Police Vetting Information

Joshua Grainger made this Official Information request to New Zealand Police

The request was partially successful.

From: Joshua Grainger

Dear New Zealand Police,

I was recently made aware of the ability that the Police have to 'vet' people for employers, which has the ability to not only show up person's criminal convictions, but also details of any interactions with the Police that a person may have had as a victim. I would like to request some information under the Official Information Act about this.

I would like to request:

a) a list of the approved organizations that Police vetting is available for, as it is my understanding that organizations need to be approved before they can request vetting

b) any statistics about how often Police vetting is used, including any statistics about when the police refuse to vet someone due to privacy concerns

c) the Police website mentions a 'memorandum of understanding.' I would like to request this memorandum.

d) any correspondence that the Police have had with the office of the Privacy Commissioner regarding the practice of Police vetting (other than concerning an investigation under the Privacy Act, which is excluded from being considered official information).

e) a copy of any privacy impact assessment (PIA) that has been created regarding the practice of Police vetting.

f) a copy of any criteria, guidelines, manuals, or other documents that the Police use in deciding whether to red-stamp a vetting request.

g) whether the Police have found that they have wrongfully released any information in response to a vetting request, and if so, any statistics about how often this occurs.

h) whether the Police have withdrawn the authorization for an organization to request Police vetting due to inappropriate handling of private information, and if so, any statistics about this.

For the purposes of s16(1) I am a New Zealand citizenship who is resident in New Zealand. You can consider the relevant sections of my request (I imagine questions (c), (d) and (f)) as requests for internal rules under s23 of the Official Information Act, or alternatively if they do not fit the criteria of s23, an ordinary s16 request.

Feel free to contact me if you wish me to clarify my request.

Yours faithfully,

Joshua Grainger

Link to this

Joshua Grainger left an annotation ()

Note that I got the section for internal rules wrong: it is section 22 instead of section 23. Section 23 concerns the reason for a decision affecting a particular person rather than general internal rules.

Link to this

New Zealand Police

Dear Joshua,

Thank you for your email.

I have forwarded your request to our Ministerial Services team.

They will be in touch with you in due course.

Kind regards

PUBLIC AFFAIRS TEAM
NZ POLICE

MCA
-----Joshua Grainger <[OIA #726 email]> wrote:
-----

To: OIA requests at New Zealand Police <[New Zealand Police request email]>
From: Joshua Grainger <[OIA #726 email]>
Date: 18/01/2013 10:25AM
Subject: Official Information Act request - Police Vetting Information

     Dear New Zealand Police,
    
     I was recently made aware of the ability that the Police have to
     'vet' people for employers, which has the ability to not only show
     up person's criminal convictions, but also details of any
     interactions with the Police that a person may have had as a
     victim. I would like to request some information under the Official
     Information Act about this.
    
     I would like to request:
    
     a) a list of the approved organizations that Police vetting is
     available for, as it is my understanding that organizations need to
     be approved before they can request vetting
    
     b) any statistics about how often Police vetting is used, including
     any statistics about when the police refuse to vet someone due to
     privacy concerns
    
     c) the Police website mentions a 'memorandum of understanding.' I
     would like to request this memorandum.
    
     d) any correspondence that the Police have had with the office of
     the Privacy Commissioner regarding the practice of Police vetting
     (other than concerning an investigation under the Privacy Act,
     which is excluded from being considered official information).
    
     e) a copy of any privacy impact assessment (PIA) that has been
     created regarding the practice of Police vetting.
    
     f) a copy of any criteria, guidelines, manuals, or other documents
     that the Police use in deciding whether to red-stamp a vetting
     request.
    
     g) whether the Police have found that they have wrongfully released
     any information in response to a vetting request, and if so, any
     statistics about how often this occurs.
    
     h) whether the Police have withdrawn the authorization for an
     organization to request Police vetting due to inappropriate
     handling of private information, and if so, any statistics about
     this.
    
     For the purposes of s16(1) I am a New Zealand citizenship who is
     resident in New Zealand. You can consider the relevant sections of
     my request (I imagine questions (c), (d) and (f)) as requests for
     internal rules under s23 of the Official Information Act, or
     alternatively if they do not fit the criteria of s23, an ordinary
     s16 request.
    
     Feel free to contact me if you wish me to clarify my request.
    
     Yours faithfully,
    
     Joshua Grainger
    
     -------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
     [OIA #726 email]
    
     Is [New Zealand Police request email] the wrong address for Official
     Information Act requests to New Zealand Police? If so, please
     contact us using this form:
     [1]http://fyi.org.nz/help/contact
    
     Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be
     published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
     [2]http://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
    
     If you find this service useful as an OIA officer, please ask your
     web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
    
    
    

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: SMITH, Jason
New Zealand Police


Attachment Grainger Joshua 12 143 12 information about vetting and validation sent reply.pdf
649K Download View as HTML

Attachment Grainger Joshua 12 143 12 information about vetting and validation list of Approved agencies Jan 2013.xls
1.4M Download View as HTML


Dear Joshua

 

Please find attached the New Zealand Police response to you Official
Information Act request.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Jason Smith

Ministerial Services

New Zealand Police - Nga Pirihimana O Aotearoa

 

 

 

===============================================================

WARNING

The information contained in this email message is intended for the
addressee only and may contain privileged information. It may also be
subject to the provisions of section 50 of the Policing Act 2008, which
creates an offence to have unlawful possession of Police property. If you
are not the intended recipient of this message or have received this
message in error, you must not peruse, use, distribute or copy this
message or any of its contents.

Also note, the views expressed in this message may not necessarily reflect
those of the New Zealand Police. If you have received this message in
error, please email or telephone the sender immediately

Link to this

Joshua Grainger left an annotation ()

Memorandum of Understanding is available here: https://www.police.govt.nz/sites/default...

This response indicates that consultation has taken place with the Privacy Commissioner, but no correspondence could be found. Under the hope that the Privacy Commissioner may hold better records than the Police I have filed a follow up request with them here: http://fyi.org.nz/request/police_vetting...

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
New Zealand Police only: