Request for costs for the new timetable on the Johnsonville Line

Tony Randle made this Official Information request to Wellington Regional Council

The request was partially successful.

From: Tony Randle

Dear Wellington Regional Council,

I understand that the GWRC is introducing a new timetable on the Johnsonville Line with an increased number of train services.

A) Can I please have a copy of any and all information held about any changes to the operating costs for the Johnsonville Line to support the new timetable ?

B) Can I please have a copy of any and all information held about any changes to the capital costs for the Johnsonville Line to support the new timetable ?

C) Can I please have a copy of any and all information held about any changes to the costs of providing additional Maitangi trains for the Johnsonville Line to support the new timetable ?

D) Can I please have a copy of any and all information held about any estimates on the predicted changes to patronage on the Johnsonville Line as a result of the new timetable ?

If this information is held in electronic form, I would prefer it was provided to me in its complete and original electronic format. Also, I would prefer that any correspondence on this information request be via the FYI web site.

Yours faithfully,

Tony Randle

Link to this

From: Mark Sutherland
Wellington Regional Council

Dear Tony,

Acknowledgement of Request for Information

Thank you for your email dated 22 of October 2015, requesting information
regarding cost for new timetable on the Johnsonville line

 

Your request is being followed-up and a reply will be sent to you shortly.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

Mark Sutherland

 

 

 

for
Luke Troy

General Manager

Strategy

 

ATTENTION: This correspondence is confidential and intended for the named
recipient(s) only. If you are not the named recipient and receive this
correspondence in error, you must not copy, distribute or take any action
in reliance on it and you should delete it from your system and notify the
sender immediately. Unless otherwise stated, any views or opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of
the organisation.

Link to this

From: Andrea Houlihan
Wellington Regional Council


Attachment Response to OIA 2015 096.pdf
115K Download View as HTML

Attachment Response to OIA 2015 096 Attachment.pdf
94K Download View as HTML


Good morning Mr Randle

Please find attached our response to your request for information dated 22
October 2015.

 

He mihi mahana (warm regards)

Andrea Houlihan | Executive Assistant (kaiāwhina mātua)
GREATER WELLINGTON REGIONAL COUNCIL
Te Pane Matua Taiao
Shed 39, 2 Fryatt Quay, Pipitea, Wellington 6011 | PO Box 11646
T: 04 830 4201 | M: 021 948 273
[1]www.gw.govt.nz | [2]www.facebook.com/greaterwellington

 

ATTENTION: This correspondence is confidential and intended for the named
recipient(s) only. If you are not the named recipient and receive this
correspondence in error, you must not copy, distribute or take any action
in reliance on it and you should delete it from your system and notify the
sender immediately. Unless otherwise stated, any views or opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of
the organisation.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.gw.govt.nz/
2. http://www.facebook.com/greaterwellington

Link to this

From: Tony Randle

Dear Andrea Houlihan,

Thanks you for provision of the Tranzmetro report on additional services for the new Johnsonville Line timetable.
I do want to make three following points to confirm the request is complete.
----
1) The substantive response document from TranzMetro (27 August 2015) starts by stating it:
"Provides a cost summary for implementing the new Johnsonville timetable"
and ends with:
"5. Recommendation
Approval and issue a budget variation for $213,589 in FY16 in order to implement the new Johnsonville timetable"

I would also to have expected to some form of approval document that approves this recommendations and a copy of the budget variation for $213,589 to fund this service change.
* Can I ask that the GWRC confirm that there are no funding approval and/or budget variation documents associated with implementation of the new Johnsonville Line timetable as recommended in the TranzMetro document ?
----

2) Also, with respect to my original question C, the GWRC response refers to "the additional train maintenance and electricity costs associated with the new Johnsonville timetable". I would to have expected the GWRC also has costs associated with additional the Maitangi train (such as loan funding, depreciation or long-term maintenance charges) that was provided by GWRC to support extra services under the new timetable.
* Can I confirm that the GWRC does not incur any other costs for the 4 unit Maitangi train passenger that was provided to support the new Johnsonville timetable such as loan funding, depreciation or long-term maintenance charges ?
* If the GWRC do incur other costs for the 4-unit Maitangi train provided to support additional services on the Johnsonville line (such as loan funding, depreciation or long-term maintenance charges), can the GWRC please provide a copy of these costs ?
----
3) the response to Question D states “Specific patronage estimates on the Johnsonville Line as a result of the timetable changes have not been undertaken“. I must note that my request D is broader than asking for “Specific patronage estimates …”, it actually asked about “ANY estimates on the predicted changes to patronage on the Johnsonville Line as a result of the new timetable” (caps added for emphasis).

I also note that the GRWC response to question C includes the statement “These costs will be managed within existing budgets and are expected to be at least partially offset by an increase in patronage”. This indicates the GWRC has had some advice “on the predicted changes to patronage on the Johnsonville Line as a result of the new timetable”.
* Can the GWRC please provide a copy of the advice it holds that the change to the Johnsonville line timetable will result an increase in patronage as stated in its response to Question C ?
----

Yours sincerely,

Tony Randle

Link to this

From: Ben Volz
Wellington Regional Council

Dear Mr Randle

 

A response to your three queries relating to Greater Wellington Regional
Council’s (GWRC) response to your Local Government Official Information
and Meetings Act Request on the changes to the Johnsonville Line timetable
is below.

 

1.       GWRC can confirm that there are no funding approval and/or budget
variation documents associated with the implementation of the new
Johnsonville Line timetable. This is because negotiations are still taking
place between GWRC and KiwiRail.

 

2.       Additional costs such as loan funding, depreciation and long term
maintenance charges are calculated for the rail fleet as a whole and
therefore specific costs for the Johnsonville Line are not held by GWRC.

 

3.       No estimates on the predicted changes to patronage on the
Johnsonville Line as a result of the new timetable have been undertaken by
GWRC. The comment that ‘these costs will be managed within existing
budgets and are expected to be at least partially offset by an increase in
patronage’ was not based on any patronage estimate undertaken or held by
GWRC.

 

If you have any concerns with the decision(s) referred to in this email,
you have the right to request an investigation and review by the
         Ombudsman under section 27(3) of the Act.

Regards

 

Ben Volz | Democratic Services Advisor
GREATER WELLINGTON REGIONAL COUNCIL
Te Pane Matua Taiao
Shed 39, 2 Fryatt Quay, Pipitea | PO Box 11646, Manners St, Wellington
6142
T: 04 830 4212 | [1]www.gw.govt.nz

 

 

ATTENTION: This correspondence is confidential and intended for the named
recipient(s) only. If you are not the named recipient and receive this
correspondence in error, you must not copy, distribute or take any action
in reliance on it and you should delete it from your system and notify the
sender immediately. Unless otherwise stated, any views or opinions
expressed are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of
the organisation.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.gw.govt.nz/

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Wellington Regional Council only: