Good afternoon,

Many thanks for your email. When making an official information request, you’re required to specify the information you want with due particularity. This means the agency must be able to identify what you seek.

Could you please supply further information to the Treasury for us to be able to identify what it is you are requesting please?

If you can please provide more information to the Treasury then we will be able to process your request.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Alastair

Ministerial Advisory Service | Te Tai Ôhanga – The Treasury
Visit us online at https://treasury.govt.nz/ and follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn and Instagram

[IN-CONFIDENCE]
                                                       
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
The information in this email is confidential to the Treasury, intended only for the addressee(s), and may also be legally privileged. If you are not an intended addressee:
a. please immediately delete this email and notify the Treasury by return email or telephone (64 4 472 2733);
b. any use, dissemination or copying of this email is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Peti <[FOI #31396 email]>
Sent: Wednesday, 25 June 2025 7:43 pm
To: Ministerial Services Inbox [TSY] <[The Treasury request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - To the Treasury in formation on my Estate Private no.1052

Dear The Treasury,
Estate Private no.1052 unique identifier letters of administration acting under the rules 426H,397,517,531(c),531(b),531(M) of the codes of civil procedures of the New Zealand insurance company no.1 I Michael Peti Succeeded to my grandfather in 2002 Kaupapa 1993 100(2)e Samuel Hami Peti aka Samuel Peti address] with letters of administration of the estate of the deceased who died 2nd April 1969 intestate claim intestacy involved in a legal matter concerning the jurisdiction of the Hamilton Registrar.
The case involves Rule 426H of the Code, which was inserted by rule 3 of the Supreme Court Amendment Rules (No. 2) 1954.
Events:
Rule 426H has been amended.
The amendment involves inserting the word "Hamilton" after the word "Auckland" in subclause (1)

Additional jurisdiction of Hamilton Registrar-Rule 426H of the Code (as inserted by rule 3 of the Supreme Court Amendment Rules (No. 2) 1954*) is hereby amended by inserting in subclause (1), after the word "Auckland", the word "Hamilton

The amendment to Rule 426H of the Code, introduced by Rule 3 of the Supreme Court Amendment Rules (No. 2) 1954, involves adding the word "Hamilton" after "Auckland" in subclause (1). This change means that the jurisdiction previously held by the Auckland Registrar now also applies to the Hamilton Registrar. This could impact where certain legal actions can be initiated or handled, potentially offering more convenience or options for parties involved in legal proceedings within these regions. If you have specific concerns or scenarios in mind, please let me know so I can provide more targeted advice.

Yours faithfully,

Michael Peti

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #31396 email]

Is [The Treasury request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests to The Treasury? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections