Requests similar to 'Tony Hay - OIR No. 7 – Arborist Report by David James Tree Services'
Tony Hay - OIR No. 9 – 47 Purkiss Street, Springlands
Response by Marlborough District Council to Tony Hay on .
Refused.
I refer to this and indicate the information I received on this one for
questions 1 and 3 is as follows:
The Tree Policy provides guidance under...
Tony Hay - OIR No. 5 – Marlborough District Council coming onto my property without my permission to carry out substantial pruning of the trees
Response by Marlborough District Council to Tony Hay on .
Refused.
The information I have received in response to the two questions are as
follows:
1. Often the timeframe for notifying residents about tree...
Tony Hay - OIR No. 10 – Electricity (Hazards from Trees) Regulations 2003
Response by Marlborough District Council to Tony Hay on .
Refused.
Mr Hay
I refer to your email of 1 June.
We responded to the request in an email of 19 May. You set out some views
that are not shared by...
Tony Hay - OIR No. 12 – 47 Purkiss Street, Springlands – Council’s Double Standards
Response by Marlborough District Council to Tony Hay on .
Awaiting classification.
The Office of the Ombudsman received a complaint from you that you had not
received any response to OIA12.
I indicated to that Office that a respo...
Tony Hay - OIR No. 6 – Marlborough District Council survey
Response by Marlborough District Council to Tony Hay on .
Refused.
The information I have received in response to this is that the survey is
a standard type used where residents and public views are sought to obtain...
Tony Hay - OIR No. 3 – Health and Safety
Response by Marlborough District Council to Tony Hay on .
Refused.
I refer to your email of 14 February and indicate that the information I
have received is as follows:
1. The Tree Policy contains a number of r...
Tony Hay – OIR No. 13 - Marlborough District Council regards Ratepayers as COLLATERAL No 1
Response by Marlborough District Council to Tony Hay on .
Awaiting classification.
I refer to your email of 10 December and note the questions listed as
follows:
1. Why has the Council deemed it necessary to change the trees...
Tony Hay - OIR No. 4 – Marlborough District Council new tree policy, June 2020
Response by Marlborough District Council to Tony Hay on .
Refused.
I refer to your email of 14 February and indicate the information has been
received and the response is as follows:
1. The Tree Policy pro...
Tony Hay - OIR No. 8 – Full Marlborough District Council Ratifies “Lakings Road – Tree Management (RS10-015-07)”
Response by Marlborough District Council to Tony Hay on .
Refused.
Dear Mr Hay
I refer to your email of 15 February which asked the question whether
Council accepted a mistake had been made and that the trees wo...
Protection Orders on Trees on Rate Payers properties
Response by Marlborough District Council to Tony Hay on .
Long overdue.
Dear Mr Hay
I refer to your request of 29 September which is one made and actioned by
us under LGOIMA.
I referred the query to Council’s P...
Tony Hay - OIR No. 2 – Problem with the the Marlborough District Council in addressing complaints
Request sent to Marlborough District Council by Tony Hay on .
Refused.
Please see Information posted in Tony Hay OIR No. 1 before proceeding.
Further Background:
My name is Tony Hay and I am the owner, along with my...
Tony Hay – OIR No. 11 – Aftermath of major flooding event to hit Blenheim
Response by Marlborough District Council to Tony Hay on .
Refused.
I refer to your email of 14 February and will deal with the questions at
the foot of your commentary.
1. Cost to remove 3 trees and fix fence. ...
Protection Orders on 3 Trees
Response by Marlborough District Council to Tony Hay on .
Long overdue.
Dear Mr Hay
I refer to your email of 13 August about trees by 42 Lakings Road,
PN346626.
I attach the following:
1. Arboriculture assess...
Tony Hay - OIR No. 1 – Climate Change
Response by Marlborough District Council to Tony Hay on .
Partially successful.
I refer to your email of 14 February and indicate the information I have
received is as follows:
1. Acceptance by MDC – Council accepts that...
Impact of The Springlands Retirement Village on Council owned trees
Response by Marlborough District Council to Tony Hay on .
Successful.
Mr Hay
I refer to your email of 31 July and indicate that it is not really a
request for information but rather a request for information on a...
How is the Council using its rights under the Public Health Act to inspect rental housing properties?
Response by Marlborough District Council to Aaron Packard on .
Successful.
Dear Mr Packard
I refer to your email of 12 September and have consulted with our
Environmental Health Team who addressed the six questions you...
Emails between CEO and Mayor
Response by Marlborough District Council to Alan Riley on .
Successful.
Thank you for emailing the Marlborough District Council.
Your message will be processed and forwarded to the appropriate staff
member or departm...
Answers by Marlborough District Council to my request for the complete removal of 3 trees
Request sent to Marlborough District Council by Tony Hay on .
Long overdue.
On Tuesday 6th March 2019 I approached the Marlborough District Council (MDC) to discuss the removal of the 3 trees on council road reserve “the Ber...
Harbour Risk Assessment
Response by Marlborough District Council to Brent Yardley on .
Long overdue.
Dear Mr Yardley
I refer to your email of 18 September which referenced further data you
were seeking.
I see the Harbour Master explained t...
Dear Mr Rush
I refer to your email of 14 March and indicate that I am transferring your
request to NZTA. The speed limit changes were actioned...
Dear Mr Riley
I refer to Tony Quirk’s email below and attach another Sharefile link.
Please let me know if you have any problems opening this att...
Delivering better broadband for Marlborough
Response by Marlborough District Council to Jonathan Brewer on .
Partially successful.
Mr Brewer
I advise that I have received the information which covers Steering Group
attendees, Working Group attendees, meeting notes 22 June 20...
Number of dogs on the Council's dog register classified as dangerous or menacing.
Response by Marlborough District Council to Mike Stoneley on .
Successful.
Dear Mr Stoneley
I refer to your request dated 26 January 2015 and indicate the following:
For menacing dogs the split is Blenheim 52, Picton 4...
Dear Mr Harris
I refer to your email of 30 July 2012 which no doubt is a request sent to
all organisations that submitted to the Law Commissions R...
Thank you for emailing the Marlborough District Council.
Your message will be processed and forwarded to the appropriate staff
member or departm...