Data Manipulation, Vaccine Safety and Real Time Data
Chuck Schooner (Account suspended) made this Official Information request to Ministry of Health
Response to this request is long overdue. By law Ministry of Health should have responded by now (details and exceptions). The requester can complain to the Ombudsman.
From: Chuck Schooner (Account suspended)
Dear Ministry of Health,
Why has the data reports completed by Medsafe appear to be more favourable in relation to "Observed versus Expected Deaths" in the recent report. Did this have anything to do with Medsafe approving Pfizer vaccine again. Data that has changed is below.
Safety Report #31 Observed Deaths within 21 Days - 2,501 deaths
Safety Report # 32 Observed Deaths within 21 Days - 623 deaths
I note this is reported in slightly different way but there are 1,878 deaths that have mysteriously disappeared. Can Medsafe state why deaths have mysteriously been reduced from earlier reporting?
Can Medsafe/Ministry of Health/Covid-19 Response Minister Please confirm how they define "Safe and Effective"?
New Zealand has the benefit of real time data overseas so is anybody at all monitoring overseas trends? By way of an example here is data from the US Governments VAERS website - government data by the way and this is not "misinformation".
17,000 plus deaths reported dead direct from the vaccine - is anyone at Medsafe responsible for asking Pfizer why there are all these deaths in US?
800,000 injuries - has Medsafe investigated why there are so many injuries in the US before approving this vaccine in New Zealand - side effects in New Zealand each week continue to tick up - injuries in children no less - how are Medsafe okay with that when children prior to mass vaccination were hardly impacted
26,000 people with permanent disabilities in the US - would Medsafe consider this safe?
How can this be overlooked by Medsafe?
How does Medsafe/Ministry of Health define effective?
Please note again real time data Waterford in Ireland that is 99.7% vaccinated previously had one of the lowest Covid rates (before mass vaccination) and now has one of the highest with what is almost a perfect vaccination rate.
How does Medsafe square that circle as to why highly vaccinated areas are seeing significant outbreaks in vaccinated. Is this not a worrying sign - similar trends in Israel, Gibraltor, UK. I would also ask Medsafe to immediately confirm if "unlinked" cases are in the vaccinated in New Zealand.
At what point does Ministry of Health/Medsafe wake up? It does look like all of the science around mRNA vaccines and it impacting the immune system are correct and we are likely to see more people sick in the next 6-9 months.
This is just exhausting and so sad.
Yours faithfully,
Chuck Schooner
From: OIA Requests
Kia ora,
Thank you for your Official Information Act (the Act) request. This is
an automatic reply to let you know we received it.
Due to the COVID-19 global pandemic response, the Ministry is experiencing
significantly higher volumes of queries and requests for information. We
will endeavour to acknowledge your request as soon as possible. Further
information about COVID-19 can be found on our
website: [1]https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/dise...
In accordance with the Act, we'll let you know our decision within no more
than 20 working days. If you'd like to calculate the timeframe, you can
use the Ombudsman's online calculator
here: [2]http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/
If you have any questions while we're processing your request, please let
us know via [3][email address]
Ngā mihi
OIA Services Team
[4]Ministry of Health information releases
[5]Unite against COVID-19
show quoted sections
References
Visible links
1. https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/dise...
2. http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=15517&a...
3. mailto:[email address]
4. https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministr...
5. https://covid19.govt.nz/
From: OIA Requests
Kia ora Chuck,
Thank you for your request for official information. The Ministry's
reference number for your request is: H202115489.
As required under the Official Information Act 1982, the Ministry will
endeavour to respond to your request no later than 20 working days after
the day your request was received. If you'd like to calculate the
timeframe, you can use the Ombudsman's online calculator
here: [1]http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/
Due to the COVID-19 global pandemic response, the Ministry is experiencing
significantly higher volumes of queries and requests for information. If
we are unable to respond to your request within this time frame, we will
notify you of an extension of that time frame.
If you have any queries related to this request, please do not hesitate to
get in touch.
Ngā mihi
OIA Services
Government Services
Office of the Director-General
Ministry of Health
E: [2][email address]
show quoted sections
From: OIA Requests
Kia ora Chuck,
Thank you for your emails. Your requests of 3, 8, 11, 12 and 13 November
2021 have been consolidated under section 18(A) of the Official
Information Act (the Act).
As it stands, your requests are for a significant amount of information
and the Ministry may consider refusing under section 18(f) of the Act,
that the information requested cannot be made available without
substantial collation or research. If it is possible for you to narrow the
scope of your request or choose some questions from the list below that
you would like answered.
Please note the Ministry remains willing and engaged to work with you on a
new, refined scope of your request.
Under section 28(3) of the Act you have the right to ask the Ombudsman to
review any decisions made under this request. The Ombudsman may be
contacted by email at: [1][email address] or by calling 0800
802 602.
Ngā mihi
OIA Services
Government Services
Office of the Director-General
Ministry of Health
E: [2][email address]
Your request:
Why has the data reports completed by Medsafe appear to be more favourable
in relation to "Observed versus Expected Deaths" in the recent report. Did
this have anything to do with Medsafe approving Pfizer vaccine again. Data
that has changed is below.
Safety Report #31 Observed Deaths within 21 Days - 2,501 deaths Safety
Report # 32 Observed Deaths within 21 Days - 623 deaths
I note this is reported in slightly different way but there are 1,878
deaths that have mysteriously disappeared. Can Medsafe state why deaths
have mysteriously been reduced from earlier reporting?
Can Medsafe/Ministry of Health/Covid-19 Response Minister Please confirm
how they define "Safe and Effective"?
New Zealand has the benefit of real time data overseas so is anybody at
all monitoring overseas trends? By way of an example here is data from the
US Governments VAERS website - government data by the way and this is not
"misinformation".
17,000 plus deaths reported dead direct from the vaccine - is anyone at
Medsafe responsible for asking Pfizer why there are all these deaths in
US?
800,000 injuries - has Medsafe investigated why there are so many injuries
in the US before approving this vaccine in New Zealand - side effects in
New Zealand each week continue to tick up - injuries in children no less -
how are Medsafe okay with that when children prior to mass vaccination
were hardly impacted
26,000 people with permanent disabilities in the US - would Medsafe
consider this safe?
How can this be overlooked by Medsafe?
How does Medsafe/Ministry of Health define effective?
Please note again real time data Waterford in Ireland that is 99.7%
vaccinated previously had one of the lowest Covid rates (before mass
vaccination) and now has one of the highest with what is almost a perfect
vaccination rate.
How does Medsafe square that circle as to why highly vaccinated areas are
seeing significant outbreaks in vaccinated. Is this not a worrying sign -
similar trends in Israel, Gibraltor, UK. I would also ask Medsafe to
immediately confirm if "unlinked" cases are in the vaccinated in New
Zealand.
At what point does Ministry of Health/Medsafe wake up? It does look like
all of the science around mRNA vaccines and it impacting the immune system
are correct and we are likely to see more people sick in the next 6-9
months.
Number of persons/panel/investigators who assess if the deaths after
administration are from the vaccine
- Please provide their individual qualifications
- Please provide the amount of years they have been in practice
- Please provide if this work is peer reviewed by an independent body
- Please provide who employs them
As per the statistics on the Medsafe website can you please state if you
consider them to be effective and competent based on the following
statistics.
94 total deaths
40 deaths unlikely related
38 deaths could not be assessed due to insufficient information
15 cases still under investigation
1 death from vaccine
Based on the above whoever is assessing these deaths it appears they can
only successfully assess 50% of these deaths then surely that calls into
question the usefulness of this group and an independent group needs to be
appointed to investigate the 40 deaths this panel cannot figure out?
Because if these 40 deaths are in any way related to the vaccine this
means the vaccine has done more damage than the virus - 2-1 for some basic
math for you. You can't tell me we can't find a group that could actually
assess these properly as it appears there is a competence issue involved
here.
Can you please tell me why an independent group not related to MOH/Medsafe
has not been appointed to assess these deaths as only being 50% successful
at something as important as this is effectively negligence/misconduct.
Because if an independent third party was appointed and able to assess
even two of these cases as having died from the vaccine then surely that
calls into question if Medsafe has done their due diligence when approving
this vaccine again.
Where is the main information coming from with regard to the Covid-19
vaccine response? Real time data or information from Pfizer?
The Ministry of Health states the vaccine is effective yet can't point to
how long a person might have immunity for.
New Zealand has the benefit of seeing all of the overseas trends before
things eventuate in New Zealand and we should be able to tailor a proper
response yet YOU are failing with every metric due to the real time data
now available. Even your own statistics you are refusing to look at.
- Are the Ministry of Health aware Dr Anthony Fauci is on TV saying
vaccines do not work as intended and immunity wanes relatively quickly
(given he has ties to vaccine this should raise flags). Given this
information would the Ministry of Health agree a vaccine passport which
might be relevant for two months is pointless?
- If the Ministry of Health can't tell you how long you have immunity and
real time data is coming out saying it might be a few months only this
would mean the vaccine is not effective at all? Would the Ministry of
Health agree? What does the Ministry of Health consider effective?
- Is the Ministry of Health aware that Merriam Webster changed the
official definition of vaccine this year because mRNA technology did not
fit into the definition. Do you think NZ would see vaccine take up if the
treatment was classed as a drug or gene therapy?
- When the Ministry of Health approved this vaccine for the second time
were you aware that on the VAERS website (government statistics) there
were the following
- 17,000 deaths directly from vaccine
- 26,199 people disabled
- 10,179 bells palsy
- 10,304 cases of myocarditis
- 8,408 heart attacks
- 2,631 miscarriages
Did anybody at all do Due Diligence of actual statistics?
Medsafes own data shows this vaccine is doing large amounts of damage.
Given the obfuscation when OIA requests come in and the inability to
properly answer basic requests New Zealanders no longer trust the
competence of the people making decisions. Is this a fair statement?
You are gambling with peoples long term health - have some integrity and
come out and say this vaccine is neither safe or effective. There is even
data in the US that says the vaccine is killing 2 persons to the one
person it might help.
Is it corruption or incompetence stopping Medsafe/MOH from doing the right
thing?
We are now getting 100's of Covid cases per day in Auckland when Auckland
is 85% fully vaccinated.
Please State how the Ministry of Health define effective?
Is if different to the following - Effective - producing a result that is
wanted; having an intended effect.
It appears Auckland is starting to mirror all highly vaccinated countries
overseas whereby highly vaccinated areas are seeing an uptick in Covid
cases and also other "rare conditions". These rare conditions never
existed prior to vaccination. Please date this request as I expect we
will start seeing an uptick in ADE in coming months.
Please provide number of cases of ADE by year for the last 5 years
2016-2020.
Also provide ADE numbers 2021 and if the person was vaccinated.
Recently it has come out that leaked information about the drug trials
completed by Pfizer have all sorts of issues with safety, efficacy and the
side effects that have been hidden.
Given this publicly available information does Medsafe not want to look
out for New Zealanders and halt the vaccine roll-out until this is
thoroughly investigated?
If Medsafe does not do this - would you acknowledge that this is not about
health at all and you don't care about New Zealanders and would rather put
them at risk.
Is there anything planned by the MOH, Medsafe, PM, Director General of
Health or Covid Response Minister for when 100 deaths not from the vaccine
are tabulated. To date we are at 94 that aren't from the vaccine.
[3]https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/saf...
Please provide if there will be a morning tea shout?
Will the six names be toasted at the morning tea?
What will the budget be for the morning tea?
Who will be in attendance?
Can the Ministry of Health please state if
- Any of these three deaths died within 21 days of either the first or
second dose of Pfizer-
- Can you confirm if these three persons were vaccinated
- Can you confirm if any of these deaths has been recorded on the Medsafe
vaccine reports as part of the 94 deaths
show quoted sections
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. mailto:[email address]
3. https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/saf...
From: Chuck Schooner (Account suspended)
Dear OIA Requests,
Please provide the following scaled back.
Why have the data reports completed by Medsafe appear to be more favourable in relation to "Observed versus Expected Deaths" in the recent report.
Safety Report #31 Observed Deaths within 21 Days - 2,501 deaths Safety
Report # 32 Observed Deaths within 21 Days - 623 deaths
Please define "Safe" in relation to this vaccine?
Would the following be classed as safe based on statistics from the US VAERS website
17,000 deaths - safe?
26,000 disabled - safe?
10,179 cases of bells palsy - safe?
10,304 cases of myocarditis - safe?
8,408 heart attacks - safe?
2,631 miscarriages - safe?
Who is responsible for doing due diligence of actual statistics prior to approving this vaccine - do Medsafe do any due diligence or do they rely on what Pfizer has told them?
Why was a cost benefit assessment of this vaccine not been completed and why is one not being completed now?
Given the above a basic cost benefit based on actual data - based on global data of a 99% survival rate of the virus only 746 people would be impacted by the virus yet the vaccine has killed or permanently injured 74,522. Would you agree the cure is worse than the disease? This is a basic cost benefit and it totally destroys any justification for the vaccine.
Please State how the Ministry of Health Define Effective?
It is now acknowledged by Pfizer and experts that six months immunity might be provided? Would that be considered effective by MOH?
If the vaccine can't stop you getting or transmitting virus does that fall into the definition of effective?
Recently it has come out that leaked information about the drug trials completed by Pfizer have all sorts of issues with safety, efficacy and the side effects that have been hidden. How can the MOH trust Pfizer? Especially for a vaccine that doesn't work as intended?
If investigations aren't undertaken would you agree that you do not care about New Zealanders at all and this is past the point of caring about their health?
Is the Ministry of Health aware that Merriam Webster changed the official definition of vaccine this year because mRNA technology did not fit into the definition. Do you think NZ would see vaccine take up if when they went to get the vaccine they were told the treatment was classed as a drug or gene therapy and not a vaccine?
Do you believe that New Zealanders have actual "informed consent" when they go to get a vaccine?
Will reduce the queries to this - we now need competent people in charge and in any other year this vaccine would never have been approved least of all put onto an unsuspecting population that could see their long term health dramatically impacted.
Yours sincerely,
Chuck Schooner
From: OIA Requests
Kia ora,
Thank you for your Official Information Act (the Act) request. This is
an automatic reply to let you know we received it.
Due to the COVID-19 global pandemic response, the Ministry is experiencing
significantly higher volumes of queries and requests for information. We
will endeavour to acknowledge your request as soon as possible. Further
information about COVID-19 can be found on our
website: [1]https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/dise...
In accordance with the Act, we'll let you know our decision within no more
than 20 working days. If you'd like to calculate the timeframe, you can
use the Ombudsman's online calculator
here: [2]http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/
If you have any questions while we're processing your request, please let
us know via [3][email address]
Ngā mihi
OIA Services Team
[4]Ministry of Health information releases
[5]Unite against COVID-19
show quoted sections
References
Visible links
1. https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/dise...
2. http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=15517&a...
3. mailto:[email address]
4. https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministr...
5. https://covid19.govt.nz/
victor left an annotation ()
MOH does not provide opinions as an additional service on top of the data manipulation which is in plain view for anyone to observe.
Points of interest.
- Brighton Collaboration
- BC AESI
- NZs BC science board member
- Auckland University SAFE data
- IMAC
- False equivalence data sets
- Misleading published formula
- Unpublished data sets
ASE left an annotation ()
Report #31 includes observed-versus-expected deaths "up to 1 year after dose 1, 19 February 2021 to 31 July 2021".
Report #32 includes observed-versus-expected deaths "up to 21 days after dose 1, 19 February 2021 to 31 July 2021", and "up to 21 days after dose 2, 19 February 2021 to 31 July 2021".
It seems like the 1,878 "missing" deaths are missing because the reporting period was changed from 1 year to 21 days.
This change of reporting period, combined with reporting by age and not reporting by ethnicity, hides the relative risk of 1.03 (0.99 – 1.07 CI) in the "European or other" group, as noted in Report #31.
From: OIA Requests
Kia ora Chuck,
Please find attached a response to your official information act request
Ngā mihi
OIA Services
Government Services
Office of the Director-General
Ministry of Health
E: [1][email address]
show quoted sections
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Offensive? Unsuitable?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid requests for Official Information (read more).
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators
Report this request
victor left an annotation ()
REPORT 28
Age Breakdown
Dose 1
32 + 86 + 359 = 477
Table total = 485
Dose 2
20 + 42 + 197 = 259
Table total = 264
TOTAL 749 or 736 ?
REPORT 31
Ethnicity breakdown
173 + 62 + 56 + 2210
= 2501
REPORT 31
Dose 1
9 + 45 + 132 + 430 = 616 (623)
Dose 2
7 + 43 + 95 + 379 = 524 (527)
1140 or 1150 ?
The individual field items don't add up which indicates the manipulation and lack of competancy within the program.
MOH Medsafe are using a comparison group which is uncontrolled and has no history of receiving mrna injections.
Moh medsafe is seeking to create a perception that taking the mrna injection improves all cause mortality outcomes.
CDC produced a paper- mm7043e2-H.pdf claiming the same. MOH Medsafe have muddied the water in an attempt to deflect away from the manipulation technuglques used.
mm7043e2-H.pdf
Link to this