Birth certificate contract information request

Karissa Best made this Official Information request to The Treasury

Response to this request is long overdue. By law The Treasury should have responded by now (details and exceptions). The requester can complain to the Ombudsman.

From: Karissa Best

Dear The Treasury,

I am wishing to obtain knowledge of the value of my birth certificate,
And also information about how to start and end my birth certificate registration with the government. This is purely for knowledge and information about myself and contracts I may have been placed into by my parents .

Yours faithfully,
Karissa Best
[email address]

Link to this

From: Ministerial Services Inbox [TSY]
The Treasury


Attachment Official Information Act Response Karissa Best 20170303.pdf
180K Download View as HTML


 

Dear Karissa

 

A response is attached regarding your Official Information Act Request.

 

Best Regards

 

Lucy May

 

Lucy May - Ministerial Coordinator - Ministerial Advisory Service

The Treasury - Kaitohutohu Kaupapa Rawa

[1][email address]

   

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

The information in this email is confidential to the Treasury, intended
only for the addressee(s), and may also be legally privileged. If you are
not an intended addressee:

a. please immediately delete this email and notify the Treasury by return
email or telephone (64 4 472 2733);

b. any use, dissemination or copying of this email is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful.

[IN-CONFIDENCE]

 

 

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]

Link to this

From: Graham Stronach


Attachment image001.png
33K Download

Attachment image002.jpg
8K Download

Attachment OIA Karissa Best 13 09 2017.pdf
57K Download View as HTML


Dear Karissa Best

 

 

Attached is the Department’s response to your Official Information Act
request of 31 August 2017.

 

Thank you for your enquiry.

 

 

Regards

Graham Stronach

Business Advisor

Births, Deaths, Marriages, Citizenship and Translations

Department of Internal Affairs Te Tari Taiwhenua

Box 10-526 Wellington

New Zealand

www.dia.govt.nz

 

 

[1]cid:image002.png@01D328BD.8A49F8F0

[2]www.endoflife.services.govt.nz

 

[3]cid:image004.jpg@01D328BE.13DFFCE0

[4]www.smartstart.services.govt.nz

 

References

Visible links
2. http://www.endoflife.services.govt.nz/
3. file:///tmp/smartstart.services.govt.nz
4. http://www.smartstart.services.govt.nz/

Link to this

From: Karissa Best

Dear Graham Stronach,

Is that suggesting because I don't have any rights over myself or my personal information, that in all respect I could be deemed a slave by definition.
If not, can you explain how not.
Thank you very much for your time and for your reply

Yours sincerely,

Karissa Best

Link to this

Luke C left an annotation ()

What are you getting at?

Link to this

From: OIA


Attachment OIA 1718 0100 BEST Response.pdf
54K Download View as HTML


Dear Karissa Best

Thank you for your request for information received by The Department of Internal Affairs (Department) on 13 September 2017.
Please find attached the Department's response under the Official Information Request Act 1982.

Kind Regards

Rosemary Dhlakama | Advisor Governance
[email address]
The Department of Internal Affairs Te Tari Taiwhenua
147 Lambton Quay | PO Box 805, Wellington 6140, New Zealand | www.dia.govt.nz
  

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: Karissa Best

Dear OIA,

That didn't really answer my question.
You have said I don't pertain rights to my own birth information, name, birth place, date of birth, among other types of personal information.
I do not have a choice over my OWN personal information. It was taken against my will and stored with people I do not know, and have never met.
The definition of slavery is : "a person entirely under the domination of some influence or person."
I would argue because I cannot freely build my own shelter, or freely eat natural food growing outdoors, and do not have rights to my own person in the form of choices, and personal information... that this situation would be applicable to this definition.
If not, then how can I remove my personal information from the system... you have said that I cannot. That I have no right to do so, and that it is impossible. Thus, I am under domination by the government's hand.
If you could please answer this question.

Yours sincerely,

Karissa Best

Link to this

From: Karissa Best

Dear OIA,

Legally you were supposed to reply quite some time ago. If you do not intend to respond please say so and i will lay a complaint.

Yours sincerely,

Karissa Best

Link to this

Karissa Best left an annotation ()

Have filed a complaint with ombudsman.
My thoughts are they cannot answer because I am deemed a slave, in a sense.
Because I did not consent to contract with the goverment. The goverment is no different to any other business. They cannot answer because they have committed fraud. Hopefully the ombudsman will give assistance as my judiciary.

Link to this

Mr Rodgers left an annotation ()

Karissa

You need to make up your mind whether you are inside the tent or outside of it. You appear to be taking advantage of society's laws such as the OIA and the Ombudsman but seem to object to have had your birth recorded (in the past). They are all part of the same package.

The protections provided by a government have always had a cost which is usually a loss of liberty. The trick is in getting the balance right.

If you don't want your information to be in the "system" then step outside the tent. Choose a new name, get a "under the table" job which the taxman doesn't know about and hope you never get sick.

Link to this

D J Blair left an annotation ()

Dear Mr Rogers
Are you so opposed to freedom you had to make comment?
New opinions are always suspected, and usually opposed, without any other reason but because they are not already common.
Hegemony aside, critical thinking is required to perceive the extent of this deceit, they have been working their scheme for a long time. They have devised a system that gives as well as it takes and it has been a careful balance of both of these that has allowed them to maintain their control. So if there are benefits as well as liabilities and we do not want to throw the baby out with the bath water, where do we go from here?

The answer to that dilemma is simple. The system can be used for our overall benefit. The bad guys have taken control of it and they are quite deliberately using it for their benefit at our expense. They are using it to fine us excessively and needlessly to feed their greed, to tax and persecute us; keeping us on a tread mill of servitude and making our lives a misery in the process. We have a right to take the benefits and reject the liabilities when the balance has been distorted to our detriment – which clearly it is.

Link to this

Mr Rodgers left an annotation ()

Dear Mr Bair

I'm reminded of a remark prof Brian Cox made during a discussion on Creation "science". He said he would be overjoyed if someone could *prove* that the Earth was only 6500 years old as it would open a whle new field of physics to explore.

I feel the same way about chem trails and the notion that a birth certificate is some kind of ownership paper enabling "Them" to issuing 90 day bonds.

Link to this

sinned left an annotation ()

I fail to understand the relevence of the earth's age or the manner of it's creation in this request nor are chemtrails relevent in any way Mr Rogers. This request is about a living being having dominion over and above a corporation, which the government is. You may check it's registration, it is subject to the foreign UNITED NATIONS and its UNIDROIT private Roman law control.
They are all one “thing” that maintains a massive grammatical deception over your mind in order to keep you “under VATICAN control”. One World Government or the so called NEW WORLD ORDER, can only appear under the water law of corporations, operating under the copyright of the written language of the VATICAN or a total corruption of such a language, and if you become the “citizen” of a private corporation operating under such maritime rules of such a corporation, you are no longer a civilian of the land. You are “over-seas” presumed dead.

If you don’t know who you are or your real name, you will be assumed LOST-AT-SEA, giving Rome and the Church the right to “salvage” (Salvation) you and plunder your estate, being your God given Dominion, but as Christ claimed, only in his name shall you be saved! …. You do have a “Christian Name” for that very reason, but not when you attach your given Christian name to the foreign ACCOUNTS of ROME, being the “mark of the beast” (DOG-LATIN-ALL-UPPERCASE-TEXT)

That’s why you have two birthing certificates, one is the birth of the SURNAME “ACCOUNT” (Born Date) and the other is the birth of your Christian Name “ACCOUNT” (Registration Date). The choice is yours but only if you are aware that there is a choice. Such a choice appears in Adam and Eve, House of the debtor and the House of the Creditor…

The game is up

Link to this

Karen Rogers left an annotation ()

Dear Karrisa

I think what you are trying to achieve is called "cestui que trust nz" which basically states that Government holds all information and property on behalf of a person and proceed on the basis that this person is "lost at sea" OR "dead" until otherwise proven to be alive. So every 7 years the government then sends out a consensus and unless people respond the Government then assume that this person is deceased and no family members have claimed the deeds of that person which then legally enables to Government to claim it rather than it just staying in limbo. If you request your information under Statute Law Revision Act 1888 (c.3) and section 3 of the Statute Law Revision Act 1948 (c.62) (but don't quote me exactly as I think NZ also has other laws associated with this act) then you might get some better responses than the ones you already are getting? I would be interested in knowing how you are doing in these matters.

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
The Treasury only: