FORGERY OF BIRTH DOCUMENTS by Registrars of New Zealand

Angela made this Official Information request to Ministry of Justice

The request was partially successful.

From: Angela

Kia ora and greetings Ministry of Justice,

We are seeking information held prior to 1990 by the Papakura District Court on all BDM107a certificates and birth registrations please?

Can Courts of New Zealand please supply the signed contract or an application form signed by both parties that formed the bdm107a and agreement to the attachment of a judaic surname?

How many babies were born in Papakura in the month of July and August 1968 and how many of those babies in those months were adopted?

How many BDM107a certificates were created for babies born in the month of July and August 1968 including those who ended up adopted?

Can Papakura Court please supply a copy of the contract c.f BOE Act 1908 s23 used for creating the BDM107A that was signed by both parties, being the parents, the state and the wee baby?

BDM107a is a trust certificate, how many times has this certificate been hypothecated?

RG27 just records the names of the living child in all capitals, creating an ORGANISATION on paper, then a document was forged by the NZ Government using the signature and particulars from the RG27 and the consideration for the family benefit, and the state FORGES another document being a TRUST certificate bdm107a a pre-adoptive certificate, giving legal ownership to the state of the living child without any knowledge by innocent child or parent, so these documents are all copyrighted property of the CROWN, and therefor where is my signature to the contract that binds me to any obligation?

The parents at Papakura signed an rg27 when filling out the particulars for the newborn child, and did the Courts of New Zealand use this signature as permission to create the BDM107a, and if so, please supply a copy of the signature giving permission to the creation of all the BDM107a ever created without having to supply the personal information please?

Yours faithfully,

Angela

Link to this

From: OIA@justice.govt.nz
Ministry of Justice

Thank you for contacting the Official Information Act request mailbox for
the Ministry of Justice. We will endeavour to acknowledge your
email within 2 working days

You can find more information about how we can help you at our [1]Official
Information Act Requests page.

Please note that by law, when you ask for official information we have to
respond to your request as soon as reasonably practicable and no later
than 20 working days after we receive it. 

Please send any non-OIA related emails through to
o[2][email address] and any complaints through to
[3][email address]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Confidentiality notice:
This email may contain information that is confidential or legally
privileged. If you have received it by mistake, please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email and the reply
from your system;
(2) do not act on this email in any other way.
Thank you.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

References

Visible links
1. https://www.justice.govt.nz/about/offici...
2. mailto:[email address]
3. mailto:[email address]

hide quoted sections

Link to this

From: OIA@justice.govt.nz
Ministry of Justice


Attachment Picture Device Independent Bitmap 1.jpg
4K Download


Kia ora Angela,
 
Thank you for emailing the Ministry of Justice.
 
We have partially transferred your request for information to the
Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) namely these parts of your request:
 
“How many babies were born in Papakura in the month of July and August
1968 and how many of those babies in those months were adopted?”
 
“How many BDM107a certificates were created for babies born in the month
of July and August 1968 including those who ended up adopted?”
 
“BDM107a is a trust certificate, how many times has this certificate been
hypothecated?”
 
“RG27 just records the names of the living child in all capitals, creating
an ORGANISATION on paper, then a document was forged by the NZ Government
using the signature and particulars from the RG27 and the consideration
for the family benefit, and the state FORGES another document being a
TRUST certificate bdm107a a pre-adoptive certificate, giving legal
ownership to the state of the living child without any knowledge by
innocent child or parent, so these documents are all copyrighted property
of the CROWN, and therefor where is my signature to the contract that
binds me to any obligation?”
 
“The parents at Papakura signed an rg27 when filling out the particulars
for the newborn child, and did the Courts of New Zealand use this
signature as permission to create the BDM107a, and if so, please supply a
copy of the signature giving permission to the creation of all the BDM107a
ever created without having to supply the personal information please?”
 
The information to which these parts of your request relates, is not held
by us but is believed to be held by the DIA. In these circumstances, we
are required by section 14 of the Official Information Act to transfer
your request.
 
You will hear further from the DIA concerning these parts of your request
in due course. [1][email address]
 
For the remainder of your request:
 
“We are seeking information held prior to 1990 by the Papakura District
Court on all BDM107a certificates and birth registrations please?”
 
“Can Courts of New Zealand please supply the signed contract or an
application form signed by both parties that formed the bdm107a and
agreement to the attachment of a judaic surname?”
 
“Can Papakura Court please supply a copy of the contract c.f BOE Act 1908
s23 used for creating the BDM107A that was signed by both parties, being
the parents, the state and the wee baby?”
 
The information you are requesting is a court record and not held by the
Ministry of Justice. This is because, while the Ministry provides
administrative support to courts, the judiciary are responsible for court
records.
 
Information held by the courts, sentencing notes, court records,
transcriptions or information about a case currently before the court and
are not subject to the Official Information Act 1982.
 
On this basis your request is refused under section 18(g)(i) as the
information requested is not held by the Ministry of Justice.
 
However, access to these records is dealt with by separate legislation and
Court Rules and you will need to contact the relevant court directly, the
details for the courts can be found here
[2]https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/utilities...
 
Please be aware that your name and address will be given to the parties to
the relevant proceeding or appeal, as a part of the application process
and that this may include the defendant/offender. No other contact or
personal information should be given to the parties.
 
You do not have to request information in person from the courts. You can
do so by contacting them and filling out an application. This can be done
via email or by post.
 
Here is a link to the form you will need to complete
[3]https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Docum...
 
Nga mihi,
Stephanie

 
Ministerial Relations and Services
  Strategy, Governance and Finance
DDI: +64 4 918 8800
[4]www.justice.govt.nz

 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Angela <[FOI #19440 email]>
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2022 10:54 am
To: [Ministry of Justice request email]
Subject: Official Information request - FORGERY OF BIRTH DOCUMENTS by
Registrars of New Zealand
 
Kia ora and greetings Ministry of Justice,
 
We are seeking information held prior to 1990 by the Papakura District
Court on all BDM107a certificates and birth registrations please?
 
Can Courts of New Zealand please supply the signed contract or an
application form signed by both parties that formed the bdm107a and
agreement to the attachment of a judaic surname?
 
How many babies were born in Papakura in the month of July and August 1968
and how many of those babies in those months were adopted?
 
How many BDM107a certificates were created for babies born in the month of
July and August 1968 including those who ended up adopted?
 
Can Papakura Court please supply a copy of the contract c.f BOE Act 1908
s23 used for creating the BDM107A that was signed by both parties, being
the parents, the state and the wee baby?
 
BDM107a is a trust certificate, how many times has this certificate been
hypothecated?
 
RG27 just records the names of the living child in all capitals, creating
an ORGANISATION on paper, then a document was forged by the NZ Government
using the signature and particulars from the RG27 and the consideration
for the family benefit, and the state FORGES another document being a
TRUST certificate bdm107a a pre-adoptive certificate, giving legal
ownership to the state of the living child without any knowledge by
innocent child or parent, so these documents are all copyrighted property
of the CROWN, and therefor where is my signature to the contract that
binds me to any obligation?
 
The parents at Papakura signed an rg27 when filling out the particulars
for the newborn child, and did the Courts of New Zealand use this
signature as permission to create the BDM107a, and if so, please supply a
copy of the signature giving permission to the creation of all the BDM107a
ever created without having to supply the personal information please?
 
Yours faithfully,
 
Angela
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
 
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
 
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[5][FOI #19440 email]
 
Is [6][Ministry of Justice request email] the wrong address for Official Information
requests to Ministry of Justice? If so, please contact us using this form:
[7]https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
 
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[8]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
 
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.
 
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Confidentiality notice:
This email may contain information that is confidential or legally
privileged. If you have received it by mistake, please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email and the reply
from your system;
(2) do not act on this email in any other way.
Thank you.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/utilities...
3. https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Docum...
4. http://www.justice.govt.nz/
5. mailto:[FOI #19440 email]
6. mailto:[Ministry of Justice request email]
7. https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
8. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

hide quoted sections

Link to this

Angela left an annotation ()

The information you have supplied is worthless, as there is no court case, did you look at what was asked? I am rather looking for the records held by the Papakura District Registrars prior to1990 when the records were held at the courts regarding births, deaths, etc.
Read the question and respond thoughtfully please.

Link to this

From: OIA


Attachment image001.jpg
4K Download

Attachment image002.jpg
4K Download


Tçnâ koe Angela,

 

Thank you for your OIA request, which was transferred from the Ministry of
Justice to the Department of Internal Affairs (included in train of this
email) on 27 May 2022.  You have requested the following official
information:

 

 1. “How many babies were born in Papakura in the month of July and August
1968 and how many of those babies in those months were adopted?”
 2. “How many BDM107a certificates were created for babies born in the
month of July and August 1968 including those who ended up adopted?”

 

The Department will provide its response to your request as soon as
practicable and within twenty working days.  The 20^th working day is 28
June 2022

 

Please note that in cases where the Department’s response provides
information that is identified to be of general public interest, the
response may also be published on the Department of Internal Affairs
website.  If the Department publishes its response to your OIA request,
all personal information, including your name and contact details, will be
removed.

 

You have also asked the following questions which state incorrect
information as fact and then ask a question on the basis of that incorrect
information.  An example would be if I were to say ‘since the earth is
flat, I want to know how far it is from Wellington to the outer ice
wall’.  These questions can’t be answered without correcting the original
incorrect belief.   The Department is refusing these questions under
section 18(e) of the Official Information Act as no such official
information exists.

 

 3. “BDM107a is a trust certificate, how many times has this certificate
been hypothecated?”
 4. “RG27 just records the names of the living child in all capitals,
creating an ORGANISATION on paper, then a document was forged by the
NZ Government using the signature and particulars from the RG27 and
the consideration for the family benefit, and the state FORGES another
document being a TRUST certificate bdm107a a pre-adoptive certificate,
giving legal ownership to the state of the living child without any
knowledge by innocent child or parent, so these documents are all
copyrighted property of the CROWN, and therefor where is my signature
to the contract that binds me to any obligation?”
 5. “The parents at Papakura signed an rg27 when filling out the
particulars for the newborn child, and did the Courts of New Zealand
use this signature as permission to create the BDM107a, and if so,
please supply a copy of the signature giving permission to the
creation of all the BDM107a ever created without having to supply the
personal information please?”

 

Please note that The Department is aware of misinformation regarding birth
documents that may be circulated by groups such as the Sovereign Movement
or the Freemen on the land.   The birth certificate records the event of a
birth.  Other birth forms support the recording of a birth.  None of these
documents are trusts, bonds or any other kind of financial instrument.  

 

Recording a birth enables the recognition of citizenship of those eligible
to be recognised as citizens by birth. It also enables the factual
determination of age, which is relevant for a range of public support
systems in which age may be relevant, such as school entry, offender
status within the justice system, the issuing of the pension, eligibility
for social services and support benefits to families, and provision of
health services e.g. cancer screening.

 

Nâku, nâ

 

Michelle Reed [1](she/her)  

Kaitohutohu Ârahi, te Ture Pârongo Ôkawa | Lead Advisor Official
Correspondence 

Te Urûngi | Organisational Strategy & Performance

Level 6, 45 Pipitea St | PO Box 805, Wellington 6140, New Zealand |
 [2]www.dia.govt.nz

[3]DIA Logo - Black

 

From: [Ministry of Justice request email] <[Ministry of Justice request email]>
Sent: Friday, 27 May 2022 9:28 am
To: Angela <[FOI #19440 email]>
Subject: RE: Official Information request - FORGERY OF BIRTH DOCUMENTS by
Registrars of New Zealand

 

Kia ora Angela,

Thank you for emailing the Ministry of Justice.

We have partially transferred your request for information to the
Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) namely these parts of your request:

“How many babies were born in Papakura in the month of July and August
1968 and how many of those babies in those months were adopted?”

“How many BDM107a certificates were created for babies born in the month
of July and August 1968 including those who ended up adopted?”

“BDM107a is a trust certificate, how many times has this certificate been
hypothecated?”

“RG27 just records the names of the living child in all capitals, creating
an ORGANISATION on paper, then a document was forged by the NZ Government
using the signature and particulars from the RG27 and the consideration
for the family benefit, and the state FORGES another document being a
TRUST certificate bdm107a a pre-adoptive certificate, giving legal
ownership to the state of the living child without any knowledge by
innocent child or parent, so these documents are all copyrighted property
of the CROWN, and therefor where is my signature to the contract that
binds me to any obligation?”

“The parents at Papakura signed an rg27 when filling out the particulars
for the newborn child, and did the Courts of New Zealand use this
signature as permission to create the BDM107a, and if so, please supply a
copy of the signature giving permission to the creation of all the BDM107a
ever created without having to supply the personal information please?”

The information to which these parts of your request relates, is not held
by us but is believed to be held by the DIA. In these circumstances, we
are required by section 14 of the Official Information Act to transfer
your request.

You will hear further from the DIA concerning these parts of your request
in due course. [4][email address]

For the remainder of your request:

“We are seeking information held prior to 1990 by the Papakura District
Court on all BDM107a certificates and birth registrations please?”

“Can Courts of New Zealand please supply the signed contract or an
application form signed by both parties that formed the bdm107a and
agreement to the attachment of a judaic surname?”

“Can Papakura Court please supply a copy of the contract c.f BOE Act 1908
s23 used for creating the BDM107A that was signed by both parties, being
the parents, the state and the wee baby?”

The information you are requesting is a court record and not held by the
Ministry of Justice. This is because, while the Ministry provides
administrative support to courts, the judiciary are responsible for court
records.

Information held by the courts, sentencing notes, court records,
transcriptions or information about a case currently before the court and
are not subject to the Official Information Act 1982.

On this basis your request is refused under section 18(g)(i) as the
information requested is not held by the Ministry of Justice.

However, access to these records is dealt with by separate legislation and
Court Rules and you will need to contact the relevant court directly, the
details for the courts can be found here
[5]https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/utilities...

Please be aware that your name and address will be given to the parties to
the relevant proceeding or appeal, as a part of the application process
and that this may include the defendant/offender. No other contact or
personal information should be given to the parties.

You do not have to request information in person from the courts. You can
do so by contacting them and filling out an application. This can be done
via email or by post.

Here is a link to the form you will need to complete
[6]https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Docum...

Nga mihi,

Stephanie

Ministerial Relations and Services

Strategy, Governance and Finance
DDI: +64 4 918 8800

[7]www.justice.govt.nz

-----Original Message-----
From: Angela <[8][FOI #19440 email]>
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2022 10:54 am
To: [9][Ministry of Justice request email]
Subject: Official Information request - FORGERY OF BIRTH DOCUMENTS by
Registrars of New Zealand

Kia ora and greetings Ministry of Justice,

We are seeking information held prior to 1990 by the Papakura District
Court on all BDM107a certificates and birth registrations please?

Can Courts of New Zealand please supply the signed contract or an
application form signed by both parties that formed the bdm107a and
agreement to the attachment of a judaic surname?

How many babies were born in Papakura in the month of July and August 1968
and how many of those babies in those months were adopted?

How many BDM107a certificates were created for babies born in the month of
July and August 1968 including those who ended up adopted?

Can Papakura Court please supply a copy of the contract c.f BOE Act 1908
s23 used for creating the BDM107A that was signed by both parties, being
the parents, the state and the wee baby?

BDM107a is a trust certificate, how many times has this certificate been
hypothecated?

RG27 just records the names of the living child in all capitals, creating
an ORGANISATION on paper, then a document was forged by the NZ Government
using the signature and particulars from the RG27 and the consideration
for the family benefit, and the state FORGES another document being a
TRUST certificate bdm107a a pre-adoptive certificate, giving legal
ownership to the state of the living child without any knowledge by
innocent child or parent, so these documents are all copyrighted property
of the CROWN, and therefor where is my signature to the contract that
binds me to any obligation?

The parents at Papakura signed an rg27 when filling out the particulars
for the newborn child, and did the Courts of New Zealand use this
signature as permission to create the BDM107a, and if so, please supply a
copy of the signature giving permission to the creation of all the BDM107a
ever created without having to supply the personal information please?

Yours faithfully,

Angela

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[10][FOI #19440 email]

Is [11][Ministry of Justice request email] the wrong address for Official Information
requests to Ministry of Justice? If so, please contact us using this form:

[12]https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:

[13]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

References

Visible links
1. https://ssc.govt.nz/our-work/diversity-a...
2. http://www.dia.govt.nz/
4. mailto:[email address]
5. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/utilities...
6. https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Docum...
7. http://www.justice.govt.nz/
8. mailto:[FOI #19440 email]
9. mailto:[Ministry of Justice request email]
10. mailto:[FOI #19440 email]
11. mailto:[Ministry of Justice request email]
12. https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
13. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

hide quoted sections

Link to this

Angela left an annotation ()

Kia ora.
The accusation of being involved in a sovereignty movement to justify forgery and false statements by registrars at Internal Affairs is not helpful, considering prior to the arrival of settlers in this country, our ancestors were SOVEREIGN tipuna with nobody but the Divine Creator above them.
My great grandmother was one of Te Kootis wives, and we have our own relationship with the Divine Creator, not a foreign corporate entity with aspirations of control and digital assassination.
My Tipuna did not surrender to the CROWN and nor did he agree to cede his sovereignty to the CROWN or any other entity.
Therefore a corporation that anointed itself power without the WILL of the people, and that operates without a codified constitution is neither sovereign, nor an authority to be afforded any respect, no matter how belligerent and equipped with the peoples institutions of military and policy enforcing mercenaries they are.

However if what you convey is how the department of Internal Affairs conducts its business, why are the Department Of Internal Affairs reticent in amending FALSE STATEMENTS made about those who do not wish, nor desire to be made CITIZENS of New Zealand?
I am NOT from New Zealand, and yet the DIA creates a citizenship certificate and requires people identify with this made up entity without having neither signed, nor agreed to such a construct.
One must agree to be made into a CITIZEN, particularly when one ancestors were here before the existence of the Department of Internal Affairs.
First in time, is best in LAW.
Jeff Montgomery is receiving inducements to falsify information, as Internal Affairs fails to produce the CONTRACT whereby there would be agreement to being made into a ROMAN civil law entity.
Jeffs educational background does not qualify him for such an important role, and his unwillingness to amend the records falsely made about original right holders is to me evidence he is operating a commercial name game racket.
It is OUR whenua the NZ company are deriving all of their income from, and i once agin do NOT consent to your enslavement tactics.

Link to this

From: SDO Official Correspondence


Attachment image001.png
86K Download

Attachment Angela OIA response 2122 0796.pdf
243K Download View as HTML


Kia ora Angela

 

Please find attached the response to your Official Information Act
request.

 

Ngā mihi

 

Alysha Stevenson | Advisor Official Correspondence

SDO Branch Development and Support Te Waka Aukaha   

The Department of Internal Affairs Te Tari Taiwhenua   
7 Waterloo Quay | PO Box 805, Wellington 6143|  [1]www.dia.govt.nz  

[2]Logo-test

 

References

Visible links
1. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

Link to this

Angela left an annotation ()

Thank you Julia Taylor.

I will reiterate once again living people are not issued certificates, only legal entities, so the creation of the BDM107a is a certificate of incorporation and the individual is part of trust corpus, hence why we have RES-idents of districts all Roman Civil Law legal terminology.
The denials by those engaged in the fraudulent practice of commercial name game fraud are because obviously it is a criminal act, and they will not admit they are acting as criminals by engaging in legal plunder.
Anyone who is knowledgeable on the creation of trusts know what has been created is a hypothecated trust.

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Ministry of Justice only: