Legal spending on Monte Cecilia Park dog access issue
Harry made this Official Information request to Auckland Council
This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for Harry to read a recent response and update the status.
From: Harry
Dear Auckland Council,
As a constituent, park user and ratepayer, I have been paying close attention to the ongoing story of some members of Puketāpapa Local Board attempting to outlaw offleash dog access at Monte Cecilia Park despite staff advice from multiple teams and despite a strong negative response to the proposal in public submissions.
This issue has now been taken to the High Court for judicial review, precipitating at least a thirty minute confidential legally privileged session at the local board’s 24 July workshop.
This is inevitably generating work for the council’s legal team, if not external experts and law firms as well.
As a ratepayer I am concerned that in this highly constrained financial environment these local board members are not only overstepping their powers and derelict in their duty to the views of their constituents, but are also wasting rates funding on this pointless and frivolous personal crusade.
It is an election year, and information on this flagrant mismanagement of public funding by specific local board members is important electoral information.
Please enumerate for me:
- How much time has been spent on this issue by the council’s legal team—rough estimates to the nearest couple of hours are acceptable.
- What’s the approximate average salary of the legal team either overall or working on this matter.
- How much has been spent on external input on this matter whether on legal advice or other consultation.
I understand that some of this information may be considered privileged, please feel free to exclude what is necessary. The average salary of your legal team for instance will not be.
Yours faithfully,
Harry
From: Official Information
Auckland Council
Kia ora Harry,
Thank you for your request for information about Legal spending on Monte
Cecilia Park.
We have attached an information sheet on our processes and requirements
under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.
We will respond to your request as soon as possible and in any event no
later than 20 working days after the day your request was received. This
will be by 20.08.25
If you have further questions, please feel free to contact Fernanda
Maciel via reply email to [1][Auckland Council request email]
quoting reference above.
Ngā mihi,
The Privacy and LGOIMA team
Auckland Council
From: Harry <[FOI #31721 email]>
Sent: Wednesday, 23 July 2025 4:22 pm
To: Official Information <[email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - Legal spending on Monte Cecilia
Park dog access issue
Dear Auckland Council,
As a constituent, park user and ratepayer, I have been paying close
attention to the ongoing story of some members of Puketāpapa Local Board
attempting to outlaw offleash dog access at Monte Cecilia Park despite
staff advice from multiple teams and despite a strong negative response to
the proposal in public submissions.
This issue has now been taken to the High Court for judicial review,
precipitating at least a thirty minute confidential legally privileged
session at the local board’s 24 July workshop.
This is inevitably generating work for the council’s legal team, if not
external experts and law firms as well.
As a ratepayer I am concerned that in this highly constrained financial
environment these local board members are not only overstepping their
powers and derelict in their duty to the views of their constituents, but
are also wasting rates funding on this pointless and frivolous personal
crusade.
It is an election year, and information on this flagrant mismanagement of
public funding by specific local board members is important electoral
information.
Please enumerate for me:
- How much time has been spent on this issue by the council’s legal
team—rough estimates to the nearest couple of hours are acceptable.
- What’s the approximate average salary of the legal team either overall
or working on this matter.
- How much has been spent on external input on this matter whether on
legal advice or other consultation.
I understand that some of this information may be considered privileged,
please feel free to exclude what is necessary. The average salary of your
legal team for instance will not be.
Yours faithfully,
Harry
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[2][FOI #31721 email]
Is [3][Auckland Council request email] the wrong address for
Official Information requests to Auckland Council? If so, please contact
us using this form:
[4]https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[5]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.
show quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence