Peter Ellis Apology II

Ross Francis made this Official Information request to Radio New Zealand Limited

The request was partially successful.

From: Ross Francis

Dear Radio New Zealand Limited,

In your recent reply to me, you attached a copy of a statement that was "published on October 18, 2015 at the BSA's direction". The BSA ordered, on 3 September 2004, that RNZ publish an apology to Peter Ellis in various newspapers within a month of its decision.

On what date(s) did RNZ publish an apology to Mr Ellis, and was an apology published in various newspapers on the same date? I do not believe the date of publication was 18 October 2015.

In my previous request I asked for all information about any complaints made to RNZ about the "Nathan" interview. However, despite considerable correspondence between Mr Ellis, his lawyers, and RNZ, I did not receive any documents from RNZ. The BSA identified at least 11 pieces of correspondence from Mr Ellis to RNZ, or from RNZ to Mr Ellis. I would appreciate copies of that correspondence and any other correspondence to or from RNZ about Nathan's interview. The date range for my request is 1 August 2003 to 30 June 2004.

https://www.bsa.govt.nz/decisions/all-de...

Please send me copies of this correspondence.

Yours faithfully,

Ross Francis

Link to this

From: George Bignell
Radio New Zealand Limited


Attachment image001.png
6K Download

Attachment Ellis Docs 1.pdf
1.9M Download View as HTML

Attachment Ellis Docs 2.pdf
1.4M Download View as HTML

Attachment Ellis Docs 3.pdf
1.3M Download View as HTML


 

Dear Mr Francis

 

Any papers relating to the Ellis complaint are now held offsite at our
storage area at our transmission building in Titahi Bay, Wellington.  That
building is only accessed intermittently.

 

As a result of a visit in late January, I am now able to send you the
attached documents.

 

I understand from the Broadcasting Standards Authority that their file is
now held at the National Archive which may be a more comprehensive record
of the documents you seek.  Unfortunately this was only confirmed after
the deadline date that the Official Information Act provides for the
transferring of requests from one entity to another.

 

Finally, I confirm that the apology was published on October 18, 2005.

 

As we are required to do, this message is to also advise you that our
response to your request can be referred to the Ombudsman’s Office for
review under s 28 (3) of the Official Information Act if you wish.

 

Kind regards

 

George Bignell| OIA Inquiries Coordinator

RADIO NEW ZEALAND | LEVEL 2 | 155 THE TERRACE

PO BOX 123 | WELLINGTON | NEW ZEALAND 6140 | [1]www.rnz.co.nz

DDI +64 4 474 1424 | [mobile number]

 

[2]RNZ-logo-reo                                                                                               

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: George Bignell
Sent: Wednesday, 23 December 2020 9:38 AM
To: Maggie Hedge <[email address]>
Subject: FW: Official Information request - Peter Ellis Apology II

 

....please do this as a new request....

 

-----Original Message-----

From: RNZ <[3][email address]>

Sent: Wednesday, 23 December 2020 8:17 AM

To: George Bignell <[4][email address]>

Cc: Maggie Hedge <[5][email address]>

Subject: FW: Official Information request - Peter Ellis Apology II

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Ross Francis <[6][FYI request #14360 email]>

Sent: Wednesday, 23 December 2020 8:11 AM

To: RNZ <[7][email address]>

Subject: Official Information request - Peter Ellis Apology II

 

Dear Radio New Zealand Limited,

 

In your recent reply to me, you attached a copy of a statement that was
"published on October 18, 2015 at the BSA's direction". The BSA ordered,
on 3 September 2004, that RNZ publish an apology to Peter Ellis in various
newspapers within a month of its decision.

 

On what date(s) did RNZ publish an apology to Mr Ellis, and was an apology
published in various newspapers on the same date? I do not believe the
date of publication was 18 October 2015.

 

In my previous request I asked for all information about any complaints
made to RNZ about the "Nathan" interview. However, despite considerable
correspondence between Mr Ellis, his lawyers, and RNZ, I did not receive
any documents from RNZ. The BSA identified at least 11 pieces of
correspondence from Mr Ellis to RNZ, or from RNZ to Mr Ellis. I would
appreciate copies of that correspondence and any other correspondence to
or from RNZ about Nathan's interview. The date range for my request is 1
August 2003 to 30 June 2004.

 

[8]https://www.bsa.govt.nz/decisions/all-de...

 

Please send me copies of this correspondence.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Ross Francis

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

 

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[9][FYI request #14360 email]

 

Is [10][RNZ request email] the wrong address for Official Information
requests to Radio New Zealand Limited? If so, please contact us using this
form:

[11]https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...

 

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:

[12]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

 

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Emails sent by Radio New Zealand Limited (RNZ) or any related entity,
including any attachments, may be confidential, protected by copyright
and/or subject to privilege. If you receive an email from RNZ in error,
please inform the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do
not use, copy or disclose any of the information in that email for any
purpose. Emails to/from RNZ may undergo email filtering and virus
scanning, including by third party contractors. However, RNZ does not
guarantee that any email or any attachment is secure, error-free or free
of viruses or other unwanted or unexpected inclusions. The views expressed
in any non-business email are not necessarily the views of RNZ.
www.rnz.co.nz

References

Visible links
1. http://www.radionz.co.nz/
3. mailto:[email address]
4. mailto:[email address]
5. mailto:[email address]
6. mailto:[FYI request #14360 email]
7. mailto:[email address]
8. https://www.bsa.govt.nz/decisions/all-de...
9. mailto:[FYI request #14360 email]
10. mailto:[RNZ request email]
11. https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
12. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

hide quoted sections

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Radio New Zealand Limited only: