Dear Ministry of Social Development,

I request all and every information held by WINZ MSD that WINZ MSD relied upon to arrive at the conclusion that telling clients untruthful information / deceiving them ( false names on documents, false names when talking by phone ) would lessen any risk to any staff members. Any studies, anything that would lead MSD to think such actions as deceit would placate an unhappy client and the full reasoning on which this plan to use non legal actions and serious abuse of natural justice rights was based upon please. Any proof that this action of removal of natural justice rights would achieve its goals rather than anger further already annoyed clients. The theory that abusing clients rights would lessen their annoyance or anger in any way. Studies etc.

Yours faithfully,

Gregory Soar

Dear OIA_Requests (MSD),

Thank you for the response. It confirms that there is no evidence held by MSD to support this abuse of clients rights. I have a few more informations to gather before proceeding with remedy. Thank you very much.

Yours sincerely,

Gregory Soar