Dear Crown Law Office,

We trust this request finds you all in the best of Spirits!

Please can Crown Law advise the position held by Crown Law regarding individual Rangatira of lawfully constituted Hapu who rebutted the Covid-19 offer within 72hours timeframe of the offer having been made by way of various public broadcasts, social media, etc in 2020?

Has Crown Law any emails, correspondence, notes and information on any individuals who advised by way of email or other communication they did not buy into, nor contract with the NZ Government Covid-19 offer and ideology?

Does Crown Law hold the legal opinion that those who rebutted the Covid-19 offer are not subject to the restrictions imposed?

Has Crown Law had to deal with any individual rebuttals and what is the position on Crown Law regarding the individuals who rebutted the offer to contract?

Can Crown Law please provide any correspondence between Crown Law and the Registrar General of BDM dealing with the numbers of accusations of enslavement and forgery of individual birth documents by those tasked with the handling of this information?

Can Crown Law please provide the contract with wet ink whereby individual New Zealand people or sovereign tangatawhenua have agreed to be enslaved and made into emissions in PPSR legislation?

Can Crown Law provide the number of individual requests to secede from the corporation that is New Zealand?

Can Crown Law provide any documentation, contract or consent by any individual living in NZ that obligates them to be yoked to the dead?
By the dead I am referring to the Corporation HER MAJESTY QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND that came about as the result of the NZ constitution Act.

The NZ constitution Act did not receive royal assent and therefore the corporation that gave itself power operates without a constitution, where was the agreement by the people of New Zealand and the ascendants of the Tipuna who did not sign Te Tiriti 1840 consent to the creation of this belligerent entity?

If One is not compliant to form, and One did not surrender, nor cede their sovereignty to a corporation, yet is being enslaved even though slavery is abominable in all its forms, due to being conveyed shortly after the birth registration, can Crown Law advise what remedy exists for non statutory, unincorporated EW44 individuals to secede from a harmful government who continues to promote the Covid-19 ideology and is in contempt of our Native Pa Kooti?

If you prescribe things and act at ministering and magistrating, then remedy must be forthcoming, please send through all information held by Crown Law office that contains the remedy for those wishing to secede from a foreign corporation and exist as sovereigns on our whenua taonga tuku iho in perfect peace and harmony with the Divine Creator c.f Secret Commissions Act.

If God is with us, who can be against us?

I Am has sent me to you.

Yours faithfully,

Angela

Kia ora Matt McKillop the man acting in the Office of Crown Law,

Thank you for your message and response to my OIA request.

It appears the Labour government and CROWN law refuse to answer questions that would see their authority challenged, and instead answer disparagingly with the tired old trope of the sovereign citizen.

Lets try to be a little more original Matt, surely you can do better?

First of all your interpretation of the request as being "sovereign" citizen related is a mistaken interpretation, nothing wrong with "things" Matt, rather our perception of those things appears to be the problem, perhaps seeing things that are not there?

God is the only Sovereign, and myself I Am an ascendant of an UNSURRENDERED Tipuna and an owner of the ancestral whenua i stand upon.

I trust your perception of the matter has shifted knowing that your presumption has been rebutted.

Rebutting an offer to contract cannot be seen to be a sovereign citizen movement, rather can be seen as knowing the basic elements of contract, equity, and common law precepts as taught in blackstones commentaries.
These being a matter of discerning authentic reality as opposed to manufactured reality.

One must always operate from their own court Matt and not one that is a star chamber, roman catholic court, these are courts of commerce.

First in time, is best in Law.

Thank you for proving yourself to be the most transparent private corporate government ever

Yours sincerely,

Angela