We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Matt Albert Munro please sign in and let everyone know.

Evidence for Kauri Dieback caused by a pathogen and questions regarding tracks on DOC land in Auckland

Matt Albert Munro made this Official Information request to Department of Conservation

This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for Matt Albert Munro to read recent responses and update the status.

From: Matt Albert Munro

Dear Department of Conservation,

1) What evidence exists that Kauri Dieback (= high number of symptomatic Kauri in a forest) is caused by Phytophthora agathidicida and mostly spread by people with their walking boots.Please don't just refer to articles. I want a short & clear description of the evidence.

2) Can you give me a list of New Zealand scientists who still believe in the idea that Kauri Dieback is caused by Phytophthora agathidicida and mostly spread by people with their walking boots.

These are important and serious questions. According my information the majority of scientists don't believe anymore that Phytophthora agathidicida is a kauri killing pathogen. It appears that the driver of kauri dieback is environmental stress (especially due to droughts) and Phytophthora agathidicida is only a secondary pathogen jumping on dying kauri and accelerating the rotting process (that seems to be the typical behavior of Phytophthora in native forests worldwide).

3) Is DOC aware that some people (e.g. Nick Waipara, Mels Barton, Edward Ashby) spread crass incorrect information?
a) In the Waitakere Ranges 70% of sick kauri are within 50m of a track. [In reality, as confirmed by latest survey, the correct percentage is only about 22%)
b) In the Waitākeres between 2012 and 2017 the number of sick kauri has more than doubled. [in reality this doubling was only away from tracks, the increase close to tracks was much much lower. This was a very obvious weird "fact" and the natural explanation was that in 2012 most sick trees away from tracks had been overlooked but found in the more thoroughly survey 2015-2017. So there never was a doubling ... and the latest 2022 report confirmed that the pathogen is very slow moving ... if at all]

4) Is DOC aware that the same people who spread incorrect information (see question before) are the propagators of the closures not only of the Waitākere Ranges Regional Park (Auckland Council) but also DOC administered public spaces like Goldie Bush and Okura Forest?

5) More than one third of New Zealand population lives in Auckland. Is DOC aware how dire the situation is for Aucklanders looking for enjoyment, recreation and healing in nature? Can you please provide a timeframe for the reopening of Goldie Bush, Okura Forest, Te Henga Walkway, Albany Scenic Reserve.

6) Are the current closures of public spaces on DOC land due to kauri dieback
a) precautionary ("We don't know what is going on so we are for now closing it, but if the scientists are coming to new conclusions then we will reopen")
b) final ("That Phytophthora agathidicida is the main driver of Kauri Dieback and people are the main spreaders is confirmed")

7) Is DOC aware that all evidence actually points to
a) environmental stress as the driver of kauri dieback (especially droughts)
b) Phytophthora agathidicida is already in the country for at least hundreds of years and therefore has already spread to all areas where the soil conditions are conducive for its survival.
c) Phytophthora agathidicida is causing no deaths to kauri but is only a secondary pathogen invading dying kauri.
d) People do not spread Kauri Dieback (because they only transport the pathogen to areas where it cannot survive AND the pathogen is not the decisive factor for kauri death)

8) Is DOC aware of any attempts to intimidate scientists to speak openly about kauri dieback? Is DOC aware of any obstacles for scientists to openly discuss their findings and conclusions regarding kauri dieback?

Please take these questions very seriously.

Please consider the possibility that some people are actually not so "holy" as they appear because they deliberately spread fake news AND have financial advantages of the kauri dieback delusion.

Yours faithfully,

Matt Munro

Link to this

From: do-not-reply
Department of Conservation

Kia ora Matt

Thank you for your official information request to the Department of
Conservation (DOC), received on 14/02/2024. We are currently processing
your request under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). 

Your reference number for your request is OIAD-3803.

We endeavour to respond to your request as soon as possible and no later
than 13/03/2024, being 20-working days after the day DOC received your
request. If we are unable to respond to your request by then, we will
notify you of an extension of the timeframe.

A tool that automatically calculates the 20-working day response period to
OIA requests is available on the Ombudsman’s website at the following
link:
[1]https://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/agen....
The calculator accounts for the three-week OIA holiday.

If you have any queries, please email us at
[2][email address] and quote your reference number. 

Ngā mihi

Government Services

Department of Conservation

Te Papa Atawhai

Privacy: Your details have been recorded in DOC's workflow system and will
be used to provide you with a response to, and communicate with you about,
your request. Records are retained, used and disposed of in accordance
with the Privacy Act 2020 and the Public Records Act 2005. See our
[3]privacy statements for more information about how DOC manages personal
information.

Caution - This message and accompanying data may contain information that
is confidential or subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this message or data is prohibited. If you received this email
in error, please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message
and attachments. We apologise for the inconvenience. Thank you.

References

Visible links
1. https://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/agen...
2. mailto:[email address]
3. https://www.doc.govt.nz/footer-links/pri...

Link to this

From: do-not-reply
Department of Conservation


Attachment OIAD 3803 Response Munro.pdf
164K Download View as HTML


Kia ora Matt

Thank you for your request received on 14/02/2024 to the Department of
Conservation.

Please find attached our response to your request.

If you have any queries email us at [1][email address]. 

Ngā mihi

Government Services
Department of Conservation
Te Papa Atawhai

Caution - This message and accompanying data may contain information that
is confidential or subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this message or data is prohibited. If you received this email
in error, please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message
and attachments. We apologise for the inconvenience. Thank you.

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]

Link to this

We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Matt Albert Munro please sign in and let everyone know.

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Department of Conservation only: