Dear Ministry of Justice,

Would I be breaking the law by asking a policy enforcement office trading as "New Zealand Police" for proof of his / her name ie photographic evidence?

Please evidence the appropriate legislative evidence that supports a "yes" reply.

Yours faithfully,

:Deborah-joy: of the Longstaff family

Dear Media,

A]. Who is "Media Team"? I legitimately and respectfully request to have the name of a human being to communicate with given that My OIA was not address to "Media Team"

B]. Insult 1]. You insult me by not using the name that was supplied to the Ministry of Justice, it is :Deborah-joy: of the Longstaff family NOT Deborah-Joy.

C]. Insult 2]. I did not ask for "legal advice", I know exactly who to approach for legal advice.

D]. Insult 3]. My question was not hypothetical, I asked it based on previous experiences I have had with NZ policy enforcement officers.

E]. Insult 4]. You were asked to provide any links to appropriate legislation pertaining to a "law" that I have been accused of breaking. You failed to do so given your assumption that this was a "hypothetical question".

F]. I asked the Ministry of Justice ONE simple question, not questions ...... Can you not count?

G]. Where does as ONE simple question amount to your interpretation that "Your questions designed to engage in debate about sovereignty".

H]. Your attempts to ridicule and gaslight me are duly noted, as is your attempt to deflect my simple question. This could be considered as obstruction of my access to transparency and factual evidence that I believe that the Ministry of Justice will have access to. In deciding not to answer my ONE simple question leads me to believe that there is no law which pertains to my question which was: "Would I be breaking the law by asking a policy enforcement officer trading as "New Zealand Police" for proof of his / her name ie photographic evidence?".

I]. My time is as valuable as yours "Media team", your interpretation of my legitimate requests for information appear to be biased. So as not to trouble you further, perhaps you could help me to construct this question so that it is not deemed as "hypothetical" or interpreted as "designed to engage in debate about sovereignty" or will your arrogance and ego prevent you from assisting an individual whose taxes contribute to your salary and pension?

J]. If you are unable to transparently and lawfully answer my simple initial question which was: "Would I be breaking the law by asking a policy enforcement officer trading as "New Zealand Police" for proof of his / her name ie photographic evidence"; as a tax payer funded department you are required to forward this request for an answer / information to the relevant human being who can answer this request, and who is duly instructed to provide me with his / her full name and contact details.

K]. You advise that "there is no reason to believe that it is held by any other agency subject to the Act". I have no evidence of that and therefore respectfully and legitimately instruct you to send my original question and request for the appropriate legislation to the following human beings:
The previous and / or current Minister of Justice, The Governor General, the Attorney-General, the Solicitor-General, the Minister for Police.

L]. You are also legitimately and respectfully requested to confirm and provide that evidence that you have in fact forwarded my questions / request for evidence to the above individuals in K]. by 30 October 2023.

M]. Should you fail to answer my simple question, and provide me with the appropriate legislation that supports this, I will have no option but to take this contempt for me asking a simple question as a tax payer further.

Sincerely,

:Deborah-joy: of the Longstaff family. [RD].

Dear Ministry of Justice team

I would like to re-word my initial request for information as follows:

Please advise, with the relevant sections of any legislation provided: Is a member of the public committing an offence by asking a policy enforcement officer wearing any type of uniform when they demand that uniformed individual to prove their ID (eg show warrant card, photo IDs name badges etc) ie Is there any law which prohibits such a demand of any policy enforcement officer? eg police, border staff, court officials, traffic wardens, bailiffs, airline security staff, bank security staff given that there are (a) numerous provable events regarding enforcement imposters & (b) published official information regarding personal safety & asking for proof of ID,

Yours sincerely,

:Deborah-joy: of the Longstaff family