Road Projects Approvals - Meeting Standards & Design
Chris McCashin made this Official Information request to Wellington City Council
This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for Chris McCashin to read recent responses and update the status.
From: Chris McCashin
Dear Wellington City Council,
I am writing to request the following for all of the previous Lets Get Wellington Moving projects which have since been taken in-house - any and all projects including but not limited to
- Thorndon Quay
- Onepu Road
- Adelaide Road
- Berhampore Cycleway
- Island Bay Cycleway
- Recent Karori works
Any and all recent projects whereby cycleways have gone in. I am specifically requesting
- Resource & Building consent applications for cycleway / roading projects
- Resource & Building consent approvals
- Consultation documents including with stakeholders - emergency services etc
- Documentation confirming the developments meet the code of practice for land development including but not limited to - code of practice for land development, road design and construction (to include all vehicle crossings meeting the standards and applications associated amending the vehicle crossings that are impacted)
- Designs (meeting the standards for primary/secondary/arterial roads/principal, widths etc),
- Plantings
- Traffic calming - ie can traffic calming measures being placed on arterial roads, primary roads etc etc - per NZTA standards I didn't think speed humps could be installed on these?
- Visibility requirements / sight lines etc
- Gradients associated with arterial, principal, collector, sub-collector and local roads ensuring these projects comply - are speed humps factored into these gradients?
- Carriageways
- Traffic Islands
- Road amenity and berm construction
- Minimum widths
- Parking
- As-built requirements
- Aesthetics / bollards - could a private developer put plastic bollards all over their roads as part of a new subdivision
Ultimately I want the application and approval documents of all of these projects ensuring they are meeting minimum standards per council guidelines notably Codes of Practice for Land Development 2012 & Road Design and Construction 2012 - application documents for amending road crossings where they have been done.
Where these documents are not available (if that is the case) can you please explain why? Where vehicle crossings, arterial road standards and site lines do not meet the standards can you tell me which ones don't and the reason for this?
Yours faithfully,
Chris
From: BUS: Official Information
Wellington City Council
Kia ora
Thank you for contacting the Wellington City Council Official Information
Team.
Your email has been received and we will respond within 3 business days.
If your request is more a general enquiry, or for anything urgent, please
contact our Contact Centre on 04 499 4444 or email [1][email address]
For Police CCTV requests, please send through to [2][email address]
Many thanks
Official Information Team
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. mailto:[email address]
From: BUS: Official Information
Wellington City Council
Kia ora Chris
Thank you for your email dated 14 August requesting information.
Our team will manage your request under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 which requires us to provide a decision as soon as possible, but no later than 11 September, being 20 working days of receipt.
The reference number for your request is IRC-6924
Please contact us if you have any further questions.
Kind regards
Official Information Team
Email: [email address]
Wellington City Council | W Wellington.govt.nz | |
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris McCashin <[FOI #28051 email]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2024 4:14 PM
To: BUS: Official Information <[Wellington City Council request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Road Projects Approvals - Meeting Standards & Design
Dear Wellington City Council,
I am writing to request the following for all of the previous Lets Get Wellington Moving projects which have since been taken in-house - any and all projects including but not limited to
- Thorndon Quay
- Onepu Road
- Adelaide Road
- Berhampore Cycleway
- Island Bay Cycleway
- Recent Karori works
Any and all recent projects whereby cycleways have gone in. I am specifically requesting
- Resource & Building consent applications for cycleway / roading projects
- Resource & Building consent approvals
- Consultation documents including with stakeholders - emergency services etc
- Documentation confirming the developments meet the code of practice for land development including but not limited to - code of practice for land development, road design and construction (to include all vehicle crossings meeting the standards and applications associated amending the vehicle crossings that are impacted)
- Designs (meeting the standards for primary/secondary/arterial roads/principal, widths etc),
- Plantings
- Traffic calming - ie can traffic calming measures being placed on arterial roads, primary roads etc etc - per NZTA standards I didn't think speed humps could be installed on these?
- Visibility requirements / sight lines etc
- Gradients associated with arterial, principal, collector, sub-collector and local roads ensuring these projects comply - are speed humps factored into these gradients?
- Carriageways
- Traffic Islands
- Road amenity and berm construction
- Minimum widths
- Parking
- As-built requirements
- Aesthetics / bollards - could a private developer put plastic bollards all over their roads as part of a new subdivision
Ultimately I want the application and approval documents of all of these projects ensuring they are meeting minimum standards per council guidelines notably Codes of Practice for Land Development 2012 & Road Design and Construction 2012 - application documents for amending road crossings where they have been done.
Where these documents are not available (if that is the case) can you please explain why? Where vehicle crossings, arterial road standards and site lines do not meet the standards can you tell me which ones don't and the reason for this?
Yours faithfully,
Chris
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #28051 email]
Is [Wellington City Council request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests to Wellington City Council? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
hide quoted sections
From: BUS: Official Information
Wellington City Council
Tēnā koe Mr McCashin
Thank you for your request of 14 August 2024, to Te Kaunihera o Pōneke |
Wellington City Council (the Council), requesting the following
information:
1. I am writing to request the following for all of the previous Lets Get
Wellington Moving projects which have since been taken in-house - any
and all projects including but not limited to
a. Thorndon Quay
b. Onepu Road
c. Adelaide Road
d. Berhampore Cycleway
e. Island Bay Cycleway
f. Recent Karori works
2. Any and all recent projects whereby cycleways have gone in. I am
specifically requesting
a. Resource & Building consent applications for cycleway / roading
projects
b. Resource & Building consent approvals
c. Consultation documents including with stakeholders - emergency
services etc
d. Documentation confirming the developments meet the code of
practice for land development including but not limited to - code
of practice for land development, road design and construction
(to include all vehicle crossings meeting the standards and
applications associated amending the vehicle crossings that are
impacted)
e. Designs (meeting the standards for primary/secondary/arterial
roads/principal, widths etc),
f. Plantings
g. Traffic calming - ie can traffic calming measures being placed on
arterial roads, primary roads etc etc - per NZTA standards I
didn't think speed humps could be installed on these?
h. Visibility requirements / sight lines etc
i. Gradients associated with arterial, principal, collector,
sub-collector and local roads ensuring these projects comply -
are speed humps factored into these gradients?
j. Carriageways
k. Traffic Islands
l. Road amenity and berm construction
m. Minimum widths
n. Parking
o. As-built requirements
p. Aesthetics / bollards - could a private developer put plastic
bollards all over their roads as part of a new subdivision
3. Ultimately I want the application and approval documents of all of
these projects ensuring they are meeting minimum standards per council
guidelines notably Codes of Practice for Land Development 2012 & Road
Design and Construction 2012 - application documents for amending road
crossings where they have been done.
4. Where these documents are not available (if that is the case) can you
please explain why? Where vehicle crossings, arterial road standards
and site lines do not meet the standards can you tell me which ones
don't and the reason for this?
Your request is being considered under the Local Government Official
Information and Meetings Act 1987 (LGOIMA).
As currently worded, your request would require substantial collation and
assessment of a considerable number of documents from the Council’s
systems. To enable us to provide you with a timely response, and in
accordance with our obligations under section 18(b) of the OIA, we wish to
refine your request. If so, the Council recommends refining your request
to be for a narrower scope of information if possible. Should the request
not be refined, it is likely that the request will be refused pursuant to
section 17(f) of the LGOIMA, as the information requested cannot be made
available without substantial collection or research.
As per part three of your request, we would like to propose to refine your
request to be for the following:
1. I want the application and approval documents of all of these projects
(listed below) ensuring they are meeting minimum standards per council
guidelines notably Codes of Practice for Land Development 2012 & Road
Design and Construction 2012 - application documents for amending road
crossings where they have been done:
a. Thorndon Quay
b. Onepu Road
c. Adelaide Road
d. Berhampore Cycleway
e. Island Bay Cycleway
f. Recent Karori works
To enable us to meet our obligations under the LGOIMA, we would be
grateful for your response as soon as possible, but by no later than COB
26 August 2024.
Nga mihi
Danika Morris-Brown
Senior Advisor Official Information
Ara Whaimana | Strategy and Governance
Te Kaunihera o Pōneke | Wellington City Council
E [1][email address] | W [2]wellington.govt.nz
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. http://wellington.govt.nz/
From: BUS: Official Information
Wellington City Council
Tēnā koe Mr McCashin
Please find attached correspondence from Te Kaunihera o Pōneke |
Wellington City Council.
Nga mihi
Danika Morris-Brown
Senior Advisor Official Information
Ara Whaimana | Strategy and Governance
Te Kaunihera o Pōneke | Wellington City Council
E [1][email address] | W [2]wellington.govt.nz
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. http://wellington.govt.nz/
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence