Reason for ongoing refusal to prosecute serious violent offender
Katherine Raue made this Official Information request to New Zealand Police
Response to this request is long overdue. By law New Zealand Police should have responded by now (details and exceptions). The requester can complain to the Ombudsman.
From: Katherine Raue
Dear New Zealand Police,
On May 13th I made the an OIA request for information regarding a decision not to prosecute an offender for two serious assaults despite a witness coming forward and formal complaints laid. The request is at this link.
https://fyi.org.nz/request/1686-reason-f...
"Jamahl Glassey" responded, stating that the reason for the decision not to prosecute was that "the identity of THAT PERSON is not known." Glassey deliberately failed to specify WHICH person he is talking about - the offender or the witness.
He is lying, everyone knows who the offender is, and the identity of the witness is known to the journalist who printed the 'story' in the newspaper as well as the Police because the witness went to the Police as well as the local paper.
Please read the request and the responses at the link above and then respond to the request properly! WHOSE identity is Glassey falsely stating is unknown?
The offenders identity is RONALD CHARLES PEACOCK - a recidivist violent offender - as you know PERFECTLY WELL! The whole community believes that he deliberately torched two houses as well! As this front page news report proves:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/articl...
Yours faithfully,
Katherine Raue
New Zealand Police
Dear Katherine,
Thank you for your email.
I ahve forwarded your email to the team that manages OIA requests.
Kind regards,
PUBLIC AFFAIRS TEAM
NZ POLICE
JC
-----Katherine Raue <[OIA #1797 email]> wrote:
-----
To: OIA requests at New Zealand Police <[New Zealand Police request email]>
From: Katherine Raue <[OIA #1797 email]>
Date: 09/07/2014 02:45AM
Subject: Official Information Act request - Reason for ongoing refusal
to prosecute serious violent offender
Dear New Zealand Police,
On May 13th I made the an OIA request for information regarding a
decision not to prosecute an offender for two serious assaults despite a
witness coming forward and formal complaints laid. The request is at
this link.
[1]https://fyi.org.nz/request/1686-reason-f...
"Jamahl Glassey" responded, stating that the reason for the decision not
to prosecute was that "the identity of THAT PERSON is not known."
Glassey deliberately failed to specify WHICH person he is talking about
- the offender or the witness.
He is lying, everyone knows who the offender is, and the identity of the
witness is known to the journalist who printed the 'story' in the
newspaper as well as the Police because the witness went to the Police
as well as the local paper.
Please read the request and the responses at the link above and then
respond to the request properly! WHOSE identity is Glassey falsely
stating is unknown?
The offenders identity is RONALD CHARLES PEACOCK - a recidivist violent
offender - as you know PERFECTLY WELL! The whole community believes
that he deliberately torched two houses as well! As this front page
news report proves:
[2]http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/articl...
Yours faithfully,
Katherine Raue
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an OIA request done via the FYI website.
Please do not send progress updates as PDF files.
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published
on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[3]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an OIA officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA page.
show quoted sections
From: Katherine Raue
Dear New Zealand Police,
This request was made on May 13th and is now WELL OVERDUE! This is a formal complaint - Glassey's response is further evidence of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice - please forward it to the IPCA accordingly.
Yours faithfully,
Katherine Raue
From: Katherine Raue
Dear New Zealand Police,
This is a FORMAL COMPLAINT regarding the refusal to prosecute and the refusal to respond to the information request - there is clearly enough evidence to prosecute according to the Solicitor General's guidelines and the ongoing refusal to do so is BLATANT CORRUPTION!
Yours faithfully,
Katherine Raue
New Zealand Police
Dear Katherine,
Thank you for your email. I have passed this on to the relevant team to
process as a formal complaint.
Kind regards,
PUBLIC AFFAIRS TEAM
NZ POLICE
A S-B
-----Katherine Raue <[OIA #1797 email]> wrote:
-----
To: <[New Zealand Police request email]>
From: Katherine Raue <[OIA #1797 email]>
Date: 10/08/2014 01:27AM
Subject: Re: Official Information Act request - Reason for ongoing
refusal to prosecute serious violent offender
Dear New Zealand Police,
This is a FORMAL COMPLAINT regarding the refusal to prosecute and the
refusal to respond to the information request - there is clearly enough
evidence to prosecute according to the Solicitor General's guidelines
and the ongoing refusal to do so is BLATANT CORRUPTION!
Yours faithfully,
Katherine Raue
show quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence