JCA request for information supporting the Proposed Spatial Plan
Tony Randle made this Official Information request to Wellington City Council
The request was partially successful.
From: Tony Randle
Dear Wellington City Council,
The Johnsonville Community Association is very interested in providing a submission to the WCC Spatial Plan public consultation. It understands that a lot of analysis has been completed to support the proposed changes under the Spatial Plan and it seeks access to this information to inform a possible submission to it.
On behalf of the Johnsonville Community Association, the following information related to the proposed Wellington City Spatial Plan is requested:
1) The WCC criteria for determining the size of "a walkable catchment" as outlined under Policy 3 (c) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020
2) The WCC criteria for determining is a public transport stop is a "rapid transit stop" as outlined under Policy 3 (c)(i) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020
3) The WCC criteria for what areas are a "metropolitan centre zone" as outlined under Policy 3 (c)(iii) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020
4) Each location in Wellington City that is "in city centre zones" as defined by Policy 3 (a) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3.
5) Each location in Wellington City that is "in metropolitan centre zones" as defined by Policy 3 (b) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3.
6) Each location in Wellington City that is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."existing and planned rapid transit stops" as defined by Policy 3 (c)(i) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3. The evidence used to support the extent of the walkable catchment for each location is also requested.
7) Each location in Wellington City that is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."the edge of city centre zones" as defined by Policy 3 (c)(ii) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3. The evidence used to support the extent of the walkable catchment for each location is also requested.
8) Each location in Wellington City that is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."the edge of metropolitan centre zones" as defined by Policy 3 (c)(iii) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3. The evidence used to support the extent of the walkable catchment for each location is also requested.
9) Each location in Wellington City that is under "all other locations in the tier 1 urban environment" as defined by Policy 3 (d) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3.
10) Each location in Wellington City that the WCC considers that it is necessary to modify the building height or densities in order to provide for a qualifying matter under Policy 4 of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 including, for each location:
* the qualifying matter including a copy of the evaluation report prepared under section 32 of the Act in relation to the proposed amendment
* the alternative building heights and densities proposed.
11) The Housing demand assessment for each location in Wellington City including:
* the current number of each dwelling type
* the short term, medium term and long term demand for additional housing including by dwelling type
12) The housing development capacity for each location in Wellington City that is plan-enabled including:
* whether the location is plan-enabled; plan-enabled and infrastructure-ready; or plan-enabled and infrastructure-ready and reasonably expected to be realised
* the development capacity quantified as numbers of dwellings of different types in the short, medium and long-term
* that the WCC is satisfied there is adequate existing development infrastructure
* if there is not adequate existing development infrastructure, identify what the infrastructure deficiencies are and confirm that the WCC is satisfied the additional infrastructure to service development capacity is likely to be available.
If this information is held in electronic form, then it is preferred that it is provided in its complete and original electronic format.
13) The criteria used to specify why Tawa railway station is to have 10 minute walkable catchments while Lindon Railway Station and the Johnsonville Line railway stations are to have 5 minute walkable catchments along with the evidence to support the application of this criteria.
14) The specification for the walkable catchment for the Johnsonville metropolitan centre zone, the criteria used to specify this catchment area and the evidence used to support the application of this criteria.
15) The specification for the walkable catchment for the Kilbernie metropolitan centre zone, the criteria used to specify this catchment area and the evidence used to support the application of this criteria.
16) The criteria for specifying the walkable catchment for Medium density housing (type 3): 3-4 storey small apartment housing adjacent to suburban centres.
The JCA is happy to assist in clarifying any issue the WCC may have in providing this information.
The JCA would also prefer that the information that is already publically available be provided promptly so that it can be reviewed by JCA members rather than waiting until all the information is collated.
Yours faithfully,
Tony Randle
From: BUS: Assurance
Wellington City Council
Tēnā koe Tony
Thank you for your email dated 19 August 2020 requesting information.
Our team will manage your request under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 which requires us to respond as soon as possible, but no later than 16 September 2020.
The reference number for your request is IRO-10409
Please contact us if you have any further questions.
Kind regards
Jessica Hall
Assurance Services Coordinator | Wellington City Council
| W Wellington.govt.nz | |
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
From: BUS: Assurance
Wellington City Council
Kai Ora Tony
Please see attached decision letter to your request.
Kind Regards
Asha Harry
Assurance Advisor | Complaints & Information Assurance | Wellington City Council
P +64 4 383 4435 | E [email address] | W Wellington.govt.nz | |
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Randle <[FOI #13552 email]>
Sent: Wednesday, 19 August 2020 11:16 am
To: BUS: Assurance <[email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - JCA request for information supporting the Proposed Spatial Plan
Dear Wellington City Council,
The Johnsonville Community Association is very interested in providing a submission to the WCC Spatial Plan public consultation. It understands that a lot of analysis has been completed to support the proposed changes under the Spatial Plan and it seeks access to this information to inform a possible submission to it.
On behalf of the Johnsonville Community Association, the following information related to the proposed Wellington City Spatial Plan is requested:
1) The WCC criteria for determining the size of "a walkable catchment" as outlined under Policy 3 (c) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020
2) The WCC criteria for determining is a public transport stop is a "rapid transit stop" as outlined under Policy 3 (c)(i) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020
3) The WCC criteria for what areas are a "metropolitan centre zone" as outlined under Policy 3 (c)(iii) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020
4) Each location in Wellington City that is "in city centre zones" as defined by Policy 3 (a) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3.
5) Each location in Wellington City that is "in metropolitan centre zones" as defined by Policy 3 (b) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3.
6) Each location in Wellington City that is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."existing and planned rapid transit stops" as defined by Policy 3 (c)(i) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3. The evidence used to support the extent of the walkable catchment for each location is also requested.
7) Each location in Wellington City that is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."the edge of city centre zones" as defined by Policy 3 (c)(ii) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3. The evidence used to support the extent of the walkable catchment for each location is also requested.
8) Each location in Wellington City that is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."the edge of metropolitan centre zones" as defined by Policy 3 (c)(iii) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3. The evidence used to support the extent of the walkable catchment for each location is also requested.
9) Each location in Wellington City that is under "all other locations in the tier 1 urban environment" as defined by Policy 3 (d) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3.
10) Each location in Wellington City that the WCC considers that it is necessary to modify the building height or densities in order to provide for a qualifying matter under Policy 4 of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 including, for each location:
* the qualifying matter including a copy of the evaluation report prepared under section 32 of the Act in relation to the proposed amendment
* the alternative building heights and densities proposed.
11) The Housing demand assessment for each location in Wellington City including:
* the current number of each dwelling type
* the short term, medium term and long term demand for additional housing including by dwelling type
12) The housing development capacity for each location in Wellington City that is plan-enabled including:
* whether the location is plan-enabled; plan-enabled and infrastructure-ready; or plan-enabled and infrastructure-ready and reasonably expected to be realised
* the development capacity quantified as numbers of dwellings of different types in the short, medium and long-term
* that the WCC is satisfied there is adequate existing development infrastructure
* if there is not adequate existing development infrastructure, identify what the infrastructure deficiencies are and confirm that the WCC is satisfied the additional infrastructure to service development capacity is likely to be available.
If this information is held in electronic form, then it is preferred that it is provided in its complete and original electronic format.
13) The criteria used to specify why Tawa railway station is to have 10 minute walkable catchments while Lindon Railway Station and the Johnsonville Line railway stations are to have 5 minute walkable catchments along with the evidence to support the application of this criteria.
14) The specification for the walkable catchment for the Johnsonville metropolitan centre zone, the criteria used to specify this catchment area and the evidence used to support the application of this criteria.
15) The specification for the walkable catchment for the Kilbernie metropolitan centre zone, the criteria used to specify this catchment area and the evidence used to support the application of this criteria.
16) The criteria for specifying the walkable catchment for Medium density housing (type 3): 3-4 storey small apartment housing adjacent to suburban centres.
The JCA is happy to assist in clarifying any issue the WCC may have in providing this information.
The JCA would also prefer that the information that is already publically available be provided promptly so that it can be reviewed by JCA members rather than waiting until all the information is collated.
Yours faithfully,
Tony Randle
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #13552 email]
Is [Wellington City Council request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests to Wellington City Council? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
hide quoted sections
From: BUS: Assurance
Wellington City Council
Kia Ora Tony
Please see attached response to your request.
Kind Regards
Asha Harry
Assurance Advisor | Complaints & Information Assurance | Wellington City Council
P +64 4 383 4435 | E [email address] | W Wellington.govt.nz | |
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
-----Original Message-----
From: BUS: Assurance <[email address]>
Sent: Wednesday, 16 September 2020 4:52 pm
To: 'Tony Randle' <[FOI #13552 email]>
Cc: BUS: Assurance <[email address]>
Subject: RE: Official Information request - JCA request for information supporting the Proposed Spatial Plan
Kia Ora Tony
Please see attached decision letter to your request.
Kind Regards
Asha Harry
Assurance Advisor | Complaints & Information Assurance | Wellington City Council P +64 4 383 4435 | E [email address] | W Wellington.govt.nz | |
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Randle <[FOI #13552 email]>
Sent: Wednesday, 19 August 2020 11:16 am
To: BUS: Assurance <[email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - JCA request for information supporting the Proposed Spatial Plan
Dear Wellington City Council,
The Johnsonville Community Association is very interested in providing a submission to the WCC Spatial Plan public consultation. It understands that a lot of analysis has been completed to support the proposed changes under the Spatial Plan and it seeks access to this information to inform a possible submission to it.
On behalf of the Johnsonville Community Association, the following information related to the proposed Wellington City Spatial Plan is requested:
1) The WCC criteria for determining the size of "a walkable catchment" as outlined under Policy 3 (c) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020
2) The WCC criteria for determining is a public transport stop is a "rapid transit stop" as outlined under Policy 3 (c)(i) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020
3) The WCC criteria for what areas are a "metropolitan centre zone" as outlined under Policy 3 (c)(iii) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020
4) Each location in Wellington City that is "in city centre zones" as defined by Policy 3 (a) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3.
5) Each location in Wellington City that is "in metropolitan centre zones" as defined by Policy 3 (b) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3.
6) Each location in Wellington City that is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."existing and planned rapid transit stops" as defined by Policy 3 (c)(i) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3. The evidence used to support the extent of the walkable catchment for each location is also requested.
7) Each location in Wellington City that is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."the edge of city centre zones" as defined by Policy 3 (c)(ii) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3. The evidence used to support the extent of the walkable catchment for each location is also requested.
8) Each location in Wellington City that is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."the edge of metropolitan centre zones" as defined by Policy 3 (c)(iii) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3. The evidence used to support the extent of the walkable catchment for each location is also requested.
9) Each location in Wellington City that is under "all other locations in the tier 1 urban environment" as defined by Policy 3 (d) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3.
10) Each location in Wellington City that the WCC considers that it is necessary to modify the building height or densities in order to provide for a qualifying matter under Policy 4 of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 including, for each location:
* the qualifying matter including a copy of the evaluation report prepared under section 32 of the Act in relation to the proposed amendment
* the alternative building heights and densities proposed.
11) The Housing demand assessment for each location in Wellington City including:
* the current number of each dwelling type
* the short term, medium term and long term demand for additional housing including by dwelling type
12) The housing development capacity for each location in Wellington City that is plan-enabled including:
* whether the location is plan-enabled; plan-enabled and infrastructure-ready; or plan-enabled and infrastructure-ready and reasonably expected to be realised
* the development capacity quantified as numbers of dwellings of different types in the short, medium and long-term
* that the WCC is satisfied there is adequate existing development infrastructure
* if there is not adequate existing development infrastructure, identify what the infrastructure deficiencies are and confirm that the WCC is satisfied the additional infrastructure to service development capacity is likely to be available.
If this information is held in electronic form, then it is preferred that it is provided in its complete and original electronic format.
13) The criteria used to specify why Tawa railway station is to have 10 minute walkable catchments while Lindon Railway Station and the Johnsonville Line railway stations are to have 5 minute walkable catchments along with the evidence to support the application of this criteria.
14) The specification for the walkable catchment for the Johnsonville metropolitan centre zone, the criteria used to specify this catchment area and the evidence used to support the application of this criteria.
15) The specification for the walkable catchment for the Kilbernie metropolitan centre zone, the criteria used to specify this catchment area and the evidence used to support the application of this criteria.
16) The criteria for specifying the walkable catchment for Medium density housing (type 3): 3-4 storey small apartment housing adjacent to suburban centres.
The JCA is happy to assist in clarifying any issue the WCC may have in providing this information.
The JCA would also prefer that the information that is already publically available be provided promptly so that it can be reviewed by JCA members rather than waiting until all the information is collated.
Yours faithfully,
Tony Randle
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #13552 email]
Is [Wellington City Council request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests to Wellington City Council? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
hide quoted sections
From: Tony Randle
Dear BUS: Assurance,
This response references the substantive WCC response to the JCA of 18th September 2020 (https://fyi.org.nz/request/13552-jca-req... ).
The information requested by the JCA is based on the requirements of the NPS-UD 2020 that certain location specific information must be made available to the public, in particular, under section 13.31(3).
The JCA also highlights that the location specific information is particularly important in areas such as Johnsonville, which have multiple locations with multiple NPS-UD rules being applied yet the WCC has only provided information, such as walking catchment, for the combined area. It is difficult to submit or even understand the application of specific NPS-UD rules to Johnsonville without being provided with the location specific information that was requested. For example, it is not possible to identify areas within the walking catchment from Johnsonville Station from areas within the walking catchment of the Johnsonville Town Centre or from the Raroa Station walking catchment.
It is also noted that building density information for each location has yet to be provided.
The following list outlines requested location by location specific information yet to be provided by the WCC:
4) Each location in Wellington City that is "in city centre zones" as defined by Policy 3 (a) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3.
4a) The WCC has not provided the building heights information for each location that is “in city centre zones” as requested
4b) The WCC has not provided the building density information for each location that is “in city centre zones” as requested
5) Each location in Wellington City that is "in metropolitan centre zones" as defined by Policy 3 (b) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3.
5a) The WCC has not provided the building heights information for each location that is "in metropolitan centre zones" as requested
5b) The WCC has not provided the building density information for each location that is "in metropolitan centre zones" as requested
6) Each location in Wellington City that "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."existing and planned rapid transit stops" as defined by Policy 3 (c)(i) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3.
6a) The WCC has not provided the walkable catchment which is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."existing and planned rapid transit stops" for Johnsonville Station and for Raroa Station as requested
6b) The WCC has not provided the building heights information for each location that is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."existing and planned rapid transit stops" as requested
6c) The WCC has not provided the building density information for each location that is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."existing and planned rapid transit stops" as requested
6d) The WCC has not provided the evidence used to support the extent of the walkable catchment for each location that is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."existing and planned rapid transit stops" as requested
7) Each location in Wellington City that "within at least a walkable catchment of"..." "the edge of city centre zones" as defined by Policy 3 (c)(ii) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3.
7a) The WCC has not provided the building heights information for each location that is "within at least a walkable catchment of "the edge of city centre zones" as requested
7b) The WCC has not provided the building density information for each location that is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."the edge of city centre zones" as requested
7c) The WCC has not provided the evidence used to support the extent of the walkable catchment for each location that is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."the edge of city centre zones" as requested
8) Each location in Wellington City that "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."the edge of metropolitan centre zones" as defined by Policy 3 (c)(iii) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3.
8a) The WCC has not provided the walkable catchment which is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."the edge of metropolitan centre zones" for Kilbirnie as requested
8b) The WCC has not provided the building heights information for each location that is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."the edge of metropolitan centre zones" as requested
8c) The WCC has not provided the building density information for each location that is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."the edge of metropolitan centre zones" as requested
8d) The WCC has not provided the evidence used to support the extent of the walkable catchment for each location that is "within at least a walkable catchment of"..."the edge of metropolitan centre zones" as requested
9) Each location in Wellington City that is under "all other locations in the tier 1 urban environment" as defined by Policy 3 (d) of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 as well as the building heights and densities required by Policy 3.
9a) The WCC has not provided the walking catchment or UPS-UD Impacted Area for each location that are locations as defined "all other locations in the tier 1 urban environment" as defined by Policy 3 (d) as requested
9b) The WCC has not provided the building heights information for each location that are locations as defined "all other locations in the tier 1 urban environment" as defined by Policy 3 (d) as requested
9c) The WCC has not provided the building density information for each location that are locations as defined under "all other locations in the tier 1 urban environment" as defined by Policy 3 (d) as requested
10) Each location in Wellington City that the WCC considers that it is necessary to modify the building height or densities in order to provide for a qualifying matter under Policy 4 of the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 including, for each location:
o The qualifying matter including a copy of the evaluation report prepared under section 32 of the Act in relation to the proposed amendment
o The alternative building heights and densities proposed.
9a) The WCC has not provided qualifying matter information for each location where a qualifying matter (as permitted under Policy 4) has been applied as defined by Policy 3 (d) as requested
9b) The WCC has not provided the alternate building height information for each location where a qualifying matter (as permitted under Policy 4) has been applied as defined by Policy 3 (d) as requested
9c) The WCC has not provided the alternate building density information for each location where a qualifying matter (as permitted under Policy 4) has been applied as defined by Policy 3 (d) as requested
14) The specification for the walkable catchment for the Johnsonville metropolitan centre zone, the criteria used to specify this catchment area and the evidence used to support the application of this criteria.
14a) The WCC have determined under the previous District Plan that the extent of the 10 minute walking catchment for Johnsonville as being the Johnsonville Medium Density Residential Area. The Spatial Plan has proposed a much larger extent to be walkable. The area proposed by the Spatial Plan as the walkable catchment for the Johnsonville metropolitian centre zone is different from both the MDRA and the walking catchment from Johnsonville Station. The area of this catchment area is yet to be provided.
14b) The criteria applied by the Spatial Plan to determine the walkable catchment for the Johnsonville metropolitian centre zone is different from both the MDRA and the walking catchment from Johnsonville Station. The criteria used to specify this catchment area and the evidence used to support application of this criteria are yet to be provided.
15) The specification for the walkable catchment for the Kilbirnie metropolitan centre zone, the criteria used to specify this catchment area and the evidence used to support the application of this criteria.
15a) Although the WCC claims it has applied the same walking catchment criteria used for Johnsonville also to Kilbirnie, the walking catchment area for Kilbirnie was requested and is yet to be provided by the WCC.
15b) As noted in 8a), the NPS-UD Impact area for Kilbirnie is also not on the WCC on-line Spatial Plan map even though this area is impacted.
16) The criteria for specifying the walkable catchment for Medium density housing (type 3): 3-4 storey small apartment housing adjacent to suburban centres.
16a) While the WCC notes that “The Type 3 housing typology was not based solely on a walkable catchment basis”, the walkable catchment information that was used was requested and is yet to be provided by the WCC.
16b) As noted in 9(a), the NPS-UD Impact area is also not provided on the WCC on-line Spatial Plan map even though these areas are impacted.
If any of the requested information is held in electronic form, it is preferred that it is provided in its complete and original electronic format.
The JCA is happy to assist in further clarifying any issue the WCC may have in providing the requested information.
Yours faithfully,
Tony Randle
From: BUS: Assurance
Wellington City Council
Tēnā koe Tony
Thank you for your email dated 2 November 2020 requesting information supporting the Proposed Spatial Plan.
Our team will manage your request under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 which requires us provide a decision as soon as possible, but no later than 20 working days of receipt.
The reference number for your request is IRO-10768.
Please contact us if you have any further questions.
Kind regards
The Assurance Team
Email: [email address]
Wellington City Council | W Wellington.govt.nz | |
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
From: Tony Randle
Dear BUS: Assurance,
The Johnsonville Community Association (JCA) reply of 2 November via FYI to the WCC substantive response of 18th September 2020 is NOT a new information request. The JCA reply outlines, in detail, which information previously requested in our OIA Request of 19th August 2020 (WCC Reference IRO-10409) that is yet to be provided by the WCC.
Can the WCC please confirm this that the communication of 2nd November is not a new information request ?
Yours sincerely,
Tony Randle
From: Tony Randle
Dear BUS: Assurance,
On 3rd November, the JCA replied to the WCC response that claimed the JCA reply of 2nd Novmber 2020 was new LGOIMA Request. This JCA reply on the 3rd of November 2020 asked the WCC:
"Can the WCC please confirm that the communication of 2nd November is not a new information request ?"
Can the WCC please confirm when it will answer the question on the status of the JCA 2nd November 2020 communication ?
Yours sincerely,
Tony Randle
From: BUS: Assurance
Wellington City Council
Hello Mr Randle.
We are working with the Spatial Plan team to see if we can provide you with more detailed information to what has already been provided you.
For our administrative purposes we have log this as a new request but see this as a continuation of your original request.
Kind Regards
Asha Harry
Assurance Advisor | Complaints & Information Assurance | Wellington City Council
P +64 4 383 4435 | E [email address] | W Wellington.govt.nz | |
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Randle <[FOI #13552 email]>
Sent: 10 November 2020 10:39
To: BUS: Assurance <[email address]>
Subject: Re: IRO-10768 Official Information request - JCA request for information supporting the Proposed Spatial Plan
Dear BUS: Assurance,
On 3rd November, the JCA replied to the WCC response that claimed the JCA reply of 2nd Novmber 2020 was new LGOIMA Request. This JCA reply on the 3rd of November 2020 asked the WCC:
"Can the WCC please confirm that the communication of 2nd November is not a new information request ?"
Can the WCC please confirm when it will answer the question on the status of the JCA 2nd November 2020 communication ?
Yours sincerely,
Tony Randle
-----Original Message-----
Tēnā koe Tony
Thank you for your email dated 2 November 2020 requesting information supporting the Proposed Spatial Plan.
Our team will manage your request under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 which requires us provide a decision as soon as possible, but no later than 20 working days of receipt.
The reference number for your request is IRO-10768.
Please contact us if you have any further questions.
Kind regards
The Assurance Team
Email: [email address]
Wellington City Council | W Wellington.govt.nz | |
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #13552 email]
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
hide quoted sections
From: Tony Randle
Dear BUS: Assurance,
Can the WCC please provide an update on the timeframe under which you expect to provide the requested information on the WCC Spatial Plan ?
Yours sincerely,
Tony Randle
From: BUS: Assurance
Wellington City Council
Sending response to correct email.
-----Original Message-----
From: BUS: Assurance <[email address]>
Sent: 03 December 2020 10:38
To: 'Tony Randle' <[email address]>
Cc: BUS: Assurance <[email address]>
Subject: RE: Official Information request - Request for communications on the Spatial Plan Rapid Transit lines
Hi Tony
Please see attached response to your follow up questions to the Spatial Plan Rapid Transit Services/Stops.
Kind Regards
Asha Harry
Assurance Advisor | Complaints & Information Assurance | Wellington City Council P +64 4 830 8306 | E [email address] | W Wellington.govt.nz |
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Randle <[email address]>
Sent: 23 November 2020 19:06
To: BUS: Assurance <[email address]>
Subject: RE: Official Information request - Request for communications on the Spatial Plan Rapid Transit lines
Dear BUS: Assurance,
Thank you for finally releasing some of the requested information. For the 15 documents release, can the WCC please also provide the following information related to each document:
a) The date when the document was finalised by the WCC or, if not created by the WCC, received by the WCC
b) The author of the document or agency from which the document was sent (if not created by the WCC)
c) If the document was sent as an email attachment, a copy of the email to which the document was attached
d) The recipient(s) of the document within the WCC for document 1, 6, 14 and 15.
e) Where information has been withheld in a document, for each redaction, the grounds of LGOIMA under which the WCC has chosen to withhold information
I note that the provided information does not include any correspondence, workshops or meetings with the Ministry of the Environment or any other central government agency. As any and all correspondence, workshops or meetings with the Ministry of the Environment or any other central government agency that includes reference to Rapid Transit and/or Rapid Transit Stations is within the scope of this information request, can the WCC please confirm if it holds any such information ?
Finally, can you please outline the final information still to be provided ?
Yours sincerely,
Tony Randle
-----Original Message-----
Hi Tony
Please see attached response to the below information request.
I still have one more for you that I am still working on.
Kind Regards
Asha Harry
Assurance Advisor | Complaints & Information Assurance | Wellington City Council P +64 4 383 4435 | E [email address] | W Wellington.govt.nz | |
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[email address]
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
hide quoted sections
From: Asha Harry
Wellington City Council
image007.png
1K
Download
image008.png
1K
Download
image009.jpg
4K
Download
UPDATED IRO 10768 Follow up to Spatial Plan request IRO 10409.pdf
1.0M
Download
View as HTML
Hello Tony
Please see attached updated response to IRO-10768
Asha Harry
Assurance Advisor | Complaints & Information Assurance | Wellington City Council
P +64 4 830 8306 | E [1][email address] | W [2]Wellington.govt.nz |
[3]Facebook| [4]Twitter
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended
for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality
and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender
immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
[5]https://email-signature-images.s3-ap-sou...
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. http://wellington.govt.nz/
3. https://www.facebook.com/wellingtoncityc...
4. http://twitter.com/wgtncc
5. https://wellington.govt.nz/?utm_source=e...
From: Asha Harry
Wellington City Council
image007.png
1K
Download
image008.png
1K
Download
image009.jpg
4K
Download
IRO 10768 Clarification to response.pdf
555K
Download
View as HTML
Hello Mr Randle
Please see attached information regarding clarification on our response.
Kind Regards
Asha Harry
Assurance Advisor | Complaints & Information Assurance | Wellington City Council
E [1][email address] | W [2]Wellington.govt.nz | [3]Facebook| [4]Twitter
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended
for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality
and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender
immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
[5]https://email-signature-images.s3-ap-sou...
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. http://wellington.govt.nz/
3. https://www.facebook.com/wellingtoncityc...
4. http://twitter.com/wgtncc
5. https://wellington.govt.nz/?utm_source=e...
From: BUS: Assurance
Wellington City Council
image001.png
1K
Download
image002.png
1K
Download
image003.jpg
3K
Download
OMB ref 543075 Tony Randle Delay in decision making.pdf
568K
Download
View as HTML
Kia ora Tony
Please see attached Council response to the Ombudsman’s Office
investigation into your request regarding the proposed Spatial Plan.
Kind Regards
Asha Harry
Senior Advisor | Official Information Team | Wellington City Council
W [1]Wellington.govt.nz | [2]Facebook| [3]Twitter
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended
for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality
and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender
immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
[4]https://email-signature-images.s3-ap-sou...
References
Visible links
1. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
2. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
3. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
4. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
From: BUS: Assurance
Wellington City Council
image001.png
1K
Download
image002.png
1K
Download
image003.jpg
3K
Download
OMB ref 543075 Spatial Plan Delay in decision making Updated.pdf
529K
Download
View as HTML
Hello Tony
Please see updated response.
Kind Regards
Asha Harry
Senior Advisor | Official Information Team | Wellington City Council
W [1]Wellington.govt.nz | [2]Facebook| [3]Twitter
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended
for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality
and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender
immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
[4]https://email-signature-images.s3-ap-sou...
References
Visible links
1. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
2. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
3. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
4. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Offensive? Unsuitable?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid requests for Official Information (read more).
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators
Report this request
