Dear Jo
 
I acknowledge receipt of your Official Information Act (OIA) request
below, received by NZ Police on 1 November 2020.
 
Your request is being actioned pursuant to the Act.
 
Kind regards
Fiona
Ministerial Services
PNHQ

-----"Jo" <[FOI #14067 email]> wrote: -----
To: "OIA/LGOIMA requests at New Zealand Police"
<[New Zealand Police request email]>
From: "Jo" <[FOI #14067 email]>
Date: 01/11/2020 07:18PM
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Official Information request - Accountability to Tax
Payers

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
the content is safe.

Dear New Zealand Police,
I have a number of miscellaneous requests related to Police expenditure. I
consider the expenditure to be questionable and as a taxpayer I would like
to understand more about the reasons behinds this expenditure.
1). During the England Roses v New Zealand Silver Ferns netball series
held at Claudelands Arena in Hamilton this week, I noticed Police had
advertising space near the half court area.
It is common for commercial agencies to advertise their products (ANZ,
Cadbury, Special K etc are examples of fellow advertisers at this venue).
However, I do not consider the NZ Police to be a commercial entity and
would like to know what the intended purpose of this advertising space is
and what was the cost of this billboard?
2). The New Zealand Police Facebook page recently ran an extensive social
media post about a lost teddy bear in Masterson and the NZ Police efforts
to reunite it with it's owner. The post ran over several days with regular
photographic updates such as the teddy bear featuring in Police offices,
photographed with officers and/or other staff, photographed in various
external locations and buckled in to a seatbelt to be delivered to its
owner where it was photographed again.
At a time when Police fail to respond to a significant number of reports
and leave the task of investigating crime and gathering evidence to
distressed complainants I consider this quite inappropriate, resource
intensive and wasteful.
What was the total number of staff involved in handling this teddy bear?
What are their salaries? How long was this teddy bear in Police
possession? Why are legitimate Police resources diverted from actual work?
3). The New Zealand Police Facebook page created a post on 16 September
which documented Police efforts to locate the mother of a duckling found
in West Auckland. This appeared to be a lengthy operation. How long did
this take? How many staff were involved. Why did the Police not hand over
to the SPCA?
4). In relation to the above, particularly the wasteful and resource
intensive efforts to locate the owner of a teddy bear, I would like to ask
how many times NZ Police have asked any Member of Parliament, Parliament
itself, any minister or any other appropriate agency or individual for
increased staff or funding, particularly where a lack of resources has
been cited in the last 18 months.
Yours faithfully,
Jo.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #14067 email]
Is [New Zealand Police request email] the wrong address for Official
Information requests to New Zealand Police? If so, please contact us using
this form:
[1]https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[2]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

===============================================================

WARNING

The information contained in this email message is intended for the
addressee only and may contain privileged information. It may also be
subject to the provisions of section 50 of the Policing Act 2008, which
creates an offence to have unlawful possession of Police property. If you
are not the intended recipient of this message or have received this
message in error, you must not peruse, use, distribute or copy this
message or any of its contents.

Also note, the views expressed in this message may not necessarily reflect
those of the New Zealand Police. If you have received this message in
error, please email or telephone the sender immediately

References

Visible links
1. https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
2. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

hide quoted sections

Kia ora Jo

Please find attached the response to your Official Information Act
request, received by New Zealand Police on 1 November 2020.

Please accept our apologies for the delay in providing you with this
response.

Kind regards,

Sarah

Ministerial Services

PNHQ

===============================================================

WARNING

The information contained in this email message is intended for the
addressee only and may contain privileged information. It may also be
subject to the provisions of section 50 of the Policing Act 2008, which
creates an offence to have unlawful possession of Police property. If you
are not the intended recipient of this message or have received this
message in error, you must not peruse, use, distribute or copy this
message or any of its contents.

Also note, the views expressed in this message may not necessarily reflect
those of the New Zealand Police. If you have received this message in
error, please email or telephone the sender immediately