Photographs of the Kea DOC has poisoned

T. Benseman made this Official Information request to Department of Conservation

Response to this request is delayed. By law, Department of Conservation should normally have responded promptly and by (details and exceptions)

From: T. Benseman

Dear Department of Conservation,

please provide copies of all the photos of all the Protected Native Kea birds that your department staff or contractors have poisoned with toxins in 2011, 2012 and 2013.

Thanks.,

T. Benseman

Link to this

From: Government Services
Department of Conservation

Dear T Benseman

On behalf of the Director-General of the Department of Conservation, I confirm receipt of your request below.
Your request has been forwarded to the relevant business group for processing. You will receive a reply in accordance with the requirements of the Official Information Act 1982.

Yours sincerely

Gabrielle Muir
for Director-General

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: Amber Bill
Department of Conservation


Attachment 19 E 0099 T Benseman DOC 5728535.pdf
123K Download View as HTML


Good afternoon, please find my reply to your 13 February 2019 OIA request.

 

Kind regards

 

 

Amber Bill
Director, Biodiversity Threats

Biodiversity Group | Kāhui Kanorau Koiora

Department of Conservation | Te Papa Atawhai
M: +64 0275 894719

Conservation House Wellington | Whare Kaupapa Atawhai
18 - 32 Manners St | PO Box 10 420, Wellington 6143
T: +64 4 471 0726

Kia piki te oranga o te ao tūroa, i roto i te ngātahitanga, ki Aotearoa.
To work with others to increase the value of conservation for New
Zealanders.

[1]www.doc.govt.nz

 

Caution - This message and accompanying data may contain information that
is confidential or subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this message or data is prohibited. If you received this email
in error, please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message
and attachments. We apologise for the inconvenience. Thank you.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.doc.govt.nz/

Link to this

From: T. Benseman

Dear Amber Bill,

Here's what I think, when you told me that between 1-1-2010 and 1-1-2014 there were 560 emails between DOC and Beef + Lamb NZ Ltd's front company OSPRI relating to 1080 poisoning Kea, and no I can't have them, I think you exposed enough evidence that you have a serious case to answer.

You try to say that Kea are coming back but many West Coasters report plummeting numbers after 1080 drops and your own studies show up to 78% kill rates.

Beef + Lamb NZ Ltd want Kea gone because they predate sheep that encroach on Kea habitat and I think you are helping them do it.

Their front company OSPRI, along with your own poisoning contractors, kill protected native birds year after year and you don't prosecute them. This is collusion and corruption. It is against the law. These OIA requests are not vexatious, they seek to expose crimes against our native birds and wildlife.

Yes I will use these images to expose your crimes, you should be ashamed of yourselves for this disgusting behaviour. The images are not even yours to with-hold, they belong to the New Zealand Tax paying public.

You also state no Kiwi have been found dead from 1080 but you don't test the dead ones you find. You have tested one Kiwi dropping and it came back positive for 1080. What happened to the bird? DOC admit 1080 is a teratogen, so why are you harming our national birds ability to breed? Why do you freeze bird samples for weeks or months on end when your own best practice for kiwi says not to freeze. https://www.kiwisforkiwi.org/kiwipractit...

Overseas studies state that freezing samples reduces the amount of detectable 1080 in those samples. And so you freeze them.

T. Benseman

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Department of Conservation only: