1 September 2022
Angela
By email: [FYI request #20132 email]
Dear Angela
Official information request for information under the Official Information Act 1982
dated 4 August 2022
Our Ref: OIA353/1
1.
I refer to your official information request dated 4 August 2022, seeking
information under the Official Information Act 1982 (
OIA). I set out my response
to your specific questions below.
Requests for opinion
2.
In your request, you have asked the following opinions of Crown Law:
2.1
Please can Crown Law advise the position held by Crown Law regarding
individual Rangatira of lawfully constituted Hapu who rebutted the
Covid-19 offer within 72hours timeframe of the offer having been made
by way of various public broadcasts, social media, etc in 2020?
2.2
Does Crown Law hold the legal opinion that those who rebutted the
Covid-19 offer are not subject to the restrictions imposed?
2.3
Has Crown Law had to deal with any individual rebuttals and what is the
position on Crown Law regarding the individuals who rebutted the offer
to contract?
2.4
If One is not compliant to form, and One did not surrender, nor cede
their sovereignty to a corporation, yet is being enslaved even though
slavery is abominable in all its forms, due to being conveyed shortly after
the birth registration, can Crown Law advise what remedy exists for non
statutory, unincorporated EW44 individuals to secede from a harmful
government who continues to promote the Covid-19 ideology and is in
contempt of our Native Pa Kooti?
2.5
If you prescribe things and act at ministering and magistrating, then
remedy must be forthcoming, please send through all information held
by Crown Law office that contains the remedy for those wishing to
secede from a foreign corporation and exist as sovereigns on our
whenua taonga tuku iho in perfect peace and harmony with the Divine
Level 3 Justice
Centre, 19 Aitken Street, Wellington 6011 | PO Box 2858 or DX SP20208, Wellington 6140, New Zealand | +64 4 472 1719 | crownlaw.govt.nz
6982444_2
2
Creator c.f Secret Commissions Act.
3.
Information must be held (be in existence) when it is requested and the answer
to these questions would involve the creation of information in order to respond
to your request.1 There is no obligation under the OIA for an agency to form an
opinion, provide an explanation or create information to answer a request.2
4.
Therefore, we refuse these requests under section 18(e) of the OIA because the
requested documents do not exist.
Requests for information that does not exist or would require substantial collation or
research
5.
In your request, you have asked the following:
5.1
Has Crown Law any emails, correspondence, notes and information on
any individuals who advised by way of email or other communication
they did not buy into, nor contract with the NZ Government Covid-19
offer and ideology?
5.2
Can Crown Law please provide any correspondence between Crown Law
and the Registrar General of BDM dealing with the numbers of
accusations of enslavement and forgery of individual birth documents by
those tasked with the handling of this information?
5.3
Can Crown Law please provide the contract with wet ink whereby
individual New Zealand people or sovereign tangatawhenua have
agreed to be enslaved and made into emissions in PPSR legislation?
5.4
Can Crown Law provide the number of individual requests to secede
from the corporation that is New Zealand?
5.5
Can Crown Law provide any documentation, contract or consent by any
individual living in NZ that obligates them to be yoked to the dead? By
the dead I am referring to the Corporation HER MAJESTY QUEEN IN
RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND that came about as the result of the NZ
constitution Act.
5.6
The NZ constitution Act did not receive royal assent and therefore the
corporation that gave itself power operates without a constitution,
where was the agreement by the people of New Zealand and the
ascendants of the Tipuna who did not sign Te Tiriti 1840 consent to the
creation of this belligerent entity?
6.
We have interpreted this request broadly as a request for correspondence from
people with a “sovereign citizen” belief relating to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our
preliminary searches of Crown Law’s database using search terms from your
request have not uncovered any correspondence received on those themes and
saved to our central database since 2020. While it is possible that other, less
precise search terms would uncover information broadly relevant to your
1 Official Information Act 1982, s 2.
2 Office of the Ombudsman
The OIA for Ministers and Agencies: a guide to processing official information requests (April 2019) at 6.
6982444_2
3
request held by Crown Law, such information cannot be made available without
substantial collation or research.
7.
Therefore, we refuse your request under section 18(e) and 18(f) of the OIA
because the requested documents either not exist or would require substantial
collation or research to make available.
8.
The “sovereign citizen” belief system underpinning your request has been
regularly dismissed by New Zealand’s courts as meritless. Your request has a vast
scope but appears to have the unserious purpose of supporting “sovereign
citizen” arguments. As a result, we also refuse your request under section 18(h)
on the grounds that it is trivial or vexatious.
Right to seek an investigation and review
9.
You have the right to seek an investigation and review by the Ombudsman of this
decision. Information about how to make a complaint is available at
www.ombudsman.parliament.nz or freephone 0800 802 602.
Yours faithfully
Crown Law
Matt McKillop
Crown Counsel
6982444_2
