Use of Trespass Notices in Schools – Policy, Guidance, and Oversight
SPENCER JONES made this Official Information request to Ministry of Education
This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for SPENCER JONES to read a recent response and update the status.
From: SPENCER JONES
Dear Ministry of Education,
Kia ora,
I request the following information under the Official Information Act 1982.
This request relates to the use of trespass notices by state schools (Boards of Trustees and/or Principals) under the Trespass Act 1980.
1. Ministry Guidance and Policy
Please provide:
a) Any formal guidance, policy, circulars, or advisory material issued by the Ministry of Education to schools regarding:
• the use of trespass notices
• exclusion of parents or caregivers from school property
b) Any documents that outline:
• expected process prior to issuing a trespass notice
• expectations of proportionality or last-resort use
• recommended engagement or dispute resolution steps
2. Delegation of Authority
Please provide:
a) Any Ministry guidance or interpretation regarding:
• whether Boards must formally delegate authority to issue trespass notices
• whether Principals can issue trespass notices without explicit Board resolution
b) Any templates, examples, or recommended governance practices relating to delegation
3. Procedural Fairness / Natural Justice
Please provide any documents that set out expectations for:
• notifying parents of concerns prior to escalation
• providing opportunity to respond
• use of mediation or conflict resolution before issuing trespass
4. Complaints and Oversight
Please provide (summary-level information only):
a) The number of complaints received by the Ministry (from 1 January 2018 to present) relating to:
• schools issuing trespass notices to parents or caregivers
b) Any internal reports, summaries, or briefings discussing:
• risks associated with the use of trespass notices in schools
• concerns about inconsistency or overuse
(If full reports are too large, a summary or extract is sufficient.)
5. National Consistency / Policy Development
Please provide:
a) Any documents, emails, or briefings (from 1 January 2018 to present) discussing:
• whether national guidance on trespass use in schools is required
• any identified inconsistency across schools
6. Responsible Authority
Please confirm:
• Which agency or body is responsible for ensuring that:
the use of trespass notices by schools is lawful, proportionate, and procedurally fair
If no single agency holds this responsibility, please state this clearly.
Clarification (to avoid refusal under s18(f))
This request is limited to:
• existing documents, summaries, or guidance
• not requiring creation of new information
Kind regards,
Spencer Jones
From: Enquiries National
Ministry of Education
Thank you for your email to the Ministry of Education.
This is an auto generated response confirming your email has been received.
Please do not respond to this message.
We will respond to your email as soon as possible.
Tēnā koe mō tō īmēra mai ki te Tāhuhu o te Mātauranga.
He urupare aunoa tēnei hei whakaatu kua tae mai tō īmēra
ki a mātou. Kaua noa e whakautu i tēnei karere.
Mea ake nei ka urupare tonu atu mātou ki tō īmēra.
show quoted sections
From: Enquiries National
Ministry of Education
[IN-CONFIDENCE - RELEASE EXTERNAL]
Kia ora Spencer,
Thank you for your request.
The Ministry will consider your request in accordance with the Official
Information Act 1982 (the Act).
Under section 15(1) of the Act, we are required to make and inform you of
our decision on your request as soon as reasonably practicable and in any
case not later than 20 working days after the day on which your request is
received. You can therefore expect to receive our decision on your request
on or before 24 April 2026. If more than 20 working days are needed due to
the potential workload and/or consultations involved in answering your
request, we will notify you accordingly.
The Ministry may publicly release on our website the response to your
request five days after you have received it. Any personal information
will be removed.
In the interim, if you have any questions about your request, please email
[1][email address]
Ngā mihi,
Enquiries National Team | Te Tāhuhu o te Mātauranga | Ministry of
Education | PN education.govt.nz
We shape an education system that delivers equitable and excellent
outcomes He mea tārai e mātou te mātauranga kia rangatira ai, kia mana
taurite ai ōna
show quoted sections
From: Enquiries National
Ministry of Education
[IN-CONFIDENCE - RELEASE EXTERNAL]
Tēnā koe Spencer
OIA: [GEMS-47428] – Use of Trespass Notices in Schools – Policy, Guidance,
and Oversight
Thank you for your below email of 25 March 2026 to the Ministry of
Education (the Ministry) seeking information about the use of trespass
notices by state schools.
Under the Education and Training Act 2020, schools are self‑governing
through their boards and are each considered Crown entities. Boards are
independently responsible for governance and operational decisions,
including engagement with parents or caregivers and the use of trespass
notices.
The Ministry does not issue guidance, policies, or templates on the use of
trespass notices by schools, does not collect data or complaints relating
to their use, and does not hold internal reports or briefings on this
matter.
The Ministry is not responsible for verifying schools’ compliance in this
area and does not seek assurance from boards that they are meeting these
obligations.
Accordingly, your request is refused in full under section 18(g) of the
Act, as the information requested is not held by the Ministry and there is
no reason to believe it is held by another agency or is more closely
connected with another agency’s functions.
Thank you again for your email. You have the right to ask an Ombudsman to
review my decision on your request, in accordance with section 28 of the
Act. You can do this by writing to [1][email address] or to
Office of the Ombudsman, PO Box 10152, Wellington 6143.
Ngā mihi,
Enquiries National Team | Te Tāhuhu o te Mātauranga | Ministry of
Education | JH
[2]education.govt.nz
We shape an education system that delivers equitable and excellent
outcomes
He mea tārai e mātou te mātauranga kia rangatira ai, kia mana taurite ai
ōna huanga
[3]Te TD huhu o te MD tauranga
show quoted sections
From: SPENCER JONES
Dear Enquiries National,
Subject: Follow-up OIA – Search Adequacy, Decision Chain, and Oversight Gap
Reference: GEMS-47428
Tēnā koutou,
I refer to your response dated 15 April 2026 to my request regarding the use of trespass notices in state schools.
Your response states that:
• The Ministry does not issue guidance, policies, or templates
• The Ministry does not collect data or complaints
• The Ministry does not hold reports or briefings
• The Ministry does not verify compliance or seek assurance
• The request was refused under s18(g) on the basis that the information is not held and “there is no reason to believe it is held by another agency or more closely connected”
Part 1 – Search Adequacy (s13 duty to assist)
Please confirm the following regarding your decision:
1. Search Scope
• What systems, repositories, and record classes were searched (e.g. email systems, Ministerial servicing records, policy units, legal team records)?
• Which business units were consulted (e.g. School Governance, Legal Services, Regional Offices)?
2. Search Methodology
• What keywords or search parameters were used?
• Were searches conducted across:
• Ministerial correspondence
• Briefing trackers / registers
• Risk or incident reporting systems
• Complaints escalation channels
3. Staff Consultation
• Which roles or positions (not names) were consulted before concluding the information is not held?
4. Record Existence Threshold
• Please confirm whether the Ministry is asserting:
• (a) No records exist; or
• (b) Records may exist but were not located
Part 2 – Decision Chain & Governance Responsibility
Your response asserts no policy, oversight, or assurance role.
Please provide:
5. Any documents (including Cabinet papers, RIS, internal memos, or legal advice) that define or confirm:
• The Ministry’s position on trespass notices in schools
• The boundary of responsibility between:
• School Boards
• Ministry of Education
• Any other agency (e.g. NZSTA, Teaching Council, Police)
6. Any internal discussion, analysis, or advice (since 2015) regarding:
• Risks associated with use or misuse of trespass notices
• Impacts on students, parents, or access to education
• Potential need for guidance, monitoring, or intervention
Part 3 – Oversight Gap Confirmation (Critical)
Your response implies a complete absence of oversight in this area.
Please confirm whether the Ministry:
7. Has ever considered introducing:
• Guidance
• Monitoring
• Reporting mechanisms
• Complaint pathways specific to trespass use
8. Holds any risk assessments, issue logs, or escalations relating to:
• School exclusion practices
• Parent access restrictions
• Use of legal mechanisms (including trespass) within school environments
Part 4 – “No Other Agency” Assertion (Challenge to s18(g))
You stated there is “no reason to believe the information is held by another agency or more closely connected with another agency’s functions.”
Please provide:
9. The basis for this conclusion, including:
• Whether any consideration was given to:
• New Zealand School Trustees Association (NZSTA)
• Teaching Council of Aotearoa New Zealand
• Ministry of Justice (trespass legislation interface)
• New Zealand Police (enforcement context)
10. Any internal record (email, memo, or note) documenting:
• The decision not to transfer the request under s14
Part 5 – Recordkeeping & Public Records Act Interface
Given the Ministry’s role in the education system, please provide:
11. Any record retention / disposal authority references relevant to:
• School governance issues
• Legal or disciplinary actions involving parents or caregivers
12. Confirmation whether the absence of records reflects:
• (a) No function exists
• (b) A function exists but is not recorded or monitored
• (c) Records exist but are held outside Ministry systems
Clarification of Refusal Grounds
If any information falling within the above scope is held, this request serves as a refinement of scope and should be treated accordingly.
If you maintain reliance on s18(g), please ensure your response complies with:
• Ombudsman guidance on search adequacy
• Duty to assist under s13
• Proper consideration of transfer under s14
Purpose of Request
This request seeks to clarify whether the Ministry’s position represents:
• A genuine absence of information, or
• A systemic governance gap in oversight, monitoring, and accountability
Kind regards,
Spencer Jones
From: Enquiries National
Ministry of Education
[IN-CONFIDENCE - RELEASE EXTERNAL]
Kia ora Spencer
Thank you for the information request below. The Ministry will consider
and respond to your request in accordance with the Official Information
Act 1982 (the Act).
Under section 15(1) of the Act, we are required to make and inform you of
our decision on your request as soon as reasonably practicable and in any
case not later than 20 working days after the day on which your request is
received. You can therefore expect to receive our decision on your
request on or before 15 May 2026. If more than 20 working days are needed
due to the potential workload and/or consultations involved in answering
your request, we will notify you accordingly.
In the interim, if you have any questions about your request, please email
[1][email address].
Ngâ mihi,
Enquiries National Team | Te Tâhuhu o te Mâtauranga | Ministry of
Education | JH
[2]education.govt.nz
We shape an education system that delivers equitable and excellent
outcomes
He mea târai e mâtou te mâtauranga kia rangatira ai, kia mana taurite ai
ôna huanga
[3]Te TD huhu o te MD tauranga
Dear Enquiries National,
Subject: Follow-up OIA – Search Adequacy, Decision Chain, and Oversight
Gap
Reference: GEMS-47428
Tçnâ koutou,
I refer to your response dated 15 April 2026 to my request regarding the
use of trespass notices in state schools.
Your response states that:
• The Ministry does not issue guidance, policies, or
templates
• The Ministry does not collect data or complaints
• The Ministry does not hold reports or briefings
• The Ministry does not verify compliance or seek assurance
• The request was refused under s18(g) on the basis that the
information is not held and “there is no reason to believe it is held by
another agency or more closely connected”
Part 1 – Search Adequacy (s13 duty to assist)
Please confirm the following regarding your decision:
1. Search Scope
• What systems, repositories, and record classes were
searched (e.g. email systems, Ministerial servicing records, policy units,
legal team records)?
• Which business units were consulted (e.g. School
Governance, Legal Services, Regional Offices)?
2. Search Methodology
• What keywords or search parameters were used?
• Were searches conducted across:
• Ministerial correspondence
• Briefing trackers / registers
• Risk or incident reporting systems
• Complaints escalation channels
3. Staff Consultation
• Which roles or positions (not names) were consulted before
concluding the information is not held?
4. Record Existence Threshold
• Please confirm whether the Ministry is asserting:
• (a) No records exist; or
• (b) Records may exist but were not located
Part 2 – Decision Chain & Governance Responsibility
Your response asserts no policy, oversight, or assurance role.
Please provide:
5. Any documents (including Cabinet papers, RIS, internal
memos, or legal advice) that define or confirm:
• The Ministry’s position on trespass notices in schools
• The boundary of responsibility between:
• School Boards
• Ministry of Education
• Any other agency (e.g. NZSTA, Teaching Council, Police)
6. Any internal discussion, analysis, or advice (since 2015)
regarding:
• Risks associated with use or misuse of trespass notices
• Impacts on students, parents, or access to education
• Potential need for guidance, monitoring, or intervention
Part 3 – Oversight Gap Confirmation (Critical)
Your response implies a complete absence of oversight in this area.
Please confirm whether the Ministry:
7. Has ever considered introducing:
• Guidance
• Monitoring
• Reporting mechanisms
• Complaint pathways specific to trespass use
8. Holds any risk assessments, issue logs, or escalations
relating to:
• School exclusion practices
• Parent access restrictions
• Use of legal mechanisms (including trespass) within school
environments
Part 4 – “No Other Agency” Assertion (Challenge to s18(g))
You stated there is “no reason to believe the information is held by
another agency or more closely connected with another agency’s functions.”
Please provide:
9. The basis for this conclusion, including:
• Whether any consideration was given to:
• New Zealand School Trustees Association (NZSTA)
• Teaching Council of Aotearoa New Zealand
• Ministry of Justice (trespass legislation interface)
• New Zealand Police (enforcement context)
10. Any internal record (email, memo, or note) documenting:
• The decision not to transfer the request under s14
Part 5 – Recordkeeping & Public Records Act Interface
Given the Ministry’s role in the education system, please provide:
11. Any record retention / disposal authority references
relevant to:
• School governance issues
• Legal or disciplinary actions involving parents or
caregivers
12. Confirmation whether the absence of records reflects:
• (a) No function exists
• (b) A function exists but is not recorded or monitored
• (c) Records exist but are held outside Ministry systems
Clarification of Refusal Grounds
If any information falling within the above scope is held, this request
serves as a refinement of scope and should be treated accordingly.
If you maintain reliance on s18(g), please ensure your response complies
with:
• Ombudsman guidance on search adequacy
• Duty to assist under s13
• Proper consideration of transfer under s14
Purpose of Request
This request seeks to clarify whether the Ministry’s position represents:
• A genuine absence of information, or
• A systemic governance gap in oversight, monitoring, and
accountability
Kind regards,
Spencer Jones
show quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence (note: this contains the same information already available above).

SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()
Public Annotation – OIA Request: Use of Trespass Notices in Schools (Ministry of Education)
This request seeks to clarify how, and under what framework, state schools in New Zealand use trespass notices to exclude parents or caregivers from school grounds.
The issue is not about any specific allegation of misconduct. Rather, it raises a broader question of process, consistency, and governance.
Why this matters
Boards of Trustees operate as both:
- occupiers of school property (under the Trespass Act 1980), and
- public decision-makers (subject to principles of natural justice and fair process)
This creates a potential tension:
> How are statutory powers being applied in a way that is fair, proportionate, and consistent across schools?
What is currently unclear
Based on publicly available information, it is not evident:
- whether national guidance exists for schools on issuing trespass notices
- what procedural steps are expected before escalation
- whether formal Board delegation is required
- how parents’ rights to engagement are protected in these situations
- which agency is responsible for ensuring lawful and proportionate use of these powers
Why this OIA has been submitted
This request aims to determine whether:
- a clear and consistent governance framework exists, or
- decisions are being made at individual school level without national oversight or guidance
Public interest
Trespass notices are a significant legal mechanism. Their use in a school context has implications for:
- parent–school relationships
- access to children’s education environments
- procedural fairness
- consistency of public sector decision-making
Outcome sought
The goal is not criticism, but clarity:
- What guidance exists?
- Who is accountable?
- What safeguards are in place?
If no clear framework exists, this may indicate a policy gap requiring attention at a national level.
I will provide a further update once the Ministry responds.
Link to this