contained in this email message is intended for the
addressee only and may contain privileged information. It may also be
subject to the provisions of section 50 of the Policing Act 2008, which
creates an offence to have unlawful possession of Police property. If you
are not the intended recipient of this message or have received this
message in error, you must not peruse, use, distribute or copy this
message or any of its contents.

Also note, the views expressed in this message may not necessarily reflect
those of the New Zealand Police. If you have received this message in
error, please email or telephone the sender immediately

References

Visible links
1. https://fyi.org.nz/request/1686-reason-f...
2. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/articl...
3. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

hide quoted sections

Link to this

From: Katherine Raue

Dear New Zealand Police,

This request was made on May 13th and is now WELL OVERDUE! This is a formal complaint - Glassey's response is further evidence of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice - please forward it to the IPCA accordingly.

Yours faithfully,

Katherine Raue

Link to this

From: Katherine Raue

Dear New Zealand Police,

This is a FORMAL COMPLAINT regarding the refusal to prosecute and the refusal to respond to the information request - there is clearly enough evidence to prosecute according to the Solicitor General's guidelines and the ongoing refusal to do so is BLATANT CORRUPTION!

Yours faithfully,

Katherine Raue

Link to this

New Zealand Police

Dear Katherine,

Thank you for your email. I have passed this on to the relevant team to
process as a formal complaint.

Kind regards,

PUBLIC AFFAIRS TEAM
NZ POLICE

A S-B
-----Katherine Raue <[OIA #1797 email]> wrote:
-----

To: <[New Zealand Police request email]>
From: Katherine Raue <[OIA #1797 email]>
Date: 10/08/2014 01:27AM
Subject: Re: Official Information Act request - Reason for ongoing
refusal to prosecute serious violent offender

Dear New Zealand Police,

This is a FORMAL COMPLAINT regarding the refusal to prosecute and the
refusal to respond to the information request - there is clearly enough
evidence to prosecute according to the Solicitor General's guidelines
and the ongoing refusal to do so is BLATANT CORRUPTION!

Yours faithfully,

Katherine Raue

-----Original Message-----

Dear Katherine,

 Thank you for your email.
 I ahve forwarded your email to the team that manages OIA requests.

 Kind regards,

 PUBLIC AFFAIRS TEAM
 NZ POLICE
 JC

 -----Katherine Raue <[OIA #1797 email]> wrote:
 -----

 To: OIA requests at New Zealand Police <[New Zealand Police request
email]>
 From: Katherine Raue <[OIA #1797 email]>
 Date: 09/07/2014 02:45AM
 Subject: Official Information Act request - Reason for ongoing refusal
 to prosecute serious violent offender

 Dear New Zealand Police,

 On May 13th I made the an OIA request for information regarding a
 decision not to prosecute an offender for two serious assaults despite
a
 witness coming forward and formal complaints laid.  The request is at
 this link.
 [1][1]https://fyi.org.nz/request/1686-reason-f...

 "Jamahl Glassey" responded, stating that the reason for the decision
not
 to prosecute was that "the identity of THAT PERSON is not known."
  Glassey deliberately failed to specify WHICH person he is talking
about
 - the offender or the witness.  

 He is lying, everyone knows who the offender is, and the identity of
the
 witness is known to the journalist who printed the 'story' in the
 newspaper as well as the Police because the witness went to the Police
 as well as the local paper.

 Please read the request and the responses at the link above and then
 respond to the request properly!  WHOSE identity is Glassey falsely
 stating is unknown?

 The offenders identity is RONALD CHARLES PEACOCK - a recidivist violent
 offender - as you know PERFECTLY WELL!  The whole community believes
 that he deliberately torched two houses as well!  As this front page
 news report proves:
 [2][2]http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/articl...

 Yours faithfully,

 Katherine Raue

 -------------------------------------------------------------------

 This is an OIA request done via the FYI website.

 Please do not send progress updates as PDF files.

 Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published
 on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
 [3][3]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

 If you find this service useful as an OIA officer, please ask your web
 manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[OIA #1797 email]

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published
on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[4]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

If you find this service useful as an OIA officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

===============================================================

WARNING

The information contained in this email message is intended for the
addressee only and may contain privileged information. It may also be
subject to the provisions of section 50 of the Policing Act 2008, which
creates an offence to have unlawful possession of Police property. If you
are not the intended recipient of this message or have received this
message in error, you must not peruse, use, distribute or copy this
message or any of its contents.

Also note, the views expressed in this message may not necessarily reflect
those of the New Zealand Police. If you have received this message in
error, please email or telephone the sender immediately

References

Visible links
1. https://fyi.org.nz/request/1686-reason-f...
2. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/articl...
3. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
4. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

hide quoted sections

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
New Zealand Police only: