Covid Case and Hospitalisation Numbers
P McKenna made this Official Information request to Ministry of Health
The request was partially successful.
From: P McKenna
Dear Ministry of Health,
1) On the 8th of July 2022 there was a change on the table 'Vaccination details' on the Covid-19 Case demographics page (https://www.health.govt.nz/covid-19-nove...) . Compared to same table on the 7th July, total cases of Covid-19 reduced for Partially vaccinated by 11,421, and Fully vaccinated reduced 853. Unvaccinated and boostered on the other hand increased by 14336, and 45,636 cases respectively.
Can you please explain the case definition or allocation policy that resulted in these significant changes?
2) On the same table on the same day, hospitalisations decreased for all categories (except for the new 'Under 12 years old' category). Presumably this is because non-covid related hospitalisations have been removed as per the note at the bottom of the table. But the decrease was not any where near uniform. Unvaccinated decreased only 11.6% while partially vaccinated,fully vaccinated, and boostered decreased 71.9%, 56%, and 44.1% respectively.
Why would the new policy result in a disproportionate reduction especially for the unvaccinated category?
3) What is the reason for changing the 'Not eligible' category to 'Under 12 years old'? Does the latter include both vaccinated and unvaccinated? If so, what are the numbers for each?
4) Does the ministry record the number of all hospitalisations for any reason by vaccination status? If so can you supply the totals for the month of June?
5) on the Vaccination Data page for the table 'Total Vacinations 12+' There is an entry for 'Third Primary'. What is this category for?
Yours faithfully,
P McKenna
From: OIA Requests
Thank you for your Official Information Act request. This is
an automatic reply to let you know we received it.
In accordance with the Act, we'll let you know our decision within no more
than 20 working days. If you'd like to calculate the timeframe, you can
use the Ombudsman's online calculator
here: [1]http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/
Due to the COVID-19 global pandemic response, the Ministry is experiencing
significantly higher volumes of queries and requests for information. This
means we may take some time in responding to your request. The Ministry
regularly updates information about the COVID-19 situation and publishes
OIA responses considered to be of public interest:
[2]https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministr...
Please also refer to the Unite Against Covid-19 website for copies of
papers, minutes, and key advice for the decisions the Government has made
relating to COVID-19.
Sometimes we may need to clarify aspects of a request. You can expect to
hear from us soon if that is the case here.
Ngā mihi,
OIA Services
Government Services
Office of the Director-General
Ministry of Health
E: [3][email address]
****************************************************************************
Statement of confidentiality: This e-mail message and any accompanying
attachments may contain information that is IN-CONFIDENCE and subject to
legal privilege.
If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate,
distribute or copy this message or attachments.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete this message.
****************************************************************************
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by the Ministry of Health's Content and Virus Filtering Gateway
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. http://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=15517&a...
2. https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministr...
3. mailto:[email address]
hide quoted sections
From: OIA Requests
Kia ora,
Thank you for your request for official information. The Ministry's
reference number for your request is: H2022007735.
As required under the Official Information Act 1982, the Ministry will
endeavour to respond to your request no later than 20 working days after
the day your request was received. If you'd like to calculate the
timeframe, you can use the Ombudsman's online calculator
here: [1]http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/
Due to the COVID-19 global pandemic response, the Ministry is experiencing
significantly higher volumes of queries and requests for information. If
we are unable to respond to your request within this time frame, we will
notify you of an extension of that time frame.
If you have any queries related to this request, please do not hesitate to
get in touch.
Ngā mihi
OIA Services Team
M[2]inistry of Health information releases
U[3]nite against COVID-19
------------------- Original Message -------------------
From: P McKenna <[FOI #19938 email]>;
Received: Sun Jul 17 2022 16:56:19 GMT+1200 (New Zealand Standard Time)
To: OIA Requests <[email address]>; OIA <[email address]>;
Subject: Official Information request - Covid Case and Hospitalisation
Numbers
Dear Ministry of Health,
1) On the 8th of July 2022 there was a change on the table 'Vaccination
details' on the Covid-19 Case demographics page
([4]https://www.health.govt.nz/covid-19-nove...)
. Compared to same table on the 7th July, total cases of Covid-19 reduced
for Partially vaccinated by 11,421, and Fully vaccinated reduced 853.
Unvaccinated and boostered on the other hand increased by 14336, and
45,636 cases respectively.
Can you please explain the case definition or allocation policy that
resulted in these significant changes?
2) On the same table on the same day, hospitalisations decreased for all
categories (except for the new 'Under 12 years old' category). Presumably
this is because non-covid related hospitalisations have been removed as
per the note at the bottom of the table. But the decrease was not any
where near uniform. Unvaccinated decreased only 11.6% while partially
vaccinated,fully vaccinated, and boostered decreased 71.9%, 56%, and
44.1% respectively.
Why would the new policy result in a disproportionate reduction especially
for the unvaccinated category?
3) What is the reason for changing the 'Not eligible' category to 'Under
12 years old'? Does the latter include both vaccinated and unvaccinated?
If so, what are the numbers for each?
4) Does the ministry record the number of all hospitalisations for any
reason by vaccination status? If so can you supply the totals for the
month of June?
5) on the Vaccination Data page for the table 'Total Vacinations 12+'
There is an entry for 'Third Primary'. What is this category for?
Yours faithfully,
P McKenna
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #19938 email]
Is [Ministry of Health request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests
to Ministry of Health? If so, please contact us using this form:
[5]https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=15517&...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[6]https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=15517&...
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
****************************************************************************
Statement of confidentiality: This e-mail message and any accompanying
attachments may contain information that is IN-CONFIDENCE and subject to
legal privilege.
If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate,
distribute or copy this message or attachments.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete this message.
****************************************************************************
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by the Ministry of Health's Content and Virus Filtering Gateway
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. http://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/
2. https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministr...
3. https://covid19.govt.nz/
4. https://www.health.govt.nz/covid-19-nove...
5. https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=15517&...
6. https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=15517&...
hide quoted sections
From: OIA Requests
Kia ora
Please find attached a response to your request for information
Ngā mihi
OIA Services Team
M[1]inistry of Health information releases
U[2]nite against COVID-19
****************************************************************************
Statement of confidentiality: This e-mail message and any accompanying
attachments may contain information that is IN-CONFIDENCE and subject to
legal privilege.
If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate,
distribute or copy this message or attachments.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete this message.
****************************************************************************
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by the Ministry of Health's Content and Virus Filtering Gateway
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministr...
2. https://covid19.govt.nz/
hide quoted sections
From: OIA Requests
Kia ora
Please find attached a response to your request for information
Ngā mihi
OIA Services Team
M[1]inistry of Health information releases
U[2]nite against COVID-19
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: OIA Requests
Sent: Tuesday, 16 August 2022 13:39
To: P McKenna <[FOI #19938 email]>
Subject: Your request for information, ref: H2022007735
Kia ora
Please find attached a response to your request for information
Ngā mihi
OIA Services Team
M[3]inistry of Health information releases
U[4]nite against COVID-19
****************************************************************************
Statement of confidentiality: This e-mail message and any accompanying
attachments may contain information that is IN-CONFIDENCE and subject to
legal privilege.
If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate,
distribute or copy this message or attachments.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete this message.
****************************************************************************
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by the Ministry of Health's Content and Virus Filtering Gateway
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministr...
2. https://covid19.govt.nz/
3. https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministr...
4. https://covid19.govt.nz/
hide quoted sections
From: P McKenna
Dear Dr Old
Thankyou for your reply.
May I ask for some clarification.
You state: “The vaccination status of cases was classified incorrectly for approximately a week following changes introduced with our reporting upgrades on 6 July 2022. This was due to a coding error that resulted in vaccination status of cases being reported as it was a week after they tested positive for COVID-19, rather than a week before they tested positive for COVID-19. “
1a. From this I gather that the correct method of recording is if someone tests positive, their vaccination status is not taken as it is on the day of positive test, but instead, it is taken as what it was 1 week earlier. So if, for example, an unvaccinated person gets their first dose on the 1st of July and tests positive on the 7th of July, the case will be counted as an unvaccinated case. Is this assessment correct?
1b. I can see how this would result in a jump of 43k cases for the boosted since that is what would be expected given the case rate of boosted people since February (43k is roughly 1 weeks worth of cases). I can also see how 1 dose and 2 dose would drop, since some 2 dose people would be counted as boosted, and some 1 dose as 2dose. But the increase in unvaccinated does not seem to make sense since no one can be vaccinated before a test and then unvaccinated after it. The movement should be UP the vaccination 'food chain' not down it. The quoted paragraph, as it relates to unvaccinated, seems to say that 11,421 cases were erroneously labelled ‘unvaccinated’ because that is what they were one week after positive test, when they should have been labelled ‘vaccinated’ because that was what they were one week before positive test. Obviously one can not become physically unvaccinated so are these people subject to reclassification for some reason, or is there another explanation?
You did not address Question 2 except by referencing the spreadsheet. This sheet appears to provide the hospitalisations and ICU admissions for the days leading up to, and immediately after the change in definition which is nice, but my question refers to the disproportionate reductions seen across the different cohorts. The deleted cases represent those who had a positive test result but went to hospital for a non-covid reason- correct? If you were to reduce these deleted cases as a ratio to the number of covid cases in the respective cohorts, it demonstrates a significant excess hospitalisation among the vaccinated numbering in the thousands- a very high percentage. This gets worse if you consider that the case rates for unvaccinated appear to be very much under reported (they are about half the case rate of 2 dose and boosted).
This is a very small group of hospitalisations - about 1% of all hospitalisations, so it is only a small signal. But it is a very alarming one. If one were to extrapolate, even only a small fraction of this increased rate, to the other 99% of hospitalisations the results would be a large number of excess hospitalisations. And we are in fact seeing hospitals stretched to capacity so the hypothesis I am hinting at is at least plausible.
2a) Has the Ministry identified this?
2b)Is the ministry concerned by this? If not, why not? If so, what is being done, or could be done to further investigate?
4) My reason for Q4 was that if the MoH did record vaccination status it would be easy to check if this effect was taking place across all hospitalisations. It may be that MoH is not collating or reporting on this, but do hospitals collect this data at time of admission?
Thanking you for your time in advance,
Yours sincerely,
P McKenna
From: OIA Requests
Kia ora
Please find attached a letter regarding your request for information
Ngā mihi
OIA Services Team
M[1]inistry of Health information releases
U[2]nite against COVID-19
****************************************************************************
Statement of confidentiality: This e-mail message and any accompanying
attachments may contain information that is IN-CONFIDENCE and subject to
legal privilege.
If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate,
distribute or copy this message or attachments.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete this message.
****************************************************************************
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by the Ministry of Health's Content and Virus Filtering Gateway
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministr...
2. https://covid19.govt.nz/
hide quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence