Was any attempt made to recover the money obtained by Michelle McGreal and Michael Francis Murphy, convicted fraudsters, if not WHY NOT?!
      
    
Katherine Raue made this Official Information request to Ministry of Justice
The request was partially successful.
      From: Katherine Raue
      
    
    Dear Ministry of Justice,
Regarding the report at this link:
http://www.times-age.co.nz/news/huge-jum...
Please provide the following information:
1. Was the person named in this report, Michelle McGreal, required by the Court to repay any of the $77,800 she was convicted of defrauding the Ministry of?
2. Did the Ministry seek payment of any of the $77,800, either through the Court process or in any other way?
3. If so, how much was the person named in this report required to pay?
4. How much if any of the $77,800 has been repaid?
5. Did the Ministry of Justice or any other party to these proceedings make any attempt whatsoever to seek repayment of any of the $77,800, and if so, how much was sought and how much has been paid, and if not, why not?
Yours faithfully,
Katherine Raue
Manager
Transparency NZ
        From: collections correspondence
        Ministry of Justice
      
    
    Dear Ms Raue
  
 I am writing regarding your correspondence emailed to the Ministry of
 Justice on 8 November 2013. The link provided in your request does not
 work as it has been truncated. Please provide a full link, or a copy of
 the article you reference in order for your request to be looked into.
  
 Regards
  
 Collections
 National Office
>>> Katherine Raue <[OIA #1288 email]>
 11/8/2013 6:04 a.m. >>>
      Dear Ministry of Justice,
     
      Regarding the report at this link:
      [1]http://www.times-age.co.nz/news/huge-jum...
     
      Please provide the following information:
     
      1. Was the person named in this report, Michelle McGreal, required
      by the Court to repay any of the $77,800 she was convicted of
      defrauding the Ministry of?
     
      2. Did the Ministry seek payment of any of the $77,800, either
      through the Court process or in any other way?
     
      3. If so, how much was the person named in this report required to
      pay?
     
      4. How much if any of the $77,800 has been repaid?
     
      5. Did the Ministry of Justice or any other party to these
      proceedings make any attempt whatsoever to seek repayment of any of
      the $77,800, and if so, how much was sought and how much has been
      paid, and if not, why not?
     
      Yours faithfully,
     
      Katherine Raue
      Manager
      Transparency NZ
     
      -------------------------------------------------------------------
     
      This is an OIA request done via the FYI website.
     
      Please do not send progress updates as PDF files.
     
      Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be
      published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
      [2]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
     
      If you find this service useful as an OIA officer, please ask your
      web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA page.
     
     
     
show quoted sections
      From: Katherine Raue
      
    
    Dear collections correspondence,
Here is the link to the article - http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wairarapa-time...
Yours sincerely,
Katherine Raue
        From: collections correspondence
        Ministry of Justice
      
    
    Dear Ms Raue
  
 In response to your email of 8 November 2013, please see the attached
 response.
  
 Regards
  
  
 Collections
 National Office
 ========================================================
Confidentiality notice: This email may contain information that is
 confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by mistake,
 please:
 (1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email and the reply
 from your system;
 (2) do not act on this email in any other way.
 Thank you.
================================================
        From: collections correspondence
        Ministry of Justice
      
    
    Dear Ms Raue
  
 In response to your email of 8 November 2013, please see the attached
 response.
  
 Regards
  
  
 Collections
 National Office
 ========================================================
Confidentiality notice: This email may contain information that is
 confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by mistake,
 please:
 (1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email and the reply
 from your system;
 (2) do not act on this email in any other way.
 Thank you.
================================================
        From: collections correspondence
        Ministry of Justice
      
    
    Dear Katherine,
  
 Please find attached follow up correspondence regarding your Official
 Information Act requests.
  
 Regards
  
  
 Collections
 National Office
 ========================================================
Confidentiality notice: This email may contain information that is
 confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by mistake,
 please:
 (1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email and the reply
 from your system;
 (2) do not act on this email in any other way.
 Thank you.
================================================
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
 - Download a zip file of all correspondence (note: this contains the same information already available above).
 


Katherine Raue left an annotation ()
A copy of the Court decision regarding this matter was eventually provided by the Court and it makes for very interesting reading indeed - a pair of professional criminal bludgers profit to the tune of over $150,000 and NO reparation is ordered by the Court and they are basically let off scot free - read it at this link -
http://kate-raue.blogspot.co.nz/2014/01/...
Link to this