SCU Confirmation

Gladys Webster made this Official Information request to Accident Compensation Corporation

The request was refused by Accident Compensation Corporation.

From: Gladys Webster

Dear Accident Compensation Corporation,

A friend was sent to the senior ACC psychiatrist in Auckland by the Sensitive Claims Unit in April last year. This assessor has since been found to have provided unclear/mis-leading information in her assessment report to ACC's SCU by a Medical Body. When ACC asked this senior psychiatrist in March 2013 (as a result of advocate questioning) to clarify exactly what she meant in her report, the psychiatrist now states "I did not make a separate statement that sexual abuse was one of the contributing factors. From my point of view, at the time, I considered that ACC would be aware of that. I was writing the report for the Sensitive Claims Unit and not a lay person, and as I have said above I have confirmed that this was understood."
Does the SCU accept this position regarding claimants when senior psychiatrists deliberately with-holds making such a separate statement as they already know what she is trying to say? So in effect, the SCU can mind read their assessors? Or is this evidence that a case manager and a senior ACC psychiatrist pre-determined the outcome for the claimant, before they were assessed?? Collusion theory. I am also informed that based on this psychiatrist report the SCU declined my friend her original cover of some injuries and all entitlements.
The senior psychiatrist then continues "....it is clear that there has been a misunderstanding, which perhaps has been shared by the reviewer as to my conclusions." Apparently this Report went to two Reviewers who both concluded that the senior ACC psychiatrist did not link sexual abuse with a mental injury my friend was seeking cover for. So based on this statement then the SCU sent a Report that had a misunderstandings in it to the DRSL? (They already knowing that the sexual abuse was one of the contributing factors.) Surely this is against the Code of Claimants Rights for the SCU to provide inaccurate, misleading and out of date information to DRSL?
Can the SCU clarify a) they knew that this senior psychiatrist did not need to link sexual abuse with mental injuries as they already were aware - prior to assessment even - that this was the case.
Secondly, if indeed the SCU knew this was the case as this senior psychiatrist is now claiming, why would ACC's SCU have declined my friend cover for a mental injury and entitlements, subjecting her to significant stress and humiliation?
Thirdly does the SCU know what it's senior psychiatrists are going to write? This assessor assumes she was writing for the SCU and that they would be aware of her thoughts on the matter. If this a serious statement of SCU's operations then why would SCU need to send claimants to this senior psychiatrist - paying her large sums of taxpayer monies when they know her opinion? And then SCU used the Report provided to deny entitlements.
Fourthly, who is correct here? The senior psychiatrist, not needing to provide separate statements as SCU already knew her position - or the SCU who based on this Report (and knowing the senior psychiatrist beliefs even though they are not in writing) declined entitlements and sent false information to DRSL as they already knew - and the senior psychiatrist checked - that sexual abuse was linked to my friend's mental injury.
In this matter it appears that SCU - knowing that sexual abuse caused my friend her injuries - then declined her full cover plus entitlements and went on to provide false information to DRSL?? Is this normal SCU practice?
Or perhaps a senior ACC psychiatrist is 'making up' a position to cover themselves from negligence and the significant harm she has caused my friend?
Can ACC's SCU respond please regarding their policy on these matters.

Yours faithfully,

Gladys Webster

Link to this

From: Stephanie Lewis
Accident Compensation Corporation

Dear Ms Webster,
 
Thank you for your request, of 25 July, for information under the Official
Information Act 1982 requesting:

* a copy of the Sensitive Claims Unit's policies on what ACC expects
Assessors to include in their reports to ACC, and
* ACC's policies about using Assessor reports.

ACC is working on your request and will be in touch with your as soon as
possible, and certainly by 22 August 2013.
 
Yours sincerely,
 

       
Stephanie Lewis, Advisor, ACC
 
ACC / Government Services / Justice Centre / Level 7 / 19 Aitken
    Street
PO Box 242 / Wellington / New Zealand / [1]www.acc.co.nz
 
    ACC cares about the environment – please don’t print this email
unless it is really necessary. Thank you.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer:
"This message and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged
information.
If you believe you have received this email in error, please advise us
immediately by
return email or telephone and then delete this email together with all
attachments.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorised to use or
copy this message
or any attachments or disclose the contents to any other person. "

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

References

Visible links
1. http://www.acc.co.nz/

hide quoted sections

Link to this

From: Stephanie Lewis
Accident Compensation Corporation


Attachment Response to request for information.pdf
1.0M Download View as HTML


Good afternoon Ms Webster,
 
Please find attached ACC's response to your request, of 25 July 2013, for
information under the Official Information Act 1982.
 
If you have any questions please feel free to email me.
 
Regards,
 

       
Stephanie Lewis, Advisor, ACC
 
Tel (04) 816 7400 / ACC / Government Services / Justice Centre /
    Level 7 / 19 Aitken Street
PO Box 242 / Wellington / New Zealand / [1]www.acc.co.nz
 
    ACC cares about the environment – please don’t print this email
unless it is really necessary. Thank you.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer:
"This message and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged
information.
If you believe you have received this email in error, please advise us
immediately by
return email or telephone and then delete this email together with all
attachments.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorised to use or
copy this message
or any attachments or disclose the contents to any other person. "

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

References

Visible links
1. http://www.acc.co.nz/

hide quoted sections

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Accident Compensation Corporation only: