We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are D Dahya please sign in and let everyone know.

KO - Creating unnecessary no-park zones in communal driveways at tax payer expense

D Dahya made this Official Information request to Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities

This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for D Dahya to read a recent response and update the status.

From: D Dahya

Dear Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities,

Today we received a notice (a piece of paper) in the letterbox advising of Kainga Ora's (KO) plan to paint yellow lines in the communal driveway between 4 KO properties on Mungavin Ave for the following reasons outlined below.

The notice does not; despite inviting enquiries, provide ANY contact details ie no email address or phone number - although KO assumes that everyone(including non KO tenants) is aware of Kainga Ora's 0800 number. It also assumes that anyone does not mind waiting on the phone for a significant period of time typical of government callcentres.

Nor does the notice warn the affected tenants of WHEN this action will take place but at a guess it will be very soon before anyone has time to object.

I believe that such action is unnecessary and in the last 30 years I have not witnessed any potentially dangerous event that would warrant such a course of action.

If this is about KO being 'proactive' then where was this proactiveness, out of sheer concern, when my mother(a tenant of 50+ years) and I were subjected/placed at risk to a fire bombing, AOS raid, dope smoking, racial, verbal and physical attack all originating from a neighbouring tenant.

Has KO got time and tax payer money to waste pursuing frivolous, unnecessary projects?
Such efforts should be focussed on higher priority areas within the Porirua region.

At a time when the government is reducing expenses and cost cutting measures KO shouldn't be engaging in non urgent projects where there haven't been any incidents in the last 30 years to prompt such action?

The only incidents impacting on H&S in the immediate area was the fire bombing, the AOS raid, and the dope smoking incident (resulting in an elderly Indian woman, a tenancy of 50+ years being the target of racial, verbal and physical attack) all originating from the same problem neighbouring past tenant which KO did not respond to at the time.

How does painting yellow lines prevent AOS raids, fire bombings and dope smoking activities in this immediate area?

So what is the required action KO takes after such incidents outlined above and how do they prevent such incidents occurring in the first instance?

KO should have invested the same time, money and concern preventing those incidents from occurring in the first placed yet they chose not to as the victims were 'only' ethnic minorities and deemed by KO as not a priority.

The Kainga Ora(KO) notice reads:
'To support H&S ensuring there is clear and unhindered access for all users of this communal driveway -Yellow lines to mark non parking areas will be installed.

Please refrain from parking where the yellows lines are drawn to avoid any escalation.

Enquiries can be referred to Kainga Ora.'

Questions:

1. What incident has prompted ko to be concerned over 'unhindered access' for them to undertake such costly action?
NOTE I recall that no such incidences warranting such actions in the last 30 years.

2. Has there been any complaints that warrant such action and did KO consult /discuss with tenants in the immediate area beforehand?
If so, where did the complaints come from?

3. How did KO determine this as a priority over other high risk properties in Porirua?

4. The notice mentions due to H&S concerns- can KO explain what health issues and what safety issues prompted such plans?

5. What resources would now be required to maintain such Health and Safety measures ie time, manpower, and money etc?

6. How will compliance be enforced ie will it involve fines/infringement fees or some cost to the tenant/infringer?

7. Would they spend as much time ,money and resources as they should have done in preventing the previous recent incidences of fire bombing, AOS raid and dope smoking originating from properties in the same area?

8. Why hasn't ko addressed the dope smoking in the immediate area - ko are aware of dope smoking incidences in the past that has resulted in verbal and racial attacks against a long term tenant of ethnic minority status- my mother- KO took no action on tis matter before or after.

9. In the name of Health and Safety will KO be undertaking ANY measures to DETECT presence of dope smoking activities in the affected area ie amongst the surrounding tenants? If not, then why not?

10. In the name of Health and Safety will ko be undertaking ANY measures to CURB dope smoking in the immediate affected areas/tenants?

11. What measures have they implemented to address dope smoking activity in this area?

Note there has been more reason to do this(addressing dope smoking) based on past incidences than there has been in painting yellow lines for apparent problem parking.

12. Does KO feel that addressing dope smoking activity would take priority over parking 'concerns' of which there has been no incidents to justify such actions?

13 Is KO creating a revenue generating opportunity?
If not, how does KO justify such a course of action in the absence of any incident that would warrant such concern and over and above addressing dope smoking activities?

14. Have they ever address any dope smoking activities in the area in the last 4 years in this specific area?

15. In light of government addressing cost saving and wasteful spending would such action/cost(of painting yellow lines) be considered wisely made?

16. Does KO agree that dope smoking activities present more of a risk to h&s than implementing unjustified non parking zones in a communal driveway- despite such action would not generate /produce revenue earning opportunities as yellow lines would?

17. If KO are planning to implement non parking zones - can KO confirm they have resolved/addressed ALL higher risk/higher priority concerns in the Porirua area?

Note last year, at a meeting with KO, I provided photo evidence of higher priority concerns regarding KO properties in the Porirua area needing more urgent attention (other than focusing on our clutter issues) including one property on Warspite Ave where, for years, the branches of a tree have pushed over a fence on to the public footpath resulting in the fence hindering public thoroughfare and the heavy branch over hanging the foot path - no action was ever taken by KO as result of my concerns raised over 7 months ago.

Refer points 16 & 24 'June KO meeting' and Section 13.'June KO meeting of FYI request' https://fyi.org.nz/request/33401-kainga-...

However, a few weeks ago, during the first heavy storm in February the branch broke prompting the entire tree to be cut down soon afterwards- unsure whether any injury resulted but the danger/hazard it presented was not only very obvious for so long but was likely to happen.

Also, during the same storm, in the KO property next door to us, a dead tree branch overhanging the public foot path suffered the same fate breaking and falling onto the well used footpath below (unsure if anyone was injured) but the day after I dragged the branch off the footpath and surprisingly, the very next day workers were there clearing the debris very quickly leaving no trace of such an incident behind. For over 30 years no tenant in that property has ever maintained those trees bordering the front yard. We have never had this problem as I have maintained the trees for over 30 years avoiding such an incident.

In another storm earlier in the year a branch of another large tree at the end of Champion Street broke off in the wind causing a power outage I Porirua. KO and Porirua City Council would be aware of this also.

18. So, how many other communal driveways in Porirua has KO actioned and/or has officially planned currently?

Yours faithfully,

D Dahya

Link to this

D Dahya left an annotation ()

There was no mention of this notice the previous day by KO staff when an inspection was carried out in our home. In good faith I would have expected to be told especially when I was assured by KO that they are working with me regarding inspections.

Link to this

From: Ministerial Services
Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities


Attachment image.jpeg.jpg
7K Download


Tçnâ koe D Dahya

 

Thank you for contacting Kâinga Ora - Homes and Communities on 11 March
2026 to submit a request under the Official Information Act 1982 (the
Act).

Your request has been forwarded to the appropriate officials to respond.
You may expect a decision regarding your request to be sent to you as soon
as possible, but no later than 20 working days from the receipt of your
request being 10 April 2026. If we are unable to respond to your request
by then, we will notify you of an extension of that time frame.

 

Ngâ mihi,

Kâinga Ora Ministerial Services

Ô TÂTOU UARA – OUR VALUES
Manaakitanga – People at the Heart  |  Mahi Tahi – Better Together  | 
Whanake – Be Bold

Freephone: 0800 801 601  |  Kâinga Ora – Homes and Communities
PO Box 2628 Wellington 6140  |  New Zealand Government  | 
[1]www.kaingaora.govt.nz

[2]www.govt.nz - your guide to finding and using New Zealand government
services

Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of Kâinga
Ora. This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may
be legally privileged, and are solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible
for delivery to the intended recipient, you have received this message in
error.

Please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email, any attachment
and the reply from your system;
(2) do not use, disclose or act on this email in any other way. Thank you

www.govt.nz - your guide to finding and using New Zealand government
services

Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of Kâinga
Ora. This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may
be legally privileged, and are solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible
for delivery to the intended recipient, you have received this message in
error.

Please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email, any attachment
and the reply from your system;
(2) do not use, disclose or act on this email in any other way. Thank you.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.kaingaora.govt.nz/
2. http://www.govt.nz/

Link to this

D Dahya left an annotation ()

The tenant in question owns 2 vehicles but has space for more. Frequently there are atleast 5 vehicles parked in their parking space. The apparent 'hindered' access is caused by the high number of vehicles that visit their tenancy.

Any vehicle congestion in this small communal parking area is due to the very same tenant that will benefit the most from KO's proposed work.

My issue is not so much with the tenant but on KO's decision making without considering or prioritising other, more important concerns.

1. The frequent high vehicle traffic in this small communal parking area is caused by the same tenant -the only tenant- that will also benefit the most from KO's planned work - allowing easier access for the usual minimum of 5 cars to visit the tenancy at the same time(only 2 vehicles belong to this tenancy as they have no borders that I am aware of). In other words, ironically, the apparent 'justification' for the work is due to the same tenant that will benefit from it. And so, was it a single complaint' by these tenants of alleged 'hindered access' that has prompted KO to carry out the planned work- without raising their concerns with other affected tenants?

No discussion was ever carried out (about the proposed work) with the remaining affected tenants in the area nor was any concern raised over 'hindered access'.

There are only 2 vehicles that belong to this particular tenancy but they have space enough for up to 6 ie during certain times of the year, it is a regular occurance to have up to 5 vehicles parked up at the same time -causing the congestion. By KO continuing on with the proposed work will not only benefit these very same tenants but ensure/encourage continued unhindered high vehicle traffic/congestion in the small parking area.

I suspect that this tenant has raised the issue of the 'hindered access' in the first place knowing the proposed work will benefit them only and disadvantaging other tenants.

This is just another example of KO of catering for mainstream ethnicities and disregarding other ethnic minority tenants.

Coincidentally, I have noticed there appears to be more displays of apparent 'difficulty' of vehicle access in the parking area now - AFTER KO notified the affected tenants of the planned work.

Coincidentally, these tenants will be the only ones that will benefit from proposed work and the hindered access appears to be caused by their own visitors.

I have asked KO to take steps to detect evidence of dope smoking in the immediate area - that is now up to KO.

Questions:
1. Could KO identify the cause of the 'hindered access'?

2. Has KO bothered to ask WHY is there regular high vehicle visits to this same tenant?

3. Could the high vehicle visits to this tenant be the cause or contribute to the 'hindered access' issue?

I recommend that KO put a stop to any/all dope smoking activity in the immediate area surrounding the communal parking area.

Secondly, KO address all other higher priority work relating to KO properties in Porirua.

Thirdly, make a decision not to carry out the proposed work as there has not been any justification for it- based on the absence of any incidents or complaints in the last 20 years.

Lastly, by addressing the dope smoking activity in the area you address the mental, physical and general impact it has on other tenants that do not engage in such activity and therefore address the most significant H&S issue.

If there has been no evidence of incidents relating to hindered access but many serious incidents relating to dope smoking activity and KO are prepared to spend government/taxpayer money - it then appears that this is a revenue generating exercise (via infringement penalties) under the cloak of H&S.

If KO are genuinely concerned about our health and safety they would first address the H&S issue of dope smoking activity and not hindered access(caused by high vehicle visits). In fact, if KO addresses the former issue the second issue of hindered access will be resolved through reduced vehicle visits.

Link to this

From: Ministerial Services
Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities


Attachment image.jpeg.jpg
7K Download


Tçnâ koe  

I refer to your official information request dated 11 March 2026.

The OIA requires that we advise you of our decision on your request no
later than 20 working days after the day we received your request.
Unfortunately, it will not be possible to meet that time limit and we are
therefore writing to notify you of an extension of the time to make our
decision, to 8 May 2026.

This extension is necessary because consultations necessary to make a
decision on your request are such that a proper response cannot reasonably
be made within the original time limit.

You have the right to seek an investigation and review by the Ombudsman of
this decision. Information about how to make a complaint is available at:
[1]www.ombudsman.parliament.nz or freephone 0800 802 602.

Ngâ mihi,

Kâinga Ora Ministerial Services

Ô TÂTOU UARA – OUR VALUES
Manaakitanga – People at the Heart  |  Mahi Tahi – Better Together  | 
Whanake – Be Bold

Freephone: 0800 801 601  |  Kâinga Ora – Homes and Communities
PO Box 2628 Wellington 6140  |  New Zealand Government  | 
[2]www.kaingaora.govt.nz

[3]www.govt.nz - your guide to finding and using New Zealand government
services

Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of Kâinga
Ora. This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may
be legally privileged, and are solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible
for delivery to the intended recipient, you have received this message in
error.

Please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email, any attachment
and the reply from your system;
(2) do not use, disclose or act on this email in any other way. Thank you.

 

www.govt.nz - your guide to finding and using New Zealand government
services

Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of Kâinga
Ora. This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may
be legally privileged, and are solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible
for delivery to the intended recipient, you have received this message in
error.

Please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email, any attachment
and the reply from your system;
(2) do not use, disclose or act on this email in any other way. Thank you.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/
2. http://www.kaingaora.govt.nz/
3. http://www.govt.nz/

Link to this

From: D Dahya

Dear Ministerial Services,

Thank you for your response advising more time is need to consider the request. However, I would like to know, if this request is still under consideration, then why have Kainga Ora still gone ahead and painted the non-parking areas today during my absence from home?

I will assume that any infringement fee I receive(by continuing to use the communal parking space as I have done for 20 years) prior to the outcome of this request will be waived.

Before escalating this to the Ombudsmens Office I will wait for your reply.

Yours sincerely,

D Dahya

Link to this

D Dahya left an annotation ()

As of today during my absence Kainga Ora have gone ahead and marked out the no parking areas in the communal parking space. I'm curious whether ANY contact was made with Kainga Ora Porirua advising them of the FYI request. It appears not as yellow lines have been painted. I would have thought, reasonably and in fairness, while request is still being considered, that the work would not continue until such time as the request has been fully responded to.

Link to this

From: Ministerial Services
Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities


Attachment image.jpeg.jpg
7K Download

Attachment KO MS 26 21474 Dahya response.pdf
338K Download View as HTML


Tçnâ koe Mr Dahya,
 
Please find attached the response to your OIA request to Kâinga Ora -
Homes and Communities.
 
Please note that this email is not monitored for any follow-up requests or
queries. If you need to make another request, please complete the form on
our website: [1]OIA request form.
 
Ngâ mihi,

Kâinga Ora Ministerial Services

Ô TÂTOU UARA – OUR VALUES
Manaakitanga – People at the Heart  |  Mahi Tahi – Better Together  | 
Whanake – Be Bold

Freephone: 0800 801 601  |  Kâinga Ora – Homes and Communities
PO Box 2628 Wellington 6140  |  New Zealand Government  | 
[2]www.kaingaora.govt.nz

www.govt.nz - your guide to finding and using New Zealand government
services

Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of Kâinga
Ora. This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may
be legally privileged, and are solely for the use of the intended
recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible
for delivery to the intended recipient, you have received this message in
error.

Please:
(1) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email, any attachment
and the reply from your system;
(2) do not use, disclose or act on this email in any other way. Thank you.

References

Visible links
1. https://kaingaora.govt.nz/en_NZ/contact-...
2. http://www.kaingaora.govt.nz/

Link to this

We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are D Dahya please sign in and let everyone know.

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Kāinga Ora–Homes and Communities only: