Printed from https://fyi.org.nz/request/16350-walking-and-cycling-across-the-auckland-harbour-bridge-getacross?unfold=1 on November 22, 2024 11:15

Walking and cycling across the Auckland Harbour Bridge: GetAcross

Bevan Woodward made this Official Information request to New Zealand Transport Agency

The request was partially successful.

From: Bevan Woodward

Dear New Zealand Transport Agency,

Official Information Act Request to NZTA:

1) This Herald article:https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/auckland-h... states “A November briefing paper to Transport Minister Michael Wood warned the "loading restrictions" would be needed within the next 20 years”. Please provide:

a) a copy of the November briefing paper to Transport Minister Michael Wood
b) a copy of the technical advice to NZTA that advises the AHB cannot be further strengthened
c) a copy of the most recent load capacity study (draft or finalised) and any peer reviews prepared for NZTA.

2) Please specify what work NZTA has been had done to determine the actual measured differential temperature effects on the AHB Box Girders, including;

a) providing a copy of the report on the details of the work and the results
b) advising whether such work has been used to update the load capacity studies (in particular that referred to in 1(c) above) done for NZTA?

3) At the NZTA Board meeting on 20 August 2018, management advised the SkyPath design was “a buildable project, which can run in conjunction with vehicles, subject to the need to control flow.” (See page 14: http://www.getacross.org.nz/uploads/1/2/...)

a) Please provide the technical reports to support this advice to the NZTA Board.
b) What consideration was given to adopting the AHB strengthening solution prepared by Holmes Consulting Group in order to remove the requirement for “the need to control flow” for the SkyPath design?
http://www.getacross.org.nz/uploads/1/2/...

4) Following the NZTA Board meeting on 20 August 2018, the NZTA chair wrote to the Minister of Transport advising:

“Assuming the detailed business case confirms the economic case, the Skypath project will be able to proceed to implementation. Once the necessary designs are complete and consents in place construction can begin."
NZTA letter dated 21 August 2018
http://www.getacross.org.nz/uploads/1/2/...

Please advise the course of events and with supporting documentation and technical reports, including dates of key decisions, to explain why NZTA chose not to proceed with the SkyPath design.

5) NZTA’s HARBOUR BRIDGE SHARED PATH – SSBC (Dated 6 January 2020) states on Page 20 with regards to Option 1: “the Agency’s engineering advice is that the design would need to be altered to enable delivery of a technically achievable scheme. The extent of the design changes are likely to be sufficient that variations to the consents would be needed”.

Please provide:
a) details of this engineering advice, including what aspects of the SkyPath design would need to be altered and why.
b) details of the likely variations to the consents.
c) copies of any technical report(s) relied upon in providing such advice.

6) In terms of assessing the traffic impacts by taking the western-most traffic lane (per Option 3, NZTA’s HARBOUR BRIDGE SHARED PATH – Single stage business case dated 6 January 2020), has (or will) NZTA include modelling which takes into account the effect of road pricing?

7) This media statement from Hon Michael Wood:
https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/new-...
states “In the meantime, Waka Kotahi will continue to work on how to provide safe temporary trials of using lanes on the existing harbour bridge for cyclists and pedestrians.”

OIA-8193 RESPONSE advises "We have discussed a trial versus regular access on the bridge with the Board who have asked for and extra work necessary to understand the cost and risks associated with providing access. Any decision to provide access will be made by the board"

Please advise when the NZTA Board intends making its decision regarding access for pedestrians and cyclists across the Auckland Harbour Bridge.

8) On Saturday, May 29 we learnt from Auckland Transport’s that the western clip on lanes of the AHB would be closed to traffic for the Bike Auckland rally. On Sunday, May 30 NZTA’s traffic management vehicles were in place ready for the rally.

Please advise:

a) Given NZTA had organised to close the western clip-on lanes to traffic on Sunday, May 30, why did NZTA position their moveable barrier so that of the six remaining available traffic lanes, only two were northbound?

b) Please provide a copy of correspondence between NZTA and Auckland Transport or NZ Police in relation to the traffic management for the Bike Auckland rally on Sunday, May 30.

Do not hesitate to contact me with any questions on the above information requests.

Yours faithfully,

Bevan Woodward

Link to this

From: Official Correspondence
New Zealand Transport Agency

Attachment image001.png
12K Download

Dear Bevan,

 

This email acknowledges your below request for information made under the
Official Information Act 1982.

 

Your request has been forwarded to the appropriate section of Waka Kotahi
NZ Transport Agency for response. They will contact you if they require
clarification of your request, more time to respond, or if your request
has been transferred to another organisation to respond to. Unless more
time is required, Waka Kotahi will send a response to you within 20
working days of receiving your request – in this instance on or before
6^th September 2021.

 

The information you have requested may contain the names and contact
details of our staff. Please let us know whether you require these names
and contact details. We may need to consult our staff before deciding
whether we can release this information, and this may take a bit more
time. If we do not hear from you we will assume that you do not require
staff names and contact details.

 

If you would like to discuss your request with Waka Kotahi, please contact
us by email at [1][email address].

 

Regards  

 

Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kôtuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency

[2]twitter | [3]youtube | [4]facebook

 

[5][IMG]

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Bevan Woodward <[FYI request #16350 email]>
Sent: Monday, 9 August 2021 2:22 pm
To: Official Correspondence <[NZTA request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Walking and cycling across the
Auckland Harbour Bridge: GetAcross

 

Dear New Zealand Transport Agency,

 

Official Information Act Request to NZTA:
                                                                                            

 

1)            This Herald
article:https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
states “A November briefing paper to Transport Minister Michael Wood
warned the "loading restrictions" would be needed within the next 20
years”. Please provide:

 

a)            a copy of the November briefing paper to Transport Minister
Michael Wood

b)            a copy of the technical advice to NZTA that advises the AHB
cannot be further strengthened

c)            a copy of the most recent load capacity study (draft or
finalised) and any peer reviews prepared for NZTA.

 

2)            Please specify what work NZTA has been had done to determine
the actual measured differential temperature effects on the AHB Box
Girders, including;

 

a)            providing a copy of the report on the details of the work
and the results

b)            advising whether such work has been used to update the load
capacity studies (in particular that referred to in 1(c) above) done for
NZTA?

 

3)            At the NZTA Board meeting on 20 August 2018, management
advised the SkyPath design was “a buildable project, which can run in
conjunction with vehicles, subject to the need to control flow.” (See page
14:
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...)

 

a)            Please provide the technical reports to support this advice
to the NZTA Board.

b)            What consideration was given to adopting the AHB
strengthening solution prepared by Holmes Consulting Group in order to
remove the requirement for “the need to control flow” for the SkyPath
design?

https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

4)            Following the NZTA Board meeting on 20 August 2018, the NZTA
chair wrote to the Minister of Transport advising:

 

“Assuming the detailed business case confirms the economic case, the
Skypath project will be able to proceed to implementation. Once the
necessary designs are complete and consents in place construction can
begin."

NZTA letter dated 21 August 2018

https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

Please advise the course of events and with supporting documentation and
technical reports, including dates of key decisions, to explain why NZTA
chose not to proceed with the SkyPath design.

 

5)            NZTA’s HARBOUR BRIDGE SHARED PATH – SSBC (Dated 6 January
2020) states on Page 20 with regards to Option 1: “the Agency’s
engineering advice is that the design would need to be altered to enable
delivery of a technically achievable scheme. The extent of the design
changes are likely to be sufficient that variations to the consents would
be needed”.

 

Please provide:

a)            details of this engineering advice, including what aspects
of the SkyPath design would need to be altered and why.

b)            details of the likely variations to the consents.

c)            copies of any technical report(s) relied upon in providing
such advice.

 

6)            In terms of assessing the traffic impacts by taking the
western-most traffic lane (per Option 3, NZTA’s HARBOUR BRIDGE SHARED PATH
– Single stage business case dated 6 January 2020), has (or will) NZTA
include modelling which takes into account the effect of road pricing?

 

7)            This media statement from Hon Michael Wood:

https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

states “In the meantime, Waka Kotahi will continue to work on how to
provide safe temporary trials of using lanes on the existing harbour
bridge for cyclists and pedestrians.”

 

OIA-8193 RESPONSE advises "We have discussed a trial versus regular access
on the bridge with the Board who have asked for and extra work necessary
to understand the cost and risks associated with providing access. Any
decision to provide access will be made by the board"

 

Please advise when the NZTA Board intends making its decision regarding
access for pedestrians and cyclists across the Auckland Harbour Bridge.

 

8)            On Saturday, May 29 we learnt from Auckland Transport’s that
the western clip on lanes of the AHB would be closed to traffic for the
Bike Auckland rally.  On Sunday, May 30 NZTA’s traffic management vehicles
were in place ready for the rally. 

 

Please advise:

 

a)            Given NZTA had organised to close the western clip-on lanes
to traffic on Sunday, May 30, why did NZTA position their moveable barrier
so that of the six remaining available traffic lanes, only two were
northbound? 

 

b)            Please provide a copy of correspondence between NZTA and
Auckland Transport or NZ Police in relation to the traffic management for
the Bike Auckland rally on Sunday, May 30. 

 

Do not hesitate to contact me with any questions on the above information
requests.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Bevan Woodward

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

 

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[FYI request #16350 email]

 

Is [NZTA request email] the wrong address for Official
Information requests to New Zealand Transport Agency? If so, please
contact us using this form:

https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:

https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This message, together with any attachments, may contain information that
is classified and/or subject to legal privilege. Any classification
markings must be adhered to. If you are not the intended recipient, you
must not peruse, disclose, disseminate, copy or use the message in any
way. If you have received this message in error, please notify us
immediately by return email and then destroy the original message. This
communication may be accessed or retained by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport
Agency for information assurance purposes.

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
3. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
4. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
5. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

hide quoted sections

Link to this

From: Official Correspondence
New Zealand Transport Agency

Attachment image001.png
12K Download

Attachment OIA 8631 response.pdf
151K Download View as HTML

Attachment Attachment 1 BRI 2066 AWHC briefing note.pdf
641K Download View as HTML

Attachment Attachment 2 SkyPath Concept Structural Assessment Technical Report AHB Alliance.pdf
9.2M Download View as HTML

Attachment Attachment 3 AHB SkyPath Concept Structural Assessment Technical Report Comments.pdf
550K Download View as HTML

Attachment Attachment 4 AHB Cycleway Holmes Submission.pdf
267K Download View as HTML

Attachment Attachment 5 NZ Transport Agency Board Paper 5.2 Auckland Harbour Bridge Walking and Cycling Single Stage Business Case 18 December 2019.pdf
2.0M Download View as HTML

Attachment Attachment 6 Correspondence.pdf
1.2M Download View as HTML

Dear Bevan

 

Please find attached the response to your request of 9 August 2021 for
information under the Official Information Act 1982.

 

Regards

 

Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kōtuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency

[1]twitter | [2]youtube | [3]facebook

 

[4][IMG]

 

From: Bevan Woodward <[5][FOI #16350 email]>
Sent: Monday, 9 August 2021 2:22 pm
To: Official Correspondence <[6][NZTA request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Walking and cycling across the
Auckland Harbour Bridge: GetAcross

 

Dear New Zealand Transport Agency,

 

Official Information Act Request to NZTA:
                                                                                            

 

1)            This Herald
article:https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
states “A November briefing paper to Transport Minister Michael Wood
warned the "loading restrictions" would be needed within the next 20
years”. Please provide:

 

a)            a copy of the November briefing paper to Transport Minister
Michael Wood

b)            a copy of the technical advice to NZTA that advises the AHB
cannot be further strengthened

c)            a copy of the most recent load capacity study (draft or
finalised) and any peer reviews prepared for NZTA.

 

2)            Please specify what work NZTA has been had done to determine
the actual measured differential temperature effects on the AHB Box
Girders, including;

 

a)            providing a copy of the report on the details of the work
and the results

b)            advising whether such work has been used to update the load
capacity studies (in particular that referred to in 1(c) above) done for
NZTA?

 

3)            At the NZTA Board meeting on 20 August 2018, management
advised the SkyPath design was “a buildable project, which can run in
conjunction with vehicles, subject to the need to control flow.” (See page
14:
[7]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...)

 

a)            Please provide the technical reports to support this advice
to the NZTA Board.

b)            What consideration was given to adopting the AHB
strengthening solution prepared by Holmes Consulting Group in order to
remove the requirement for “the need to control flow” for the SkyPath
design?

[8]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

4)            Following the NZTA Board meeting on 20 August 2018, the NZTA
chair wrote to the Minister of Transport advising:

 

“Assuming the detailed business case confirms the economic case, the
Skypath project will be able to proceed to implementation. Once the
necessary designs are complete and consents in place construction can
begin."

NZTA letter dated 21 August 2018

[9]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

Please advise the course of events and with supporting documentation and
technical reports, including dates of key decisions, to explain why NZTA
chose not to proceed with the SkyPath design.

 

5)            NZTA’s HARBOUR BRIDGE SHARED PATH – SSBC (Dated 6 January
2020) states on Page 20 with regards to Option 1: “the Agency’s
engineering advice is that the design would need to be altered to enable
delivery of a technically achievable scheme. The extent of the design
changes are likely to be sufficient that variations to the consents would
be needed”.

 

Please provide:

a)            details of this engineering advice, including what aspects
of the SkyPath design would need to be altered and why.

b)            details of the likely variations to the consents.

c)            copies of any technical report(s) relied upon in providing
such advice.

 

6)            In terms of assessing the traffic impacts by taking the
western-most traffic lane (per Option 3, NZTA’s HARBOUR BRIDGE SHARED PATH
– Single stage business case dated 6 January 2020), has (or will) NZTA
include modelling which takes into account the effect of road pricing?

 

7)            This media statement from Hon Michael Wood:

[10]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

states “In the meantime, Waka Kotahi will continue to work on how to
provide safe temporary trials of using lanes on the existing harbour
bridge for cyclists and pedestrians.”

 

OIA-8193 RESPONSE advises "We have discussed a trial versus regular access
on the bridge with the Board who have asked for and extra work necessary
to understand the cost and risks associated with providing access. Any
decision to provide access will be made by the board"

 

Please advise when the NZTA Board intends making its decision regarding
access for pedestrians and cyclists across the Auckland Harbour Bridge.

 

8)            On Saturday, May 29 we learnt from Auckland Transport’s that
the western clip on lanes of the AHB would be closed to traffic for the
Bike Auckland rally.  On Sunday, May 30 NZTA’s traffic management vehicles
were in place ready for the rally. 

 

Please advise:

 

a)            Given NZTA had organised to close the western clip-on lanes
to traffic on Sunday, May 30, why did NZTA position their moveable barrier
so that of the six remaining available traffic lanes, only two were
northbound? 

 

b)            Please provide a copy of correspondence between NZTA and
Auckland Transport or NZ Police in relation to the traffic management for
the Bike Auckland rally on Sunday, May 30. 

 

Do not hesitate to contact me with any questions on the above information
requests.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Bevan Woodward

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

 

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[11][FOI #16350 email]

 

Is [12][NZTA request email] the wrong address for Official
Information requests to New Zealand Transport Agency? If so, please
contact us using this form:

[13]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:

[14]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

 

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

This message, together with any attachments, may contain information that
is classified and/or subject to legal privilege. Any classification
markings must be adhered to. If you are not the intended recipient, you
must not peruse, disclose, disseminate, copy or use the message in any
way. If you have received this message in error, please notify us
immediately by return email and then destroy the original message. This
communication may be accessed or retained by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport
Agency for information assurance purposes.

References

Visible links
1. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
2. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
3. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
4. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
5. mailto:[FOI #16350 email]
6. mailto:[NZTA request email]
7. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
8. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
9. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
10. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
11. mailto:[FOI #16350 email]
12. mailto:[NZTA request email]
13. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
14. https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

hide quoted sections

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
New Zealand Transport Agency only: