Replies to our queries and providing us our requested documents
The request was partially successful.
From: RC DAHIYA (Account suspended)
Sub: Lodging a complaint about New Zealand Solicitor's conduct for obtaining a cost order fraudulently / improperly, blocking of our emails by her/her law firm and her not replying to our emails and not providing our requested documents
We aged and retired persons wish to lodge a complaint against New Zealand Solicitor's conduct for obtaining a cost order fraudulently / improperly. We request you to help us get replies from her and our much requested documents that have not been provided to us even after numerous requests and reminders till date. To our horror, our emails have been blocked by her/her law firm.
The details of the solicitor are:
Ms Nicole Copeland, Solicitor in our case.
nicole.copeland at the rate mc.co.nz
We have sought replies to our queries from her in our attached letter. The answers to our queries will reveal the whole case. We shall be thankful to you if you kindly help us get replies to our queries and our requested documents from the solicitor.
Till date even after numerous requests and reminders to Ms Nicole Copeland, the Crown solicitor we have NOT been able to get replies to our queries and documents, which will very clearly reveal how severe injustice has been done to us VERY PURPOSELY in New Zealand.
Ours numerous supplied queries and requested documents are very clearly mentioned in our Letter to Nicole Copeland seeking permission, reply and documents (ATTACHED).
Some of the requested documents include:
• The signed contract between the parties with a clause stating that, in the event of litigation, the unsuccessful party will pay the successful party's costs on that basis.”
 I see no reason to take a different view when considering the issue of costs. I consider that the usual principles should apply, and that Mr Dahiya as the unsuccessful party should be required to contribute to the costs incurred by the Chief Executive as the successful party.
Ref: , The Hon'ble High Court Decision on Costs dated 9 August 2016
“A judge will order the unsuccessful party to pay costs on a solicitor-client basis if the parties have entered into a contract with a clause stating that, in the event of litigation, the unsuccessful party will pay the successful party's costs on that basis.”
Home > Courts> Going to court > Going to court without a lawyer > Representing yourself in a civil case in the High Court> Costs & disbursements...........
• The alleged IPT’s invitation letter, wherein Hon IPT invited and we declined.
[Ref:  CIV2016-404-191 8-6-2016 JUDG; as envisaged in “Secondly, the Tribunal invited Mr Dahiya and his wife to provide it with details of the steps they would have taken if they had been aware of the true position. Mr Dahiya declined to take up that invitation. The Tribunal and the Court are therefore left to speculate how Mr Dahiya and his wife have been disadvantaged by the fact that they were not aware they had been issued with SSRV’s rather than PRV’s”.]
• High Quality Original Audio-Video recording of the hearings in the ALL OF THE Hon Courts to be compared with Transcripts.
• Substantive reasons of INZ’s not supplying us the statutorily required Visa Approval Letter (Visa Explanatory Letter)
Pages 12-14 of Guide for Resident and Former Resident Visa Holders (INZ 1176) downloaded from the link given as below give a clear picture of the duties and responsibilities of the INZ.
"(Page 12) Line: We............. application being declined. We will always provide you with a chance to comment on potentially prejudicial information that could lead to your application being declined.
Page 14 Line : Your resident visa…………….. once you have met them.
Your resident visa approval letter will contain DETAILS of any conditions you must meet and the process for having these conditions removed once you have met them."
We request the Hon International Court of Justice to help us get replies to our queries and our requested documents which we have been simply NOT been provided even after numerous requests and reminders. Getting these documents will reveal how severe injustice has been done to us very purposely.
We look forward that equitable justice based on truth shall be allowed to prevail.
Disclaimer: We do not mean any prejudice, ill-will or contempt to any individual, in stating the facts of the case, nor do we nourish, nurture or relish proceeding as we have to, to get natural justice in our case, for we feel that a grave injustice has been done to us in the cancellation of our hard-earned Resident Visas, whereas the non-issuance of visa explanatory letter in 2012 by the INZ, the fountainhead of our woes, has been exonerated, with motives best known to the officials concerned. If proceeding as such for justice goes against any person, we sincerely apologise.
Kindly help us get replies to our queries, our requested documents and the reasons of blocking of our emails by her/her law firm and her not replying to our emails and not providing our requested documents.
We hope you will help us in this case.
Dr Rc Dahiya & Savitri
From: correspondence, official
Ministry of Justice
Acknowledging receipt of your request on 16 April, as below.
We have passed this on to the relevant unit for response, and you can
expect a reply on or before 15 May 2018.
http://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/shared... Alex Pickard
Justice | Tāhū
o te Ture
From: correspondence, official
Ministry of Justice
Good afternoon Dr Dahiya
Please find attached a response to your Official Information Act request
regarding information held by a solicitor.
Description: Description: Description: Antony Paltridge
Team Leader (Media and
External Relations) |
DDI: +64 4 918 8980