Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Subjiciendum
Lance D. Lavery made this Official Information request to Department of Corrections
The request was partially successful.
From: Lance D. Lavery
Dear Department of Corrections,
Under the Official Information Act 1982 I require the New Zealand DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS to answer the following questions...
1. What is the DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS policy regarding a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Subjiciendum application?
2. Does the DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS have the "Lawful" authority to ignore the Habeas Corpus Act 2001 and do they also have the "Lawful" authority to ignore a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Subjiciendum application?
Yours faithfully,
Lance-Desmond: Lavery
From: Lance D. Lavery
Dear Department of Corrections,
What's happening with my request please respond as soon as possible.
Yours faithfully,
Lance-Desmond: Lavery
From: Info@Corrections
Department of Corrections
Dear Mr Lavery
Thank you for your email of 8 August 2014 requesting information relating
to Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Subjiciendum.
Your request will be considered under the Official Information Act 1982.
Kind Regards
Ministerial Services Team
National Office
Department of Corrections
Mayfair House
44-52 The Terrace
Private Bag 1206
Wellington 6140
[1]www.corrections.govt.nz
-----Original Message-----
From: Lance-Desmond: Lavery
[mailto:[OIA #1876 email]]
Sent: 08 August 2014 11:50 p.m.
To: Ministerial Services
Subject: Official Information Act request - Writ of Habeas Corpus ad
Subjiciendum
Dear Department of Corrections,
Under the Official Information Act 1982 I require the New Zealand
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS to answer the following questions...
1. What is the DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS policy regarding a Writ of Habeas
Corpus ad Subjiciendum application?
2. Does the DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS have the "Lawful" authority to
ignore the Habeas Corpus Act 2001 and do they also have the "Lawful"
authority to ignore a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Subjiciendum application?
Yours faithfully,
Lance-Desmond: Lavery
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an OIA request done via the FYI website.
Please do not send progress updates as PDF files.
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[2]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an OIA officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information in this message is the property of the New Zealand
Department of Corrections. It is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged material.
Any review, storage, copying, editing, summarising, transmission,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, by any means, in whole or
part, or taking any action in reliance upon, this information by persons
or entities other than intended recipient are prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers.
References
Visible links
1. http://www.corrections.govt.nz/
2. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
hide quoted sections
From: Lance D. Lavery
Dear Info@Corrections,
Thank you for your acknowledgement. According to the Official Information Act 1982, the Department of Corrections has twenty[20] working days to respond.
I expect to receive an appropriate and detailed response no later than the 5th of September, 2014.
Kind Regards,
Lance-Desmond: Lavery
From: Lance D. Lavery
From: Info@Corrections
Department of Corrections
Hello
Please find attached correspondence from the Department of Corrections.
Regards
Ministerial Services Team
National Office
Department of Corrections
Mayfair House
44-52 The Terrace
Private Bag 1206
Wellington 6140
[1]www.corrections.govt.nz
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information in this message is the property of the New Zealand
Department of Corrections. It is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged material.
Any review, storage, copying, editing, summarising, transmission,
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, by any means, in whole or
part, or taking any action in reliance upon, this information by persons
or entities other than intended recipient are prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all
computers.
References
Visible links
1. http://www.corrections.govt.nz/
hide quoted sections
From: Lance D. Lavery
Dear Info@Corrections,
Thank you for your response however I am not satisfied with the response and I will decide how to remedy my dissatisfaction after I have thought about the best way forward.
In regards to this request it is still open and needs to be satisfied.
I feel an Ombudsman review is premature at this particular stage but it will be considered during the planning process.
Yours sincerely,
Lance-Desmond: Lavery
From: Info@Corrections
Department of Corrections
Thank you for your email Lance
If you would like to let us know why you are dissatifioed with this response we will do our best to address your concerns.
Regards
Ministerial Services Team
National Office
Department of Corrections
Mayfair House
44-52 The Terrace
Private Bag 1206
Wellington 6140
www.corrections.govt.nz
-----Original Message-----
From: Lance-Desmond: Lavery [mailto:[OIA #1876 email]]
Sent: 10 September 2014 2:39 a.m.
To: Info@Corrections
Subject: Re: c67843 - correspondence from the Department of Corrections.
Dear Info@Corrections,
Thank you for your response however I am not satisfied with the response and I will decide how to remedy my dissatisfaction after I have thought about the best way forward.
In regards to this request it is still open and needs to be satisfied.
I feel an Ombudsman review is premature at this particular stage but it will be considered during the planning process.
Yours sincerely,
Lance-Desmond: Lavery
-----Original Message-----
Hello
Please find attached correspondence from the Department of Corrections.
Regards
Ministerial Services Team
National Office
Department of Corrections
Mayfair House
44-52 The Terrace
Private Bag 1206
Wellington 6140
[1]www.corrections.govt.nz
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[OIA #1876 email]
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an OIA officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information in this message is the property of the New Zealand Department of Corrections. It is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged material. Any review, storage, copying, editing, summarising, transmission, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, by any means, in whole or part, or taking any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than intended recipient are prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers.
hide quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Ian Andrews left an annotation ()
I'm in touch with several parties who have a history of making OIA requests of Corrections dept . It appears to be Corrections' standard policy to ask for an extention of time . The legal provision to extend was designed as an exception , not as standard policy .
These parties have recently complained to the Ombudsman about this . I suggest you do likewise .
Link to this