We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Teresa please sign in and let everyone know.

Minister allowing Issuance team to respond to correspondence directly addressed to her in her private capacity.

Teresa made this Official Information request to Department of Internal Affairs

This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for Teresa to read a recent response and update the status.

From: Teresa

Dear Department of Internal Affairs,

In November last year I sent correspondence by courier & signature required that was addressed to Minister Jan Tinetti in her private capacity.
The correspondence was a Declaration of Understanding, Statement of Intent and Claim of Right.

The correspondence was responded to by the Issuance Team as follows:

"The Department of Internal Affairs is aware of false theories (sometimes known as the Sovereign movement or Freeman of the Land movement) that have appeared on the internet and try to prove a link between New Zealand Birth Certificates and financial corporations. There is no link between New Zealand birth certificates and financial corporations. Please note that the Department fulfills its obligations under the Births, Death Marriages and Relationships Act 1995.

This information can be found at: https://www.govt.nz/organisations/births...

Under the circumstances we are unable to assist you further and future correspondence about matters involving claims of sovereignty will not be responded to.

Signed by the Issuance Team
No lawful name.

My questions are:

1) I have evidence of previous Internal Affairs ministers acknowledging receipt of correspondence that is similar to mine. So why has this Minister not responded to my correspondence in the same fashion? If its an operational matter, please explain why?

2)I have received acknowledgement letters from the Register-General of LINZ for the same correspondence so why is it any different for this Minister?

3) Is this not a breach of the Privacy Act 2020 Principles 5 & 7 as it was sent directly to the Minister in her private capacity? and if there is no breach please explain why in laymans terms as I am not a lawyer.

4) The letter from the Issuance Team has no lawful name of the person signing it therefore doesn't it make the letter void anyway?

5) There are several Acts that allow persons to claim their sovereignty (should they wake up to the fraud) and Acts that prove there IS a link to a trust (should one know how to access it). So why does the DIA website deny that?

6) Finally, who is committing the fraud? Is it us who were born live, then unknowingly killed on paper? I doubt it. I comprehend that this question will not be answered as no person who works for the oppressor will admit that they are also the ones committing the fraud. But I have put it here for the record.

Many thanks

Link to this

From: SDO Official Correspondence
Department of Internal Affairs

Attachment image002.png
60K Download

Attachment Teresa FYI OIA response 2021 0425.pdf
203K Download View as HTML

Kia ora Teresa


Please find attached the response to your Official Information Act


Ngā mihi


Alysha Stevenson | Advisor Official Correspondence

SDO Branch Development and Support Te Waka Aukaha   

The Department of Internal Affairs Te Tari Taiwhenua   
45 Pipitea Street | PO Box 805, Wellington 6143|  [1]www.dia.govt.nz  





Visible links
1. http://www.dia.govt.nz/

Link to this

Daymond David Goulder-Horobin left an annotation ()

This needs to be taken further, fantastic OIA but insist on more information from them and maybe not draw controversy unless you can prove it on the spot in a rebuttal. More information on this "Issuance Team" is needed.

Link to this

We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Teresa please sign in and let everyone know.

Things to do with this request

Department of Internal Affairs only: