Social media job ad and staff Culture/Engagement measurements for the Marketing Communications team
Marriam Ward made this Official Information request to Wellington City Council
The request was successful.
From: Marriam Ward
Dear Wellington City Council,
Referencing the Social Media job ad posted on your website on 3 February 2020, and screen-captured in this tweet: https://twitter.com/chamfy/status/122417...
I would like to know:
1. What are the last 3 scores/measurements/reports for culture/engagement for the Marketing Communications team
2. A comparison of the answer to question 1 to the average score across the organisation, and any commentary on differences
3. Whether the job ad referenced above was done in partnership with a recruitment firm (if so, which one)?
4. Whether the job ad referenced above was approved by HR or whether this is not part of your process?
5. Does the HR department think that the tone of the job ad supports the kind of culture that WCC aims for?
6. Whether or not the job ad was prematurely taken down, and if so, why?
7. Details on the "robust and challenging appointment process" that candidates would be put through.
Yours faithfully,
Marriam Ward
From: BUS: Assurance
Wellington City Council
Tēnā koe Marriam
Thank you for your email dated 5 February 2020 submitted via FYI requesting information regarding a recent job advertisement.
Our team will manage your request under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 which requires us to respond as soon as possible, but no later than 5 March 2020.
The reference number for your request is IRO-9672.
Please contact us if you have any further questions.
Kind regards
Jessica Hall
Assurance Services Coordinator | Wellington City Council
| W Wellington.govt.nz | |
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents.
If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
From: BUS: Assurance
Wellington City Council
Kia ora Marriam
I refer to your email dated 5 February 2020 requesting for information relating to a social media job ad and staff culture measurements for the Councils' communications team
I am pleased to advise that your request has been granted at no costs. Please note however that there may be some information that is withheld as there is good grounds to refuse, or the information is not held by the Council.
It will take me some time to prepare the information and consult for release. I aim to have the information emailed to you at this email address by the end of next week, 13 March 2020.
Right of review
If you disagree with my decision you have the right, under section 27(3) of the Act, to ask the Ombudsman to review and investigate my decision. Further information is available on the Ombudsman website, www.ombudsman.parliament.nz.
Ngā mihi
Phyllis
Phyllis Lee | Team Leader Complaints and Information Assurance
Ara Whaimana | Strategy and Governance
Te Kaunihera o Pōneke | Wellington City Council
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents. If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
-----Original Message-----
From: Marriam Ward [mailto:[FOI #12165 email]]
Sent: Wednesday, 5 February 2020 4:03 PM
To: BUS: Assurance
Subject: Official Information request - Social media job ad and staff Culture/Engagement measurements for the Marketing Communications team
Dear Wellington City Council,
Referencing the Social Media job ad posted on your website on 3 February 2020, and screen-captured in this tweet: https://twitter.com/chamfy/status/122417...
I would like to know:
1. What are the last 3 scores/measurements/reports for culture/engagement for the Marketing Communications team
2. A comparison of the answer to question 1 to the average score across the organisation, and any commentary on differences
3. Whether the job ad referenced above was done in partnership with a recruitment firm (if so, which one)?
4. Whether the job ad referenced above was approved by HR or whether this is not part of your process?
5. Does the HR department think that the tone of the job ad supports the kind of culture that WCC aims for?
6. Whether or not the job ad was prematurely taken down, and if so, why?
7. Details on the "robust and challenging appointment process" that candidates would be put through.
Yours faithfully,
Marriam Ward
hide quoted sections
From: BUS: Assurance
Wellington City Council
Kia ora Marriam
Please find attached, the response to your request for information.
Kind regards
Phyllis Lee | Team Leader Complaints and Information Assurance
Te Kaunihera o Pōneke | Wellington City Council
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents. If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.
-----Original Message-----
From: Marriam Ward [mailto:[FOI #12165 email]]
Sent: Wednesday, 5 February 2020 4:03 PM
To: BUS: Assurance
Subject: Official Information request - Social media job ad and staff Culture/Engagement measurements for the Marketing Communications team
Dear Wellington City Council,
Referencing the Social Media job ad posted on your website on 3 February 2020, and screen-captured in this tweet: https://twitter.com/chamfy/status/122417...
I would like to know:
1. What are the last 3 scores/measurements/reports for culture/engagement for the Marketing Communications team
2. A comparison of the answer to question 1 to the average score across the organisation, and any commentary on differences
3. Whether the job ad referenced above was done in partnership with a recruitment firm (if so, which one)?
4. Whether the job ad referenced above was approved by HR or whether this is not part of your process?
5. Does the HR department think that the tone of the job ad supports the kind of culture that WCC aims for?
6. Whether or not the job ad was prematurely taken down, and if so, why?
7. Details on the "robust and challenging appointment process" that candidates would be put through.
Yours faithfully,
Marriam Ward
hide quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence