1080 Poison in honey.
T. Benseman made this Official Information request to Environmental Protection Authority
The request was partially successful.
From: T. Benseman
Dear Environmental Protection Authority,
Please provide a full copy of the paper referenced below:
Evaluation and Review Report: Reassessment of 1080 (HRE05002) pg 709
Lowe M, 1080 in honey from possum baits, Rahotu - Taranaki - 12. 1994
Please provide all of EPA's study notes relating to this document.
T. Benseman
From: T. Benseman
Dear Environmental Protection Authority,
by law, you should normally have responded promptly and by November 15, 2018
T. Benseman
From: T. Benseman
Dear Environmental Protection Authority,
this is to remind you that a response is required by law from you under a certain timeframe and now that this timeframe has passed you are in breach of the law. If you evaluate the dictionary description of the word corruption you will see that your actions fall into this category. So as well as the information I originally asked for, a public admittance of guilt, misuse of public funds (your salaries) an apology, a commitment to retraining or resignation is also required as corruption was never part of your job description.
Thankyou,
T. Benseman
From: Ministerials
Environmental Protection Authority
Hi Mr Benseman,
Thank you for your email. We are looking into the matter now and we will get back to you very soon.
Kind regards,
Saioa Polin
Official Correspondence Advisor
+64 4 474 5504 | [email address] | www.epa.govt.nz
Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn.
This email message and any attachment(s) are intended for the addressee(s) only.
The contents may be confidential and are not necessarily the opinions of EPA New Zealand.
If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender and delete the message and any attachment(s).
-----Original Message-----
From: T. Benseman [mailto:[FOI #8886 email]]
Sent: Sunday, 16 December 2018 8:57 AM
To: Information Mailbox <[email address]>
Subject: Re: Official Information request - 1080 Poison in honey.
Dear Environmental Protection Authority,
this is to remind you that a response is required by law from you under a certain timeframe and now that this timeframe has passed you are in breach of the law. If you evaluate the dictionary description of the word corruption you will see that your actions fall into this category. So as well as the information I originally asked for, a public admittance of guilt, misuse of public funds (your salaries) an apology, a commitment to retraining or resignation is also required as corruption was never part of your job description.
Thankyou,
T. Benseman
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #8886 email]
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
hide quoted sections
From: Saioa Polin
Environmental Protection Authority
Dear Mr Benseman,
Please find attached the response to your Official Information Request together with a copy of the requested documentation.
Kind regards,
Saioa Polin
Official Correspondence Advisor
+64 4 474 5504 | [email address] | www.epa.govt.nz
Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn.
This email message and any attachment(s) are intended for the addressee(s) only.
The contents may be confidential and are not necessarily the opinions of EPA New Zealand.
If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender and delete the message and any attachment(s).
-----Original Message-----
From: T. Benseman [mailto:[FOI #8886 email]]
Sent: Wednesday, 17 October 2018 7:40 AM
To: Information Mailbox <[email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - 1080 Poison in honey.
Dear Environmental Protection Authority,
Please provide a full copy of the paper referenced below:
Evaluation and Review Report: Reassessment of 1080 (HRE05002) pg 709
Lowe M, 1080 in honey from possum baits, Rahotu - Taranaki - 12. 1994
Please provide all of EPA's study notes relating to this document.
T. Benseman
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #8886 email]
Is [EPA request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests to Environmental Protection Authority? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
hide quoted sections
T. Benseman left an annotation ()
Actually, 1080 was still being found in honeycomb in 2003 and 2004, 9 years after 1080 jam was banned. For evidence of this, see Landcare toxicology lab report numbers T1843 and T1837. 3 honeycomb samples tested, all had 1080. No jam. 1080 is a problem in honey. Bees were seen and photographed drinking 1080 tainted blood from dead cows nostrils at Mapara in 2018.
S June left an annotation ()
Your information is years out of date and has been superseded by more recent 2012 field research which is summarised by Dr Penny Fisher in Landcare Fact Sheet 10 '1080 and Bees'.
T. Benseman left an annotation ()
Yeah I have read that, it says if you see green dye in your hives you should contact MPI to test for poison.??? Wow. Most beekeepers don't even check, they just look down from the top, see capped honey and throw it on the production line. And 2012? So out of date. Bees were photographed feeding on the bloody noses of 1080-killed cattle at Mapara South Road on the 14th of September 2018. Thats 6 years more up to date than your info. Maybe you need to open your eyes, and your mind, to what is really going on here.
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
S June left an annotation ()
Note that the testing of honey in this study was done when jam baits were used for 1080. This is no longer done.
Link to this