Industrial Hemp Testing, Environmental Assessments, and Interagency Advice (2020–2025)
SPENCER JONES made this Official Information request to Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited
Response to this request is delayed. By law, Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited should normally have responded promptly and by (details and exceptions)
From: SPENCER JONES
Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited,
Dear ESR / PHF Science,
Under the OIA, I request the following information from 1 January 2020 to 2 September 2025:
Testing/Compliance
Any lab reports, technical data, or assessments on THC testing or compliance for iHemp, provided to MoH, MPI, or other agencies.
Environmental/Health Assessments
Any documents or advice on environmental or health aspects of iHemp (e.g., phytoremediation, emissions).
Interagency Communications
Communications with MoH, MPI, MBIE, MfE concerning hemp testing, compliance, or oversight.
Funding/Contracts
Details of any ESR projects, contracts, or MoH-funded work related to hemp.
Please identify which databases/teams were searched and keywords used, per s18(e).
Yours faithfully,
Spencer Jones
From: OIA & Privacy Requests
Dear Spencer,
I am writing to acknowledge receipt of your request for information dated
Tuesday 2 September 2025.
PHF Science endeavour to respond to your request as soon as possible and
in any event no later than Tuesday 30 September 2025, being 20 working
days after the day your request was received pursuant to section 15(1) of
the Official Information Act 1982.
If we are unable to respond to your request by Tuesday 30 September, we
will notify you of an extension of that timeframe.
Kind Regards,
Wendy Chung
Legal Coordinator
[1]www.phfscience.nz
27 Creyke Road, Ilam
Christchurch 8041, New Zealand
PO Box 29181, Christchurch 8540, New Zealand
New Zealand Institute for
Public Health and Forensic Science
Formerly ESR – the Institute of
Environmental Science and Research
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: PHF Science External Enquiries <[email address]>
Sent: Tuesday, 2 September 2025 1:18 pm
To: OIA & Privacy Requests <OIA&[email address]>; Wendy
Chung <[email address]>
Subject: FW: Official Information request - Industrial Hemp Testing,
Environmental Assessments, and Interagency Advice (2020–2025)
show quoted sections
From: OIA & Privacy Requests
Good Afternoon Spencer,
Please find attached, an extension letter for your OIA request received by
PHF Science on Tuesday 2 September 2025.
Kind Regards,
Wendy Chung
Legal Coordinator
[1]www.phfscience.nz
27 Creyke Road, Ilam
Christchurch 8041, New Zealand
PO Box 29181, Christchurch 8540, New Zealand
New Zealand Institute for
Public Health and Forensic Science
Formerly ESR – the Institute of
Environmental Science and Research
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: PHF Science External Enquiries <[email address]>
Sent: Tuesday, 2 September 2025 1:18 pm
To: OIA & Privacy Requests <OIA&[email address]>; Wendy
Chung <[email address]>
Subject: FW: Official Information request - Industrial Hemp Testing,
Environmental Assessments, and Interagency Advice (2020–2025)
show quoted sections
From: SPENCER JONES
Subject: Re: OIA #32200 – Extension Notice and Clarification of Consultations and Search Process
Kia ora Wendy,
Thank you for your letter dated 30 September 2025 extending the due date for my OIA request (#32200) to 8 October 2025 under section 15A(1)(b) of the Official Information Act 1982 to allow third-party consultations. I acknowledge the extension while reserving my rights under the Act.
To maintain transparency and efficiency—particularly given the approaching statutory deadline—please provide the following clarifications in advance of, or alongside, your final decision:
Consultations under s 15A(1)(b): Please identify (by agency type, not individual names) which third parties are being consulted and the subject matter of those consultations.
Search particulars (s 18(e)): Kindly outline the internal teams or business units searched, the repositories/databases checked (e.g., LIMS, SharePoint, email servers), and the keywords and date ranges used (e.g., “industrial hemp”, “THC compliance”, “phytoremediation”, “MoH briefing”). This forms part of my original request and is required for any valid s 18(e) finding.
Rolling or staged release: If any information has been located that is not dependent on third-party consultation, please release that material now as a partial response, consistent with s 15 and Ombudsman best practice.
Possible transfers (s 14): If any elements of my request relate to information held by another agency (e.g., MoH, MPI, MBIE or MfE), please transfer those parts and notify me of the date and recipient agency.
Anticipated withholdings: If any withholding grounds are being considered (e.g., ss 6, 9, or 18), please indicate the sections so I may refine scope or provide context before a final decision.
As you will know, the Act requires extensions to be reasonable and justified. Given that similar requests to MfE and MPI between June and July 2025 were refused under s 18(e) without adequate search disclosure, I wish to ensure PHF Science’s process meets the higher transparency standard expected by the Ombudsman.
I also note the strong public interest in industrial hemp’s environmental applications (e.g., phytoremediation and emissions reduction), currently under review by the Ministry for Regulation and other agencies. This reinforces the importance of a full and timely response.
If a complete decision is not issued by close of business on 8 October 2025, the request will be deemed refused under s 28 of the Act, and I will refer the matter to the Office of the Ombudsman for review. I hope this can be avoided through prompt clarification.
Kind regards,
Spencer Jones
FYI request #32200
SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()
Update (7 October 2025): PHF Science (formerly ESR) extended the deadline for OIA #32200 to 8 October 2025 under s 15A(1)(b) due to third-party consultations. I’ve asked for clarity on which agencies are involved, the search parameters used (teams, databases, keywords), and whether any rolling release or transfers under s 14 will occur. This follows a pattern of other hemp-related OIA delays (MfE / MPI) where agencies cited procedural grounds without transparency on search efforts. I’ve requested full compliance and timely release given the public interest in industrial hemp environmental research and policy coordination (2020–2025).
From: OIA & Privacy Requests
Good Afternoon Spencer,
Please find attached, PHF Science's response to your OIA request received
on 2 September 2025 and subsequently extended to 8 October 2025.
Please also accept my sincerest apologies as I have noticed that in the
extension letter previously sent to you on the 30 September, the due date
of our response was incorrect. The given date was Tuesday 8 October where
it should have been Wednesday 8 October. This was completely an error on
my part and I sincerely apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Kind Regards,
Wendy Chung
Legal Coordinator
[1]www.phfscience.nz
27 Creyke Road, Ilam
Christchurch 8041, New Zealand
PO Box 29181, Christchurch 8540, New Zealand
New Zealand Institute for
Public Health and Forensic Science
Formerly ESR – the Institute of
Environmental Science and Research
References
Visible links
1. http://www.phfscience.nz/
http://www.phfscience.nz/
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence (note: this contains the same information already available above).
SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()
📌 FYI.org.nz Annotation – Industrial Hemp OIA Package (2020–2025)
This set of requests follows earlier OIAs (#31349 and related responses OIAD-1653 and OIAD-1707) where both MPI and MfE issued blanket refusals under section 18(e), claiming no records exist. The Ministry for the Environment later acknowledged limited consultation with MPI and MoH, but still asserted no information was held.
Given the contradictions between these refusals and publicly available information — including evidence of funding (e.g., MPI’s SFFF grants, Callaghan Innovation projects), regulatory review activity (2025 Minister Seymour review), and interagency roles already acknowledged in legislation — I am submitting a coordinated package of requests to MoH, MPI, MBIE, and ESR/PHF Science.
The purpose is to:
1. **Clarify interagency roles and responsibilities** (MoH, MPI, MBIE, MfE, ESR);
2. **Test for duplication or inefficiency** in licensing, food regulation, environmental oversight, and bioeconomy policy;
3. **Confirm existence of government funding and pilot projects** that have already been publicly reported;
4. **Ensure transparency in search efforts**, including which units/databases were checked, and whether transfers under s14 were considered.
This approach is designed to establish a clear, cross-agency record before pursuing any further escalation. It is in the public interest given hemp’s role in climate mitigation, sustainable agriculture, and New Zealand’s emerging bioeconomy.
Link to this