Health monitoring of 143 people poisoned by 1080.

H Enderby (Account suspended) made this Official Information request to Department of Conservation

The request is waiting for clarification. If you are H Enderby (Account suspended), please sign in to send a follow up message.

From: H Enderby (Account suspended)

Tena Koutou department of conservation,

As a matter in the interest of public safety regarding the 143 positive tests for 1080 in peoples urine, what further monitoring have you done to establish and document your legal responsibilities to these people under NZ health and safety legislation.
What dates did these tests come back from Manaaki Whenua.
Of the victims of this poisoning;
What percentage were male.
What compensation was offered or paid.
What were the routes of exposure.
Who is legally responsible for poisoning these 143 people.
Who manufactured the toxin and bait medium that lead to these poisonings
Who decided to ignore the MSDS for the toxin
Who allowed them to ignore it.
Where did these human poisoning incidents take place.
Why were so many people poisoned.
When did these human poisonings take place and how soon after were the urine samples taken.
And yes I need the poisoning date, sample date and test dates on the same page.
How do you plan to stop this from happening again.
What reproductive system monitoring has been done on these people considering the ERMA review of 1080 acknowledged that 1080 is a confirmed teratogen.
Who set the BEI so high considering USA consider fluorine based toxins may be causing harm at 1 PPT.
Does the precautionary principle not apply to you.
Hannah Enderby

Link to this

From: Government Services
Department of Conservation

Dear  Ms Enderby

 

On behalf of the Director-General of the Department of Conservation, I
confirm receipt of your request below.

Your request has been forwarded to the relevant business group for
processing.  You will receive a reply in accordance with the requirements
of the Official Information Act 1982.

 

Yours sincerely

Gabrielle Muir

Government Services

for Director-General

 

-----Original Message-----
From: H Enderby <[FOI #10760 email]>
Sent: Thursday, 18 July 2019 8:44 p.m.
To: OIA <[DOC request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Health monitoring of 143 people
poisoned by 1080.

 

Tena Koutou department of conservation,

 

As a matter in the interest of public safety regarding the 143 positive
tests for 1080 in peoples urine, what further monitoring have you done to
establish and document your legal responsibilities to these people under
NZ health and safety legislation.

What dates did these tests come back from Manaaki Whenua.

Of the victims of this poisoning;

What percentage were male.

What compensation was offered or paid.

What were the routes of exposure.

Who is legally responsible for poisoning these 143 people.

Who manufactured the toxin and bait medium that lead to these poisonings
Who decided to ignore the MSDS for the toxin Who allowed them to ignore
it.

Where did these human poisoning incidents take place.

Why were so many people poisoned.

When did these human poisonings take place and how soon after were the
urine samples taken.

And yes I need the poisoning date, sample date and test dates on the same
page.

How do you plan to stop this from happening again.

What reproductive system monitoring has been done on these people
considering the ERMA review of 1080 acknowledged that 1080 is a confirmed
teratogen.

Who set the BEI so high considering USA consider fluorine based toxins may
be causing harm at 1 PPT.

Does the precautionary principle not apply to you.

Hannah Enderby

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

 

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[1][FOI #10760 email]

 

Is [2][DOC request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests
to Department of Conservation? If so, please contact us using this form:

[3]https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...

 

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:

[4]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

 

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Caution - This message and accompanying data may contain information that
is confidential or subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this message or data is prohibited. If you received this email
in error, please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message
and attachments. We apologise for the inconvenience. Thank you.

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[FOI #10760 email]
2. mailto:[DOC request email]
3. https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
4. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

hide quoted sections

Link to this

From: replies
Department of Conservation


Attachment 19 E 0484 departmental OIA Enderby DOC 6038744.pdf
181K Download View as HTML


Dear Ms Enderby,

 

Please find attached correspondence relating to your request of 18 July
2019.

 

Kind regards

Department of Conservation

Caution - This message and accompanying data may contain information that
is confidential or subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this message or data is prohibited. If you received this email
in error, please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message
and attachments. We apologise for the inconvenience. Thank you.

Link to this

Mark Montgomery left an annotation ()

15 August 2019 the agency asked that the requester provide evidence of their eligibility to make requests. They also advise that the will be charging for the requested information.
No other notes on the file to show what the requester actions were.
I deem that this was a request by the agency for clarification.
I also note that the requester has been suspended from fyi

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Department of Conservation only: