Dear Auckland Council,

I refer to the response OIA #1219 email
https://fyi.org.nz/request/1219/response...

I have an issue with your maths in the first instance as the figures in paragraph 3 reflect a variance of $29 million not $28 Million

I am aware that people have been made redundant from council and have been paid a " confidentiality " payment.

Please advise how many confidential settlement there were with regards to dismissal, redundancy or any other staffing related matter such as security guards being paid of to be "discrete" .

and also advise the totals sum of these " redundancy confidentiality pay outs in each of the years since the super city commenced.

I am also aware that you have given me break down for the difference between the 20012 and 2013 figures could you please provide a break down for the council and the group for the totals under the heading employee benefits so that a proper comparison can be made

please also provide a break down for the general expenses 2012 & 2013 and a copy of the change of policy which facilitated the change of coding of training expenses .

Please also advise how the 10 million in the council benefits came to be in elsewhere in the 2012 report and please provide evidence of where this 10 million was previously coded to and how you calculated this sum to be 10million .

Yours faithfully,

Grace Haden

Dear Fleming, Stephanie,

thank you for your response I will digest the figures but I notice that no reference is made or sums provided for
" redundancy confidentiality pay outs in each of the years since the super city commenced.

could you please urgently attend to that issue.

Yours sincerely,

Grace Haden