Dear Mr Schooner,

 

I refer to your request of 11 January 2022.

 

Unfortunately, consultations necessary to make a decision on your request
are such that a proper response cannot reasonably be made within the
original time limit. Accordingly, the University has extended the time
limit for your request until 15 March 2022 under section 15A of the
Official Information Act. This is the new maximum time limit for the
University’s response; we will respond to your request as soon as
reasonably practicable.

You have the right to make a complaint to an Ombudsman if you are
dissatisfied with this extension.

Yours sincerely,

Rebecca Ewert

General Counsel

University of Auckland

 

From: Chuck Schooner <[1][FOI #18145 email]>
Sent: Tuesday, 11 January 2022 1:41 PM
To: legal <[2][email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - University of Auckland Covid-19
"Experts"

 

Dear University of Auckland/Ministry of Health,

Any terms of service/rfi that Shaun Hendy has with any government agency
specifically Ministry of Health or any other agency whereby he was
employed to do models
- With regards to the Terms of Service or RFI can you please ensure what
qualifications were sought by Ministry of Health.
- Given modelling completed to date has been way off how does the Ministry
of Health/University of Auckland plan to make Mr Hendy accountable for
spreading "misinformation"
- What lessons can be learned by the Ministry of Health employing a
Physics professor to report on a pandemic?
- Any terms of service that Siouxsie Wiles has with any government agency
specifically relating to Covid-19 including agreements understanding with
media companies
- Any funding/grants/donations that either of the above has received from
any government agency within the last 12 months
- Any payments from any media companies from statements in the press
- Does The University of Auckland support the comments by either advisor
promoting the experimental gene therapy in children when there are now
filings in international court. It is known that the m-RNA ‘vaccination’
treatments have caused the de- ath of many as well as injury and severe
damage (including disablement and paralysis) after the ‘vaccine’ was
administered. If it is found that these treatments have caused more damage
than good will the University of Auckland support these two promoting this
so called treatment without making the public known of the potential side
effects which is in breach of the Medicines Act? Subject to the outcome of
the filings in international court there might be ground for local
proscecutions. If either of the University of Auckland employees are
making statements in the media would it not be wise to mention the risks
associated with a treatment whereby trials are only complete in 2023. Just
in New Zealand healthy 13, 17 and 26 years olds have been recorded as
deaths as per Medsafe reporting yet your employees are promoting an
experimental gene therapy for children

Yours faithfully,

Chuck Schooner

cc Ministry of Health

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[3][FOI #18145 email]

Is [4][University of Auckland request email] the wrong address for Official Information
requests to University of Auckland? If so, please contact us using this
form:
[5]https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[6]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[FOI #18145 email]
2. mailto:[email address]
3. mailto:[FOI #18145 email]
4. mailto:[University of Auckland request email]
5. https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
6. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

Dear Mr Schooner,

 

I refer to your request of 11 January 2022. The University’s response
follows. Note that:

 

o The University can only respond on the basis of information it holds,
and that some of your requests are for information more closely
connected with the Ministry of Health, which we understand has now
responded to your request.
o It is normal practice for government agencies to enter into agreements
with institutions rather than individual researchers, who are the
focus of your request.

 

“Any terms of service/rfi that Shaun Hendy has with any government agency
specifically Ministry of Health or any other agency whereby he was
employed to do models”

 

See the Ministry of Health’s OIA response. The University does not hold
any documents requested for any other government agency.

“With regards to the Terms of Service or RFI can you please ensure what
qualifications were sought by Ministry of Health.”

 

See the Ministry of Health’s OIA response.

“Given modelling completed to date has been way off how does the Ministry
of Health/University of Auckland plan to make Mr Hendy accountable for
spreading "misinformation"”

“What lessons can be learned by the Ministry of Health employing a Physics
professor to report on a pandemic?”

 

The Official Information Act does not require agencies to create
information by creating comments, explanations or justifications on
matters of interest to the requester.

“Any terms of service that Siouxsie Wiles has with any government agency
specifically relating to Covid-19 including agreements understanding with
media companies”

 

The University does not hold any documents within the scope of your
request.

“Any funding/grants/donations that either of the above has received from
any government agency within the last 12 months”

 

The University does not hold any information within the scope of your
request.

“Any payments from any media companies from statements in the press”

 

The University does not hold any information within the scope of your
request.

“Does The University of Auckland support the comments by either advisor
promoting the experimental gene therapy in children when there are now
filings in international court. It is known that the m-RNA ‘vaccination’
treatments have caused the de- ath of many as well as injury and severe
damage (including disablement and paralysis) after the ‘vaccine’ was
administered. If it is found that these treatments have caused more damage
than good will the University of Auckland support these two promoting this
so called treatment without making the public known of the potential side
effects which is in breach of the Medicines Act? Subject to the outcome of
the filings in international court there might be ground for local
proscecutions. If either of the University of Auckland employees are
making statements in the media would it not be wise to mention the risks
associated with a treatment whereby trials are only complete in 2023. Just
in New Zealand healthy 13, 17 and 26 years olds have been recorded as
deaths as per Medsafe reporting yet your employees are promoting an
experimental gene therapy for children”

The Official Information Act does not require agencies to create
information by creating comments, explanations or justifications on
matters of interest to the requester.

 

Where the University does not hold information or documents within the
scope of your request, that constitutes a refusal under section 18(e) or
18(g) of the Official Information Act respectively. You have the right to
make a complaint to an Ombudsman if you are dissatisfied with this
response.

 

Yours sincerely,

Rebecca Ewert

General Counsel

University of Auckland

 

 

From: Chuck Schooner <[1][FOI #18145 email]>
Sent: Tuesday, 11 January 2022 1:41 pm
To: legal <[2][email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - University of Auckland Covid-19
"Experts"

 

Dear University of Auckland/Ministry of Health,

Any terms of service/rfi that Shaun Hendy has with any government agency
specifically Ministry of Health or any other agency whereby he was
employed to do models
- With regards to the Terms of Service or RFI can you please ensure what
qualifications were sought by Ministry of Health.
- Given modelling completed to date has been way off how does the Ministry
of Health/University of Auckland plan to make Mr Hendy accountable for
spreading "misinformation"
- What lessons can be learned by the Ministry of Health employing a
Physics professor to report on a pandemic?
- Any terms of service that Siouxsie Wiles has with any government agency
specifically relating to Covid-19 including agreements understanding with
media companies
- Any funding/grants/donations that either of the above has received from
any government agency within the last 12 months
- Any payments from any media companies from statements in the press
- Does The University of Auckland support the comments by either advisor
promoting the experimental gene therapy in children when there are now
filings in international court. It is known that the m-RNA ‘vaccination’
treatments have caused the de- ath of many as well as injury and severe
damage (including disablement and paralysis) after the ‘vaccine’ was
administered. If it is found that these treatments have caused more damage
than good will the University of Auckland support these two promoting this
so called treatment without making the public known of the potential side
effects which is in breach of the Medicines Act? Subject to the outcome of
the filings in international court there might be ground for local
proscecutions. If either of the University of Auckland employees are
making statements in the media would it not be wise to mention the risks
associated with a treatment whereby trials are only complete in 2023. Just
in New Zealand healthy 13, 17 and 26 years olds have been recorded as
deaths as per Medsafe reporting yet your employees are promoting an
experimental gene therapy for children

Yours faithfully,

Chuck Schooner

cc Ministry of Health

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[3][FOI #18145 email]

Is [4][University of Auckland request email] the wrong address for Official Information
requests to University of Auckland? If so, please contact us using this
form:
[5]https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[6]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[FOI #18145 email]
2. mailto:[email address]
3. mailto:[FOI #18145 email]
4. mailto:[University of Auckland request email]
5. https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
6. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers