Linking to material later classified as objectionable considered illegal?

Roger Brown made this Official Information request to Department of Internal Affairs

The request was partially successful.

From: Roger Brown

Dear Department of Internal Affairs,

I made a request to OFLC on 2022-08-26 with the same title that I understand has been referred to you. You should consider this request to supersede it. That response clarified to me DIA's responsibility for offenses under the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993.

1a) Did DIA recommend to Police that charges be laid against the 'Counterspin Media' cranks for posting a link to a website that allowed users who accessed that website to play a video that was later classified as objectionable by the Office of Film and Literature Classification?
1b) Did DIA recommend to Police that charges be laid against the 'Counterspin Media' cranks for posting a document that makes broadly similar claims to said video, which OFLC has confirmed is not, itself, classified as objectionable?
1c) Please provide all communications made with Police/Crown Solicitors prior to laying these charges, which seem questionably founded to say the least.
2a) The Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993 provides a very clear definition of the meaning of 'distribute' in the context of the offenses with which the cranks have been charged. It is very obvious that the act only covers the actual electronic transmission of objectionable publications, whether on its own (publishing/hosting objectionable publications yourself on your own website) or as part of a wider set of material (publishing/hosting a website which includes offensive material as a subset of the content of a web page, or embedded on such). Please provide any documents relevant to how the DIA reinterprets the Act in the context of publications on the World Wide Web.
2b) Does DIA consider linking (providing an internet location that a user might choose to visit) to content that has been classified as objectionable to constitute 'distributing' objectionable publications?
2c) Does DIA consider linking to web pages that include embedded links to content that has been classified as objectionable to constitute 'distributing' objectionable publications?
2d) Does DIA consider linking to web pages that link to content that has been classified as objectionable to constitute 'distributing' objectionable publications?
2e) Does DIA consider linking to web pages that include embedded links to content that is classified as objectionable after the links are originally posted to constitute 'distributing' objectionable publications?
3) Please provide all communications with other agencies, besides Police, and ministers prior to these charges being laid.

Regards,
Roger Brown

Link to this

From: OIA
Department of Internal Affairs

Tçnâ koe Roger,

Thank you for your OIA request to the Department of Internal Affairs (included with this email). We have noted that this request now replaces the request you made to the Classification Office, which was partially transferred to the Department on 9 September 2022.

The Department will provide its response to your request as soon as practicable and within twenty working days.  The 20th working day is 7 October 2022

Please note that in cases where the Department’s response provides information that is identified to be of general public interest, the response may also be published on the Department of Internal Affairs website.  If the Department publishes its response to your OIA request, all personal information, including your name and contact details, will be removed.

Nâku, nâ

Michelle Reed (she/her)  
Kaitohutohu Ârahi, te Ture Pârongo Ôkawa | Lead Advisor Official Correspondence 
Te Urûngi | Organisational Strategy & Performance
Level 6, 45 Pipitea St | PO Box 805, Wellington 6140, New Zealand |  www.dia.govt.nz

-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Brown <[FOI #20507 email]>
Sent: Saturday, 10 September 2022 12:47 pm
To: OIA <[email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - Linking to material later classified as objectionable considered illegal?

[You don't often get email from [FOI #20507 email]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific... ]

Dear Department of Internal Affairs,

I made a request to OFLC on 2022-08-26 with the same title that I understand has been referred to you. You should consider this request to supersede it. That response clarified to me DIA's responsibility for offenses under the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993.

1a) Did DIA recommend to Police that charges be laid against the 'Counterspin Media' cranks for posting a link to a website that allowed users who accessed that website to play a video that was later classified as objectionable by the Office of Film and Literature Classification?
1b) Did DIA recommend to Police that charges be laid against the 'Counterspin Media' cranks for posting a document that makes broadly similar claims to said video, which OFLC has confirmed is not, itself, classified as objectionable?
1c) Please provide all communications made with Police/Crown Solicitors prior to laying these charges, which seem questionably founded to say the least.
2a) The Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993 provides a very clear definition of the meaning of 'distribute' in the context of the offenses with which the cranks have been charged. It is very obvious that the act only covers the actual electronic transmission of objectionable publications, whether on its own (publishing/hosting objectionable publications yourself on your own website) or as part of a wider set of material (publishing/hosting a website which includes offensive material as a subset of the content of a web page, or embedded on such). Please provide any documents relevant to how the DIA reinterprets the Act in the context of publications on the World Wide Web.
2b) Does DIA consider linking (providing an internet location that a user might choose to visit) to content that has been classified as objectionable to constitute 'distributing' objectionable publications?
2c) Does DIA consider linking to web pages that include embedded links to content that has been classified as objectionable to constitute 'distributing' objectionable publications?
2d) Does DIA consider linking to web pages that link to content that has been classified as objectionable to constitute 'distributing' objectionable publications?
2e) Does DIA consider linking to web pages that include embedded links to content that is classified as objectionable after the links are originally posted to constitute 'distributing' objectionable publications?
3) Please provide all communications with other agencies, besides Police, and ministers prior to these charges being laid.

Regards,
Roger Brown

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #20507 email]

Is [DIA request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests to Department of Internal Affairs? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections

Link to this

From: RSOC
Department of Internal Affairs


Attachment OIA response letter.pdf
247K Download View as HTML


Hi

 

Please find attached our decision letter in response to your OIA request
from the Department of Internal Affairs.

 

We are in the final stages of processing the documents and we will get to
this as soon as practicable. We currently anticipate that you will receive
the documents by no later than close of business on Tuesday 1 November
2022.

 

Kind regards

 

Rachel Chrystall | Principal Advisor Official Correspondence (Acting)

Regulatory Strategy and Performance

Toi Hiranga | Regulation & Policy

Department of Internal Affairs | Te Tari Taiwhenua

45 Pipitea Street, Wellington

Direct Dial: +64 4 816 4041 | Extn: 6041 | [mobile number]
[1]www.dia.govt.nz

 

 

References

Visible links
1. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

Link to this

From: Rachel Chrystall
Department of Internal Affairs


Attachment OIA response letter.pdf
247K Download View as HTML

Attachment Part 1c Bundle 1 for the requestor FINAL documents.pdf
3.9M Download View as HTML

Attachment Part 1c Bundle 2 for the requestor FINAL documents.pdf
5.6M Download View as HTML

Attachment Part 3 Document 42 FINAL document.pdf
661K Download View as HTML


Hi

 

Please find attached the documents in relation to your OIA request.

 

Kind regards

 

Rachel

 

From: RSOC
Sent: Thursday, 27 October 2022 2:31 pm
To: Roger Brown <[FOI #20507 email]>
Subject: Response to your Official Information Act 1982 (OIA) request from
the Department of Internal Affairs (ref OIA2223-0214)

 

Hi

 

Please find attached our decision letter in response to your OIA request
from the Department of Internal Affairs.

 

We are in the final stages of processing the documents and we will get to
this as soon as practicable. We currently anticipate that you will receive
the documents by no later than close of business on Tuesday 1 November
2022.

 

Kind regards

 

Rachel Chrystall | Principal Advisor Official Correspondence (Acting)

Regulatory Strategy and Performance

Toi Hiranga | Regulation & Policy

Department of Internal Affairs | Te Tari Taiwhenua

45 Pipitea Street, Wellington

Direct Dial: +64 4 816 4041 | Extn: 6041 | [mobile number]
[1]www.dia.govt.nz

 

 

References

Visible links
1. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Department of Internal Affairs only: