Cestui Que Vie Act 1666

Sovereign sharna made this Official Information request to Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

Response to this request is long overdue. By law Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet should have responded by now (details and exceptions). You can complain to the Ombudsman.

From: Sovereign sharna

Dear Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet,

Please explain in full and in plain English the meaning and the agenda of the
following act:
Cestui Que Vie Act 1666

The following short you tube video with explaination may or may not
help you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JivNhEg...

Please explain what the agenda for the act would have been at the time it was passed and also please explain why the act was passed in secret without the knowledge of all men and women.

Is the act still in force? Is any of it in force? Why was it ever put into force in the first place?

Please tell me the last time the act was used, whether officially or unofficially, preferably with proof.

Please also tell me the aim of the act in PLAIN english - ie: what was the intention of it? (I believe I've asked the questions in an extremely simple fashion and therefore will not expect anything other than a simple answer - I have noticed that others have asked the same questions previously and it would appear that everything except a truthful answer has been given.

Please name the rank and position of the person who brought this act to parliament, and also their status in life. Did it have to be signed by any Royal body? If so, who?

Please also supply me (and the public) with any information regarding this act that the public may not be aware of , yet could affect our lives, even in a small way.
Please also tell me how you, as a civil servant reading this, can remain happy in the knowledge that at some point, our govt declared all uk citizens dead and does not appear to have reversed it's LUNATIC acts? (which, incidentally are not laws and not the same and have no lawful status in this country.)

If I have made this freedom of information request to the wrong
corporation, please advise which corporation the information can be
gleaned from. Please remember this act also affects your children and classes them as dead as far as anyone nowadays can work out. Please let me know if the thousands of people reading and decyphering this 'act' are wrong in their analysis of it and why.?

All rights reserved
All authority of sovereign
Living flesh and blood woman
Sovereign:sharna-kim:

Link to this

Mr Rodgers left an annotation ()

Refusal under s18(e) — information does not exist.

The Cestui Que Vie Act is not, nor ever has been, a NZ statute. You could search for it here (note it does cover some "imperial" laws such as the Magna Carta): https://www.legislation.govt.nz/searchad...

You could learn more about the Act here:
https://robscholtemuseum.nl/freeman-delu...

https://venerablepuzzle.wordpress.com/20...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeman_on...

Link to this

Sovereign sharna left an annotation ()

I would like to remind you that you have not replied to my request and you must do so in a timely manner

Link to this

From: Information [DPMC]
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet


Attachment image001.png
24K Download


[UNCLASSIFIED]

 

Kia ora Soverign Sharna

 

Thank you for your Official Information Act requests, requesting as
follows:

 1. “1. Who holds title of your NAME on the Birth Certificate?

2. How does the mother and father get ownership of the NAME on the birth
certificate?

3. How does the mother and father withdraw the title from the NAME on the
birth certificate?

4. What does the PERSON do with the NAME on the birth certificate?

 5. Are any natural laws being broken with the birth certificate?”

 2. “On the birth certificate it states the word CHILD.

As you are aware that there is a distinction between the words CHILD and
ADULT.

Can you tell me if there is a birth certificate that states the word
ADULT.

If there is no birth certificate that states the word ADULT, can you
explain why.

Also can you confirm that you conduct business and in business what the
meaning of a CHILD COMPANY or PARENT COMPANY is in relation to the
corporate function of your business and the administration of birth
certificates.”

 3. “I have checked the numbers on over 50 BC's now.

Each one comes back as a recorded security which is trading. I refuse to
except the wide variance of numbers on these BC's is just coincidence,
turns up as a registered security as has been suggested by the government.
I have had paid the BC's closer inspection in regard the the language
styles manuals. In particular Chicago Styles and referenced against legal
dictionaries and indeed to text implies something is in the custody of the
general registrar. Your birth documentation should be straightforward and
transparent, however it soon becomes the most complex and secretive paper
trail imaginable. This alone suggests a long history of corruption. The
process involves a maze of secret Trusts and various parts of legislation,
focused on claiming your Estate. The modern “Birth Certificate” began as a
“Settlement Certificate” issued in England in 1837 to officially record
the poor (paupers), granting basic rights to benefits in exchange for
recognition of their status as owned “property,” lawful slaves, also known
as indentured servants and bondsmen. A child’s birthplace was its place of
“settlement,” where its bond began. Thus, a “settlement” is equivalent to
a voluntary slave plantation. Since 1933, all New Zealanders have been
required by statute to have a Birth Certificate and a tax identification
number. Since 1990, under the United Nations and the World Health
Organisation (WHO), by the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the
birth certificate process has become an international system of
“settlement.” When you are born, a “Record of Live Birth” is created as
prima facie evidence of your Life. The New Zealand equivalent is a
“Notification of Birth for Registration.” It is your Affidavit of Life,
with details that absolutely identify you. It shows your given name as a
unique “title,” i.e. John. The autograph of your Mother establishes your
Estate (an Estate must come before a Trust). Your Mother and the State are
now Trustees in an “expressed” Public Trust, of which you are the
Beneficiary. You are the holder in “expectancy” of your Estate, which will
descend to you as of right when you attain the “age of majority” (20).
This original Trust should serve you well, but … Soon, your parents are
told that you “must” be registered. You are under no lawful obligation to
do so, but the State is very insistent, for reasons undisclosed. It seems
that under Eclessiastical Law your Estate can only be held in trust by a
male. But your Mother has given her maiden name on the first record, and
your Father has not autographed to become the holder of your Estate until
you come of age. On the birth register, an “Informant” (unknowingly) makes
an accusation as to your illegitimate status. [Informer. 'A person who
informs or prefers an accusation against another.' Black's Law Dictionary,
2nd Edition]. The Status of Children Act 1969, 2. says that ‘For the
purposes of this Act marriage includes avoid marriage.’ You seem to be a
bastard without birthrights. [Bastard. '4. Considered as nullius filius, a
bastard has no inheritable blood in him, and therefore no estate can
descend to him.' Bouviers Law Dictionary, 1856 Edition]. The State can now
legally claim your Estate, making you a “ward of the State” in an “estates
for life” Foreign Situs Trust. [Estate. 9.-2. The estates for life created
by operation of law are … 4th. Jointure. … The estate for life is somewhat
similar to the usufruct of the civil law.' Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1856
Edition]. This new Estate can involve “Jointure” (joinder), and is similar
to “usufruct” (right to derive income from the property of another). Your
original Estate Title (Record of Live Birth), is used to create a Birth
Certificate bond. This shows your unique given name (title) as part of a
trade name. Only corporations have a last name. A “legal person” has been
created by the State, which is literally a franchise child of the parent
corporation. The Birth Certificate bond (original) is a property Title
that is used as a Security. It is basically a Warehouse Receipt for the
baby, the delivered goods. [Warehouse Receipt. 'A warehouse receipt, which
is considered a document of title, may be a negotiable instrument used for
financing with inventory as security.' Black's Law Dictionary, 7th
Edition]. This bond is sold to the World Bank (Bank of International
Settlements, created by the Vatican in 1931) as Settlor of the Trust. Your
weight in ounces, on the Record of Live Birth, is needed to calculate your
market value relative to gold. Your bond becomes a registered Security,
which the Treasury uses as Surety for new Treasury securities such as
Treasury Bonds, Notes and Bills. So you have been MONETISED. The people
truly are the “Credit of the Nation.” Although the State can seize the
“legal person,” the baby, as a “ward of the State” if their “investment”
is threatened, its greatest value is realized from the “matured” working
adult. The perpetrators of this crime know that their fraud depends on
your ignorance, and that you could one day discover the truth and invoke
your Power of Attorney, which is your undeniable right from the age of 18.
Property Law Act 2007, Section 22.(1) ‘Person between 18 and 20 years may
do certain things, … (c) accept appointment, or act, as an attorney,
22.(2) … has the same effect as if the person were 20 years old.’ In other
words, you can attain the age of majority by declaring your own Power of
Attorney. You have a chance to inherit your “living Estate,” but if they
can somehow “kill” you off, legally speaking, they can claim your
“deceased Estate,” being your real property (lands), and personal property
(life). This is why the “legal person” is also defined as a “vessel,” in
which the State has a security interest, via the bond. When you attain
full legal age, you become the Master (Mr/Mrs/Ms) of that “vessel.” The
living you has “gone to sea,” and under the Admiralty Maritime
jurisdiction, the “Law” of the Sea, if you are missing for seven years,
you can be declared legally dead by the court. The same process is applied
to ships and mariners when they are lost at sea and “declared dead” after
seven years. But you will probably commit legal suicide by “voluntarily”
forfeiting your Estate. You may start work and register as a taxpayer on
an IRD330, or you may enroll on a voting register. Either way, you are
transferring your Estate to the State-owned “legal person.” If you do not
register as the “legal person,” you are “lost at sea.” Unfortunately,
after seven years, you “died” without a will “Intestate,” so someone must
be appointed to manage your Estate/Trust. The Public Trust applies to the
Family Court to manage your Estate under the ‘Protection of Personal and
Property Rights Act 1988, Section 11. Form PPPR 6 Application for order to
administer property’. Under the first Sovereign Public Trust (national
public) agreement set up by your Mother, you are the Beneficiary, while
your Mother and the State are your Trustees. The State employees are your
Public Servants obligated to work for your benefit and defend your rights,
having a Fiduciary responsibility to do so. But under the new Foreign
Situs Trust (international private), the government becomes the
Beneficiary, and you become the Trustee obligated to work for the Trust.
The State has turned the tables on you. The People are employed by the
State as debtors for a private banking system, which is upheld by a
private Bar Association Guild. While acting as the Trustee of the Foreign
Situs Trust in your corporatized NAME, you will receive endless
presentments (bills), which that employee of the State, the “legal
person”, aka Strawman[FRANCHISE], is obliged to pay. But the theft of your
Estate is based on false presumptions that cannot be proven in fact. The
fundamental flaw is that in order for a Birth Certificate to be issued, a
man or a woman must first have been born on the land. Plainly, you are not
really dead, so you still have birthrights on the land. Under the Cestui
Que Vie Act 1666, IV ‘If the supposed dead MAN proves to be alive, then
the title is revested.’ You are the only rightful General Executor and
Beneficiary of the Foreign Situs Trust that represents your Estate in
commerce. Your Estate is your Office. You are the owner of your Estate and
therefore the “legal person” is your rightful property, with all rights
and entitlements owned by YOU. Legal Maxim: “He who fails to assert his
rights has none.”

 4. “Please explain in full and in plain English the meaning and the
agenda of the following act: Cestui Que Vie Act 1666

The following short you tube video with explaination may or may not help
you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JivNhEg...

Please explain what the agenda for the act would have been at the time it
was passed and also please explain why the act was passed in secret
without the knowledge of all men and women.

Is the act still in force? Is any of it in force? Why was it ever put into
force in the first place?

Please tell me the last time the act was used, whether officially or
unofficially, preferably with proof.

Please also tell me the aim of the act in PLAIN english - ie: what was the
intention of it? (I believe I've asked the questions in an extremely
simple fashion and therefore will not expect anything other than a simple
answer - I have noticed that others have asked the same questions
previously and it would appear that everything except a truthful answer
has been given.

Please name the rank and position of the person who brought this act to
parliament, and also their status in life. Did it have to be signed by any
Royal body? If so, who?

Please also supply me (and the public) with any information regarding this
act that the public may not be aware of , yet could affect our lives, even
in a small way.

Please also tell me how you, as a civil servant reading this, can remain
happy in the knowledge that at some point, our govt declared all uk
citizens dead and does not appear to have reversed it's LUNATIC acts?
(which, incidentally are not laws and not the same and have no lawful
status in this country.)

If I have made this freedom of information request to the wrong
corporation, please advise which corporation the information can be
gleaned from. Please remember this act also affects your children and
classes them as dead as far as anyone nowadays can work out. Please let me
know if the thousands of people reading and decyphering this 'act' are
wrong in their analysis of it and why.?”

 

As we did not receive the above requests from FYI until today 15 January
2021, we will consider today the first working day under the Act. We will
provide a response in accordance with the Act in due course and will
endeavour to process as quickly as possible. Please note that under the
Act, the working days to respond to requests do not include 25 December
through to 15 January, to account for the summer break.  (please see the
Office of the Ombudsman Website for more details -
[1]http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/).

 

DPMC may publish the response to your Official Information Act request.

 

When you are provided with a response to this request, you will be
informed about whether the response to your OIA request will be published.
If DPMC does publish the response to your OIA request, personal
information, including your name and contact details, will be removed.
This publication process does not apply to extension letters or transfers.

 

Ngâ mihi

 

Ministerial Coordinator
Ministerial Services
Strategy, Governance and Engagement
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet
E    [2][DPMC request email]
 
[3]cid:image002.png@01D43609.296F69C0
 
The information contained in this email message is for the attention of
the intended recipient only and is not necessarily the official view or
communication of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. If you
are not the intended recipient you must not disclose, copy or distribute
this message or the information in it. If you have received this message
in error, please destroy the email and notify the sender immediately.

 

 

References

Visible links
1. http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/
2. mailto:[DPMC request email]

Link to this

From: Information [DPMC]
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet


Attachment image001.png
24K Download

Attachment OIA 2020 21 0302 Letter to requestor.pdf
40K Download View as HTML


[UNCLASSIFIED]

 

Kia ora Sharna,

 

Please see the attached letter regarding your recent OIA request.

 

Ngā mihi

 

Matthew

 

 

Ministerial Services
Senior Ministerial Advisor
Strategy, Governance and Engagement
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet
 
[1]cid:image002.png@01D43609.296F69C0
 
The information contained in this email message is for the attention of
the intended recipient only and is not necessarily the official view or
communication of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. If you
are not the intended recipient you must not disclose, copy or distribute
this message or the information in it. If you have received this message
in error, please destroy the email and notify the sender immediately.

 

 

References

Visible links

Link to this

James left an annotation ()

It IS part of NZ Law -
"The above named caveator claims a beneficial interest in the land contained in the above [record of title] as cestui que trust of which the registered owner,[name] is trustee".
See Land Information NZ. It is all hidden in plain sight.

Link to this

Mr Rodgers left an annotation ()

<sigh>
No it isn't.

The Cestui Que Vie Act (part of UK law but not NZ):
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Cha2/...

And then a piece of NZ law that uses similar words (shock, horror, probe) but with a totally different meaning. Section 138 of the Land transfer Act:
https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/publ...

Link to this

JragonM8 left an annotation ()

I've noticed Mr Roger's many times now, especially on the dodgy unanswered questions that expose the fraud going on trying to push people off the right path. Who are you Mr Snakey?

Link to this

JragonM8 left an annotation ()

Funny that. The Youtube video in the link is now "unavailable". It's kind of like when someone asked the corrections department the trillion dollar question. Next minute... it's 1M instead of 1T with no explanation of why. Was it a mistake on behalf of Dunn & Bradstreet or an order from the Corpserment. (I made that word up just now). #Corpserment

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet only: