We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Editor please sign in and let everyone know.

MRCagney's contracts, work, and specific email correspondence

Editor made this Official Information request to Auckland Transport

This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for Editor to read recent responses and update the status.

From: Editor

To whom it may concern at Auckland Transport,

1. How much was paid to MRCagney for the work on Auckland Transport’s 'Urban Street and Road Design Guide'?

2. How much was paid to MRCagney for the work on Auckland Transport’s 2017 'Local Path Design Guide'?

3. Is the Auckland Transport 'Urban Street and Road Design Guide' and the Auckland 'Transport Street and Road Design Guide' the same project/document?

4. When was MRCagney first contracted to work on Auckland Transport’s 'Urban Street and Road Design Guide'?

5. Prior to 2022, did Auckland Transport have any contracts with MRCagney involving the design of raised crossing, raised platforms, and/or raised intersections?

6. Can you release any draft versions, emails and discussion notes from the development of Auckland Transport’s 'Urban Street and Road Design Guide' and 'Street and Road Design Guide' which contain the word “raised”?

7. Can you release any emails between Auckland Transport and anyone from MRCagney that contain the phrases “emergency response” and/or “Traffic Calming and Traditional Neighborhood Streets”?

8. Can you release any emails between Auckland Transport and anyone from MRCagney that contain the words “damage” and/or “delay”?

9. Did any draft versions of Auckland Transport’s 'Urban Street and Road Design Guide' and/or 'Street and Road Design Guide' contain a recommendation not to install raised raised crossings, raised platforms, raised tables, speed humps, or raised intersections on major arterial roads?

10. Did any draft versions of Auckland Transport’s 'Urban Street and Road Design Guide' and/or 'Street and Road Design Guide' contain recommendations for less steep slopes on any raised crossings, raised platforms, raised tables, or raised intersections on bus routes or emergency vehicle routes?

Sincerely,

John McDonald (Editor at CityWatch NZ)
[email address]

Link to this

From: AT Official Information (AT)
Auckland Transport


Attachment image.jpeg.jpg
4K Download


Kia ora John,
 
Auckland Transport (AT) acknowledges receipt of your request for official
information dated 18^th of August 2024 in relation to MRCagney's
contracts, work, and correspondence. 
 
We hope to respond to your request as soon as possible, but not later than
13^th of September 2024, which is 20 working days after the day your
request was received. If we aren’t able to respond to your request by
then, we will notify you of an extension of that timeframe.  
 
Your case is being managed by Varsha, who is one of our LGOIMA Business
partners. If you have any further queries, you can contact the team on
(09) 355 3553 during business hours, quoting Local Government Official
Information request number CAS-962713-M0H7M7. 

Ngâ mihi,
 
Maria | Customer Care Coordinator 
Customer Care| Case Management 
20 Viaduct Harbour Avenue, Auckland 1010 
[1]www.at.govt.nz  
 
[2]A<br> picture containing text, clipart<br> Description automatically
generated 

 
 

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: AT Official Information (AT)
Auckland Transport


Attachment image.png
27K Download


Kia ora John 

 

I’m the LGOIMA Business Partner who’s looking into your official
information request

My name is Varsha and I’m a LGOIMA Business Partner at Auckland Transport.

 

I’m responsible for looking into the official information request you made
on 18/08/2024 about payments made to MRCagney for their work on Auckland
Transport’s design guides, the nature and timeline of these contracts, and
requests for specific documents and emails related to the development of
these guides.

 

The LGOIMA requires that we let you know our decision on your request no
later than 20 working days after the day we received your request.
Unfortunately, it won’t be possible to meet that time limit and we are
therefore letting you know of an extension of the time to make our
decision, to 27 September 2024, or sooner. 
 

This extension is necessary because consultations within Auckland
Transport are necessary to make a decision on your request. Therefore, a
proper response cannot reasonably be made within the original time limit.

You are able to seek an investigation and review by the Ombudsman of this
decision. Information about how to make a complaint is available at
[1]www.ombudsman.parliament.nz or freephone 0800 802 602. 

 

Ngā mihi

Varsha 

LGOIMA Business Partner 

 

Auckland Transport 

20 Viaduct Harbour Avenue, Auckland 1010

[2]www.at.govt.nz

 

Important notice: The contents of this email and any attachments may be
confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you have received this
email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies
of the message and attachments; any use, disclosure or copying of this
message or attachments is prohibited. Any views expressed in this email
may be those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the
views of Auckland Transport.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/
2. http://www.at.govt.nz/

Link to this

From: AT Official Information (AT)
Auckland Transport


Attachment image.png
27K Download


Kia ora John, 

 

I had hoped to have a decision for you today but it is taking us a little
longer than expected with the internal consultation. 

 

Decision to extend

We are still conducting our internal consultations, and we need to seek
refinement from you regarding the following questions. Therefore we are
unable to make our decision until we have completed our internal
consultation, and received your refinement. Therefore we are extending our
decision due date to 10 October 2024. 

 

Refinement

 

7. Can you release any emails between Auckland Transport and anyone from
MRCagney that contain the phrases “emergency response” and/or “Traffic
Calming and Traditional Neighborhood Streets”?
 

We searched our email database for all emails between AT and anyone from
MRCagney with the phrase Emergency response and/or traffic calming and
traditional neighbourhood streets. This search returned 1335 emails, which
is a big result. Are you seeking information regarding standards or
project delivery? as this will help us narrow the result. Alternatively,
please provide me with a refinement option and I can run this search and
let you know the result. 

If you are unable to refine this question, we are included to refuse your
request under 17(f) of the LGOIMA due to the substantial collation that
would be required. 

8. Can you release any emails between Auckland Transport and anyone from
MRCagney that contain the words “damage” and/or “delay”?

We searched our email database for all emails that contained the keywords
Damange or Delay in relation to MRCagney. This returned 25,831 items.
Please refinement this question as it is a large result. 

If you are unable to refine this question, we are included to refuse your
request under 17(f) of the LGOIMA due to the substantial collation that
would be required. 
 
Please let me know how you wish to proceed with questions 7 and 8.
 
Kind regards,
Varsha
LGOIMA Business Partner 

 
 

------------------- Original Message

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: AT Official Information (AT)
Auckland Transport


Attachment image.png
27K Download


Kia ora John, 

 

I'm following up on my email below please.

 

Thanks,

Varsha

LGOIMA Business Partner 

 

 

show quoted sections

Link to this

We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Editor please sign in and let everyone know.

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Auckland Transport only: