Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Amendment Bill (2025) and Banking Class Action
SPENCER JONES made this Official Information request to Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
Response to this request is long overdue. By law Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment should have responded by now (details and exceptions). The requester can complain to the Ombudsman.
From: SPENCER JONES
Dear MBIE,
Under the Official Information Act 1982, I request:
1. All internal MBIE briefings, Cabinet papers, Regulatory Impact Assessments, legal advice, or memos between 1 Jan 2024 and today regarding:
- Drafting, intent, or legal rationale behind the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Amendment Bill (2025);
- Any retrospective effect on litigation, especially the Banking Class Action (CIV-2021-404-119);
- Implications for consumer rights under CCCFA ss 22, 48, 99(1), and 99(1A).
2. All correspondence (emails, meeting notes, Teams chats, or memos) between MBIE staff and:
- Minister Scott Simpson or his office;
- Representatives of ANZ, ASB, NZBA, or any law firms (including Bell Gully, Russell McVeagh, or MinterEllisonRuddWatts);
- Treasury, PCO, or the Commerce Commission concerning the class action or amendment bill.
3. Any records of:
- Stakeholder consultation prior to the bill’s drafting;
- Concerns about interference with judicial proceedings;
- Conflict-of-interest declarations by officials or advisors.
If any material is withheld, please cite the specific section of the OIA relied on.
Kind regards,
Spencer Jones
From: NoReplyMinisterialServices
Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
Kia ora Spencer Jones,
On behalf of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment I
acknowledge your email of 4/08/2025 requesting, under the Official
Information Act 1982, the following:
Under the Official Information Act 1982, I request:
1. All internal MBIE briefings, Cabinet papers, Regulatory Impact
Assessments, legal advice, or memos between 1 Jan 2024 and today
regarding:
- Drafting, intent, or legal rationale behind the Credit Contracts and
Consumer Finance Amendment Bill (2025);
- Any retrospective effect on litigation, especially the Banking Class
Action (CIV-2021-404-119);
- Implications for consumer rights under CCCFA ss 22, 48, 99(1), and
99(1A).
2. All correspondence (emails, meeting notes, Teams chats, or memos)
between MBIE staff and:
- Minister Scott Simpson or his office;
- Representatives of ANZ, ASB, NZBA, or any law firms (including Bell
Gully, Russell McVeagh, or MinterEllisonRuddWatts);
- Treasury, PCO, or the Commerce Commission concerning the class action
or amendment bill.
3. Any records of:
- Stakeholder consultation prior to the bill’s drafting;
- Concerns about interference with judicial proceedings;
- Conflict-of-interest declarations by officials or advisors.
If any material is withheld, please cite the specific section of the OIA
relied on.
We will endeavour to respond to your request as soon as possible, and no
later than 1/09/2025, being 20 working days after the day your request
was received. If we are unable to respond to your request by then, we will
notify you of an extension of that timeframe. If you have any enquiries
regarding your request feel free to contact us via email to
[1][MBIE request email].
Nāku noa, nā
Ministerial Services
Strategy and Assurance
Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
15 Stout Street, Wellington 6011 | P O Box 1473 Wellington 6140
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[MBIE request email]
From: *OIA
Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
Kia ora Spencer
Please find attached a letter regarding the extension of your request
under the Official Information Act 1982.
Ngā mihi
Matthew
Principal Ministerial Advisor
Building Resources and Markets
[1]Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CE732A.1A2F9630
References
Visible links
From: NoReplyMinisterialServices
Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
Kia ora
Please see attached our response to your request for information under the
Official Information Act 1982.
We regret that we have not met the statutory timeframe for responding and
apologise for the delay.
Ngā mihi nui,
Ministerial Services
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
15 Stout Street, Wellington 6011 | PO Box 1473, Wellington 6140
From: SPENCER JONES
Follow-Up on OIA Response Ref DOIA-REQ-0019128 – Request for Clarification under s 15(1AA)
To:** [[email address]](mailto:[email address])
Cc:** [[email address]](mailto:[email address])
Thank you for your letter dated 30 September 2025 responding to my Official Information Act request (Ref DOIA-REQ-0019128) concerning the *Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Amendment Bill (2025)* and the *Banking Class Action (CIV-2021-404-119)*. I acknowledge and appreciate the 53-page release and the consultation undertaken with the Commerce Commission, RBNZ, Treasury, FMA, and the Minister’s office.
After reviewing the released material and the statutory grounds cited, I wish to request clarification and further particulars under section 15(1AA) of the OIA to ensure the response is complete and consistent with sections 4, 5, 9 and 13 of the Act.
1. Schedule of Documents and Withholdings
Please provide a **document schedule or index** listing all documents identified within the scope of my request, showing for each:
* the title or description,
* date and author (where practicable),
* page count, and
* the exact OIA section(s) relied on for any withholding or redaction.
This will clarify whether Cabinet papers, Regulatory Impact Statements, Crown Law opinions, or internal legal memos were located and withheld under s 9(2)(f)(iv) or s 9(2)(h).
2. Public-Interest Consideration
Your letter cites multiple withholding grounds (s 9(2)(a), (b)(ii), (ba)(i), (h)) but does not set out the **public-interest balancing test required by s 9(1)**.
Please identify the factors considered when deciding that the public interest in release did not outweigh the reasons for withholding – particularly in relation to:
* legal advice on retrospective legislative effects, and
* communications with regulated entities (ANZ, ASB, NZBA) concerning pending litigation.
Given the material’s clear public-policy significance, transparency of the balancing process is essential.
3. Scope of Search and Records Captured
Kindly confirm whether the search included:
* Microsoft Teams chats, informal notes, and calendar records, in addition to emails;
* correspondence between MBIE and the Parliamentary Counsel Office (PCO); and
* any briefing or report shared with the Minister after 1 August 2025.
If such records exist but were excluded or withheld, please state the reason and applicable OIA provision.
4. Conflict-of-Interest Declarations
The response notes that two MBIE officials declared conflicts as customers of an affected bank. Please clarify:
* the date these declarations were made,
* whether mitigation steps or management plans were recorded, and
* whether any broader conflict reviews were undertaken across the policy team.
(Names are not sought; I accept privacy grounds under s 9(2)(a).)
5. Follow-Up Timeframe
I would appreciate clarification or the requested schedule **within 10 working days**. Should further time be required, please notify me in accordance with s 15A(1).
Kind regards,
Spencer Jones
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence (note: this contains the same information already available above).
SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()
Public Annotation – Clarification Request and Observations on MBIE’s OIA Response (Ref DOIA-REQ-0019128)
**Request:** [Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Amendment Bill (2025) and Banking Class Action](https://fyi.org.nz/request/31890-credit-...)
Summary
MBIE released 53 pages of material on 30 September 2025 relating to the *Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Amendment Bill (2025)* and the ongoing *Banking Class Action* (CIV-2021-404-119). While this response contains useful internal correspondence, policy memos, and limited conflict-of-interest disclosures, several key documents appear to have been withheld without detailed reasoning.
A follow-up clarification has now been lodged under **s 15(1AA)** of the *Official Information Act 1982* requesting:
1. A full **document schedule/index** showing each item located and the exact OIA section relied on for any withholding;
2. An explanation of the **public-interest balancing** undertaken before applying ss 9(2)(a), (b)(ii), (ba)(i) and (h);
3. Confirmation of the **search scope** (whether Teams chats, calendar entries, or PCO communications were included); and
4. Clarification on how **conflicts of interest** were managed among MBIE policy staff involved in the Bill.
**Why This Matters**
The Amendment Bill introduces retrospective changes to **CCCFA s 99(1A)**—potentially reducing redress owed to consumers affected by historical bank disclosure breaches. Transparency around the policy rationale and any consultation with banks or their representatives is therefore a matter of significant public interest.
This clarification step aims to ensure the Government’s decision-making process meets the OIA’s core principle of availability (s 5) and that any withheld material is reviewed against the statutory public-interest test (s 9(1)).
**Next Steps**
* Await MBIE’s clarification or updated document schedule.
* If the response remains incomplete or opaque, an **Ombudsman review** may be sought regarding over-broad application of ss 9(2)(ba)(i) and 9(2)(h).
* Interested readers can reference this thread when lodging related OIA requests (e.g., to Treasury, Commerce Commission, or Minister Simpson’s Office) to ensure consistent disclosure across agencies.
**Context Update (as of October 2025)**
ASB Bank has agreed to a NZD 135.6 million settlement in the Banking Class Action, while proceedings against ANZ continue. The Finance and Expenditure Committee is expected to report on the Amendment Bill by 20 October 2025. Whether retrospective provisions proceed unchanged may influence both court outcomes and consumer compensation.
(This annotation is provided for public transparency and to assist future requesters researching CCCFA enforcement, retrospective legislation, or financial-sector accountability. It does not constitute legal advice.)*
Link to this