Status mode choice for A2B?

Nicholas Lee made this Official Information request to New Zealand Transport Agency

The request was successful.

From: Nicholas Lee

Dear New Zealand Transport Agency,

Please provide information on the Airport 2 Botany project (A2B):

What is the current preferred mode - BRT or LRT?

# If LRT,

1) What sections require route protection? And what work has been done to protect the route?
2) Has planning been done for future depot locations?

# If BRT.

3) What type of BRT mode is planned? Fare zone stations, low entry buses? Or simple standard AT buses with (some) separated lane.
4) What sections require route protection?
5) Is LRT still part of a future consideration for the A2B route?
6) If LRT is not part of future consideration. Why?
7) If BRT now and LRT in the future, see the question 1+2) in this context. ie. Is additional work being done to protect the route for LRT.

# More generally.

8) Are there any specific challenges for the above.
I note that Puhinui is a narrow road corridor with limited capacity to expand without property purchases. How about the sections of the route in Manukau City? Crossing SH1? Others?

9) What work has been done to scope challenges for LRT on the A2B route?

Cycleways:

What work is being done to provide a grade separated cycling path along the A2B route?

Yours faithfully,

Nicholas Lee

Link to this

From: Official Correspondence
New Zealand Transport Agency


Attachment image001.jpg
2K Download

Attachment image002.jpg
1K Download

Attachment image003.jpg
0K Download

Attachment image004.jpg
1K Download


Dear Nicholas

 

This email acknowledges your below request for information made under the
Official Information Act 1982.

 

Your request has been forwarded to the appropriate section of Waka Kotahi
NZ Transport Agency for response. They will contact you if they require
clarification of your request, more time to respond, or if your request
has been transferred to another organisation to respond to. Unless more
time is required, Waka Kotahi will send a response to you within 20
working days of receiving your request – in this instance on or before 2
June 2020.

 

As you will be aware, New Zealand is currently responding to COVID-19
(novel coronavirus). As a result, resourcing is being redeployed across
Government, and the response to your Official Information Act request
could be delayed. We will endeavour to provide a response to you within
the 20 day timeframe, or as soon as possible. In the meantime, we will
keep you informed of any changing timeframes. We apologise for any
inconvenience and appreciate your understanding.

 

The information you have requested may contain the names and contact
details of our staff. Please let us know whether you require these names
and contact details. We may need to consult our staff before deciding
whether we can release this information, and this may take a bit more
time. If we do not hear from you we will assume that you do not require
staff names and contact details.

 

If you would like to discuss your request with Waka Kotahi, please contact
us by email at [1][email address].

 

Regards  

_________  __________________________________________

Ministerial Services

Government | Engagement & Partnerships

Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
National Office / 50 Victoria Street
Private Bag 6995, Wellington 6141, New Zealand 
_________  _____________________________________

          
     [2]cid:image002.jpg@01D56496.5A7CD4A0 [3]cid:image003.jpg@01D56496.5A7CD4A0 [4]cid:image004.jpg@01D56496.5A7CD4A0  

From: Nicholas Lee <[FOI #12773 email]>
Sent: Monday, 4 May 2020 5:07 PM
To: Official Correspondence <[NZTA request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Status mode choice for A2B?

 

Dear New Zealand Transport Agency,

 

Please provide information on the Airport 2 Botany project (A2B):

 

What is the current preferred mode - BRT or LRT?

 

# If LRT,

 

1) What sections require route protection? And what work has been done to
protect the route?

2) Has planning been done for future depot locations?

 

# If BRT.

 

3) What type of BRT mode is planned? Fare zone stations, low entry buses?
Or simple standard AT buses with (some) separated lane.

4) What sections require route protection?

5) Is LRT still part of a future consideration for the A2B route?

6) If LRT is not part of future consideration. Why?

7) If BRT now and LRT in the future, see the question 1+2) in this
context. ie. Is additional work being done to protect the route for LRT.

 

# More generally.

 

8) Are there any specific challenges for the above. 

I note that Puhinui is a narrow road corridor with limited capacity to
expand without property purchases. How about the sections of the route in
Manukau City? Crossing SH1? Others?

 

9) What work has been done to scope challenges for LRT on the A2B route?

 

Cycleways:

 

What work is being done to provide a grade separated cycling path along
the A2B route?

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Nicholas Lee

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

 

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[5][FOI #12773 email]

 

Is [6][NZTA request email] the wrong address for Official
Information requests to New Zealand Transport Agency? If so, please
contact us using this form:

[7]https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=2838&a...

 

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:

[8]https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=2838&a...

 

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

Find the latest transport news, information, and advice on our website:

[9]www.nzta.govt.nz

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

This email is only intended to be read by the named recipient.  It may
contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of
legal privilege.  If you are not the intended recipient you must delete
this email and may not use any information contained in it.  Legal
privilege is not waived because you have read this email.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. https://www.facebook.com/TransportAgency
3. https://twitter.com/nzta_news
4. http://www.youtube.com/user/NZTransportA...
5. mailto:[FOI #12773 email]
6. mailto:[NZTA request email]
7. https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=2838&a...
8. https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=2838&a...
9. http://www.nzta.govt.nz/

hide quoted sections

Link to this

From: AT Official Information (AT)


Attachment image.png
4K Download

Attachment image.png
0K Download

Attachment image.png
0K Download

Attachment image.png
1K Download

Attachment image.png
1K Download

Attachment image.png
1K Download


Kia ora Nicholas,
 
Auckland Transport (AT) acknowledges receipt of your request below for
official information which we received from New Zealand Transport Agency
on 12 May 2020.
 
We hope to respond to your request as soon as possible, but not later than
10 June 2020, which is 20 working days after the day your request was
received. If we aren’t able to respond to your request by then, we will
notify you of an extension of that timeframe.
 
Your case is being managed by Cameron, who is one of our LGOIMA Business
Partners. If you have any further queries, you can contact the team on
(09) 355 3553 during business hours, quoting Local Government Official
Information request number CAS-140829-Z4Y4Q1.
 
Ngâ mihi,
 
Pablo | Customer Care Coordinator
Customer Care – Case Management
Auckland Transport
Private Bag 92250, Auckland 1142
P 09 355 3553 | E [email address] or
[email address]
[1]www.at.govt.nz
[2]cid:image008.jpg@01D4DF26.CF144370
[3]cid:image002.jpg@01D2927A.134A0850[4]cid:image003.jpg@01D2927A.134A0850 [5]cid:image004.jpg@01D2927A.134A0850 [6]cid:image005.jpg@01D2927A.134A0850[7]cid:image006.jpg@01D2927A.134A0850
 
 
 
From: Nicholas Lee <[FOI #12773 email]>
Sent: Monday, 4 May 2020 5:07 PM
To: Official Correspondence <[NZTA request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Status mode choice for A2B?

Dear New Zealand Transport Agency,

Please provide information on the Airport 2 Botany project (A2B):

What is the current preferred mode - BRT or LRT?

# If LRT,

1) What sections require route protection? And what work has been done to
protect the route?
2) Has planning been done for future depot locations?

# If BRT.

3) What type of BRT mode is planned? Fare zone stations, low entry buses?
Or simple standard AT buses with (some) separated lane.
4) What sections require route protection?
5) Is LRT still part of a future consideration for the A2B route?
6) If LRT is not part of future consideration. Why?
7) If BRT now and LRT in the future, see the question 1+2) in this
context. ie. Is additional work being done to protect the route for LRT.

# More generally.

8) Are there any specific challenges for the above. 
I note that Puhinui is a narrow road corridor with limited capacity to
expand without property purchases. How about the sections of the route in
Manukau City? Crossing SH1? Others?

9) What work has been done to scope challenges for LRT on the A2B route?

Cycleways:

What work is being done to provide a grade separated cycling path along
the A2B route?

Yours faithfully,

Nicholas Lee

 
 

We all have an important part to play in helping to reduce the spread of
COVID-19 in our communities. For the latest information and advice from
Auckland Transport go to
https://at.govt.nz/bus-train-ferry/servi....
For Ministry of Health updates go to
https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/dise....

Important notice: The contents of this email and any attachments may be
confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you have received this
email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies
of the message and attachments; any use, disclosure or copying of this
message or attachments is prohibited. Any views expressed in this email
may be those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the
views of Auckland Transport.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.at.govt.nz/
3. https://www.facebook.com/akltransport
4. https://twitter.com/akltransport
5. https://www.instagram.com/akltransport/
6. https://www.linkedin.com/company/aucklan...
7. https://www.youtube.com/user/aucklandtra...

Link to this

From: Official Correspondence
New Zealand Transport Agency


Attachment image005.jpg
1K Download

Attachment image006.jpg
0K Download

Attachment image007.jpg
1K Download

Attachment OIA 6634 Transfer letter.pdf
39K Download View as HTML


Dear Nicholas

 

Please find attached a letter advising of a transfer of your request for
information under the Official Information Act 1982 of 4 May 2020.

 

Your request is being transferred to Auckland Transport, and you can
expect to receive further correspondence from them.

 

Regards

 

_________  ____________________________________________   

Ministerial Services

Government – Engagement & Partnerships
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
National Office / 50 Victoria Street
Private Bag 6995, Wellington 6141, New Zealand 
_________ _____________________________________________

[1]Waka Kotahi
logo[2]cid:image002.jpg@01CF322A.4C836B10[3]cid:image003.jpg@01CF322A.4C836B10[4]cid:image004.jpg@01CF322A.4C836B10

 

 

From: Nicholas Lee <[5][FOI #12773 email]>
Sent: Monday, 4 May 2020 5:07 PM
To: Official Correspondence <[6][NZTA request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Status mode choice for A2B?

 

Dear New Zealand Transport Agency,

 

Please provide information on the Airport 2 Botany project (A2B):

 

What is the current preferred mode - BRT or LRT?

 

# If LRT,

 

1) What sections require route protection? And what work has been done to
protect the route?

2) Has planning been done for future depot locations?

 

# If BRT.

 

3) What type of BRT mode is planned? Fare zone stations, low entry buses?
Or simple standard AT buses with (some) separated lane.

4) What sections require route protection?

5) Is LRT still part of a future consideration for the A2B route?

6) If LRT is not part of future consideration. Why?

7) If BRT now and LRT in the future, see the question 1+2) in this
context. ie. Is additional work being done to protect the route for LRT.

 

# More generally.

 

8) Are there any specific challenges for the above. 

I note that Puhinui is a narrow road corridor with limited capacity to
expand without property purchases. How about the sections of the route in
Manukau City? Crossing SH1? Others?

 

9) What work has been done to scope challenges for LRT on the A2B route?

 

Cycleways:

 

What work is being done to provide a grade separated cycling path along
the A2B route?

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Nicholas Lee

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

 

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[7][FOI #12773 email]

 

Is [8][NZTA request email] the wrong address for Official
Information requests to New Zealand Transport Agency? If so, please
contact us using this form:

[9]https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=2838&a...

 

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:

[10]https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=2838&a...

 

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

Find the latest transport news, information, and advice on our website:

[11]www.nzta.govt.nz

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

This email is only intended to be read by the named recipient.  It may
contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of
legal privilege.  If you are not the intended recipient you must delete
this email and may not use any information contained in it.  Legal
privilege is not waived because you have read this email.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

References

Visible links
2. https://www.facebook.com/TransportAgency
3. https://twitter.com/nzta_news
4. http://www.youtube.com/user/NZTransportA...
5. mailto:[FOI #12773 email]
6. mailto:[NZTA request email]
7. mailto:[FOI #12773 email]
8. mailto:[NZTA request email]
9. https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=2838&a...
10. https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=2838&a...
11. http://www.nzta.govt.nz/

hide quoted sections

Link to this

From: AT Official Information (AT)


Attachment image.jpeg.jpg
4K Download

Attachment image.jpeg.jpg
0K Download

Attachment image.jpeg.jpg
0K Download

Attachment image.jpeg.jpg
1K Download

Attachment image.jpeg.jpg
1K Download

Attachment image.jpeg.jpg
1K Download

Attachment Auckland Transport CAS 140829 Z4Y4Q1.pdf
167K Download View as HTML

Attachment Southwest Gateway Programme Information Boards.pdf
12.9M Download View as HTML


Kia ora Nicholas,
 
My name is Cameron and I’m a LGOIMA Business Partner at Auckland
Transport. I’m responsible for looking into the official information
request you made on 12/05/2020.
 
As your request is for information that is not available straight away, we
need to treat it as an official information request. This means that we
follow the rules of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings
Act 1987 (LGOIMA)
 
Update
I’ve attached a letter signed by Chris Morgan - Group Manager, Strategic
Projects and a copy of the Southwest Gateway Programme.

Please let me know if you would like to discuss the request, simply reply
to this email leaving the subject line as it is. We’ll make sure this
information is added to your case.

Ngā mihi
Cameron 
LGOIMA Business Partner 
Auckland Transport
20 Viaduct Harbour Avenue, Auckland 1010
[1]www.at.govt.nz
[2]https://at.govt.nz/media/383477/atlogo.jpg

------------------- Original Message -------------------
From: LGOIMA;
Received: Tue May 12 2020 13:09:50 GMT+1200 (New Zealand Standard Time)
To: Nicholas Lee;
Subject: We’ve received your request for official information (case number
CAS-140829-Z4Y4Q1) CRM:000159074
Kia ora Nicholas,
 
Auckland Transport (AT) acknowledges receipt of your request below for
official information which we received from New Zealand Transport Agency
on 12 May 2020.
 
We hope to respond to your request as soon as possible, but not later than
10 June 2020, which is 20 working days after the day your request was
received. If we aren’t able to respond to your request by then, we will
notify you of an extension of that timeframe.
 
Your case is being managed by Cameron, who is one of our LGOIMA Business
Partners. If you have any further queries, you can contact the team on
(09) 355 3553 during business hours, quoting Local Government Official
Information request number CAS-140829-Z4Y4Q1.
 
Ngā mihi,
 
Pablo | Customer Care Coordinator
Customer Care – Case Management
Auckland Transport
Private Bag 92250, Auckland 1142
P 09 355 3553 | E [email address] or
[email address]
[3]www.at.govt.nz
[4][IMG][5][IMG] [6][IMG] [7][IMG][8][IMG]
 
 
 
From: Nicholas Lee <[FOI #12773 email]>
Sent: Monday, 4 May 2020 5:07 PM
To: Official Correspondence <[NZTA request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Status mode choice for A2B?

Dear New Zealand Transport Agency,

Please provide information on the Airport 2 Botany project (A2B):

What is the current preferred mode - BRT or LRT?

# If LRT,

1) What sections require route protection? And what work has been done to
protect the route?
2) Has planning been done for future depot locations?

# If BRT.

3) What type of BRT mode is planned? Fare zone stations, low entry buses?
Or simple standard AT buses with (some) separated lane.
4) What sections require route protection?
5) Is LRT still part of a future consideration for the A2B route?
6) If LRT is not part of future consideration. Why?
7) If BRT now and LRT in the future, see the question 1+2) in this
context. ie. Is additional work being done to protect the route for LRT.

# More generally.

8) Are there any specific challenges for the above. 
I note that Puhinui is a narrow road corridor with limited capacity to
expand without property purchases. How about the sections of the route in
Manukau City? Crossing SH1? Others?

9) What work has been done to scope challenges for LRT on the A2B route?

Cycleways:

What work is being done to provide a grade separated cycling path along
the A2B route?

Yours faithfully,

Nicholas Lee

 
 

 

We all have an important part to play in helping to reduce the spread of
COVID-19 in our communities. For the latest information and advice from
Auckland Transport go to
https://at.govt.nz/bus-train-ferry/servi....
For Ministry of Health updates go to
https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/dise....

Important notice: The contents of this email and any attachments may be
confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you have received this
email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies
of the message and attachments; any use, disclosure or copying of this
message or attachments is prohibited. Any views expressed in this email
may be those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the
views of Auckland Transport.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.at.govt.nz/
3. http://www.at.govt.nz/
4. https://www.facebook.com/akltransport
5. https://twitter.com/akltransport
6. https://www.instagram.com/akltransport/
7. https://www.linkedin.com/company/aucklan...
8. https://www.youtube.com/user/aucklandtra...

hide quoted sections

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
New Zealand Transport Agency only: