Source of background rate used in CARM reports

Athina Andonatou made this Official Information request to Ministry of Health

The request was successful.

From: Athina Andonatou

Dear Ministry of Health,
Please provide all sources and evidence used on the CARM reports for the numbers written as the "AESI background hospitalisation rates used to estimate the expected number of events in the general population, which help in vaccine safety surveillance. Counts indicate average of hospitalisation rates for the calendar years 2016-2019".

And please provide all documents that support it being used as an accurate predictor. It does not seem to be comparing the same conditions, if it was would it not also be more accurate if the adverse effects of this gene editing therapy were compared to the adverse effects from other injections. Or at least include the totals of the hospitalisation rates over the calendar years 2016-2019 for each of the adverse effects listed, minus those where a CARM report has been filed. This seems to be a more accurate method.

Yours faithfully,
Truth seeker and freedom lover
Athina Andonatou

Link to this

From: OIA Requests

Thank you for your Official Information Act request. This is
an automatic reply to let you know we received it.

In accordance with the Act, we'll let you know our decision within no more
than 20 working days. If you'd like to calculate the timeframe, you can
use the Ombudsman's online calculator
here: [1]http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/

Due to the COVID-19 global pandemic response, the Ministry is experiencing
significantly higher volumes of queries and requests for information. This
means we may take some time in responding to your request. The Ministry
regularly updates information about the COVID-19 situation and publishes
OIA responses considered to be of public interest:
[2]https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministr...

Please also refer to the Unite Against Covid-19 website for copies of
papers, minutes, and key advice for the decisions the Government has made
relating to COVID-19.

Sometimes we may need to clarify aspects of a request. You can expect to
hear from us soon if that is the case here.

Ngā mihi,

OIA Services

Government Services

Office of the Director-General

Ministry of Health

E: [3][email address]

 

 

 

 

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=15517&a...
2. https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministr...
3. mailto:[email address]

Link to this

From: OIA Requests


Attachment Outlook yzxiljhq.png
14K Download


Kia ora Athina,  

  

Thank you for your request for official information received on 26 May
2022 for: 

  

"Please provide all sources and evidence used on the CARM reports for the
numbers written as the "AESI background hospitalisation rates used to
estimate the expected number of events in the general population, which
help in vaccine safety surveillance. Counts indicate average of
hospitalisation rates for the calendar years 2016-2019".
And please provide all documents that support it being used as an accurate
predictor. It does not seem to be comparing the same conditions, if it was
would it not also be more accurate if the adverse effects of this gene
editing therapy were compared to the adverse effects from other
injections. Or at least include the totals of the hospitalisation rates
over the calendar years 2016-2019 for each of the adverse effects listed,
minus those where a CARM report has been filed. This seems to be a more
accurate method." 

  

The Ministry's reference number for your request is: H202206977.  

  

As required under the Official Information Act 1982, the Ministry will
endeavour to respond to your request no later than 27 June 2022, being 20
working days after the day your request was received. 

  

Due to the COVID-19 global pandemic response, the Ministry is experiencing
significantly higher volumes of queries and requests for information. If
we are unable to respond to your request within this time frame, we will
notify you of an extension of that time frame. 

  

If you have any queries related to this request, please do not hesitate to
get in touch. 

Ngā mihi

 

OIA Services Team

 

[1]Ministry of Health information releases

[2]Unite against COVID-19

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministr...
2. https://covid19.govt.nz/

Link to this

victor left an annotation ()

Statistics NZ are in control of the data sets and will only release them under narrowly defined application which includes

If the application is deemed to be in the public interest and public good

Determined by those with motive and incentive to keep data formulas and calculations away from the public

https://www.globalvaccinedatanetwork.org...

Link to this

From: OIA Requests


Attachment Outlook bp5yp0pz.png
14K Download

Attachment OIA H202206977 Response.pdf
185K Download View as HTML


Kia ora Athina,

Please find attached the response for your request for official
information.

Ngā mihi 

  

OIA Services Team 

  

[1]Ministry of Health information releases 

[2]Unite against COVID-19 

 

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministr...
2. https://covid19.govt.nz/

Link to this

From: Athina Andonatou

Dear OIA Requests,
Thank you for your response. As stated in your reply "The purpose of the Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) section of the Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) report is to discern if there is a safety signal from COVID-19 vaccines by noting if the number of reports for a condition is higher than expected. The purpose of the AESI section is not to compare vaccines. As stated in the report, the background rates are the mean numbers for the years 2016 to 2019".
Given that the background rates are the mean numbers for the years 2016 to 2019 for hospitalizations for the conditions noted in the CARM register, it raises questions on why there is no column showing the mean numbers of the hospitalizations for the periods the safety reports cover. Maybe I need to do an OIA on that.

Yours sincerely,

Athina Andonatou

Link to this

M Bell left an annotation ()

I have received an OIA of the actual AESI hospitalisations from 2021, giving a reasonable comparison at least to report 39. https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/saf...
The OIA I have shows much larger numbers for several of the AESI when compared back to the background rate.

Link to this

Athina Andonatou left an annotation ()

Funnily enough I went to www.health.govt.nz/nz-health-statistics/...
minimum-dataset-hospital-events. and I'm having challenges trying to match up the pericarditis/myocarditis numbers from the hospital records with the background rates they've used on the CARM register. Interesting. Any suggestions?

Link to this

M Bell left an annotation ()

Well the 2021 actual hospitalisation rates that they supplied to me for those conditions were as follows:
Myocarditus 369
Pericarditus 1171
Hope that helps

Link to this

Athina Andonatou left an annotation ()

Wow. Those numbers are higher than the background rates they're comparing the AESI's too on the CARM report.
I'm trying to make sense of the data from 2016-2019 that they're using to support those figures used as the background rates https://www.health.govt.nz/nz-health-sta...

Link to this

Chris McCashin left an annotation ()

This OIA shows information relating to myocarditis discharges years 2000-2021. https://fyi.org.nz/request/19494/respons...
The last financial year 2020-2021 showed a total of 66 discharges with myocarditis. If you then download the AEFI spreadsheet from Medsafe this references through the year 2022 a total of 439 cases of Myocarditis. This is just a casual 565% increase. But according to MOH this is nothing to worry about because the benefits outweigh the risks yet they can't point to one risk benefit assessment. And also all these people with heart conditions probably got antibodies for a week or two so it was all worth it despite some of them likely crippled for life. Not sure why the public would be worried about this at all?!

Link to this

Athina Andonatou left an annotation ()

Thank you.
So much smoke and mirrors. This is so criminal I have no words.

Link to this

M Bell left an annotation ()

Very interesting that in the OIA I have been supplied there are some other very significant hospitalisations are hugely up from the stated background rates ie.
arthritus up 1029%
spontaneous abortion up 861%
And then some other things seem lower and not in line with other overseas information coming in, clearly obfuscation of data.

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Ministry of Health only: