Covid-19 Vaccine Independent Safety Monitoring Board
Athina Andonatou made this Official Information request to Ministry of Health
The request was partially successful.
From: Athina Andonatou
Dear Ministry of Health,
Given that the COVID-19 Independent Safety Monitoring Board are the ones responsible for determining whether deaths that occurred after receiving the comirnaty injection are attributed to the vaccine, independence is crucial. Yet how independent can they be when their wages are being paid by the government? Does that not create a conflict of interest? Just like a tobacco company funding the research that says smoking was not a cause for cancer, we now know different.
Given the 94 deaths registered with CARM as of 23 Oct 2021 it is of grave concern that only one of the deaths is being attributed to the injection being unrolled.
1) I'd like any correspondence the COVID-19 Independent Safety Monitoring Board have used to assess whether the death or adverse effect was related the receiving of the injection, without any identifying information of the person that correspondence relates to.
2) Correspondence on how it was determined that 42 deaths could not be assessed due to insufficient information, without any identifying information of the person that correspondence relates to.
3) Correspondence relating to the 10 cases that are still under investigation, without any identifying information of the person that correspondence relates too.
4) Please provide me with the protocol the COVID-19 Independent Safety Monitoring Board use when determining cause of the deaths reported in the CARM register
Yours faithfully,
Concerned New Zealand Citizen
Athina
From: OIA Requests
Kia ora,
Thank you for your Official Information Act (the Act) request. This is
an automatic reply to let you know we received it.
Due to the COVID-19 global pandemic response, the Ministry is experiencing
significantly higher volumes of queries and requests for information. We
will endeavour to acknowledge your request as soon as possible. Further
information about COVID-19 can be found on our
website: [1]https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/dise...
In accordance with the Act, we'll let you know our decision within no more
than 20 working days. If you'd like to calculate the timeframe, you can
use the Ombudsman's online calculator
here: [2]http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/
If you have any questions while we're processing your request, please let
us know via [3][email address]
Ngā mihi
OIA Services Team
[4]Ministry of Health information releases
[5]Unite against COVID-19
show quoted sections
References
Visible links
1. https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/dise...
2. http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=15517&a...
3. mailto:[email address]
4. https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministr...
5. https://covid19.govt.nz/
From: OIA Requests
Kia ora Athina,
Thank you for your request for official information. The Ministry's
reference number for your request is: H202115966.
As required under the Official Information Act 1982, the Ministry will
endeavour to respond to your request no later than 20 working days after
the day your request was received. If you'd like to calculate the
timeframe, you can use the Ombudsman's online calculator
here: [1]http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/
Due to the COVID-19 global pandemic response, the Ministry is experiencing
significantly higher volumes of queries and requests for information. If
we are unable to respond to your request within this time frame, we will
notify you of an extension of that time frame.
If you have any queries related to this request, please do not hesitate to
get in touch.
Ngā mihi
OIA Services
Government Services
Office of the Director-General
Ministry of Health
E: [2][email address]
show quoted sections
From: OIA Requests
Kia ora Athina,
Please find attached the response for your request for official
information.
Ngā mihi
OIA Services
Government Services
Office of the Director-General
Ministry of Health
E: [1][email address]
show quoted sections
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Offensive? Unsuitable?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid requests for Official Information (read more).
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators
Report this request
victor left an annotation ()
Medsafe GM Chris James
1. Shielding behind 'privacy' is his standard response which is unacceptable.
- Can you re-word Q1 specifically stating no personal information is required the names and dob can be redacted from the requested communication
James knows this was the request and is treating the OIA response process with distain
2. James response saying there is no correspondence is an injustice.
- What are they doing to gather the appropriate information must be asked and adequately explained
- According to James there is no discussion
What Chris James response does disclose is the charade of the ISMB who exist as a shell following an unpublished script directed from offshore through local intermediaries outside ISMB
ISMB is neither independent nor functional in any meaningful way and have no accountability in any aspect of the process
ISMB exists as a box ticking exercise as James admits to in the response
Page 3 picture is not the full and complete process.
Link to this