Child Support policy
Anatoly Kern made this Official Information request to Inland Revenue Department
The request was refused by Inland Revenue Department.
From: Anatoly Kern
Dear Inland Revenue Department,
I have an FOI request arising from "Briefing for the incoming minister of revenue" dated Oct 2017 and specifically the statement "Child support: we collected $468 million from over 166,000 liable parents who pay child support, and distributed $279 million to carers."
Minister for Inland Revenue, Hon Stuart Nash confirmed that the difference between the collected and distributed amount in a form of penalties was retained by the crown and clarified that further $666m of issued penalties were written off during the same period.
This pattern also confirmed by Sue Gilles Segment Management Lead Families, that during 2017/2018 $181m/$178m was retained by the crown (out of $459m/$463m collected).
So it is $279m distributed to parents while having $855m of penalties issued for $189m crown profit, meaning each family that got into this system pays close to twice as much under threat of several times multiplied penalties.
The request I have is
"What policy (Legislation, executive orders, management letters) does the department rely on in their actions to act in every possible way to increase child support payments to the level of inability to pay and profiting on penalty payments at the cost of broken families?"
Yours faithfully,
Anatoly Kern
From: oia
Inland Revenue Department
[IN CONFIDENCE RELEASE EXTERNAL]
Good morning,
Thank you for your request made under the Official Information Act 1982. We will respond to your request within 20 working days from the date of receipt.
Kind regards,
Government & Executive Services
-----Original Message-----
From: Anatoly Kern <[FOI #13369 email]>
Sent: Thursday, 23 July 2020 10:33 am
To: oia <[IRD request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Child Support policy
Dear Inland Revenue Department,
I have an FOI request arising from "Briefing for the incoming minister of revenue" dated Oct 2017 and specifically the statement "Child support: we collected $468 million from over 166,000 liable parents who pay child support, and distributed $279 million to carers."
Minister for Inland Revenue, Hon Stuart Nash confirmed that the difference between the collected and distributed amount in a form of penalties was retained by the crown and clarified that further $666m of issued penalties were written off during the same period.
This pattern also confirmed by Sue Gilles Segment Management Lead Families, that during 2017/2018 $181m/$178m was retained by the crown (out of $459m/$463m collected).
So it is $279m distributed to parents while having $855m of penalties issued for $189m crown profit, meaning each family that got into this system pays close to twice as much under threat of several times multiplied penalties.
The request I have is
"What policy (Legislation, executive orders, management letters) does the department rely on in their actions to act in every possible way to increase child support payments to the level of inability to pay and profiting on penalty payments at the cost of broken families?"
Yours faithfully,
Anatoly Kern
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #13369 email]
Is [IRD request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests to Inland Revenue Department? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any attachment may contain confidential information. If you have received this email or any attachment in error, please delete the email / attachment, and notify the sender. Please do not copy, disclose or use the email, any attachment, or any information contained in them. Consider the environment before deciding to print: avoid printing if you can, or consider printing double-sided. Visit us online at ird.govt.nz
hide quoted sections
From: oia
Inland Revenue Department
[IN CONFIDENCE RELEASE EXTERNAL]
Dear Mr Kern
Please find attached a response to your Official Information Act request.
Kind regards
OIA team
Government & Executive Services
This email and any attachment may contain confidential information. If you
have received this email or any attachment in error, please delete the
email / attachment, and notify the sender. Please do not copy, disclose or
use the email, any attachment, or any information contained in them.
Consider the environment before deciding to print: avoid printing if you
can, or consider printing double-sided. Visit us online at ird.govt.nz
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Offensive? Unsuitable?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid requests for Official Information (read more).
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators
Report this request
Anatoly Kern left an annotation ()
Is there an actual response to the request? Nope, not even acknowledgement of the problems with exisiting actions/processes within the department going far outside of the provided legislation references.
Does the mentioned SOP provide a move in the right direction? Yes, if you see the end goal of repealing all FC/CS legislation on the account of the damages done to the families in NZ, but it is aren't going to change the insanity of existing processes within IRD CS.
Link to this