We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Chuck Schooner (Account suspended) please sign in and let everyone know.

Observed versus Expected Deaths

Chuck Schooner (Account suspended) made this Official Information request to Ministry of Health

This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for Chuck Schooner (Account suspended) to read a recent response and update the status.

From: Chuck Schooner (Account suspended)

Dear Ministry of Health,

Can you please provide in excel format the following

- Observed versus Expected Deaths and the associated cause in the 1,672 recorded deaths as per the latest Medsafe report.

Recently the CDC director stated that the 75% of people dying from Covid in the USA had at least four co-morbidities. She also stated she wasn't able to provide a number associated with people dying with Covid versus people dying from Covid.

From what I can gather and previous information released in New Zealand it appeared (prior to mass vaccination) that most people dying of Covid in New Zealand were of age and/or had serious co-morbidities - from memory there was a release of this information relating to the thirty odd deaths some time ago and they all had other serious issues. That brings me to the inconsistency for the vaccine so are you able to provide the following answers.

Please provide a list of all the deaths to date from Covid-19 and if they had co-morbidities. Can you confirm that all of these were recorded as deaths from Covid-19? From the reports it looks like this is the case?

In the Medsafe reporting and I quote it states "By chance, some people will experience new illnesses or die from a pre-existing condition shortly after vaccination, especially if they are elderly. Therefore, part of our review process includes comparing natural death rates to observed death rates following vaccination, to determine if there are any specific trends or patterns that might indicate a vaccine safety concern".

Am I correct in saying that if somebody dies within 21 days of the vaccination and they have a co-morbidity then it is recorded as a death from the pre-existing condition and not from the vaccine? Yes or No?

If this is the case then this are you not inflating deaths from Covid-19 and suppressing deaths from the vaccine.

Why have the 1,672 deaths not been properly investigated?

The strategic intent document published by MOH states as a goal "living longer and healthier lives – increasing healthy life expectancy and the amount of time we spend in good health. (This is an important challenge because New Zealanders are living longer but are also, on average, spending around a decade of their lives in poor health).

1,672 peoples lives have been cut short apparently with the onset of co-morbidities however what they all had in common was an experimental gene therapy within 21 days. There are also 16 people in the 10-40 age groups so each and every one of these peoples individual health should be assessed as people don't just drop dead in these age groups. That was until this year with the hundreds of elite sports people dropping dead that nobody is able to ask questions about.

Yours faithfully,

Chuck Schooner

Link to this

victor left an annotation ()

Dying within 21 days of either dose in any age bracket should trigger immediate investigations with truly independent persons. Not the controlled script following ISMB and cronies.

Use of background rates is an industry standard for hiding adverse events and death outcomes caused by their products.

Auckland Uni SAFE program are responsible for the background rates data so you might raise OIA to A.U requesting the data as well as calculations and formulas used to derive the transparent cover story.

The fabrication being sold by MOH Medsafe A.U and all that are involved is this.

Deaths are allegedly higher in age groups of individuals for which not a single one was injected with BNT162b2. When the misused RR twice breached 1.0 (1.03/1.10) the excuse offered was inanely that ISMB advise excess deaths was within 'lower' confidence interval.

'Does not indicate a problem'

Yes that is what 1.03/1.10 indicate empirically. Excess deaths.

It isn't believable, credible and it is not statistically correct and could be criminal

Which is to say they openly deceived using a deceptive published formula which is used globally and is directed by WHO CEPI Brighton Collaboration

Therefore it is perspective that not taking the product leads to higher mortality compared to a group injected with never mass used still in experimental provisionally approved mrna injectable.

Anyone with two or more functional neurons will know there are deaths piled up under the carpet which MOH Medsafe and others are refusing to acknowledge except as a propaganda tool in a collapsing narrative.

Link to this

Chuck Schooner (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

Thanks Victor it is outrageous - are there any steps to take for private prosecution just of one of these people to put them on notice. On the release of the files in the US they confirm the virus was released, effective treatments have been stopped and vaccines effectively replicate the virus and do nothing. These people are so corrupt.

Link to this

James Wieldraaijer left an annotation ()

Hey Chuck,
I think it is great you have put forward the request for this information, I have been wondering the same thing but could not have expressed it as well as you have done.
So again thanks.
Also would it be a good idea to promote this request and get others following in support?

Link to this

Chuck Schooner (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

Thanks James - if you could get the word out it would be great. We are now at the point where our own government is about to cripple our most vulnerable and not one member of parliament seems to care whilst Pfizer are making $1m a minute (not sure of number but is is outrageous). The people at MOH will be judged at some stage and fingers crossed it is in this lifetime though not one person will be held accountable.

Link to this

victor left an annotation ()


Report released 12.01.21

Age 10-19
Within 21days dose 1
8 observed deaths
RR 1.09

'The relative risk of 1.09 does not indicate there is an increased risk of mortality in this age group because the lower end of the confidence interval is 0.47 (ie, <1.0).

[1.09 indicates increased mortality. That is exactly what it indicates. Why lie ?]

The COVID-19 Independent Safety Monitoring Board (CV-ISMB) has reviewed AEFIs in children and found that this group was not disproportionately affected by the vaccine. Medsafe will continue to monitor this closely.'

'Not disproportionately affected'

8 deaths in children 10-+19yrs in the 'observed group' . How are these not deaths being covered up needs to be clearly explained, because the summary reported are indicative of techniques used to dismiss deaths in individuals that are known to have been injected.

[ISMB names are documented publically and prosecutions need to begin at the top with the DG and GM]

Link to this

From: OIA Requests

Attachment image002.jpg
3K Download

Attachment H202200479 Response.pdf
251K Download View as HTML

Kia ora,


Please find attached a response to your official information act request.


Ngā mihi 


OIA Services

Government Services

Office of the Director-General

Ministry of Health

E: [1][email address]




show quoted sections


Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]

Link to this

We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Chuck Schooner (Account suspended) please sign in and let everyone know.

Things to do with this request

Ministry of Health only: